ML092520503: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 09/09/2009 | | issue date = 09/09/2009 | ||
| title = Acceptance Review for TAC ME2158 - Hope Creek Relief Request V-06 | | title = Acceptance Review for TAC ME2158 - Hope Creek Relief Request V-06 | ||
| author name = Ennis R | | author name = Ennis R | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLI-2 | ||
| addressee name = Keenan J | | addressee name = Keenan J | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| docket = 05000354 | | docket = 05000354 | ||
| license number = | | license number = | ||
| contact person = Ennis R | | contact person = Ennis R, NRR/DORL, 415-1420 | ||
| case reference number = TAC ME2158 | | case reference number = TAC ME2158 | ||
| document type = E-Mail | | document type = E-Mail | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Ennis, Rick Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 2:18 PM To: Jeff Keenan Cc: Feintuch, Karl; Lingam, Siva; Paul Duke; Erin West | {{#Wiki_filter:From: Ennis, Rick Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 2:18 PM To: Jeff Keenan Cc: Feintuch, Karl; Lingam, Siva; Paul Duke; Erin West | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review for TAC ME2158 - Hope Creek Relief Request V-06 Jeff, | Acceptance Review for TAC ME2158 - Hope Creek Relief Request V-06 | ||
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) | : Jeff, By letter dated September 1, 2009 (ADAMS Accession No. ML092520040), PSEG Nuclear LLC submitted relief request V-06 for the third 10-year inservice testing (IST) interval for the Hope Creek Generating Station. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. | ||
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
Section 50.55a of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), requires that IST of certain American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (Code) Class 1, 2, and 3 pumps and valves be performed at 120-month (10-year) IST program intervals in accordance with the specified ASME Code and applicable addenda incorporated by reference in the regulations, except where alternatives have been authorized or relief has been requested by the licensee and granted by the NRC pursuant to paragraphs (a)(3)(i), (a)(3)(ii), or (f)(6)(i) of 10 CFR 50.55a. | Section 50.55a of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), requires that IST of certain American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (Code) Class 1, 2, and 3 pumps and valves be performed at 120-month (10-year) IST program intervals in accordance with the specified ASME Code and applicable addenda incorporated by reference in the regulations, except where alternatives have been authorized or relief has been requested by the licensee and granted by the NRC pursuant to paragraphs (a)(3)(i), (a)(3)(ii), or (f)(6)(i) of 10 CFR 50.55a. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | ||
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420. | If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420. | ||
Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (3D27D29AB75BCD4BAE913B63CBFBBEDFDE872722D9) | |||
Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review for TAC ME2158 - Hope Creek Relief Request V-06 | Acceptance Review for TAC ME2158 - Hope Creek Relief Request V-06 | ||
Recipients: | Sent Date: 09/09/2009 2:18:02 PM Received Date: 09/09/2009 2:18:02 PM From: Ennis, Rick Created By: Rick.Ennis@nrc.gov Recipients: | ||
Jeff.Keenan@pseg.com (Jeff Keenan) | Jeff.Keenan@pseg.com (Jeff Keenan) | ||
Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl) | ||
Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva) | |||
Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl) | |||
Tracking Status: None Paul.Duke@pseg.com (Paul Duke) | Tracking Status: None Paul.Duke@pseg.com (Paul Duke) | ||
Tracking Status: None erin.west@pseg.com (Erin West) | Tracking Status: None erin.west@pseg.com (Erin West) | ||
Tracking Status: None | Tracking Status: None Post Office: | ||
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 15069 09/09/2009 Options Expiration Date: | |||
Post Office: | Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:}} | ||
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov | |||
Files | |||
MESSAGE | |||
Options Expiration Date: | |||
Priority: | |||
Sensitivity: | |||
Latest revision as of 02:22, 14 November 2019
| ML092520503 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hope Creek  |
| Issue date: | 09/09/2009 |
| From: | Richard Ennis Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Keenan J Public Service Enterprise Group |
| Ennis R, NRR/DORL, 415-1420 | |
| References | |
| TAC ME2158 | |
| Download: ML092520503 (2) | |
Text
From: Ennis, Rick Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 2:18 PM To: Jeff Keenan Cc: Feintuch, Karl; Lingam, Siva; Paul Duke; Erin West
Subject:
Acceptance Review for TAC ME2158 - Hope Creek Relief Request V-06
- Jeff, By letter dated September 1, 2009 (ADAMS Accession No. ML092520040), PSEG Nuclear LLC submitted relief request V-06 for the third 10-year inservice testing (IST) interval for the Hope Creek Generating Station. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Section 50.55a of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), requires that IST of certain American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (Code) Class 1, 2, and 3 pumps and valves be performed at 120-month (10-year) IST program intervals in accordance with the specified ASME Code and applicable addenda incorporated by reference in the regulations, except where alternatives have been authorized or relief has been requested by the licensee and granted by the NRC pursuant to paragraphs (a)(3)(i), (a)(3)(ii), or (f)(6)(i) of 10 CFR 50.55a.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1420.
Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch I-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties (3D27D29AB75BCD4BAE913B63CBFBBEDFDE872722D9)
Subject:
Acceptance Review for TAC ME2158 - Hope Creek Relief Request V-06
Sent Date: 09/09/2009 2:18:02 PM Received Date: 09/09/2009 2:18:02 PM From: Ennis, Rick Created By: Rick.Ennis@nrc.gov Recipients:
Jeff.Keenan@pseg.com (Jeff Keenan)
Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl)
Tracking Status: None Siva.Lingam@nrc.gov (Lingam, Siva)
Tracking Status: None Paul.Duke@pseg.com (Paul Duke)
Tracking Status: None erin.west@pseg.com (Erin West)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 15069 09/09/2009 Options Expiration Date:
Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received: