LR-N11-0123, Submittal of 2010 Annual Environmental Operating Report: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 0 PSEG Nuclear LLC Environmental Protection Plan 5.4.1 APR 2:7 2011 LR-N11-0123 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Hope Creek Generating Station Facility Operating License No. NPF-57 NRC Docket No. 50-354 | {{#Wiki_filter:PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 0 PSEG Nuclear LLC Environmental Protection Plan 5.4.1 APR 2:7 2011 LR-N11-0123 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Hope Creek Generating Station Facility Operating License No. NPF-57 NRC Docket No. 50-354 | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
2010 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT The attached 2010 Annual Environmental Operating Report is hereby submitted pursuant to Subsection 5.4.1 of the Environmental Protection Plan (Non-radiological) for Hope Creek Generating Station. The Environmental Protection Plan is Appendix B to Facility Operating License NPF-57 (Docket No. 50-354).There are no regulatory commitments in this correspondence. | 2010 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT The attached 2010 Annual Environmental Operating Report is hereby submitted pursuant to Subsection 5.4.1 of the Environmental Protection Plan (Non-radiological) for Hope Creek Generating Station. The Environmental Protection Plan is Appendix B to Facility Operating License NPF-57 (Docket No. 50-354). | ||
There are no regulatory commitments in this correspondence. | |||
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Christopher White at (856) 339-3301 or by e-mail at christopher.white@pseg.com. | If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Christopher White at (856) 339-3301 or by e-mail at christopher.white@pseg.com. | ||
Sincerely, Lawrence M. W er Hope Creek Plant Manager | Sincerely, Lawrence M. W er Hope Creek Plant Manager | ||
==Attachment:== | ==Attachment:== | ||
2010 Annual Environmental Operating Report 95-2168 REV. 7/99 | |||
LR-N11-0123 Document Control Desk Page 2 C Mr. W. Dean, Administrator - Region I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. Rick Ennis, Licensing Project Manager - HC U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Mail Stop 8B 1A Rockville, MD 20852 USNRC Senior Resident Inspector - Hope Creek Mail Code (X24) | |||
-Region I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. Rick Ennis, Licensing Project Manager -HC U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Mail Stop 8B 1A Rockville, MD 20852 USNRC Senior Resident Inspector | Mr. Patrick Mulligan, Manager IV Bureau of Nuclear Engineering P.O. Box 415 Trenton, NJ 08625-0415 Hope Creek Commitment Tracking Coordinator (H02) | ||
-Hope Creek Mail Code (X24)Mr. Patrick Mulligan, Manager IV Bureau of Nuclear Engineering P.O. Box 415 Trenton, NJ 08625-0415 Hope Creek Commitment Tracking Coordinator (H02) | |||
LR-N11-0123 Document Control Desk Attachment (5 Pages) 2010 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL) | |||
January 1 through December 31, 2010 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-57 PSEG NUCLEAR LLC P.O. BOX 236 HANCOCKS BRIDGE, NEW JERSEY 08038 APRIL 2011 | |||
LR-N11 -0123 Document Control Desk Attachment TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Pi | |||
==1.0 INTRODUCTION== | ==1.0 INTRODUCTION== | ||
1 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACTIVITIES 1 2.1. AQUATIC ISSUES 1 | |||
'2.2 TERRESTRIAL ISSUES 2 3.0 EPP COMPLIANCE STATUS 3 3.1 EPP NONCOMPLIANCES 3 3.2 REVIEW 3 4.0 CHANGES IN STATION DESIGN OR OPERATION 3 5.0 NONROUTINE REPORTS 3 | |||
This 2010 Annual Environmental Operating Report (AEOR) for the Hope Creek..Generating Station was prepared in accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of Appendix B to Facility Operating License No. NPF-57, Environmental Protection Plan (Non-radiological). | LR-N1 1-0123 Document Control Desk Attachment Page 1 | ||
The reporting requirements of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) became effective April 11, 1986, with the issuance of the initial Hope Creek Operating License (NPF-57).This is the 26th AEOR submitted for Hope Creek Generating Station. It corresponds to the reporting period January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.Hope Creek Generating Station produced 9,478,384 megawatt-hours of net electrical energy during this period...As required by Subsection 5.4.1 of the EPP, we have included summaries and analyses of all required environmental protection activities. | |||
This information is described in Section 2.0. Section 3.0 addresses the issue of EPP compliance. | ==1.0 INTRODUCTION== | ||
Changes to station design or operation and the review for potentially significant unreviewed environmental questions are addressed in Section 4.0.Administrative review procedures and unusual and/or important environmental events are discussed in Section 5.0.2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACTIVITIES | |||
.2.1; AQUATIC ISSUES Subsection 4.2.1 of the EPP references the Clean Water Act as the mechanism forlprotecting aquatic biota through water quality monitoring. | This 2010 Annual Environmental Operating Report (AEOR) for the Hope Creek | ||
The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) relies upon the State of New Jersey, acting under the authority of the Clean Water Act, to insure applicable requirements for aquatic monitoring are implemented. | ..Generating Station was prepared in accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of Appendix B to Facility Operating License No. NPF-57, Environmental Protection Plan (Non-radiological). The reporting requirements of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) became effective April 11, 1986, with the issuance of the initial Hope Creek Operating License (NPF-57). | ||
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) is the state's regulatory agency.The state of New Jersey requires as part of their New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES) permit program that effluent monitoring be performed, with the results summarized and submitted monthly on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms. The monitoring is intended to determine compliance with permit (NJPDES No. NJ002541 1) effluent limitations. | This is the 26th AEOR submitted for Hope Creek Generating Station. It corresponds to the reporting period January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010. | ||
We have LR-N 11-0123 Document Control Desk Attachment Page 2 reviewed the DMR's corresponding to the 2010 AEOR reporting period and have determined that no significant deviations have occurred. | Hope Creek Generating Station produced 9,478,384 megawatt-hours of net electrical energy during this period. | ||
Copies of monthly* DMR's are routinely sent to USNRC's Document Control Desk and additional copies are available upon request.Oni December 31, 2002, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) issued a Final New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES) Permit that authorizes the continued discharge of cooling tower blowdown and other effluents from the Hope Creek Generating Station to the Delaware River. The Permit was effective on March 1, 2003 and contains conditions and limitations for continued compliance with the federal and state Clean Water Act (CWA) and the NJDEP's regulations. | ..As required by Subsection 5.4.1 of the EPP, we have included summaries and analyses of all required environmental protection activities. This information is described in Section 2.0. Section 3.0 addresses the issue of EPP compliance. | ||
Changes to station design or operation and the review for potentially significant unreviewed environmental questions are addressed in Section 4.0. | |||
Administrative review procedures and unusual and/or important environmental events are discussed in Section 5.0. | |||
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACTIVITIES | |||
.2.1; AQUATIC ISSUES Subsection 4.2.1 of the EPP references the Clean Water Act as the mechanism forlprotecting aquatic biota through water quality monitoring. The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) relies upon the State of New Jersey, acting under the authority of the Clean Water Act, to insure applicable requirements for aquatic monitoring are implemented. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) is the state's regulatory agency. | |||
The state of New Jersey requires as part of their New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES) permit program that effluent monitoring be performed, with the results summarized and submitted monthly on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms. The monitoring is intended to determine compliance with permit (NJPDES No. NJ002541 1) effluent limitations. We have | |||
LR-N 11-0123 Document Control Desk Attachment Page 2 reviewed the DMR's corresponding to the 2010 AEOR reporting period and have determined that no significant deviations have occurred. Copies of monthly | |||
*DMR's are routinely sent to USNRC's Document Control Desk and additional copies are available upon request. | |||
Oni December 31, 2002, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) issued a Final New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES) Permit that authorizes the continued discharge of cooling tower blowdown and other effluents from the Hope Creek Generating Station to the Delaware River. The Permit was effective on March 1, 2003 and contains conditions and limitations for continued compliance with the federal and state Clean Water Act (CWA) and the NJDEP's regulations. | |||
On, January 31, 2005 the NJDEP issued a major modification to the NJPDES permit to correct technical errors contained in the original Permit. The NJPDES Permit retains substantially similar effluent limitations and conditions, including chemical-specific requirements and system operational requirements. | On, January 31, 2005 the NJDEP issued a major modification to the NJPDES permit to correct technical errors contained in the original Permit. The NJPDES Permit retains substantially similar effluent limitations and conditions, including chemical-specific requirements and system operational requirements. | ||
On August 31, 2007, PSEG Nuclear submitted a comprehensive request for renewal of the NJPDES Permit. The current NJPDES permit is administratively.continued pending action by NJDEP relative to the NJPDES permit renewal application. | On August 31, 2007, PSEG Nuclear submitted a comprehensive request for renewal of the NJPDES Permit. The current NJPDES permit is administratively | ||
While the NRC relies on the State of New Jersey for protection of the water.quality, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) maintains regulatory authority with respect to certain migratory threatened and endangered aquatic species. On May 15, 1993 the NMFS issued a revised Section 7 Consultation, Biological Opinion. The revision removed all requirements for marine life monitoring at the Hope Creek Generating Station. This revision was incorporated into the Facility Operating License No. NPF-57 through Amendment No. 60.2.2 TERRESTRIAL ISSUES PSEG NUCLEAR LLC has been voluntarily monitoring the osprey population that nest on our transmission towers through a joint effort with the NJDEP since 1989. | .continued pending action by NJDEP relative to the NJPDES permit renewal application. | ||
LR-N1.1-0123 Document Control Desk Attachment Page 3 3.0 EPP COMPLIANCE STATUS 3.11 EPP NONCOMPLIANCES Subsection 5.4.1 of the EPP requires a list of EPP noncompliances and the corrective actions taken to remedy them. No previously unreviewed | While the NRC relies on the State of New Jersey for protection of the water | ||
* environmental impacts attributable to the operation of the Hope Creek Generating Station were observed during 2010. Likewise, there were no instances of noncompliance with the EPP.3.2 REVIEW Subsection 5.1 of the EPP for Hope Creek Generating Station requires that an independent review of compliance with the EPP be maintained and made available for inspection. | .quality, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) maintains regulatory authority with respect to certain migratory threatened and endangered aquatic species. On May 15, 1993 the NMFS issued a revised Section 7 Consultation, Biological Opinion. The revision removed all requirements for marine life monitoring at the Hope Creek Generating Station. This revision was incorporated into the Facility Operating License No. NPF-57 through Amendment No. 60. | ||
Compliance with the EPP was reviewed as part of the QA Assessment Program in 2008. No substantive findings were identified and a copy of the review is available for inspection. | 2.2 TERRESTRIAL ISSUES PSEG NUCLEAR LLC has been voluntarily monitoring the osprey population that nest on our transmission towers through a joint effort with the NJDEP since 1989. | ||
A triennial compliance review of the EPP is scheduled for 2011.4.0 CHANGES IN STATION DESIGN OR OPERATION Puisuant to the requirements of Section 3.1 of the EPP, station design/operational changes during the time period covered by this report were reviewed for potential environmental impact. None of the recommended changes posed a potential to significantly affect the environment, and therefore, none involved an unreviewed environmental question or a change in the EPP.I 5.0 :NONROUTINE REPORTS Subsection 5.4.1 of the EPP requires that a list of nonroutine reports (submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.2 of the EPP) be included as part of the Annual Operating Environmental Report. No environmentally related nonroutine reports were submitted to the USNRC in 2010.Hope Creek Generating Station experienced no unusual or important events (in accordance with section 4.1 of the EPP) that indicated or could have resulted in a"significant environmental impact" during the 2010 reporting period.}} | |||
LR-N1.1-0123 Document Control Desk Attachment Page 3 3.0 EPP COMPLIANCE STATUS 3.11 EPP NONCOMPLIANCES Subsection 5.4.1 of the EPP requires a list of EPP noncompliances and the corrective actions taken to remedy them. No previously unreviewed | |||
*environmental impacts attributable to the operation of the Hope Creek Generating Station were observed during 2010. Likewise, there were no instances of noncompliance with the EPP. | |||
3.2 REVIEW Subsection 5.1 of the EPP for Hope Creek Generating Station requires that an independent review of compliance with the EPP be maintained and made available for inspection. Compliance with the EPP was reviewed as part of the QA Assessment Program in 2008. No substantive findings were identified and a copy of the review is available for inspection. A triennial compliance review of the EPP is scheduled for 2011. | |||
4.0 CHANGES IN STATION DESIGN OR OPERATION Puisuant to the requirements of Section 3.1 of the EPP, station design/operational changes during the time period covered by this report were reviewed for potential environmental impact. None of the recommended changes posed a potential to significantly affect the environment, and therefore, none involved an unreviewed environmental question or a change in the EPP. | |||
I 5.0 :NONROUTINE REPORTS Subsection 5.4.1 of the EPP requires that a list of nonroutine reports (submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.2 of the EPP) be included as part of the Annual Operating Environmental Report. No environmentally related nonroutine reports were submitted to the USNRC in 2010. | |||
Hope Creek Generating Station experienced no unusual or important events (in accordance with section 4.1 of the EPP) that indicated or could have resulted in a "significant environmental impact" during the 2010 reporting period.}} |
Latest revision as of 01:05, 13 November 2019
ML111260022 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Hope Creek ![]() |
Issue date: | 04/27/2011 |
From: | Wagner L Public Service Enterprise Group |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
LR-N11-0123 | |
Download: ML111260022 (7) | |
Text
PSEG Nuclear LLC P.O. Box 236, Hancocks Bridge, New Jersey 08038-0236 0 PSEG Nuclear LLC Environmental Protection Plan 5.4.1 APR 2:7 2011 LR-N11-0123 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Hope Creek Generating Station Facility Operating License No. NPF-57 NRC Docket No. 50-354
Subject:
2010 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT The attached 2010 Annual Environmental Operating Report is hereby submitted pursuant to Subsection 5.4.1 of the Environmental Protection Plan (Non-radiological) for Hope Creek Generating Station. The Environmental Protection Plan is Appendix B to Facility Operating License NPF-57 (Docket No. 50-354).
There are no regulatory commitments in this correspondence.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. Christopher White at (856) 339-3301 or by e-mail at christopher.white@pseg.com.
Sincerely, Lawrence M. W er Hope Creek Plant Manager
Attachment:
2010 Annual Environmental Operating Report 95-2168 REV. 7/99
LR-N11-0123 Document Control Desk Page 2 C Mr. W. Dean, Administrator - Region I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 475 Allendale Road King of Prussia, PA 19406 Mr. Rick Ennis, Licensing Project Manager - HC U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint North 11555 Rockville Pike Mail Stop 8B 1A Rockville, MD 20852 USNRC Senior Resident Inspector - Hope Creek Mail Code (X24)
Mr. Patrick Mulligan, Manager IV Bureau of Nuclear Engineering P.O. Box 415 Trenton, NJ 08625-0415 Hope Creek Commitment Tracking Coordinator (H02)
LR-N11-0123 Document Control Desk Attachment (5 Pages) 2010 ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT (NON-RADIOLOGICAL)
January 1 through December 31, 2010 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-57 PSEG NUCLEAR LLC P.O. BOX 236 HANCOCKS BRIDGE, NEW JERSEY 08038 APRIL 2011
LR-N11 -0123 Document Control Desk Attachment TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Pi
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACTIVITIES 1 2.1. AQUATIC ISSUES 1
'2.2 TERRESTRIAL ISSUES 2 3.0 EPP COMPLIANCE STATUS 3 3.1 EPP NONCOMPLIANCES 3 3.2 REVIEW 3 4.0 CHANGES IN STATION DESIGN OR OPERATION 3 5.0 NONROUTINE REPORTS 3
LR-N1 1-0123 Document Control Desk Attachment Page 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This 2010 Annual Environmental Operating Report (AEOR) for the Hope Creek
..Generating Station was prepared in accordance with Subsection 5.4.1 of Appendix B to Facility Operating License No. NPF-57, Environmental Protection Plan (Non-radiological). The reporting requirements of the Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) became effective April 11, 1986, with the issuance of the initial Hope Creek Operating License (NPF-57).
This is the 26th AEOR submitted for Hope Creek Generating Station. It corresponds to the reporting period January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
Hope Creek Generating Station produced 9,478,384 megawatt-hours of net electrical energy during this period.
..As required by Subsection 5.4.1 of the EPP, we have included summaries and analyses of all required environmental protection activities. This information is described in Section 2.0. Section 3.0 addresses the issue of EPP compliance.
Changes to station design or operation and the review for potentially significant unreviewed environmental questions are addressed in Section 4.0.
Administrative review procedures and unusual and/or important environmental events are discussed in Section 5.0.
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACTIVITIES
.2.1; AQUATIC ISSUES Subsection 4.2.1 of the EPP references the Clean Water Act as the mechanism forlprotecting aquatic biota through water quality monitoring. The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) relies upon the State of New Jersey, acting under the authority of the Clean Water Act, to insure applicable requirements for aquatic monitoring are implemented. The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) is the state's regulatory agency.
The state of New Jersey requires as part of their New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES) permit program that effluent monitoring be performed, with the results summarized and submitted monthly on Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) forms. The monitoring is intended to determine compliance with permit (NJPDES No. NJ002541 1) effluent limitations. We have
LR-N 11-0123 Document Control Desk Attachment Page 2 reviewed the DMR's corresponding to the 2010 AEOR reporting period and have determined that no significant deviations have occurred. Copies of monthly
- DMR's are routinely sent to USNRC's Document Control Desk and additional copies are available upon request.
Oni December 31, 2002, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) issued a Final New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES) Permit that authorizes the continued discharge of cooling tower blowdown and other effluents from the Hope Creek Generating Station to the Delaware River. The Permit was effective on March 1, 2003 and contains conditions and limitations for continued compliance with the federal and state Clean Water Act (CWA) and the NJDEP's regulations.
On, January 31, 2005 the NJDEP issued a major modification to the NJPDES permit to correct technical errors contained in the original Permit. The NJPDES Permit retains substantially similar effluent limitations and conditions, including chemical-specific requirements and system operational requirements.
On August 31, 2007, PSEG Nuclear submitted a comprehensive request for renewal of the NJPDES Permit. The current NJPDES permit is administratively
.continued pending action by NJDEP relative to the NJPDES permit renewal application.
While the NRC relies on the State of New Jersey for protection of the water
.quality, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) maintains regulatory authority with respect to certain migratory threatened and endangered aquatic species. On May 15, 1993 the NMFS issued a revised Section 7 Consultation, Biological Opinion. The revision removed all requirements for marine life monitoring at the Hope Creek Generating Station. This revision was incorporated into the Facility Operating License No. NPF-57 through Amendment No. 60.
2.2 TERRESTRIAL ISSUES PSEG NUCLEAR LLC has been voluntarily monitoring the osprey population that nest on our transmission towers through a joint effort with the NJDEP since 1989.
LR-N1.1-0123 Document Control Desk Attachment Page 3 3.0 EPP COMPLIANCE STATUS 3.11 EPP NONCOMPLIANCES Subsection 5.4.1 of the EPP requires a list of EPP noncompliances and the corrective actions taken to remedy them. No previously unreviewed
- environmental impacts attributable to the operation of the Hope Creek Generating Station were observed during 2010. Likewise, there were no instances of noncompliance with the EPP.
3.2 REVIEW Subsection 5.1 of the EPP for Hope Creek Generating Station requires that an independent review of compliance with the EPP be maintained and made available for inspection. Compliance with the EPP was reviewed as part of the QA Assessment Program in 2008. No substantive findings were identified and a copy of the review is available for inspection. A triennial compliance review of the EPP is scheduled for 2011.
4.0 CHANGES IN STATION DESIGN OR OPERATION Puisuant to the requirements of Section 3.1 of the EPP, station design/operational changes during the time period covered by this report were reviewed for potential environmental impact. None of the recommended changes posed a potential to significantly affect the environment, and therefore, none involved an unreviewed environmental question or a change in the EPP.
I 5.0 :NONROUTINE REPORTS Subsection 5.4.1 of the EPP requires that a list of nonroutine reports (submitted in accordance with Subsection 5.4.2 of the EPP) be included as part of the Annual Operating Environmental Report. No environmentally related nonroutine reports were submitted to the USNRC in 2010.
Hope Creek Generating Station experienced no unusual or important events (in accordance with section 4.1 of the EPP) that indicated or could have resulted in a "significant environmental impact" during the 2010 reporting period.