ML17249A371: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML17249A371
| number = ML17249A371
| issue date = 09/06/2017
| issue date = 09/06/2017
| title = 2017/09/06 NRR E-mail Capture - Hope Creek Acceptance Review Results - Relief Request to Use a Later Edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Operation and Maintenance Code (MG0124)
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - Hope Creek Acceptance Review Results - Relief Request to Use a Later Edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Operation and Maintenance Code (MG0124)
| author name = Regner L M
| author name = Regner L
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV
| addressee name = Duke P R
| addressee name = Duke P
| addressee affiliation = PSEG Nuclear, LLC
| addressee affiliation = PSEG Nuclear, LLC
| docket = 05000354
| docket = 05000354
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Regner, LisaSent:Wednesday, September 06, 2017 11:16 AMTo:Paul.Duke@pseg.comCc:Regner, Lisa
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                                   Regner, Lisa Sent:                                   Wednesday, September 06, 2017 11:16 AM To:                                     Paul.Duke@pseg.com Cc:                                     Regner, Lisa


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NRC Acceptance Review Results: Request to Use Later ASME OM Code (MG0124)Paul, By letter dated August 17, 2017, PSEG Nuclear, the licensee for Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station, submitted a request for relief to use a later edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Operation and Maintenance (OM) Code that, if approved, would allow the licensee to use the 2012 Edition for the fourth inservice testing interval for Hope Creek. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request (RR). The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
NRC Acceptance Review Results: Request to Use Later ASME OM Code (MG0124)
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed RR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence. Based on the information provided in your request, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by your requested date of December 20, 2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
: Paul, By letter dated August 17, 2017, PSEG Nuclear, the licensee for Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station, submitted a request for relief to use a later edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, or unanticipated addition of scope to the review. If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906. Lisa M. Regner Senior Project Manager Branch 4, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3713   Mail Envelope Properties   (1fff372df3e5400883303818745b9314)  
Operation and Maintenance (OM) Code that, if approved, would allow the licensee to use the 2012 Edition for the fourth inservice testing interval for Hope Creek. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request (RR). The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed RR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your request, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::100 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by your requested date of December 20, 2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, or unanticipated addition of scope to the review.
If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906.
Lisa M. Regner Senior Project Manager Branch 4, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lisa.Regner@NRC.gov 301-415-1906 OWFN 9D14 1
 
Hearing Identifier:   NRR_PMDA Email Number:         3713 Mail Envelope Properties   (1fff372df3e5400883303818745b9314)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
NRC Acceptance Review Results: Request to Use Later ASME OM Code (MG0124) Sent Date:   9/6/2017 11:15:44 AM Received Date: 9/6/2017 11:15:45 AM From:   Regner, Lisa Created By:   Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Regner, Lisa" <Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Paul.Duke@pseg.com" <Paul.Duke@pseg.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office:   HQPWMSMRS01.nrc.gov   Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   2931     9/6/2017 11:15:45 AM Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:      
NRC Acceptance Review Results: Request to Use Later ASME OM Code (MG0124)
}}
Sent Date:             9/6/2017 11:15:44 AM Received Date:         9/6/2017 11:15:45 AM From:                 Regner, Lisa Created By:           Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Regner, Lisa" <Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Paul.Duke@pseg.com" <Paul.Duke@pseg.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:           HQPWMSMRS01.nrc.gov Files                         Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                       2931                 9/6/2017 11:15:45 AM Options Priority:                     Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 19:41, 8 March 2020

NRR E-mail Capture - Hope Creek Acceptance Review Results - Relief Request to Use a Later Edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Operation and Maintenance Code (MG0124)
ML17249A371
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 09/06/2017
From: Lisa Regner
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Duke P
Public Service Enterprise Group
References
MG0124
Download: ML17249A371 (2)
v • d • e


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Regner, Lisa Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 11:16 AM To: Paul.Duke@pseg.com Cc: Regner, Lisa

Subject:

NRC Acceptance Review Results: Request to Use Later ASME OM Code (MG0124)

Paul, By letter dated August 17, 2017, PSEG Nuclear, the licensee for Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station, submitted a request for relief to use a later edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

Operation and Maintenance (OM) Code that, if approved, would allow the licensee to use the 2012 Edition for the fourth inservice testing interval for Hope Creek. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request (RR). The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed RR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your request, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours4.167 days <br />0.595 weeks <br />0.137 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by your requested date of December 20, 2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, or unanticipated addition of scope to the review.

If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906.

Lisa M. Regner Senior Project Manager Branch 4, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Lisa.Regner@NRC.gov 301-415-1906 OWFN 9D14 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3713 Mail Envelope Properties (1fff372df3e5400883303818745b9314)

Subject:

NRC Acceptance Review Results: Request to Use Later ASME OM Code (MG0124)

Sent Date: 9/6/2017 11:15:44 AM Received Date: 9/6/2017 11:15:45 AM From: Regner, Lisa Created By: Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Regner, Lisa" <Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Paul.Duke@pseg.com" <Paul.Duke@pseg.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2931 9/6/2017 11:15:45 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML17249A371&oldid=2538498"