ML16341E037

DC Cook 2016 ES-301-4 Scenario Quality Checklist

ML16341E037
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	12/02/2016
From:	NRC/RGN-III
To:	Indiana Michigan Power Co, American Electric Power
Shared Package
ML15274A375	List: ML16340B742 ML16340B794 ML16340B828 ML16340B905 ML16341B876 ML16341B907 ML16341D965 ML16341E007 ML16341E037 ML16341E098
References
Download: ML16341E037 (1)

Text

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Ghecklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: O c Co-C Date of Exam:lulC Scenario Numbers: I I z l3 t¿4 I f Operating Test No.

lnitials QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES a b* c#

1 The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events. 1/ 5r s

2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events. 3K s

3. Each event description consists of

. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated

. the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event

. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew

. the expected operator actions (by shift position) o the event termination point (if applicable) 5,f Pe

4. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics 6/ P-.n 'L/

5 Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives. ó( .a 6 lf time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

Operators have sufficient time to cany out expected activities without undue time constraints Cues are given. nln ulû .f

7. The simulator modeling is not altered. 5K Pl

8. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional a

fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios. ,,f Fd

9. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301, áú Zn

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the form along with the simulator scenarios). 56 1 1. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) tf frd\

12. ach applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios). 5{ l,s

13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position ó( s Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes

1. Malfunctions after EOP entry ('l-2) 3 tU I/uZ t( R-

2. Abnormal events (2-4) q t, vt,4 q ( R,

3. Major transients (1-2) 1 ttt t ttl I 3l .c<

4. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) I ttll tLtL 5f ?r't

5. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actons (0-2) t ll I lol 6 K P-n

6. EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 'L tzt z t7t L *) .r:

NOTE . The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. lndependent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.

tarLL Vry bq9r;c ¿rStTE \tAurtt on/ . l*fS 'ffia"