ML20128Q554: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:g            .
Qp    .
AQDECyg                                                                    !
  .-- I/              'o
                        'g                          UNITED STATES i      '
      '!\
* n            NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i.-
0,
                        .I                            REGION IV 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000 d'['                      ARLINGTON, TEX AS 76012 July 20, 1979 E MORANDUM FOR:  E. L. Jordan, Assistant Director for Technical Programs ROI, IE FROM:            K. V. Seyfrit, Director, RIV
 
==SUBJECT:==
TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION RE IE BULLETIN 79-14 As requested in your memorandum dated July 18, 1979, same subject, we h. ave reviewed the proposed temporary instruction. Our comments are indicated in the enclosure.
h$YYdW K. V. Seyfrit Director                          .
 
==Enclosure:==
 
Comments cc: w/ enclosure Regional Directors N. C. Moseley, ROI H. Wong, ROI l
l 8507270008 850618 PDR    FOIA HERRMANB5-301      PDR
                                                                                                )
 
V    ,
3 ENCLOSURE COP 9 TENTS ON PROPOSED TI'RELATED TO IE BULLETIN 79-14 a) ' Item IV.1: In the third line, the word valves should be values.
b)    Item IV.1: The final sentence regarding contacts with the VIB is ingppropriate. To avoid a multiplicity of contacts with VIB, generic evaluations should be identified by the inspectors, and IE:HQ should assign specific inspections for the engineering firms involved.
c)    Item IV.1: In the second line, add after "... interview one of those persons, if the review was done by on-site personnel or if consultant personnel are available on site."
d)    Item IV.2: Rewrite first sentence to read: "If practical, observe a portion of the physical inspections of accessible piping systems performed by the licensees in accordance with Item 2 of the bulletin.
Review licensees' reports of witnessed inspections to detennine ...."
Add at end of paragraph: " Compare results with licensees' results."
e)    Item IV.3: Substitute for the words "do the work", the words, " perform a similar inspection".
f)    Item VI: The composition of the evaluation task force seems to have gotten confused in typing with respect to RIII, RIV and RV.            -
l l
l l
l L}}

Latest revision as of 09:07, 23 July 2020

Forwards Comments on Temporary Instruction Re IE Bulletin 79-14.In Item IV.1 Final Sentence Re Contacts W/Vendor Insp Branch Inappropriate.Generic Evaluations Should Be Identified by Inspectors
ML20128Q554
Person / Time
Issue date: 07/20/1979
From: Seyfrit K
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Jordan E
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML20126K036 List:
References
FOIA-85-301 IEB-79-14, NUDOCS 8507270008
Download: ML20128Q554 (2)


Text

g .

Qp .

AQDECyg  !

.-- I/ 'o

'g UNITED STATES i '

'!\

  • n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i.-

0,

.I REGION IV 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 1000 d'[' ARLINGTON, TEX AS 76012 July 20, 1979 E MORANDUM FOR: E. L. Jordan, Assistant Director for Technical Programs ROI, IE FROM: K. V. Seyfrit, Director, RIV

SUBJECT:

TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION RE IE BULLETIN 79-14 As requested in your memorandum dated July 18, 1979, same subject, we h. ave reviewed the proposed temporary instruction. Our comments are indicated in the enclosure.

h$YYdW K. V. Seyfrit Director .

Enclosure:

Comments cc: w/ enclosure Regional Directors N. C. Moseley, ROI H. Wong, ROI l

l 8507270008 850618 PDR FOIA HERRMANB5-301 PDR

)

V ,

3 ENCLOSURE COP 9 TENTS ON PROPOSED TI'RELATED TO IE BULLETIN 79-14 a) ' Item IV.1: In the third line, the word valves should be values.

b) Item IV.1: The final sentence regarding contacts with the VIB is ingppropriate. To avoid a multiplicity of contacts with VIB, generic evaluations should be identified by the inspectors, and IE:HQ should assign specific inspections for the engineering firms involved.

c) Item IV.1: In the second line, add after "... interview one of those persons, if the review was done by on-site personnel or if consultant personnel are available on site."

d) Item IV.2: Rewrite first sentence to read: "If practical, observe a portion of the physical inspections of accessible piping systems performed by the licensees in accordance with Item 2 of the bulletin.

Review licensees' reports of witnessed inspections to detennine ...."

Add at end of paragraph: " Compare results with licensees' results."

e) Item IV.3: Substitute for the words "do the work", the words, " perform a similar inspection".

f) Item VI: The composition of the evaluation task force seems to have gotten confused in typing with respect to RIII, RIV and RV. -

l l

l l

l L