05000458/FIN-2010005-06: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| CCA = N/A for ROP | | CCA = N/A for ROP | ||
| INPO aspect = | | INPO aspect = | ||
| description = Procedure, EN-QV-111, Training and Certification of Inspection/Verification and Examination Personnel, Section 4.0 [4](i), requires that the Entergy corporate ANSI Level III inspector shall perform periodic (annual) surveillances of quality control inspection activities to ensure that the program is being adequately implemented and maintained. Contrary to the above, no surveillances of quality control inspection activities were performed for any Entergy site during calendar year 2008. The issue was not suitable for quantitative significance determination, so it was assessed using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix M, so it was evaluated using the qualitative criteria listed in Table 4.1. This finding was determined to be of very low safety significance because other quality assurance program functions remained unaffected by this performance deficiency, so defense-in-depth continued to exist. This issue was entered into the licensee's corrective action program as Condition Report CR-HQN-2009-00111. | | description = Procedure, EN-QV-111, Training and Certification of Inspection/Verification and Examination Personnel, Section 4.0 [4](i), requires that the Entergy corporate ANSI Level III inspector shall perform periodic (annual) surveillances of quality control inspection activities to ensure that the program is being adequately implemented and maintained. Contrary to the above, no surveillances of quality control inspection activities were performed for any Entergy site during calendar year 2008. The issue was not suitable for quantitative significance determination, so it was assessed using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Appendix M, so it was evaluated using the qualitative criteria listed in Table 4.1. This finding was determined to be of very low safety significance because other quality assurance program functions remained unaffected by this performance deficiency, so defense-in-depth continued to exist. This issue was entered into the licensee\'s corrective action program as Condition Report CR-HQN-2009-00111. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 20:40, 20 February 2018
| Site: | River Bend  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000458/2010005 Section 4OA7 |
| Date counted | Dec 31, 2010 (2010Q4) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | Licensee-identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | |
| Inspectors (proximate) | B Correll N Greene P Prescott L Carson D Jones A Barrett T Burns R Hagar G Larkin V Gaddy R Latta |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |