|
|
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:ES-301Simulator Scenario Quality Ghecklist Form ES-301-4Facility: | | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Ghecklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: O c Co-C Date of Exam:lulC Scenario Numbers: I I z l3 t¿4 I f Operating Test No. |
| O c Co-C Date of Exam:lulC Scenario Numbers: | | lnitials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c# |
| I I z l3 t¿4 If Operating Test No.QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES lnitialsab*c#1The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service,but it does not cue the operators into expected events.1/5rs2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.3Ks3. Each event description consists of. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated | | 1 The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. 1/ 5r s |
| . the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew. the expected operator actions (by shift position) o the event termination point (if applicable) 5,fPe4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics 6/P-.n5Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain completeevaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. | | : 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. 3K s |
| ó('L/.a6lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. | | : 3. Each event description consists of |
| Operators have sufficient time to cany out expected activities without undue time constraints Cues are given.nlnulû.f7. The simulator modeling is not altered.5KPl8. The scenarios have been validated. | | . the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated |
| Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), | | . the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event |
| any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. | | . the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew |
| ,,faFd9. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. | | . the expected operator actions (by shift position) o the event termination point (if applicable) 5,f Pe |
| All otherscenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301,áúZn10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit theform along with the simulator scenarios). | | : 4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics 6/ P-.n 'L/ |
| 561 1. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors.
| | 5 Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ó( .a 6 lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. |
| (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) | | Operators have sufficient time to cany out expected activities without undue time constraints Cues are given. nln ulû .f |
| tffrd\12. ach applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
| | : 7. The simulator modeling is not altered. 5K Pl |
| 5{l,s13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew positionó(sTarget Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)Actual Attributes | | : 8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional a |
| : 1. Malfunctions after EOP entry ('l-2)3 tU I/uZt(R-2. Abnormal events (2-4)q t, vt,4 q(R,3. Major transients (1-2)1 ttt t ttl I3l.c<4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2)I ttll tLtL5f?r't5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actons (0-2)t ll I lol 6KP-n6. EOP based Critical tasks (2-3)'L tzt z t7t L*).r:. The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.# lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chiefexaminer concurrence required. | | fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. ,,f Fd |
| NOTEtarLL V*ry bq9r;c ¿rStTE \tAurtt on/ . l*fS 'ffia"}}
| | : 9. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301, áú Zn |
| | : 10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). 56 1 1. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) tf frd\ |
| | : 12. ach applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). 5{ l,s |
| | : 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position ó( s Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes |
| | : 1. Malfunctions after EOP entry ('l-2) 3 tU I/uZ t( R- |
| | : 2. Abnormal events (2-4) q t, vt,4 q ( R, |
| | : 3. Major transients (1-2) 1 ttt t ttl I 3l .c< |
| | : 4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) I ttll tLtL 5f ?r't |
| | : 5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actons (0-2) t ll I lol 6 K P-n |
| | : 6. EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 'L tzt z t7t L *) .r: |
| | NOTE . The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. |
| | # lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required. |
| | tarLL Vry bq9r;c ¿rStTE \tAurtt on/ . l*fS 'ffia"}} |
Similar Documents at Cook |
---|
Category:License-Operator
MONTHYEARML23338A2642023-12-0505 December 2023 Confirmation of Initial License Examination ML22251A0192022-08-10010 August 2022 Form 5.1-1 Postexamination Check Sheet DC-Cook 2022 ML22251A0162022-08-10010 August 2022 Form 2.1-1 Examination Preparation Checklist DC-Cook 2022 ML22250A7202022-08-10010 August 2022 Form 1.3-1 Exam Security Agreement DC-Cook 2022 ML22251A0202022-08-0202 August 2022 Post Examination Submittal Letter DC-Cook 2022 ML22192A1192022-07-11011 July 2022 Operator Licensing Examination Approval ML22250A6912022-06-30030 June 2022 Form_2.3-4_Written_Exam_Quality_Checklist_DC-Cook_2022 ML22250A6902022-06-30030 June 2022 Form_2.3-2_Operating_Test_Quality_Checklist_DC-Cook_2022 ML22250A6652022-06-30030 June 2022 Form: 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist DC-Cook - 2022 ML22250A6692022-06-30030 June 2022 Form 3.4.1 Events and Evolutions Checklist DC-Cook 2022 ML22250A6922022-05-12012 May 2022 Licensee_Iinitial_License_Exam_Submittal_Letter_DC-Cook_2022 AEP-NRC-2022-20, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2022-03-14014 March 2022 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML22250A6712022-02-16016 February 2022 Outline Submittal Notification Email DC-Cook 2022 ML22032A0392022-02-0101 February 2022 Notification of an NRC Biennial Licensed Operator Requalification Program Inspection and Request for Information ML21347A5742021-12-29029 December 2021 Confirmation of Initial License Examination ML21110A5272021-04-19019 April 2021 GFE Results, March 2021 IR 05000315/20203012020-10-19019 October 2020 NRC Initial License Examination Report 05000315/2020301; 05000316/2020301 ML20356A0912020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Proposed Control Room and In-Plant Systems JPMs ML20356A0842020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist ES-301-4 ML20356A1522020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Written Exam Outlines ES-401-2 and ES-401-3 ML21006A2222020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Operating Test Outline Submittal Letter ML20356A0332020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Operating Test Competencies Checklist ES-301-6 ML20356A2592020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile As-Administered Control Room and In-Plant Systems JPMs ML21006A4402020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Post Exam Package Submittal Letter and Comment Summary Rcvd 20200825 ML21006A4372020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Exam Preparation Checklist ES-201-1 ML20356A0742020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Operating Test Quality Checklist ES-301-3 ML21005A4312020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile As-Administered Simulator Scenarios ML21006A4292020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Exam Security Checklists ES-201-3 ML20356A2652020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile As-Administered RO and SRO Admin JPMs ML21006A4102020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Operating Test Review Worksheet ES-301-7 ML20356A0802020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Proposed Exam Submittal Letter ML21006A4412020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist ES-403-1 RO ML20356A1602020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Exam Outline Quality Checklist ES-201-2 ML20356A0862020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Written Examination Quality Checklist ES-401-6 ML20356A1572020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Transient and Event Checklists ES-301-5 ML20356A2572020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile As-Administered RO SRO Written Examination ML20356A1012020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Proposed Simulator Scenarios ML20356A1412020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Operating Test JPM Outlines ES-301-1 and ES-301-2 ML20356A1492020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Operating Test Scenario Outlines ES-D-1 ML20356A0992020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Proposed Ro_Sro Written Examination ML21006A4182020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Record of Rejected KAs ES-401-4 ML21006A4202020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Written Exam Review Worksheet ES-401-9 ML20356A0952020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Proposed RO and SRO Admin JPMs ML21006A4442020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist ES-403-1 SRO ML20364A2132020-08-13013 August 2020 2018 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant Exam Administered Scenarios ML20210M4202020-07-29029 July 2020 Operator Licensing Examination Approval ML19353A0252019-12-18018 December 2019 Confirmation of Initial License Examination AEP-NRC-2019-26, Response to RIS 2019-022019-05-30030 May 2019 Response to RIS 2019-02 ML19106A0162019-04-15015 April 2019 GFE Results, March 2019 ML19045A3722019-02-12012 February 2019 March 2019 GFE Cover Letter Riii 2023-12-05
[Table view] Category:Part 55 Examination Related Material
MONTHYEARML23338A2642023-12-0505 December 2023 Confirmation of Initial License Examination ML22251A0162022-08-10010 August 2022 Form 2.1-1 Examination Preparation Checklist DC-Cook 2022 ML22251A0192022-08-10010 August 2022 Form 5.1-1 Postexamination Check Sheet DC-Cook 2022 ML22250A7202022-08-10010 August 2022 Form 1.3-1 Exam Security Agreement DC-Cook 2022 ML22251A0202022-08-0202 August 2022 Post Examination Submittal Letter DC-Cook 2022 ML22192A1192022-07-11011 July 2022 Operator Licensing Examination Approval ML22250A6692022-06-30030 June 2022 Form 3.4.1 Events and Evolutions Checklist DC-Cook 2022 ML22250A6902022-06-30030 June 2022 Form_2.3-2_Operating_Test_Quality_Checklist_DC-Cook_2022 ML22250A6912022-06-30030 June 2022 Form_2.3-4_Written_Exam_Quality_Checklist_DC-Cook_2022 ML22250A6652022-06-30030 June 2022 Form: 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist DC-Cook - 2022 ML22250A6922022-05-12012 May 2022 Licensee_Iinitial_License_Exam_Submittal_Letter_DC-Cook_2022 AEP-NRC-2022-20, Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations2022-03-14014 March 2022 Response to NRC Regulatory Issue Summary 2022-01 Preparation and Scheduling of Operator Licensing Examinations ML22250A6712022-02-16016 February 2022 Outline Submittal Notification Email DC-Cook 2022 ML22032A0392022-02-0101 February 2022 Notification of an NRC Biennial Licensed Operator Requalification Program Inspection and Request for Information ML21347A5742021-12-29029 December 2021 Confirmation of Initial License Examination IR 05000315/20203012020-10-19019 October 2020 NRC Initial License Examination Report 05000315/2020301; 05000316/2020301 ML21006A4202020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Written Exam Review Worksheet ES-401-9 ML20356A1012020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Proposed Simulator Scenarios ML20356A0862020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Written Examination Quality Checklist ES-401-6 ML20356A1412020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Operating Test JPM Outlines ES-301-1 and ES-301-2 ML20356A0742020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Operating Test Quality Checklist ES-301-3 ML21006A4372020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Exam Preparation Checklist ES-201-1 ML20356A0332020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Operating Test Competencies Checklist ES-301-6 ML21006A2222020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Operating Test Outline Submittal Letter ML20356A1602020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Exam Outline Quality Checklist ES-201-2 ML20356A0842020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist ES-301-4 ML21006A4442020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist ES-403-1 SRO ML20356A2652020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile As-Administered RO and SRO Admin JPMs ML20356A0802020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Proposed Exam Submittal Letter ML20356A1522020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Written Exam Outlines ES-401-2 and ES-401-3 ML20356A1492020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Operating Test Scenario Outlines ES-D-1 ML21006A4182020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Record of Rejected KAs ES-401-4 ML20356A0992020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Proposed Ro_Sro Written Examination ML21005A4312020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile As-Administered Simulator Scenarios ML21006A4412020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Written Exam Grading Quality Checklist ES-403-1 RO ML20356A0952020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Proposed RO and SRO Admin JPMs ML21006A4102020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Operating Test Review Worksheet ES-301-7 ML20356A1572020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Transient and Event Checklists ES-301-5 ML21006A4292020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Exam Security Checklists ES-201-3 ML20356A2572020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile As-Administered RO SRO Written Examination ML21006A4402020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Post Exam Package Submittal Letter and Comment Summary Rcvd 20200825 ML20356A2592020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile As-Administered Control Room and In-Plant Systems JPMs ML20356A0912020-08-25025 August 2020 2020 DC Cook Ile Proposed Control Room and In-Plant Systems JPMs ML20364A2132020-08-13013 August 2020 2018 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant Exam Administered Scenarios ML20210M4202020-07-29029 July 2020 Operator Licensing Examination Approval ML19353A0252019-12-18018 December 2019 Confirmation of Initial License Examination AEP-NRC-2019-26, Response to RIS 2019-022019-05-30030 May 2019 Response to RIS 2019-02 ML20365A0662018-08-13013 August 2018 2018 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant Exam Form ES-201-1 ML20363A0982018-08-13013 August 2018 2018 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant Exam Form ES-401-6 ML20363A1042018-08-13013 August 2018 2018 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant Exam Proposed JPMs 2023-12-05
[Table view] |
Text
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Ghecklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: O c Co-C Date of Exam:lulC Scenario Numbers: I I z l3 t¿4 I f Operating Test No.
lnitials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c#
1 The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. 1/ 5r s
- 2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. 3K s
- 3. Each event description consists of
. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event
. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew
. the expected operator actions (by shift position) o the event termination point (if applicable) 5,f Pe
- 4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics 6/ P-.n 'L/
5 Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ó( .a 6 lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
Operators have sufficient time to cany out expected activities without undue time constraints Cues are given. nln ulû .f
- 7. The simulator modeling is not altered. 5K Pl
- 8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional a
fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. ,,f Fd
- 9. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301, áú Zn
- 10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). 56 1 1. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) tf frd\
- 12. ach applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). 5{ l,s
- 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position ó( s Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes
- 1. Malfunctions after EOP entry ('l-2) 3 tU I/uZ t( R-
- 2. Abnormal events (2-4) q t, vt,4 q ( R,
- 3. Major transients (1-2) 1 ttt t ttl I 3l .c<
- 4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) I ttll tLtL 5f ?r't
- 5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actons (0-2) t ll I lol 6 K P-n
- 6. EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 'L tzt z t7t L *) .r:
NOTE . The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
tarLL Vry bq9r;c ¿rStTE \tAurtt on/ . l*fS 'ffia"