ML12160A093: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 13: Line 13:
| document type = Legal-Order
| document type = Legal-Order
| page count = 10
| page count = 10
| project =
| stage = Request
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges:
Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman Dr. Michael F. Kennedy Dr. Richard E. Wardwell In the Matter of
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.
(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)
Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR
ASLBP No. 07-858-03-LR-BD01 June 8, 2012 NOTICE OF HEARING (Application for License Renewal)
This proceeding arises out of the April 23, 2007, application of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) to renew its operating licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 (Operating License Nos. DPR-26 and DPR-64) at its Indian Point Energy Center in Buchanan, New York. Entergy seeks to extend these licenses for an additional twenty years beyond the current expiration dates of September 9, 2013 (Indian Point Unit 2) and December 12, 2015 (Indian Point Unit 3). On August 1, 2007, the Commission published a notice of opportunity to request a hearing on Entergy's license renewal application.
1  Requests for hearings and petitions to intervene were filed by sixteen entities: the State of New York (New 1  Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3; Notice of Acceptance for Docketing of the Application and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing Regarding Renewal of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-26 and DPR-64 for an Additional 20-Year Period, 72 Fed. Reg. 42,134 (Aug. 1, 2007). In a subsequent notice, the Commission extended the time for which petitions to intervene in this license renewal proceeding could be timely filed. 
See Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3; Notice of Opportunity for Hearing Regarding Renewal of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-26 and DPR-64 for an Additional 20-Year Period: Extension of Time for Filing of Requests for Hearing or Petitions for Leave to Intervene in the License Renewal Proceeding, 72 Fed. Reg.
55,834 (Oct. 1, 2007). York); the State of Connecticut (Connecticut); Westchester County, New York (Westchester); the Town of Cortlandt, New York (Cortlandt); the Village of Buchanan, New York (Buchanan); the City of New York (New York City); the New York Affordable Reliable Electricity Alliance; Friends United for Sustainable Energy; Hudson River Sloop Clearwater (Clearwater);
Connecticut Residents Opposed to Relicensing Indian Point; Westchester Citizen Awareness Network; Rockland County Conservation Association; Sierra Club-Atlantic Chapter; Assemblyman Richard Brodsky; Public Health and Sustainable Energy; and Riverkeeper, Inc. (Riverkeeper). On October 18, 2007, this Atomic Safety and Licensing Board was established to conduct this adjudication.
2  On July 31, 2008, this Board issued a memorandum and order in which it (a) granted the hearing requests of three entities: New York, Riverkeeper, and Clearwater; (b) admitted thirteen contentions; and (c) granted interested governmental entity status to Connecticut, Westchester, and the Town of Cortlandt.
3  On December 18, 2008, we granted interested governmental entity 2  Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, 72 Fed. Reg. 60,394 (Oct. 24, 2007). On April 9, 2012, the Board was reconstituted, substituting Judge Michael F. Kennedy for Judge Kaye D. Lathrop. See Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3); Notice of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Reconstitution, 77 Fed. Reg. 22,361 (Apr. 13, 2012).
3  LBP-08-13, 68 NRC 43, 217-220 (2008). These thirteen contentions, which challenge the sufficiency of Entergy's license renewal application, were: NYS-5 (concerning buried pipes, tanks, and transfer canals), NYS-6/7 (concerning non-environmentally qualified inaccessible medium-voltage and low-voltage cables and wiring), NYS-8 (concerning electrical transformers), NYS-9 (concerning energy conservation in the "no-action" alternative analysis), NYS-12 (concerning decontamination and cleanup costs associated with severe accidents), NYS-16 (concerning underestimation of cleanup costs in light of underestimated population projections in severe accidents), NYS-17 (concerning land values in the no-action alternative to relicensing), NYS-24 (concerning containment structure integrity), NYS-25 (concerning embrittlement of reactor pressure vessels and associated internals), NYS-26A/RK-TC-1A (concerning metal fatigue on key reactor components), RK-TC-2 (concerning flow-accelerated corrosion on reactor components), RK-EC-3/CW-EC-1 (concerning leaks from spent fuel pools),
and CW-EC-3 (concerning disproportionate environmental justice impacts on minority, low-income, and disabled populations near Indian Point).
status to New York City and Buchanan.
4  Since our original order granting hearing requests, we have admitted several new and/or amended contentions filed against Entergy's license renewal application and the NRC Staff's environmental revi ew of that application, and consolidated some of these contentions with pre-existing contentions.
5  We have also summarily disposed of two contentions in favor of New York 6 and approved of the settlement of one contention.
7  The NRC Staff issued its final Safety Evaluation Report (SER) in November 2009 8 and a first supplemental SER in August 2011.
9  The NRC Staff issued its draft Supplemental 4  See Licensing Board Memorandum and Order (Authorizing Interested Governmental Entities to Participate in this Proceeding) (Granting in Part Riverkeeper's Motion for Clarification and Reconsideration of the Board's Ruling in LBP-08-13 Related to the Admissibility of Riverkeeper Contention EC-2) (Denying Riverkeeper's Request to Admit Amended Contention EC-2 and New Contentions EC-4 and EC-5) (Denying Entergy's Motion for Reconsideration of the Board's Decision to Admit Riverkeeper Contention EC-3 and Clearwater Contention EC-1) (Dec. 18, 2008) at 2 (unpublished).
5  These contentions are CW-EC-3A (displaci ng CW-EC-3), NYS-12C (displacing NYS-12, NYS-12A, and NYS-12B), NYS-16B (displacing NYS-16 and NYS-16A), NYS-17B (displacing NYS-17 and NYS-17A), NYS-26B/RK-TC-1B (displacing NYS-26A/RK-TC-1A), NYS-33 (displacing NYS-9), NYS-35/36 (concerning severe accident mitigation alternatives cost-benefit analyses), NYS-37 (displacing NYS-9 and NYS-33), NYS-38 (concerning reactor vessel aging management plans), and RK-EC-8 (concerning the NRC Staff's Endangered Species Act consultations). See Licensing Board Memorandum and Order (Admitting New Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5) (Nov. 10, 2011) (unpublished); Licensing Board Memorandum and Order (Ruling on Pending Motions for Leave to File New and Amended Contentions) (July 6, 2011)
(unpublished); Licensing Board Memorandum and Order (Ruling on Motion for Summary Disposition of NYS-26/26A/Riverkeeper TC-1/1A (Metal Fatigue of Reactor Components) and Motion for Leave to File New Contention NYS-26B/Riverkeeper TC-1B) (Nov. 4, 2010)
(unpublished); LBP-10-13, 71 NRC 673 (2010); Licensing Board Order (Ruling on New York State's New and Amended Contentions) (June 16, 2009) (unpublished).
6  LBP-11-17, 74 NRC __, __ (slip op. at 16-18) (July 14, 2011), pet. for rev. denied , CLI-11-1 4 , 74 NRC __, __ (slip op.) (Dec. 22, 2011) (disposing of contentions NYS-35/36).
7  Licensing Board Order (Approving Settlement of Contention NYS-24) (Jan. 26, 2012) (unpublished).
8  Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Safety Evaluation Report, Related to the License Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., NUREG-1930, Vol. 1 (Nov. 2009) (ADAMS Accession No.
ML093170451); Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Safety Evaluation Report, Related to the License Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., NUREG-1930, Vol. 2 (Nov. 2009) (ADAMS Accession No. ML093170671). Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) in December 2008 10 and its final SEIS in December 2010.11  The NRC Staff has indicated that it intends to issue a second supplemental SER in August 2012 and a second draft SEIS in July 2012, with a final version to follow.
12    In light of the foregoing, an evidentiary hearing will be conducted in this proceeding pursuant to Section 189(a) of the Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S.C. 2239(a). Subject to a Board determination regarding any request to employ hearing procedures under 10 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart G, the evidentiary hearing on all admitted contentions will be governed by the hearing procedures set forth in 10 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart L, 10 C.F.R. §§ 2.1200 - 2.1213.
13    Parties to this proceeding (including the NRC Staff) have begun to provide evidentiary submissions in support of or in opposition to the merits of the admitted contentions.
14  The 9  United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Safety Evaluation Report, Related to the License Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Supp. 1, Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286, NUREG-1930 (Supp. 1, Aug. 2011) (ADAMS Accession No. ML11242A215).
10  Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3; Notice of Availability of the Draft Supplement 38 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meeting for the License Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, 73 Fed. Reg. 80,440 (Dec. 31, 2008).
11  Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supp. 38, Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Final Report Main Report and Comment Responses, NUREG-1437, Vol. 1 (Supp. 38, Dec. 2010) (ADAMS Accession No. ML103350405); Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supp. 38, Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Final Report Public Comments, NUREG-1437, Vol. 2 (Supp. 38, Dec. 2010) (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML103350438, ML103360209, and ML103360212); Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supp. 38, Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Final Report Public Comments Continued, Appendices, NUREG-1437, Vol. 3 (Supp.38, Dec. 2010) (ADAMS Accession No.
ML103350442).
12 See NRC Staff's Fourth Status Report in Response to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's Order of February 16, 2012 (June 1, 2012) at 2-3.
13  See 10 C.F.R. § 2.310; Licensing Board Scheduling Order (July 1, 2010) at 17 (unpublished).
14  The Board will announce by order the resumption of the evidentiary submission schedule for contention NYS-25 and the commencement of the evidentiary submission schedule for    Board intends to begin taking oral testimony on October 15, 2012, in Westchester County, New York. We anticipate addressing the admitted contentions in the following order:  1. NYS-12C  2. NYS-16B
: 3. RK-TC-2  4. NYS-17B  5. NYS-37  6. NYS-5  7. NYS-8
: 8. NYS-6/7 9. CW-EC-3A  10. RK-EC-3/CW-EC-1 15 We anticipate that the hearing will continue on October 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, and 24. Current plans tentatively call for the hearing to convene again on December 10 and run through December 14 as needed. Due to the proprietary nature of some information discussed in the evidentiary submissions associated with cont entions NYS-6/7 and RK-TC-2, the Board may be required to close portions of the oral hearing on those contentions from public viewing. Despite the NRC Staff's ongoing safety and environmental reviews, and because it has received no objections in light of 10 C.F.R. § 2.332(d) from the participants in this proceeding, the Board has tentatively decided that it is efficient to proceed to the evidentiary hearing before contention RK-EC-8 and portions of contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5 that relate to NYS-25. The Board will conduct the oral hearing on contentions NYS-25, NYS-26/RK-TC-1B, NYS-38/RK-TC-5, and RK-EC-8 after receiving the evidentiary submissions for each of the contentions. The time and date of subsequent oral hearings will be announced by order of the Board.
15 The order in which we anticipate hearing conten tions is subject to change if the NRC Staff's brief in response to our June 7, 2012 Order warrants such a change. See Licensing Board Order (Ordering the NRC Staff to Address Board Questions) (June 7, 2012) (unpublished).
issuance of the NRC's additional environmental and safety review documents. This decision is based on our understanding that the NRC's recent draft SEIS will not address any issue raised in any contention other than RC-EC-8 and that the second supplemental SER will not address any issue raised in any contention other than NYS-25 and those portions of NYS-38/RK-TC-5 that have previously been defined.
16  As noted above, at footnote 15, we issued an Order on June 7, 2012, seeking input from the parties on these assumptions. The Board will notify the parties if our plans to proceed to hearing in October 2012 on the ten contentions listed above change based on the parties' responses to that order. After the NRC's additional safety and environmental documents have issued, the Board will provide a schedule on how it will hear all remaining contentions. As provided in 10 C.F.R. § 2.315(a), any person not a party to the proceeding may submit a written limited appearance statement setting forth his or her position on the issues in this proceeding. These statements do not constitute evidence but may assist the Board and/or parties in defining the issues being considered. Persons wishing to submit a written limited appearance statement should send it to the Office of the Secretary by one of the methods prescribed below:  Mail to: Office of the Secretary  Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Fax to: (301) 415-1101 (verification (301) 415-1966)
Email to: hearing.docket@nrc.gov
In addition, a copy of the limited appearance statement should be sent to the Licensing Board by one of the methods below:
Mail to: Administrative Judge Lawrence G. McDade  c/o Anne Siarnacki, Law Clerk 16 See NRC Staff's Third Status Report in Response to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's Order of February 16, 2012 (May 1, 2012) at 2. Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel  Mail Stop T-3F23  U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission  Washington, DC 20555-0001
Fax to: (301) 415-5599 (verification (301) 415-7550)
Email to: anne.siarnacki@nrc.gov
The deadline for this Board's receipt of written limited appearance statements will be September 15, 2012. This will be the sole method for providing limited appearance statements. Documents relating to this proceeding are available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room or electronically from the publicly available records component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC website at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Persons who do not have access to ADAMS, or who encounter
problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail at pdr@nrc.gov.
FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY    AND LICENSING BOARD
___________________________
Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Rockville, Maryland June 8, 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of  )  )
ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.  ) Docket Nos. 50-247-LR 
  )  and 50-286-LR (Indian Point Nuclear Generating,  )
Units 2 and 3)  )
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing NOTICE OF HEARING (APPLICATION FOR LICENSE RENEWAL) have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication
Mail Stop O-7H4M Washington, DC  20555-0001 E-mail: ocaamail@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Secretary of the Commission
Mail Stop O-16C1 Washington, DC  20555-0001 Hearing Docket
E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop T-3F23 Washington, DC  20555-0001
Lawrence G. McDade, Chair
Administrative Judge E-mail: lawrence.mcdade@nrc.gov
Richard E. Wardwell
Administrative Judge
E-mail: richard.wardwell@nrc.gov Kaye D. Lathrop Administrative Judge
190 Cedar Lane E.
Ridgway, CO  81432
E-mail: kaye.lathrop@nrc.gov Anne Siarnacki, Law Clerk
E-mail: anne.siarnacki@nrc.gov Shelbie Lewman, Law Clerk
E-mail:  shelbie.lewman@nrc.gov Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.
Edward L. Williamson, Esq.
Beth N. Mizuno, Esq. David E. Roth, Esq.
Brian Harris, Esq.
Mary B. Spencer, Esq.
Anita Ghosh, Esq.
Karl Farrar, Esq.
Brian Newell, Paralegal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the General Counsel
Mail Stop O-15D21 Washington, DC  20555-0001 E-mail:  sherwin.turk@nrc.gov edward.williamson@nrc.gov beth.mizuno@nrc.gov brian.harris.@nrc.gov david.roth@nrc.gov mary.spencer@nrc.gov anita.ghosh@nrc.gov karl.farrar@nrc.gov brian.newell@nrc.gov OGC Mail Center OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov
Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR NOTICE OF HEARING (APPLICATION FOR LICENSE RENEWAL) 2  William C. Dennis, Esq. Assistant General Counsel Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 440 Hamilton Avenue
White Plains, NY  10601
Email: wdennis@entergy.com Thomas F. Wood, Esq.
Daniel Riesel, Esq.
Victoria Shiah Treanor, Esq.
Adam Stolorow, Esq.
Jwala Gandhi, Paralegal
Peng Deng, Paralegal Counsel for Town of Cortlandt Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.
460 Park Avenue
New York, NY  10022
E-mail: driesel@sprlaw.com vtreanor@sprlaw.com astolorow@sprlaw.com jgandhi@sprlaw.com pdeng@sprlaw.com Elise N. Zoli, Esq.
Goodwin Proctor, LLP Exchange Place
53 State Street Boston, MA  02109
E-mail: ezoli@goodwinprocter.com Phillip Musegaas, Esq. Deborah Brancato, Esq. Ramona Cearley, Secretary Riverkeeper, Inc.
20 Secor Road
Ossining, NY  10562 E-mail: phillip@riverkeeper.org dbrancato@riverkeeper.org rcearley@riverkeeper.org Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.
Paul M. Bessette, Esq. Martin J. O'Neill, Esq.
Raphael Kuyler, Esq.
Jonathan M. Rund, Esq.
Lena Michelle Long, Esq.
Laura Swett, Esq. Lance Escher, Esq. Mary Freeze, Legal Secretary Antoinette Walker, Legal Secretary
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP
1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC  20004 E-mail: ksutton@morganlewis.com pbessette@morganlewis.com martin.o'neill@morganlewis.com rkuyler@morganlewis.com jrund@morganlewis.com llong@morganlewis.com lswett@morganlewis.com Melissa-Jean Rotini, Esq. Assistant County Attorney Office of Robert F. Meehan,  Westchester County Attorney
148 Martine Avenue, 6 th Floor White Plains, NY  10601
E-mail: MJR1@westchestergov.com Manna Jo Greene, Environmental Director Steven C. Filler Karla Raimundi
Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.
724 Wolcott Ave.
Beacon, NY  12508 E-mail: mannajo@clearwater.org stephenfiller@gmail.com karla@clearwater.org
Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR NOTICE OF HEARING (APPLICATION FOR LICENSE RENEWAL) 3   
lescher@morganlewis.com mfreeze@morganlewis.com awalker@morganlewis.com
Michael J. Delaney, Esq. Director, Energy Regulatory Affairs NYC Department of Environmental Protection
59-17 Junction Boulevard Flushing, NY  11373 E-mail:  mdelaney@dep.nyc.gov
John Louis Parker, Esq.
Office of General Counsel, Region 3 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
21 South Putt Corners Road
New Paltz, NY  12561-1620
E-mail: jlparker@gw.dec.state.ny.us Robert D. Snook, Esq. Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General State of Connecticut 55 Elm Street P.O. Box 120
Hartford, CT  06141-0120
E-mail: robert.snook@po.state.ct.us John J. Sipos, Esq. Charles Donaldson, Esq.
Assistant Attorneys General Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York Elyse Houle, Legal Support The Capitol
State Street Albany, New York  12224
E-mail: John.Sipos@ag.ny.gov charlie.donaldson@ag.ny.gov elyse.houle@ag.ny.gov Sean Murray, Mayor Kevin Hay, Village Administrator Village of Buchanan Municipal Building 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, NY  10511-1298
E-mail: SMurray@villageofbuchanan.com Administrator@villageofbuchanan.com Janice A. Dean, Esq. Assistant Attorney General
Kathryn Liberatore, Esq. Office of the Attorney General    of the State of New York
120 Broadway, 26 th Floor New York, New York  10271
E-mail: janice.dean@ag.ny.gov kathryn.liberatore@ag.ny.gov
        [Original signed by Evangeline S. Ngbea ]                                  Office of the Secretary of the Commission Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 8 th day of June 2012}}

Revision as of 14:00, 28 July 2018

Notice of Hearing (Application for License Renewal)
ML12160A093
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/08/2012
From: McDade L G
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
To:
SECY RAS
References
RAS 22569, 50-247-LR, 50-286-LR, ASLBP 07-858-03-LR-BD01
Download: ML12160A093 (10)


Text

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD Before Administrative Judges:

Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman Dr. Michael F. Kennedy Dr. Richard E. Wardwell In the Matter of

ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC.

(Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3)

Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR

ASLBP No. 07-858-03-LR-BD01 June 8, 2012 NOTICE OF HEARING (Application for License Renewal)

This proceeding arises out of the April 23, 2007, application of Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Entergy) to renew its operating licenses for Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3 (Operating License Nos. DPR-26 and DPR-64) at its Indian Point Energy Center in Buchanan, New York. Entergy seeks to extend these licenses for an additional twenty years beyond the current expiration dates of September 9, 2013 (Indian Point Unit 2) and December 12, 2015 (Indian Point Unit 3). On August 1, 2007, the Commission published a notice of opportunity to request a hearing on Entergy's license renewal application.

1 Requests for hearings and petitions to intervene were filed by sixteen entities: the State of New York (New 1 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3; Notice of Acceptance for Docketing of the Application and Notice of Opportunity for Hearing Regarding Renewal of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-26 and DPR-64 for an Additional 20-Year Period, 72 Fed. Reg. 42,134 (Aug. 1, 2007). In a subsequent notice, the Commission extended the time for which petitions to intervene in this license renewal proceeding could be timely filed.

See Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3; Notice of Opportunity for Hearing Regarding Renewal of Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-26 and DPR-64 for an Additional 20-Year Period: Extension of Time for Filing of Requests for Hearing or Petitions for Leave to Intervene in the License Renewal Proceeding, 72 Fed. Reg.

55,834 (Oct. 1, 2007). York); the State of Connecticut (Connecticut); Westchester County, New York (Westchester); the Town of Cortlandt, New York (Cortlandt); the Village of Buchanan, New York (Buchanan); the City of New York (New York City); the New York Affordable Reliable Electricity Alliance; Friends United for Sustainable Energy; Hudson River Sloop Clearwater (Clearwater);

Connecticut Residents Opposed to Relicensing Indian Point; Westchester Citizen Awareness Network; Rockland County Conservation Association; Sierra Club-Atlantic Chapter; Assemblyman Richard Brodsky; Public Health and Sustainable Energy; and Riverkeeper, Inc. (Riverkeeper). On October 18, 2007, this Atomic Safety and Licensing Board was established to conduct this adjudication.

2 On July 31, 2008, this Board issued a memorandum and order in which it (a) granted the hearing requests of three entities: New York, Riverkeeper, and Clearwater; (b) admitted thirteen contentions; and (c) granted interested governmental entity status to Connecticut, Westchester, and the Town of Cortlandt.

3 On December 18, 2008, we granted interested governmental entity 2 Establishment of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, 72 Fed. Reg. 60,394 (Oct. 24, 2007). On April 9, 2012, the Board was reconstituted, substituting Judge Michael F. Kennedy for Judge Kaye D. Lathrop. See Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., (Indian Point Nuclear Generating Units 2 and 3); Notice of Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Reconstitution, 77 Fed. Reg. 22,361 (Apr. 13, 2012).

3 LBP-08-13, 68 NRC 43, 217-220 (2008). These thirteen contentions, which challenge the sufficiency of Entergy's license renewal application, were: NYS-5 (concerning buried pipes, tanks, and transfer canals), NYS-6/7 (concerning non-environmentally qualified inaccessible medium-voltage and low-voltage cables and wiring), NYS-8 (concerning electrical transformers), NYS-9 (concerning energy conservation in the "no-action" alternative analysis), NYS-12 (concerning decontamination and cleanup costs associated with severe accidents), NYS-16 (concerning underestimation of cleanup costs in light of underestimated population projections in severe accidents), NYS-17 (concerning land values in the no-action alternative to relicensing), NYS-24 (concerning containment structure integrity), NYS-25 (concerning embrittlement of reactor pressure vessels and associated internals), NYS-26A/RK-TC-1A (concerning metal fatigue on key reactor components), RK-TC-2 (concerning flow-accelerated corrosion on reactor components), RK-EC-3/CW-EC-1 (concerning leaks from spent fuel pools),

and CW-EC-3 (concerning disproportionate environmental justice impacts on minority, low-income, and disabled populations near Indian Point).

status to New York City and Buchanan.

4 Since our original order granting hearing requests, we have admitted several new and/or amended contentions filed against Entergy's license renewal application and the NRC Staff's environmental revi ew of that application, and consolidated some of these contentions with pre-existing contentions.

5 We have also summarily disposed of two contentions in favor of New York 6 and approved of the settlement of one contention.

7 The NRC Staff issued its final Safety Evaluation Report (SER) in November 2009 8 and a first supplemental SER in August 2011.

9 The NRC Staff issued its draft Supplemental 4 See Licensing Board Memorandum and Order (Authorizing Interested Governmental Entities to Participate in this Proceeding) (Granting in Part Riverkeeper's Motion for Clarification and Reconsideration of the Board's Ruling in LBP-08-13 Related to the Admissibility of Riverkeeper Contention EC-2) (Denying Riverkeeper's Request to Admit Amended Contention EC-2 and New Contentions EC-4 and EC-5) (Denying Entergy's Motion for Reconsideration of the Board's Decision to Admit Riverkeeper Contention EC-3 and Clearwater Contention EC-1) (Dec. 18, 2008) at 2 (unpublished).

5 These contentions are CW-EC-3A (displaci ng CW-EC-3), NYS-12C (displacing NYS-12, NYS-12A, and NYS-12B), NYS-16B (displacing NYS-16 and NYS-16A), NYS-17B (displacing NYS-17 and NYS-17A), NYS-26B/RK-TC-1B (displacing NYS-26A/RK-TC-1A), NYS-33 (displacing NYS-9), NYS-35/36 (concerning severe accident mitigation alternatives cost-benefit analyses), NYS-37 (displacing NYS-9 and NYS-33), NYS-38 (concerning reactor vessel aging management plans), and RK-EC-8 (concerning the NRC Staff's Endangered Species Act consultations). See Licensing Board Memorandum and Order (Admitting New Contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5) (Nov. 10, 2011) (unpublished); Licensing Board Memorandum and Order (Ruling on Pending Motions for Leave to File New and Amended Contentions) (July 6, 2011)

(unpublished); Licensing Board Memorandum and Order (Ruling on Motion for Summary Disposition of NYS-26/26A/Riverkeeper TC-1/1A (Metal Fatigue of Reactor Components) and Motion for Leave to File New Contention NYS-26B/Riverkeeper TC-1B) (Nov. 4, 2010)

(unpublished); LBP-10-13, 71 NRC 673 (2010); Licensing Board Order (Ruling on New York State's New and Amended Contentions) (June 16, 2009) (unpublished).

6 LBP-11-17, 74 NRC __, __ (slip op. at 16-18) (July 14, 2011), pet. for rev. denied , CLI-11-1 4 , 74 NRC __, __ (slip op.) (Dec. 22, 2011) (disposing of contentions NYS-35/36).

7 Licensing Board Order (Approving Settlement of Contention NYS-24) (Jan. 26, 2012) (unpublished).

8 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Safety Evaluation Report, Related to the License Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., NUREG-1930, Vol. 1 (Nov. 2009) (ADAMS Accession No.

ML093170451); Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Safety Evaluation Report, Related to the License Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286, Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., NUREG-1930, Vol. 2 (Nov. 2009) (ADAMS Accession No. ML093170671). Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) in December 2008 10 and its final SEIS in December 2010.11 The NRC Staff has indicated that it intends to issue a second supplemental SER in August 2012 and a second draft SEIS in July 2012, with a final version to follow.

12 In light of the foregoing, an evidentiary hearing will be conducted in this proceeding pursuant to Section 189(a) of the Atomic Energy Act, 42 U.S.C. 2239(a). Subject to a Board determination regarding any request to employ hearing procedures under 10 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart G, the evidentiary hearing on all admitted contentions will be governed by the hearing procedures set forth in 10 C.F.R. Part 2, Subpart L, 10 C.F.R. §§ 2.1200 - 2.1213.

13 Parties to this proceeding (including the NRC Staff) have begun to provide evidentiary submissions in support of or in opposition to the merits of the admitted contentions.

14 The 9 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Safety Evaluation Report, Related to the License Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Supp. 1, Docket Nos. 50-247 and 50-286, NUREG-1930 (Supp. 1, Aug. 2011) (ADAMS Accession No. ML11242A215).

10 Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3; Notice of Availability of the Draft Supplement 38 to the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants and Public Meeting for the License Renewal of Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, 73 Fed. Reg. 80,440 (Dec. 31, 2008).

11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supp. 38, Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Final Report Main Report and Comment Responses, NUREG-1437, Vol. 1 (Supp. 38, Dec. 2010) (ADAMS Accession No. ML103350405); Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supp. 38, Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Final Report Public Comments, NUREG-1437, Vol. 2 (Supp. 38, Dec. 2010) (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML103350438, ML103360209, and ML103360212); Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supp. 38, Regarding Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3, Final Report Public Comments Continued, Appendices, NUREG-1437, Vol. 3 (Supp.38, Dec. 2010) (ADAMS Accession No.

ML103350442).

12 See NRC Staff's Fourth Status Report in Response to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's Order of February 16, 2012 (June 1, 2012) at 2-3.

13 See 10 C.F.R. § 2.310; Licensing Board Scheduling Order (July 1, 2010) at 17 (unpublished).

14 The Board will announce by order the resumption of the evidentiary submission schedule for contention NYS-25 and the commencement of the evidentiary submission schedule for Board intends to begin taking oral testimony on October 15, 2012, in Westchester County, New York. We anticipate addressing the admitted contentions in the following order: 1. NYS-12C 2. NYS-16B

3. RK-TC-2 4. NYS-17B 5. NYS-37 6. NYS-5 7. NYS-8
8. NYS-6/7 9. CW-EC-3A 10. RK-EC-3/CW-EC-1 15 We anticipate that the hearing will continue on October 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, and 24. Current plans tentatively call for the hearing to convene again on December 10 and run through December 14 as needed. Due to the proprietary nature of some information discussed in the evidentiary submissions associated with cont entions NYS-6/7 and RK-TC-2, the Board may be required to close portions of the oral hearing on those contentions from public viewing. Despite the NRC Staff's ongoing safety and environmental reviews, and because it has received no objections in light of 10 C.F.R. § 2.332(d) from the participants in this proceeding, the Board has tentatively decided that it is efficient to proceed to the evidentiary hearing before contention RK-EC-8 and portions of contention NYS-38/RK-TC-5 that relate to NYS-25. The Board will conduct the oral hearing on contentions NYS-25, NYS-26/RK-TC-1B, NYS-38/RK-TC-5, and RK-EC-8 after receiving the evidentiary submissions for each of the contentions. The time and date of subsequent oral hearings will be announced by order of the Board.

15 The order in which we anticipate hearing conten tions is subject to change if the NRC Staff's brief in response to our June 7, 2012 Order warrants such a change. See Licensing Board Order (Ordering the NRC Staff to Address Board Questions) (June 7, 2012) (unpublished).

issuance of the NRC's additional environmental and safety review documents. This decision is based on our understanding that the NRC's recent draft SEIS will not address any issue raised in any contention other than RC-EC-8 and that the second supplemental SER will not address any issue raised in any contention other than NYS-25 and those portions of NYS-38/RK-TC-5 that have previously been defined.

16 As noted above, at footnote 15, we issued an Order on June 7, 2012, seeking input from the parties on these assumptions. The Board will notify the parties if our plans to proceed to hearing in October 2012 on the ten contentions listed above change based on the parties' responses to that order. After the NRC's additional safety and environmental documents have issued, the Board will provide a schedule on how it will hear all remaining contentions. As provided in 10 C.F.R. § 2.315(a), any person not a party to the proceeding may submit a written limited appearance statement setting forth his or her position on the issues in this proceeding. These statements do not constitute evidence but may assist the Board and/or parties in defining the issues being considered. Persons wishing to submit a written limited appearance statement should send it to the Office of the Secretary by one of the methods prescribed below: Mail to: Office of the Secretary Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Fax to: (301) 415-1101 (verification (301) 415-1966)

Email to: hearing.docket@nrc.gov

In addition, a copy of the limited appearance statement should be sent to the Licensing Board by one of the methods below:

Mail to: Administrative Judge Lawrence G. McDade c/o Anne Siarnacki, Law Clerk 16 See NRC Staff's Third Status Report in Response to the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board's Order of February 16, 2012 (May 1, 2012) at 2. Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop T-3F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001

Fax to: (301) 415-5599 (verification (301) 415-7550)

Email to: anne.siarnacki@nrc.gov

The deadline for this Board's receipt of written limited appearance statements will be September 15, 2012. This will be the sole method for providing limited appearance statements. Documents relating to this proceeding are available for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room or electronically from the publicly available records component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC website at www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). Persons who do not have access to ADAMS, or who encounter

problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, should contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by telephone at 1-800-397-4209 or 301-415-4737, or by e-mail at pdr@nrc.gov.

FOR THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD

___________________________

Lawrence G. McDade, Chairman ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE Rockville, Maryland June 8, 2012 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of ) )

ENTERGY NUCLEAR OPERATIONS, INC. ) Docket Nos. 50-247-LR

) and 50-286-LR (Indian Point Nuclear Generating, )

Units 2 and 3) )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing NOTICE OF HEARING (APPLICATION FOR LICENSE RENEWAL) have been served upon the following persons by Electronic Information Exchange.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication

Mail Stop O-7H4M Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: ocaamail@nrc.gov U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the Secretary of the Commission

Mail Stop O-16C1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Hearing Docket

E-mail: hearingdocket@nrc.gov

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop T-3F23 Washington, DC 20555-0001

Lawrence G. McDade, Chair

Administrative Judge E-mail: lawrence.mcdade@nrc.gov

Richard E. Wardwell

Administrative Judge

E-mail: richard.wardwell@nrc.gov Kaye D. Lathrop Administrative Judge

190 Cedar Lane E.

Ridgway, CO 81432

E-mail: kaye.lathrop@nrc.gov Anne Siarnacki, Law Clerk

E-mail: anne.siarnacki@nrc.gov Shelbie Lewman, Law Clerk

E-mail: shelbie.lewman@nrc.gov Sherwin E. Turk, Esq.

Edward L. Williamson, Esq.

Beth N. Mizuno, Esq. David E. Roth, Esq.

Brian Harris, Esq.

Mary B. Spencer, Esq.

Anita Ghosh, Esq.

Karl Farrar, Esq.

Brian Newell, Paralegal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of the General Counsel

Mail Stop O-15D21 Washington, DC 20555-0001 E-mail: sherwin.turk@nrc.gov edward.williamson@nrc.gov beth.mizuno@nrc.gov brian.harris.@nrc.gov david.roth@nrc.gov mary.spencer@nrc.gov anita.ghosh@nrc.gov karl.farrar@nrc.gov brian.newell@nrc.gov OGC Mail Center OGCMailCenter@nrc.gov

Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR NOTICE OF HEARING (APPLICATION FOR LICENSE RENEWAL) 2 William C. Dennis, Esq. Assistant General Counsel Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. 440 Hamilton Avenue

White Plains, NY 10601

Email: wdennis@entergy.com Thomas F. Wood, Esq.

Daniel Riesel, Esq.

Victoria Shiah Treanor, Esq.

Adam Stolorow, Esq.

Jwala Gandhi, Paralegal

Peng Deng, Paralegal Counsel for Town of Cortlandt Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.

460 Park Avenue

New York, NY 10022

E-mail: driesel@sprlaw.com vtreanor@sprlaw.com astolorow@sprlaw.com jgandhi@sprlaw.com pdeng@sprlaw.com Elise N. Zoli, Esq.

Goodwin Proctor, LLP Exchange Place

53 State Street Boston, MA 02109

E-mail: ezoli@goodwinprocter.com Phillip Musegaas, Esq. Deborah Brancato, Esq. Ramona Cearley, Secretary Riverkeeper, Inc.

20 Secor Road

Ossining, NY 10562 E-mail: phillip@riverkeeper.org dbrancato@riverkeeper.org rcearley@riverkeeper.org Kathryn M. Sutton, Esq.

Paul M. Bessette, Esq. Martin J. O'Neill, Esq.

Raphael Kuyler, Esq.

Jonathan M. Rund, Esq.

Lena Michelle Long, Esq.

Laura Swett, Esq. Lance Escher, Esq. Mary Freeze, Legal Secretary Antoinette Walker, Legal Secretary

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, LLP

1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 E-mail: ksutton@morganlewis.com pbessette@morganlewis.com martin.o'neill@morganlewis.com rkuyler@morganlewis.com jrund@morganlewis.com llong@morganlewis.com lswett@morganlewis.com Melissa-Jean Rotini, Esq. Assistant County Attorney Office of Robert F. Meehan, Westchester County Attorney

148 Martine Avenue, 6 th Floor White Plains, NY 10601

E-mail: MJR1@westchestergov.com Manna Jo Greene, Environmental Director Steven C. Filler Karla Raimundi

Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc.

724 Wolcott Ave.

Beacon, NY 12508 E-mail: mannajo@clearwater.org stephenfiller@gmail.com karla@clearwater.org

Docket Nos. 50-247-LR and 50-286-LR NOTICE OF HEARING (APPLICATION FOR LICENSE RENEWAL) 3

lescher@morganlewis.com mfreeze@morganlewis.com awalker@morganlewis.com

Michael J. Delaney, Esq. Director, Energy Regulatory Affairs NYC Department of Environmental Protection

59-17 Junction Boulevard Flushing, NY 11373 E-mail: mdelaney@dep.nyc.gov

John Louis Parker, Esq.

Office of General Counsel, Region 3 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

21 South Putt Corners Road

New Paltz, NY 12561-1620

E-mail: jlparker@gw.dec.state.ny.us Robert D. Snook, Esq. Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General State of Connecticut 55 Elm Street P.O. Box 120

Hartford, CT 06141-0120

E-mail: robert.snook@po.state.ct.us John J. Sipos, Esq. Charles Donaldson, Esq.

Assistant Attorneys General Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York Elyse Houle, Legal Support The Capitol

State Street Albany, New York 12224

E-mail: John.Sipos@ag.ny.gov charlie.donaldson@ag.ny.gov elyse.houle@ag.ny.gov Sean Murray, Mayor Kevin Hay, Village Administrator Village of Buchanan Municipal Building 236 Tate Avenue Buchanan, NY 10511-1298

E-mail: SMurray@villageofbuchanan.com Administrator@villageofbuchanan.com Janice A. Dean, Esq. Assistant Attorney General

Kathryn Liberatore, Esq. Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York

120 Broadway, 26 th Floor New York, New York 10271

E-mail: janice.dean@ag.ny.gov kathryn.liberatore@ag.ny.gov

[Original signed by Evangeline S. Ngbea ] Office of the Secretary of the Commission Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 8 th day of June 2012