ML11334A151: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML11334A151
| number = ML11334A151
| issue date = 11/30/2011
| issue date = 11/30/2011
| title = 2011/11/30 NRR E-mail Capture - FW: Summary of Conference Call
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - FW: Summary of Conference Call
| author name = Poehler J C
| author name = Poehler J
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DE
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DE
| addressee name = Mozafari B L
| addressee name = Mozafari B
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| docket = 05000261
| docket = 05000261
Line 13: Line 13:
| page count = 3
| page count = 3
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                      Poehler, Jeffrey Sent:                      Wednesday, November 30, 2011 1:31 PM To:                        Mozafari, Brenda
==Subject:==
FW: Summary of Conference Call Brenda, I am resending to correct some minor errors.
Jeff From: Poehler, Jeffrey Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 3:46 PM To: Mozafari, Brenda
==Subject:==
Summary of Conference Call On the call were:
Rich Rogalski - PEC Ted Huminski - PEC Jeff Poehler - NRR/DE Brenda Mozafari - NRR/DORL Question:        Is licensees proposed schedule for Capsule U consistent with draft EPRI Report on Coordinated Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program?
Answer:          Yes EPRI recommended withdrawal in year 2020 at 38.36 EFPY and a fluence of 8.11 x 1019 n/cm . HBSEP is withdrawing at 38 EFPY and 7.84 x 1019 n/cm2.
2 Question:        What is the difference between the two slightly different neutron fluence values in the submittal of 7.79 x 1019 n/cm2 and 7.84 x 1019 n/cm2?
Answer:          7.79 x 1019 n/cm2 is the RV inner surface peak fluence at 66 EFPY and 7.84 x 1019 n/cm2 is the Capsule U fluence at 38 EFPY. The slight difference in values results because of the rounding of the EFPY to an even number (for the capsule withdrawal EFPY).
Question:        Are there any plans to reposition the two reserve capsules to higher flux locations?
Answer:          Yes, Note 3 to the table for the proposed schedule on page 3 states that Capsules Y and W will be repositioned after 40 years to accelerated flux positions to provide additional support for license extension.
The Reference to Note 2 next to Capsule Y and W should be to Note 3.
Question:        Is HBRSEP participating in an integrated surveillance program since they use Indian Point surveillance data as well as HBRSEP surveillance data in their credibility analysis for the surveillance weld metal in the Capsule X report?
Answer:          No, not an integrated surveillance program.
Thanks again for setting up the call, Jeffrey C. Poehler 1
Sr. Materials Engineer NRR/DE/EVIB (301) 415-8353 2
Hearing Identifier:    NRR_PMDA Email Number:          213 Mail Envelope Properties    (Jeffrey.Poehler@nrc.gov20111130133100)
==Subject:==
FW: Summary of Conference Call Sent Date:            11/30/2011 1:31:06 PM Received Date:        11/30/2011 1:31:00 PM From:                  Poehler, Jeffrey Created By:            Jeffrey.Poehler@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Mozafari, Brenda" <Brenda.Mozafari@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                          Size                    Date & Time MESSAGE                        2009                    11/30/2011 1:31:00 PM Options Priority:                      Standard Return Notification:            No Reply Requested:                No Sensitivity:                    Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 00:11, 6 December 2019

NRR E-mail Capture - FW: Summary of Conference Call
ML11334A151
Person / Time
Site: Robinson Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/30/2011
From: Jeffrey Poehler
Division of Engineering
To: Mozafari B
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
References
Download: ML11334A151 (3)
v • d • e


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Poehler, Jeffrey Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 1:31 PM To: Mozafari, Brenda

Subject:

FW: Summary of Conference Call Brenda, I am resending to correct some minor errors.

Jeff From: Poehler, Jeffrey Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 3:46 PM To: Mozafari, Brenda

Subject:

Summary of Conference Call On the call were:

Rich Rogalski - PEC Ted Huminski - PEC Jeff Poehler - NRR/DE Brenda Mozafari - NRR/DORL Question: Is licensees proposed schedule for Capsule U consistent with draft EPRI Report on Coordinated Reactor Vessel Surveillance Program?

Answer: Yes EPRI recommended withdrawal in year 2020 at 38.36 EFPY and a fluence of 8.11 x 1019 n/cm . HBSEP is withdrawing at 38 EFPY and 7.84 x 1019 n/cm2.

2 Question: What is the difference between the two slightly different neutron fluence values in the submittal of 7.79 x 1019 n/cm2 and 7.84 x 1019 n/cm2?

Answer: 7.79 x 1019 n/cm2 is the RV inner surface peak fluence at 66 EFPY and 7.84 x 1019 n/cm2 is the Capsule U fluence at 38 EFPY. The slight difference in values results because of the rounding of the EFPY to an even number (for the capsule withdrawal EFPY).

Question: Are there any plans to reposition the two reserve capsules to higher flux locations?

Answer: Yes, Note 3 to the table for the proposed schedule on page 3 states that Capsules Y and W will be repositioned after 40 years to accelerated flux positions to provide additional support for license extension.

The Reference to Note 2 next to Capsule Y and W should be to Note 3.

Question: Is HBRSEP participating in an integrated surveillance program since they use Indian Point surveillance data as well as HBRSEP surveillance data in their credibility analysis for the surveillance weld metal in the Capsule X report?

Answer: No, not an integrated surveillance program.

Thanks again for setting up the call, Jeffrey C. Poehler 1

Sr. Materials Engineer NRR/DE/EVIB (301) 415-8353 2

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 213 Mail Envelope Properties (Jeffrey.Poehler@nrc.gov20111130133100)

Subject:

FW: Summary of Conference Call Sent Date: 11/30/2011 1:31:06 PM Received Date: 11/30/2011 1:31:00 PM From: Poehler, Jeffrey Created By: Jeffrey.Poehler@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Mozafari, Brenda" <Brenda.Mozafari@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2009 11/30/2011 1:31:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML11334A151&oldid=2239908"