ML18143B513: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 92: Line 92:
e
e
* SAFETY EVALUATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PROPOSED CHANGE This supplemental proposed change to          the Technical Specification provides clarification for the required testing of the reactor trip breakers, reactor trip bypass breakers and the manual scram switches;                and provides further definition of operability for the reactor trip breakers.            To meet the guidance of the Generic Letter 85-09,        "Technical Specifications for Generic Letter 83-28, item 4 .3," a supplemental proposed change is submitted to provide a Limiting Condition for Operation for the reactor trip breakers; and adminis-trative notes to clarify the surveillance testing requirements for the reactor trip breakers, reactor trip bypass breakers, and the manual scram switches.
* SAFETY EVALUATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PROPOSED CHANGE This supplemental proposed change to          the Technical Specification provides clarification for the required testing of the reactor trip breakers, reactor trip bypass breakers and the manual scram switches;                and provides further definition of operability for the reactor trip breakers.            To meet the guidance of the Generic Letter 85-09,        "Technical Specifications for Generic Letter 83-28, item 4 .3," a supplemental proposed change is submitted to provide a Limiting Condition for Operation for the reactor trip breakers; and adminis-trative notes to clarify the surveillance testing requirements for the reactor trip breakers, reactor trip bypass breakers, and the manual scram switches.
50.59 Safety Review Pursuant to lOCFRS0.59, we have reviewed the supplemental proposed change and have concluded that no unreviewed safety question exists: In that,                  (i) The
50.59 Safety Review Pursuant to 10CFRS0.59, we have reviewed the supplemental proposed change and have concluded that no unreviewed safety question exists: In that,                  (i) The
* probability of occurrence or the consequences of an accident or malfunction of equipment    importantant  to  safety  is  not    increased by    these  supplemental changes. One change redefines the operability of the reactor trip breaker with one of the diverse trip features (undervoltage or shunt trip attachments) inoperable. Since either trip feature being operable would initiate a reactor trip  the    probability  of  occurrence    or  consequence    of  an  accident    or malfunction of equipment      important  to    safety is not      increased from that previously evaluated in the UFSAR,        (ii)    The possibility of a different type of accident other than discussed in the UFSAR has not been created by this supplemental    proposed  change. The  proposed    changes    are  bounded  by  the previous submittal and no new or different type of accidents are created by this additional change.      (iii) The margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification is not reduced by this change.              The proposed changes provide further definition of reactor trip breaker operability and clarification of surveillance test requirements              for  the  reactor  trip  and reactor    trip    bypass  breakers,    and    the    manual  scram    switches.      These supplemental changes are bounded by the previous submittal and do not*reduce
* probability of occurrence or the consequences of an accident or malfunction of equipment    importantant  to  safety  is  not    increased by    these  supplemental changes. One change redefines the operability of the reactor trip breaker with one of the diverse trip features (undervoltage or shunt trip attachments) inoperable. Since either trip feature being operable would initiate a reactor trip  the    probability  of  occurrence    or  consequence    of  an  accident    or malfunction of equipment      important  to    safety is not      increased from that previously evaluated in the UFSAR,        (ii)    The possibility of a different type of accident other than discussed in the UFSAR has not been created by this supplemental    proposed  change. The  proposed    changes    are  bounded  by  the previous submittal and no new or different type of accidents are created by this additional change.      (iii) The margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification is not reduced by this change.              The proposed changes provide further definition of reactor trip breaker operability and clarification of surveillance test requirements              for  the  reactor  trip  and reactor    trip    bypass  breakers,    and    the    manual  scram    switches.      These supplemental changes are bounded by the previous submittal and do not*reduce
* the margin of safety *
* the margin of safety *

Revision as of 15:02, 6 November 2019

Proposed Tech Spec Changes,Revising Limiting Conditions for Operation & Surveillance Requirements for Reactor Trip & Bypass Breakers,Undervoltage Trip Logic & Shunt Trip Logic
ML18143B513
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/1985
From:
VIRGINIA POWER (VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER CO.)
To:
Shared Package
ML18143B511 List:
References
NUDOCS 8509160363
Download: ML18143B513 (9)


Text

e ATTACHMENT 1 PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE SURRY POWER STATION

  • (

I i

8509160363 B50909 *

  • ADOCK 05000280 P PDR

\

!

  • I TABLE 3.7-1 REACTOR TRIP iI INSTRUMENT OPERATING CONDITIONS I I

COLUMN 1 COLUMN 2 COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4 OPERATOR ACTION IF CONDITIONS OF MINIMUM COLUMN 1 OR 2, EXCEPT OPERABLE DEGREE OF PERMISSIBLE AS CONDITIONED BY FUNCTIONAL UNIT CHANNELS REDUNDANCY BYPASS CONDITIONS COLUMN 3, CANNOT BE M~

17. Low Steam Generator  !/non-isolated Maintain hot shutdown Water Level With loop Steam/Feedwater*  !/non-isolated Mismatch Flow loop
18. A. Reactor Trip Breakers 2 1 Maintain hot shutdown; if one diverse trip feature (undervoltage or shunt trip attachment) is inoperable, restore it to operable status within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> or declare the breaker inoperable and maintai, hot shutdown.

B. Reactor Trip Bypass Breaker 1 0

      • t-3 C/)

TABLE 3. 7-1 REACTOR TRIP INSTRUMENT OPERATING CONDITIONS

  • COLUMN 1 COLUMN 2 COLUMN 3 COLUMN 4 OPERATOR ACTION IF CONDITIONS OF MINIMUM COLUMN 1 OR 2, EXCEPT OPERABLE DEGREE OF PERMISSIBLE AS CONDITIONED BY FUNCTIONAL UNIT CHANNELS REDUNDANCY BYPASS CONDITIONS COLUMN 3, CANNOT BE MET
19. Auto Trip Logic A. Undervoltage Trip Logic 2 1 Maintain hot shutdown; if one diverse trip feature (undervoltage or shunt trip attachment) is inoperable, restore it to operable status within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> or declare the breaker inoperable and maintain hot shutdown.

B. Shunt Trip Logic 2 1 Maintain hot shutdown; if one diverse trip feature (undervoltage or shunt trip attachment) is inoperable, restore it to operable status within 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> or declare the breaker inoperable and maintain hot shutdown.

    • If both misalignment monitors (a and b) inoperable *for 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> or more, the nuclear overpower trip shall be reset to 93 percent of rated power in addition to the increased surveillance noted.

Channel Description Check TABL~i-1 (Continued)

Calibrate Test Remarks

26. Environmental Radiation Monitors *M N.A. N.A. TLD Dosimeters
27. Logic Channel Testing N.A. N.A. M
28. Turbine Overspeed Protection N.A. R R Trip Channel (Electrical) 29.

30.

Turbine Trip Setpoint Seismic Instrumentation N.A.

M N.A R

R N.A R

M Stop valve closure or low EH fluid pressure The test shall independently

-

31. Reactor Trip Breaker M verify operability of the under-
a. Undervoltage Trip Logic N.A. N.A. M voltage and shunt trip attachments
b. Shunt Trip Logic . N.A. N.A. M
32. Reactor Coolant Pressure N.A. R. N.A.
33. Auxiliary Feedwater
a. Steam Generator Water Level s R M Low-Low
b. RCP Undervoltage s R M
c. s. I. (All Safety Injection surveillance requirements)
d. Station Blackout N.A. R N.A.
e. Main Feedwater Pump Trip N.A. N.A. R I-'

I 00

--

  • Page 4.1-8a is deleted. Item 34, Loss of Power, also appears on page 4.1-9.

The legend at the bottom of page 4.1-8a has also been moved to page 4.1-9 *

  • TABLE 4.1-1 (Continued)

Channel Description Check Calibrate. Test Remarks

34. Loss of Power
a. 4.16 KV Emergency Bus Under- N.A. R M voltage (Loss of Voltage)
b. 4.16 KV Emergency Bus Under- N.A. R M voltage .(Degraded Voltage) 3.5. Control Room Chlorine Detectors s R M
36. Manual Reactor Trip N.A. N.A. R The test shall independently verify the operability of the I undervoltage and shunt trip attachments for the manual reactor trip function. The test shall also verify the operability of the bypass breaker trip circuit.
37. Reactor Trip Bypass Breaker
a. Undervoltage attachment N.A. N.A. M Test prior to placing in service
b. Shunt trip attachment N.A. N.A. R S - Each shift M - Monthly D - Daily P Prior to each startup if not done previous week W Weekly R Each Refueling Shutdown N.A. - Not applicable BW - Every two weeks SA - Semiannually AP - After each startup if not. done previous week Q - Every 90 effective full power days

~I

  • See Specification 4.lD I-'

I

  • .

' *" .

  • ATTACHMENT 2
  • DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES

~-----===-----*- --~ .

.

" I ,..,..' ,*'),

e

  • SAFETY EVALUATION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PROPOSED CHANGE This supplemental proposed change to the Technical Specification provides clarification for the required testing of the reactor trip breakers, reactor trip bypass breakers and the manual scram switches; and provides further definition of operability for the reactor trip breakers. To meet the guidance of the Generic Letter 85-09, "Technical Specifications for Generic Letter 83-28, item 4 .3," a supplemental proposed change is submitted to provide a Limiting Condition for Operation for the reactor trip breakers; and adminis-trative notes to clarify the surveillance testing requirements for the reactor trip breakers, reactor trip bypass breakers, and the manual scram switches.

50.59 Safety Review Pursuant to 10CFRS0.59, we have reviewed the supplemental proposed change and have concluded that no unreviewed safety question exists: In that, (i) The

  • probability of occurrence or the consequences of an accident or malfunction of equipment importantant to safety is not increased by these supplemental changes. One change redefines the operability of the reactor trip breaker with one of the diverse trip features (undervoltage or shunt trip attachments) inoperable. Since either trip feature being operable would initiate a reactor trip the probability of occurrence or consequence of an accident or malfunction of equipment important to safety is not increased from that previously evaluated in the UFSAR, (ii) The possibility of a different type of accident other than discussed in the UFSAR has not been created by this supplemental proposed change. The proposed changes are bounded by the previous submittal and no new or different type of accidents are created by this additional change. (iii) The margin of safety as defined in the basis for any Technical Specification is not reduced by this change. The proposed changes provide further definition of reactor trip breaker operability and clarification of surveillance test requirements for the reactor trip and reactor trip bypass breakers, and the manual scram switches. These supplemental changes are bounded by the previous submittal and do not*reduce
  • the margin of safety *

e* Page 2

  • 50.92 Significant Hazards Review The supplemental proposed changes do not pose a significant hazards considera-tion as definec:I in 10CFR50. 92. The Commission has provided examples of changes that constitute no significant safety hazards consideration in Federal Regiiter, Volume 48, page 14870. Example (ii) consist of additional limita-tion, restrictions or controls beyond those presently specified in the Technical Specifications. Example (vii) consists of a change to make the licensee conform to changes in Commission guidances. The supplemental proposed change is similar to example (ii) in that it clarifies the intent of the su.rveill~nce testing requirements for reactor trip and reactor trip bypass breakers, and the manual scram switches. Specifically, the Technical Specification requires independent testing of the undervoltage and shunt trip attachments in the reactor trip and reactor trip bypass breakers. In addition
  • the p*roposed change is similar to example (vii) in that it clarifies operability of the reactor trip breakers in the action statement.

Specifically the Commission's guidance, in Generic Letter 85-09, permits power operation of the reactor with one (1) of the diverse trip features of a reactor-trip breaker (undervoltage or shunt trip attachment) inoperable for up to 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br /> prior to shuting down.

Based on the above we concluded that this proposed Technical Specification supplemental change does not involve an unreviewed safety question as defined in 10CFR50.59 nor a significant hazards consideration as defined in 10CFR50.92.

ETS/acm/m045