ML12091A063: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Billoch, Araceli Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 9:04 AM To: Hightower, Richard
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                         Billoch, Araceli Sent:                         Wednesday, March 28, 2012 9:04 AM To:                           Hightower, Richard


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2 - Acceptance Review for Request for Technical Specifications Change Regarding Correct ions to Table 3.3.1-1 Note 1 (TAC No.
H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2 - Acceptance Review for Request for Technical Specifications Change Regarding Corrections to Table 3.3.1-1 Note 1 (TAC No.
ME8225)Attachments:
ME8225)
image001.gif
Attachments:                 image001.gif


==Dear Mr. Hightower,==
==Dear Mr. Hightower,==


By letter dated March 16, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12083A292), Carolina Power and Light Company, submitted a license amendment request for H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2. The proposed change would make corrections in Technical Specification Table 3.3.1-1 for Overtemperature Delta Temperature (OTT) consistent with NUREG-1431, "Standard Technical Specification Westinghouse Plants," Revision 3.
By letter dated March 16, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)
Accession No. ML12083A292), Carolina Power and Light Company, submitted a license amendment request for H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2. The proposed change would make corrections in Technical Specification Table 3.3.1-1 for Overtemperature Delta Temperature (OTT) consistent with NUREG-1431, Standard Technical Specification Westinghouse Plants, Revision 3.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3302.
Araceli T. Billoch Colón Project Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Tel. 301-415-3302 1


The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_PMDA Email Number:           309 Mail Envelope Properties       (Araceli.Billoch@nrc.gov20120328090300)
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review
 
as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
 
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3302.
 
Araceli T. Billoch Colón                    Project Manager            Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation            U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission            Tel. 301-415-3302
 
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 309   Mail Envelope Properties   (Araceli.Billoch@nrc.gov20120328090300)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2 - Acceptance Review for Request for Technical Specifications Change Regarding Corrections to Table 3.3.1-1 Note 1 (TAC No. ME8225) Sent Date:   3/28/2012 9:03:37 AM Received Date: 3/28/2012 9:03:00 AM From:   Billoch, Araceli Created By:   Araceli.Billoch@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Hightower, Richard" <richard.hightower@pgnmail.com> Tracking Status: None  
H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2 - Acceptance Review for Request for Technical Specifications Change Regarding Corrections to Table 3.3.1-1 Note 1 (TAC No. ME8225)
 
Sent Date:               3/28/2012 9:03:37 AM Received Date:           3/28/2012 9:03:00 AM From:                   Billoch, Araceli Created By:             Araceli.Billoch@nrc.gov Recipients:
Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   2172     3/28/2012 9:03:00 AM image001.gif   1332
"Hightower, Richard" <richard.hightower@pgnmail.com>
 
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   Yes   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Files                             Size                     Date & Time MESSAGE                           2172                   3/28/2012 9:03:00 AM image001.gif                     1332 Options Priority:                         Standard Return Notification:             No Reply Requested:                 Yes Sensitivity:                     Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 06:34, 12 November 2019

Acceptance Review for Request for Technical Specifications Change Regarding Corrections to Table 3.3.1-1 Note 1
ML12091A063
Person / Time
Site: Robinson Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/28/2012
From: Billoch-Colon A
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
To: Hightower R
Progress Energy Co
References
TAC ME8225
Download: ML12091A063 (3)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Billoch, Araceli Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2012 9:04 AM To: Hightower, Richard

Subject:

H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2 - Acceptance Review for Request for Technical Specifications Change Regarding Corrections to Table 3.3.1-1 Note 1 (TAC No.

ME8225)

Attachments: image001.gif

Dear Mr. Hightower,

By letter dated March 16, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS)

Accession No. ML12083A292), Carolina Power and Light Company, submitted a license amendment request for H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2. The proposed change would make corrections in Technical Specification Table 3.3.1-1 for Overtemperature Delta Temperature (OTT) consistent with NUREG-1431, Standard Technical Specification Westinghouse Plants, Revision 3.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3302.

Araceli T. Billoch Colón Project Manager Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Tel. 301-415-3302 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 309 Mail Envelope Properties (Araceli.Billoch@nrc.gov20120328090300)

Subject:

H.B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2 - Acceptance Review for Request for Technical Specifications Change Regarding Corrections to Table 3.3.1-1 Note 1 (TAC No. ME8225)

Sent Date: 3/28/2012 9:03:37 AM Received Date: 3/28/2012 9:03:00 AM From: Billoch, Araceli Created By: Araceli.Billoch@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Hightower, Richard" <richard.hightower@pgnmail.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2172 3/28/2012 9:03:00 AM image001.gif 1332 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: Yes Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: