ML17193A363: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17193A363
| number = ML17193A363
| issue date = 07/12/2017
| issue date = 07/12/2017
| title = Oconee 2016-302 Admin Items 2C - Delay Release 2 Yrs
| title = 2016-302 Admin Items 2C - Delay Release 2 Yrs
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II

Revision as of 07:43, 6 April 2019

2016-302 Admin Items 2C - Delay Release 2 Yrs
ML17193A363
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/12/2017
From:
NRC/RGN-II
To:
References
Download: ML17193A363 (47)


Text

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility:

Oconee Date of Examination: 12/05/2016 Examination Level: RO X SRO Operating Test Number:

1 Administrative Topic (see Note) Type Code* Describe activity to be performed Conduct of Operations

[KA: G2.1.4 5 (4.3/4.3)] (20 min) D , R A DM-110 , Diverse Verification of Reactor Power (RO & SRO) Conduct of Operations

[KA: G2.1.2 0 (4.6/4.6)] (20 min) M , R A DM-1 11 , Perform Manual RCS Leakage Calculation (RO Only)

Equipment Control

[KA: G2.2.1 4 (3.9/4.3)] (30 min) D , R A DM-20 5 , Determine LTOP Requirements (RO Only) Radiological Control

[KA: G2.3.12 (3.2/3.7)] (20 min) M , R A DM-305, Determine Posting and Access Requirements of LPI Room Based on Plan View (RO & SRO) Emergency Plan N/A NOTE: All items (five total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only four items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics (which would require all five items)

.

  • Type Codes & Criteria:

(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from (N)ew or (M)odified from

ES-301 Administrative Topics Outline Form ES-301-1 Facility:

Oconee Date of Examination: 12/05/2016 Examination Level: RO SRO X Operating Test Number:

1 Administrative Topic (see Note) Type Code* Describe activity to be performed Conduct of Operations

[KA: G2.1.45 (4.3/4.3)]

(20 min) D , R ADM-110, Diverse Verification of Reactor Power (RO & SRO) Conduct of Operations

[KA: G2.1.4 (3.3/3.8)] (15 min) D , R A DM-S10 8 , Determine if SRO License Requirements are Met (SRO Only)

Equipment Control

[KA: G2.2.1 4 (3.9/4.3)] (30 min) N , R A DM-S20 4 , Determine LTOP Requirements and Any Required Actions (SRO Only)

Radiological Control

[KA: G2.3.12 (3.2/3.7)]

(20 min) M , R A DM-305, Determine Posting and Access Requirements of LPI Room Based on Plan View (RO & SRO) Emergency Plan

[KA: G2.4.38 (2.4/4.4)

] (3 0 min) D , R A DM-S40 5 , Determine Emergency Classification and Protective Action Recommendations (Complete Emergency Notification Form)

(SRO Only) NOTE: All items (five total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only four items unless they are retaking only the administrative topics (which would require all five items)

.

  • Type Codes & Criteria:

(C)ontrol room, (S)imulator, or Class(R)oom (D)irect from (N)ew or (M)odified from ES-301 Control Room/In

-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: ___Oconee____________________

Date of Examination: 12/05/2016 Exam Level:

RO X SRO-I SRO-U Operating Test No.: ______

1_______ Control Room Systems

  • 8 for RO; 7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO

-U System / JPM Title Type Code*

Safety Function a. RO-101 b, Align Emergency Boration During an ATWS Unit 1 EOP Rule 1 [KA: BW/E13 EA1.1 (3.4/3.2)

] (10 min) A, M , S 1 b. RO-P 4 03 , Initiate HPI Forced Cooling EOP Rule 4 (Initiate HPI Forced Cooling)

[KA: EPE 074 EA1.08 (4.2/4.2)

] (10 min) D , L, S 4P c. RO-501a, ES Channels 5 and 6 Recovery Unit 1 EOP Encl. 5.41 (ES Recovery)

[KA: APE069 AA2.01 (3.7/4.3)] (10 min) A, D, EN, L, S 5 d. RO-702, Adjust Radiation Monitor Setpoints OP/1-2/A/1104/018 (GWD System

) Encl. 4.9 & 4.10 PT/0/A/230/

001, (Radiation Monitor Check)

[KA: SYS073 A4.01 (3.9/3.9)

] (25 min) D, S 7 e. RO-S404a , Establish EFDW Flow Through Startup Valves EOP Encl. 5.27 (Alternate Methods for Controlling EFDW Flow) [KA: APE054 AA2.04 (4.2/4.3)

] (15 min) D, A, L , S 4S f. RO-80 5a, Perform Required Actions For a Turbine Building Flood AP/1/A/1700/010 (Turbine Building Flood) [KA: APE BW/A07 AA1.3 (3.

3/3.5)] (15 min) D, A, L , S 8 g. RO-604 , Perform a Manual Start of Keowee Hydro Unit 1 OP/0/A/1106/019 Encl. 4.5 (KHU

-1 Manual Startup)

[KA: SYS062 A4.07 (3.1*/3.1*)

] (15 min) D, S 6 h. RO-2 04 , Align letdown with 1HP

-14 failed in Bleed AP/1/A/170/002 (Excessive RCS Leakage)

[KA: SYS002 A2.01 (4.3/4.4)]

(1 5 min) D, S 2 In-Plant Systems

-I); (3 or 2 for SRO

-U)

i. AO-804, AO Actions for Control Room Evacuation AP/1/A/1700/050 Encl. 5.6 (AP/EOP AO Actions for Control Room Evacuation

) [KA: APE068 AA1.07 (4.1/4.2)] (15 min) N, R, E, L 8 j. AO-701 , Restoration of ICS Auto Power AP/1/A/1700/023 Encl. 5.2 (Restoration of ICS Auto Power)

[KA: BW/A02 AA1.3 (3.4/3.6)] (15 min) D, A, E 7 k. AO-S403 , AO Actions for Supply of Water to SSF AP/0/A/1700/046 Encl. 5.9 (Supply of Water to SSF)

[KA: GEN 2.1.20 (4.6/4.6)] (30 min) N, E, L 4S

-I control room (and in

-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all five SRO

-U systems must serve different safety functions; in

-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

  • Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO

-I / SRO-U A)lternate path (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank (E)mergency or abnormal in

-plant (EN)gineered safety feature (L)ow-Power / Shutdown (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A)

(P)revious 2 exams (R)CA (S)imulator 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3

ES-301 Control Room/In

-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: __Oconee_____________________

Date of Examination: _12/05/2016

__ Exam Level:

RO SRO-I X SRO-U Operating Test No.: ______

1_______ Control Room Systems

  • 8 for RO; 7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO

-U System / JPM Title Type Code*

Safety Function a. RO-101 b, Align Emergency Boration During an ATWS Unit 1 EOP Rule 1 [KA: BW/E13 EA1.1 (3.4/3.2)]

(10 min) A, M , S 1 b. RO-P 4 03, Initiate HPI Forced Cooling EOP Rule 4 (Initiate HPI Forced Cooling)

[KA: EPE 074 EA1.08 (4.2/4.2)

] (10 min) D , L, S 4P c. RO-501a, ES Channels 5 and 6 Recovery Unit 1 EOP Encl. 5.41 (ES Recovery)

[KA: APE069 AA2.01 (3.7/4.3)] (10 min)

A, D, EN, L, S 5 d. RO-702, Adjust Radiation Monitor Setpoints OP/1-2/A/1104/018 (GWD System) Encl. 4.9 & 4.10 PT/0/A/230/001, (Radiation Monitor Check)

[KA: SYS073 A4.01 (3.9/3.9)] (25 min)

D, S 7 e. RO-S404a , Establish EFDW Flow Through Startup Valves EOP Encl. 5.27 (Alternate Methods for Controlling EFDW Flow) [KA: APE054 AA2.04 (4.2/4.3)

] (15 min) D, A, L , S 4S f. RO-80 5a, Perform Required Actions For a Turbine Building Flood AP/1/A/1700/010 (Turbine Building Flood) [KA: APE BW/A07 AA1.3 (3.

3/3.5)] (15 min) D, A, L , S 8 g. RO-604, Perform a Manual Start of Keowee Hydro Unit 1 OP/0/A/1106/019 Encl. 4.5 (KHU

-1 Manual Startup)

[KA: SYS062 A4.07 (3.1*/3.1*)] (15 min)

D, S 6 h. N/A In-Plant Systems

-I); (3 or 2 for SRO

-U) i. AO-804, AO Actions for Control Room Evacuation AP/1/A/1700/050 Encl. 5.6 (AP/EOP AO Actions for Control Room Evacuation

) [KA: APE068 AA1.07 (4.1/4.2)] (15 min)

N, R, E, L 8 j. AO-701, Restoration of ICS Auto Power AP/1/A/1700/023 Encl. 5.2 (Restoration of ICS Auto Power)

[KA: BW/A02 AA1.3 (3.4/3.6)] (15 min)

D, A, E 7 k. AO-S403 , AO Actions for Supply of Water to SSF AP/0/A/1700/046 Encl. 5.9 (Supply of Water to SSF)

[KA: GEN 2.1.20 (4.6/4.6)] (30 min)

N, E, L 4S

-I control room (and in

-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all five SRO

-U systems must serve different safety functions; in

-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

  • Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO

-I / SRO-U A)lternate path (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank (E)mergency or abnormal in

-plant (EN)gineered safety feature (L)ow-Power / Shutdown (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A)

(P)revious 2 exams (R)CA (S)imulator 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3 system)

ES-301 Control Room/In

-Plant Systems Outline Form ES-301-2 Facility: __Oconee_____________________

Date of Examination: _12/05/2016

__ Exam Level:

RO SRO-I SRO-U X Operating Test No.: ______

1______ Control Room Systems

  • 8 for RO; 7 for SRO-I; 2 or 3 for SRO

-U System / JPM Title Type Code*

Safety Function a. RO-101 b, Align Emergency Boration During an ATWS Unit 1 EOP Rule 1 [KA: BW/E13 EA1.1 (3.4/3.2)]

(10 min) A, M , S 1 b. RO-P 4 03, Initiate HPI Forced Cooling EOP Rule 4 (Initiate HPI Forced Cooling)

[KA: EPE 074 EA1.08 (4.2/4.2)

] (10 min) D , L, S 4P c. RO-501a, ES Channels 5 and 6 Recovery Unit 1 EOP Encl. 5.41 (ES Recovery)

[KA: APE069 AA2.01 (3.7/4.3)] (10 min)

A, D, EN, L, S 5 d. N/A e. N/A f. N/A g. N/A h. N/A In-Plant Systems

-I); (3 or 2 for SRO

-U) i. AO-804, AO Actions for Control Room Evacuation AP/1/A/1700/050 Encl. 5.6 (AP/EOP AO Actions for Control Room Evacuation

) [KA: APE068 AA1.07 (4.1/4.2)] (15 min)

N, R, E, L 8 j. AO-701, Restoration of ICS Auto Power AP/1/A/1700/023 Encl. 5.2 (Restoration of ICS Auto Power)

[KA: BW/A02 AA1.3 (3.4/3.6)] (15 min)

D, A, E 7 k. N/A

-I control room (and in

-plant) systems must be different and serve different safety functions; all five SRO

-U systems must serve different safety functions; in

-plant systems and functions may overlap those tested in the control room.

  • Type Codes Criteria for RO / SRO

-I / SRO-U A)lternate path (C)ontrol room (D)irect from bank (E)mergency or abnormal in

-plant (EN)gineered safety feature (L)ow-Power / Shutdown (N)ew or (M)odified from bank including 1(A)

(P)revious 2 exams (R)CA (S)imulator 4-6 / 4-6 / 2-3

Final Written Sample Plan is a combination of Draft Approved Sample Plan and ES

-401-4.

1 Oconee 2016

-302 Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws
5. Other 6. B, M, N 7. U, E, S 8. Explanation LOK (F/H) LOD (1-5) Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist Partial Job-Link Minutia # / Units Back ward Q - K/A SRO Only For Bank Questions

- change the location of the correct answer. The purpose is to prevent an applicant from simply recalling the location of the answer on a recently reviewed bank question and get the correct answer knowing little else.

IAW, NUREG

-1021, unsat Qs that appeared on previous NRC exams do not count toward the percentage for determining the quality of the submittal.

1 F 2 B 47Q2 New E S APE008G2.4.34

Modify the first question statement for grammatical correctness. A procedure cannot dispatch an operator, but it can contain guidance, or the requirement, to dispatch an operator to open a breaker.

I.E. 1) The SRO will direct entry into __(AP/02 or AP/44)__,

which contains direction to open a breaker to fail 1RC

-66 closed. Incorporated.

2 H 2 B 43Q3 New E S EPE009EA1.01

The second part of the question appears to be independent of what EOP Enclosure 5.1 states. Can this part of the question be answered by only knowing systems knowledge?

Incorporated.

Plausibility of B(2) and D(2) may not be acceptable because any time a very specific item is compared to a generally stated item, plausibility can be impacted. The second part of the question would be better stated if it tested the intended contrast between ES Channel 3 being required to be reset or not needing to be reset.

I.E. Prior to stopping 1A LPI pump, ES Channel 3 __(is / is not) required to be reset.

Incorporated.

3 H 2 B 39Q4 New E S EPE011G2.4.21 Is it possible to delete the "re

-" from 'B', 'C', and 'D'?

Incorporated.

2 Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws
5. Other 6. B, M, N 7. U, E, S 8. Explanation LOK (F/H) LOD (1-5) Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist Partial Job-Link Minutia # / Units Back ward Q - K/A SRO Only 4 H 2 B 43Q5 New S APE015/017AK2.07 No comments.

5 F 2 x B 46Q5 New U S APE022AK1.01 C(1) and D(1) do not appear to be plausible. RCP shaft binding does not seem credible. What documentation exists that would indicate that shaft binding is a concern with RCPs? New Q. 6 H 2 B 46Q6 New S APE025AA1.03 No comments.

7 H 2 X M 43Q9 U S APE027AK3.03 Will suction always be from the BWST when entering the SGTR Tab? Could suction still be from the LDST if level has not dropped enough and pressure has not lowered enough? The question stem does not state which steps of the EOP Tab have been completed.

Incorporated.

B(2) and D(2) may not be plausible. Any source of water, whether it be from the LDST or BWST, is cold with respect to the pressurizer. A risk of subcooling the pressurizer due to water being sprayed from one of those two tanks does not seem credible because the potential would always be present when using aux spray. Operators would just control spray flow to control pressure

- maybe spray less?

Incorporated.

8 H 2 X B 2009B Q8 New U S EPE029EK1.01 To add plausibility to PORV being open: suggest changing RCS pressure to 2425 psig-I.E. "RCS pressure rises to 2425 psig."

Incorporated.

3 Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws
5. Other 6. B, M, N 7. U, E, S 8. Explanation LOK (F/H) LOD (1-5) Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist Partial Job-Link Minutia # / Units Back ward Q - K/A SRO Only C(1) and D(1) do not appear to be plausible. The first part of the question is only asking about the WHEN, not the magnitude. Any time a heat

-up occurs, temperature is going to act first

- even if rods fully insert into the core, even the most infinitesimal temperature increase will cause a corresponding infinitesimal amount of negative reactivity to be inserted. Furthermore, you are apparently relying on manual rod insertion, which takes time for the psycho

-motor skills of the operator to initiate the negative reactivity insertion. Therefore, the only thing this part of the question really tests is whether an ATWS will cause temp to rise and insert negative reactivity.

Modified and used 5 EFPD to enhance plausibility.

9 H 2 X B 45Q10 42Q10 U S EPE038EA2.03 Discuss the idea of changing 1000 gpm in B(2) and D(2) to 440 gpm. Incorporated.

A(1) and B(1) may not be plausible. Why would an applicant choose the SG with the lower level? Help me understand the misconception that would cause an applicant to choose the SG with the lower level? Why would I ever not pick the SG with the higher level?

Modified stem info.

10 H 2 x N U S APE040AA2.03 C(1) and D(1) do not appear to be plausible. At a glance the applicant can see that one SG is above 900 psig and the other is less than 200 psig-..what misconception would lead an applicant to determine that a LOCA was occurring versus a MSLB? Incorporated.

11 H 2 N S APE054AA2.08 No comments.

12 F 2 M 2009 Q48 S EPE055EK1.01 No comments.

13 H 2 x N U APE056AA1.33

4 Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws
5. Other 6. B, M, N 7. U, E, S 8. Explanation LOK (F/H) LOD (1-5) Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist Partial Job-Link Minutia # / Units Back ward Q - K/A SRO Only S C(1) and D(1) do not appear to be plausible. With no 4160 VAC buses energized, what misconception could an applicant have that would lead them to choose "open"? Consider having only one bus de

-energized and then asking if a specific PORV Block Valve will open.

Incorporated.

14 F 2  ? B 47Q13 New E/U S APE057AK3.01 Can the reasons be deleted in the answer choices and still have four unique choices with one and only one correct answer? It appears that the only information needed to answer the question is the first part of each answer choice.

Incorporated.

15 H 2 B 2009B Q15 New S APE065AK3.04 No comments.

16 H 2 B 44Q16 41Q16 S APE077AK2.03 No comments.

17 H 1 x N U S BWE02G2.1.7 C(1) and D(1) are not plausible due to direct lookup elimination of 0.22x10 6 lbm/hr. The question states that Emergency Feed is being used, not Main Feed. The only place 0.22x10 6 lbm/hr appears is with Main Feed. Providing a reference creates unacceptable plausibility.

Modified. B(2) and D(2) are also not plausible with the reference provided. Determined OK.

18 H 2 B46Q 16 2009Q 18 S BWE04EK2.2 No comments.

5 Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws
5. Other 6. B, M, N 7. U, E, S 8. Explanation LOK (F/H) LOD (1-5) Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist Partial Job-Link Minutia # / Units Back ward Q - K/A SRO Only 19 H 2 N E S APE003AK1.02 Discuss: An AUTO runback occurring without turbine control valves throttling closed-.this is a little confusing and may just require some discussion.

Enhanced.

No other comments at this time.

OK 20 H 2 N S APE005AK2.02 K/A Match note: Reactor Trip is accomplished by opening breakers. No comments.

21 H 2 x N E S APE028AK3.03 C(1) and D(1) may not be plausible. Containment Temperature rising enough to cause reference leg to flash seems a little extreme. Would it be better to change the first part and test IS / IS NOT due to bubble formation in vessel head? Incorporated.

22 F 2 x N U S APE032G2.4.9 K/A requires testing knowledge in the presence of an accident. This question tests only knowledge of loss of SR NIs while performing a general operating procedure.

KA Changed.

- OK. 23 H 2 x B 2009B Q21 2007 NRC Retest E S APE051AK3.01 Vacuum is not provided in the stem of the question.

The first part of the question is independent of the second part. The first part is a hypothetical, which asks for a condition that could cause TBVs to fail closed. The second part of the question asks only for what the EOP directs the operator to do, which includes using TBVs. Discuss placing the vacuum pressure in the stem as well as the turbine header pressure so that the conditions would clearly apply to both parts of the question. Sat after modification.

24 F 2 B E APE061AA2.04

6 Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws
5. Other 6. B, M, N 7. U, E, S 8. Explanation LOK (F/H) LOD (1-5) Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist Partial Job-Link Minutia # / Units Back ward Q - K/A SRO Only 40Q23 New S Does the "RB Evacuation alarm" annunciate locally? If so, then 'B' and 'C' are subsets of each other. More words in the answer choices may be needed to differentiate the choices.

Changed format of Q. OK 25 F 2 x N U S APE067AA1.01 To address the plausibility of B(2) and D(2), the distractors would be more plausible if cylinder pressure was lowered to 175 psig at 0830, or raised to 1200 psig at 0830. Otherwise, it is highly likely operators who know nothing about the se t points will still get the question correct.

Incorporated.

26 H 2 x B 45Q26 40Q15 U S BWA07AA1.3 A(1) and B(1) are not plausible because none of the parameters to determine if HPI forced cooling is required are even stated in the stem. Procedures never direct once

-thru-cooling pre

-emptive to meeting the conditions because you want to exhaust all options before creating a self

-induced LOCA. Consider adding parameters to the stem which must be analyzed for HPI forced cooling.

Added parameters. 27 H 2 x N E S BWE08EK1.3 Discuss deleting the high flow alarm from the stem. This appears to be extra information that is not needed to answer the question. It's deletion would increase the plausibility of the distractors in the first part.

Incorporated.

28 F 2 M 39Q28 S SYS003A1.02 No comments.

29 H 2 N S SYS003A3.03 No comments.

30 H 2 B 2010AQ28 New E S SYS004K3.03 Why is a time stated in the initial conditions? No time is stated in the current conditions. Suggest deleting the time unless there is a specific reason it needs to be stated.

Incorporated.

7 Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws
5. Other 6. B, M, N 7. U, E, S 8. Explanation LOK (F/H) LOD (1-5) Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist Partial Job-Link Minutia # / Units Back ward Q - K/A SRO Only 31 H 2 x B 45Q7 New U S SYS004K5.15 KA Match: How is knowledge of MTC being tested? Demineralizer's affinity for boron is being tested as letdown temperature changes. How is the "-.as it relates to MTC" part of the KA being tested? If negative reactivity is inserted via boron, then negative reactivity must be taken out be withdrawing rods ----- no MTC knowledge is ever tested.

Modified. 32 H 2 x B 44Q30 2009BQ31 S SYS005K6.03 No comments.

33 H 2 B 40Q32 New S SYS006A3.06 No comments.

34 F 2 B 45Q34 2009AQ34 S SYS007G2.2.44 No comments.

35 F 2 N S SYS008A3.08 36 H 1 x x N U S SYS010K5.02 Operational validity of the first part seems to be low, in that it only tests someone's knowledge of a definition. The second part actually tests the operator's knowledge in a more relevant way. In an accident of this type it is way more important for the operator to understand that the temp downstream will be lower as compared to keeping two similar sounding words straight in their head. Recommend replacing the first part of the question.

Deleted. Plausibility of distractors for second part are questionable. To make the choices more acceptable, it may be better to play off of a misconception on how to use the mollier 8 Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws
5. Other 6. B, M, N 7. U, E, S 8. Explanation LOK (F/H) LOD (1-5) Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist Partial Job-Link Minutia # / Units Back ward Q - K/A SRO Only diagram. As it is written now, all I need to understand is that temp will cool down as it is throttled-.I do not need to know anything on how to figure out what downstream temperature to anticipate. In other words, no applicant will even need to crack open the steam tables to figure this out. After peer checks

- others believed modified Q OK.

37 H 2 B 41Q36 New S SYS010K6.02 No comments.

38 M 2 B 39Q67 New S SYS012A2.06 No comments.

39 H 2 B 43Q55 2008-301Q5 5 S SYS013A4.02 No comments.

40 F 2 B 44Q65 40Q40 modifi ed S SYS013K2.01 No comments.

41 F 2 B 42Q40 New S SYS022K3.01 No comments.

42 H 2 N S SYS026A2.07 No comments.

43 H 2 N S SYS039 No comments.

44 H 2 B S SYS059A4.10

9 Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws
5. Other 6. B, M, N 7. U, E, S 8. Explanation LOK (F/H) LOD (1-5) Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist Partial Job-Link Minutia # / Units Back ward Q - K/A SRO Only 47Q24 New No comments.

45 F 2 N S SYS061K1.05 No comments.

46 F 2 N S SYS061K3.01 No comments.

47 H 2 B 41Q45 New S SYS062A1.03 No comments.

48 H 2 B 46Q49 New E S SYS062K4.03

Change "ASSUME NO OPERATOR ACTIONS" to "NO OPERATOR ACTIONS ARE TAKEN." Appendix E instructs the applicants to not make assumptions.

Incorporated.

49 H 2 B 43Q49 2009Q 51modified E S SYS063K4.02

Change "ASSUME NO OPERATOR ACTIONS" to "NO OPERATOR ACTIONS ARE TAKEN." Appendix E instructs the applicants to not make assumptions.

Discuss deleting ONLY from "A". It may be more correct to define what your intention is by stating ONLY. I.E. "being supplied by Battery #1 due to Battery Charger #1 not being energized." Incorporated.

50 F 2 B 4751 New S SYS073 No comments.

51 H 2 B 41Q51 E S SYS076K1.19

10 Q 1. 2. 3. Psychomeric Flaws

4. Job Content Flaws
5. Other 6. B, M, N 7. U, E, S 8. Explanation LOK (F/H) LOD (1-5) Stem Focus Cues T/F Cred. Dist Partial Job-Link Minutia # / Units Back ward Q - K/A SRO Only New Change "ASSUME NO OPERATOR ACTIONS" to "NO OPERATOR ACTIONS ARE TAKEN." Appendix E instructs the applicants to not make assumptions.

Incorporated.

52 F 2 B 41Q50 New S SYS076K2.01 53 F 2 x N U? S SYS078K2.02 Help me understand the plausibility of 3X1 and 3X3. There appears to be better choices for distractors. Discuss changing the distractors to 1XD, 2XF, and 2XP. This will maintain better symmetry by using two choices from two different units and also use some of the other power supplies that power other Worthington backup compressors.

Incorporated.

54 F 2 N S SYS103G2.1.30 Allowing K/A match due to controlling atmosphere in containment penetration room. Difficult KA to meet due to RB being largely inaccessible for most modes of operation.

55 H 2 M 44Q38 S SYS103K4.06 No comments.

56 F 2 N S SYS001K6.03 No comments.

57 - + F 2 x x N E S SYS002A3.01 To ensure one and only one correct answer, would it be safer to move the RBNS level away from the setpoint at 0820? I would suggest raising it to 2 inches so that there is not an argument that it could still be running at 1 inch.

Incorporated.

58 H 2 N E S SYS014A4.02 It appears that extra stuff is presented in the answer choices. Discuss reducing the choices to:

11 A. 1. OFF 2. place Diamond and FDW Loop Masters in MANUAL B. 1. OFF 2. leave ICS in AUTO Etc. Some of original wording remains to ensure one and only one correct answer.

59 H 2 N E S SYS015K5.04 Core Thermal Power Best is defined in the stem as (CTB),

yet in the question statement it is referred to as CTPB? Is an editorial change needed to be consistent?

Incorporated.

Why is the word "ONLY" needed at the end of the first question statement?

Deleted. 60 H 2 N E S SYS041K3.02 When a 50 psig bias is added to the setpoint, does that make the new setpoint just 50 psi higher than the old setpoint, thereby creating a subset issue in that TBVs always open at setpoint unless they are malfunctioning?

To address this, it may be better to be a little more specific on the wording of the answer choices. I.E.: (2) setting as selected on (controller number or name) vs (2) setting as selected on (controller number or name) plus 50 psi.

Modification to wording to address comment.

61 F 2 x M 48Q55 E S SYS029G2.4.46 Can 1RIA-49 receive a HIGH alarm without one of the other alarms that do cause RB Purge to isolate also annunciating?

The reason for this question is to ensure only one answer.

Yes. 62 + F 2 M 40Q61 S SYS033K4.01 No comments.

63 + F 2 N E S SYS072A1.01 Entry into a Tech Spec occurs if the conditions of applicability are met. Be more precise with the question statement and ask if the conditions of the LCO are met or ask if a REQUIRED ACTION is required or not.

Incorporated.

12 64 F 2 x x N U S SYS075A2.03 Is there enough information provided to solicit the correct answer? If the Main Turbine trips at 21.75 inches Hg, what information in the stem is provided that guarantees that to be the case? Conditions modified.

50% Power is a substantially high power level

- it only makes sense that the turbine would trip before the MFW pumps and that the reactor would receive a trip signal from 50%. Discuss. Replaced. 65 F 2 N S SYS079K1.01 No comments.

66 + + H 2 N S G2.1.19 No comments.

67 + H 2 N S G2.1.23 No comments.

68 F 2 x x N E S G2.1.6 The distractors for the first half do not appear plausible when you tell them that the BOP is performing the symptoms check while the OATC is doing IMAs. Discuss combining the first two bullets under Current Conditions and making them state: The OATC and BOP are performing IMAs and Symptoms check iaw OMP 18 (or whatever the appropriate document). This will help avoid the cue which impacts the plausibility.

Incorporated.

69 F 2 B 47Q70 New S G2.2.17 No comments.

70 F 2 B 2009BQ69 E S G2.2.2 Would operators move rods for "imbalance" control or "balance" control?

When balancing rods, is that balancing within a group? If so, is selecting the group really the only actions needed?

OK as-is.

13 All these actions must be performed iaw a procedure. This procedure reference should be stated in the question statement. This procedure should be supplied as part of the question references, or at a minimum the chief examiner needs to be informed of which procedure is directing these actions. Incorporated.

When asking for the MINIMUM actions, if there is any other action for which the author was not aware, then the question has no correct answer. This is a risky question construction method. Addressed.

71 F 2 B 44Q17 New E S G2.2.3 The statement is made in the Discussion section that EOPs direct to have only 1 RCP running during certain conditions.

Please discuss with the chief examiner which EOPs contain this direction and under what circumstances.

OK 72 F 2 B 39Q70 S G2.3.11 No comments.

73 F 2 B 48Q72 New S G2.3.4 No comments.

74 F 2 B 39Q74 S G2.4.39 No comments.

75 H 2 B 40Q13 S G2.4.46 No comments.

14 76 H 2 x N U S APE008AA2.28 A(2) and C(2) do not appear to be plausible. How can a loss of heat transfer be a reasonable misconception when CETs are lowering? By virtue of temp lowering one knows that heat is leaving the RCS without applying much thought. Potentially could be fixed by changing the question statement to test: LOCA CD (IS / IS NOT) required to be initiated.

Modified. 77 H 2 N E S APE015/017AA2.02 What is the purpose for stating that the bearing temp will rise at a constant rate? Will it actually rise at a constant rate? How could an operator predict that the rate will be constsnt. This aspect of the question appears to lack operational validity. It would make more sense to simply test two temperatures, one of which requires the action (190F), and one which is plausible but wrong (225F). Addressed.

Is it wrong for AP

-029 to be used for the power reduction? They have an option to use AP

-016, but w need to discuss if it is unequivocally wrong to use AP

-029. If an argument can be made that power can be lowered using AP

-029, then some minor modification to the wording might be needed.

Addressed.

78 H 2 x B 41Q78 2009BQ78 U S APE025G2.1.20 Question does not appear to be SRO

-only. The question can be answered by only knowing an action and the reason for that action. I have read the justification for SRO

-only supplied with this question as well as that which was supplied with ILT2009BQ78, but I still do not understand how procedure selection knowledge is required.

Q replaced.

79 H 2 x x N U S APE054G2.4.20 Is the correct answer designated on the exam? The question analysis indicates that "C" is the correct answer, yet the upper right hand corner contains a large bolded "A".

To retain plausibility, if needed ensure levels are such that the SGs are not considered dry.

Corrected.

15 Is the question testing the KA at the SRO level? It appears that the caution statement does not contain knowledge that is related to an SRO topic. It would be logical for an RO to know whether the depressurization needed to occur slowly or quickly. Discuss.

Q modified.

Where are the operators within the LOHT tabe at 0810 when the CRS is asked to make a procedure selection? Does it matter which procedure step is being performed? Discuss to ensure there is one and only one correct answer.

Q modified.

80 F 2 N S APE058G2.4.30 81 H 2 x B 2009BQ93 New U S BWE05EA2.2 How is FCD tab (distractors A(2) and C(2)) plausible? With no intact SGs and no ability to put water in them, how does FCD appear credible? What heat transfer mechanism other than SGs is available to facilitate the FCD within that procedure? Modified. 82 H 2 x x M 46Q9 U S APE001G2.4.41 KA Match: How does the continuous rod withdrawal relate to the answer choices?

Can I answer the question only by knowing that the reactor failed to trip from the control room (which is why Rule 1 is in progress)?

Modified to meet KA.

83 F 2 M 41Q83 S APE028AA2.01 No comments.

84 + H 2 N S BWE03EA2.1 No comments. 85 H 2 M 42Q84 S BWE13G2.1.20 No comments.

86 H 2 N S SYS004A2.19 No comments.

87 - H 2 M 43Q89 E S SYS006G2.4.47 Instrument number needs to be added to the graph.

Incorporated.

16 88 H 2 x N U S SYS061A2.03 KA Match: It appears that the second part of the question is testing SRO procedure selection knowledge, but to answer this part of the question no knowledge of loss of DC is required. Discuss.

Q modified.

89 + F 2 N E S SYS062A2.06 Modify the second part of the question. Entry into an LCO is not correct terminology. If the Applicability conditions are met, you are in the LCO. You may meet the conditions of the LCO and no action statements may be required, but you are in the LCO. Therefore, the wording needs to test whether the Conditions of the LCO are met

-OR- if any actions of the LCO are required to be perfo rmed. Q modified.

90 H 2 x N U S SYS063G2.4.2 Q does not appear to be SRO

-only. The Q can be answered by applying systems knowledge coupled with major EOP entry condition knowledge, both of which are required RO knowledge. Discuss.

Q modified.

91 - H 2 M 47Q91 S SYS011G2.2.22 No comments.

92 H 2 B 48Q92 New S SYS016A2.02 No comments.

93 F 2 B 39Q92 S SYS017G2.2.38 No comments.

94 H 2 B 44Q95 S G2.1.32 KA soft match on procedure selection as it applies to system limits of reactor trip on turbine trip and how procedure content will impact those trip features.

95 F 2 B 47Q94 E S G2.1.40 Is the wording of the second part of the correct answer correctly stating the words in the TS Bases? Does the bases 17 discuss the water only in the FTC or does it include all water above the flange?

Incorporated.

96 + F 2 B 16-1 Q95 E S G2.2.11 The question statement in the first part needs to reflect the actual wording of the procedure. The procedure only states that the removal of the change "SHOULD" be within one year.

This is not a requirement. Therefore the question statement needs to reflect that the procedure states "SHOULD."

Incorporated.

97 H 2 M 47Q85 E S G2.2.3 The first question statement states "At this point"? What point? At 1500? More specificity may be needed here.

Incorporated.

98 - H 2 B 46Q98 S G2.3.6 No comments.

99 F 2 M 40Q78 S G2.4.13 No comments.

100 H 2 N S G2.4.44 No comments.