ML18130A022: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
Consistent with 10 CFR 50.90, an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | Consistent with 10 CFR 50.90, an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence. | ||
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 850 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 15 months, which is August 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::850 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 15 months, which is August 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | ||
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. | These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. | ||
Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. | Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. |
Latest revision as of 08:26, 7 March 2020
ML18130A022 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Robinson ![]() |
Issue date: | 05/09/2018 |
From: | Dennis Galvin Plant Licensing Branch II |
To: | Zaremba A Duke Energy Carolinas |
References | |
L 2018-LLA-0095 | |
Download: ML18130A022 (3) | |
Text
NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Galvin, Dennis Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 6:54 PM To: Arthur.Zaremba@duke-energy.com Cc: Ellis, Kevin Michael; Nicole D. Edwards (Nicole.Edwards@duke-energy.com); Tindell, Brian; Miller, Ed
Subject:
H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2 - Acceptance Of Requested Licensing Action Re: Amendment Request Proposing To Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, "Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors
SUBJECT:
H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2 Acceptance Of Requested Licensing Action Re:
Amendment Request Proposing To Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, "Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors" (L-2018-LLA-0095)
Dear Mr. Zaremba:
By letter dated April 5, 2018 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML18099A130), Duke Energy Progress, LLC (the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant Unit No. 2. The proposed amendment would modify the licensing basis, by the addition of a License Condition, to allow for the implementation of the provisions of Section 50.69 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), "Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors."
The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Consistent with 10 CFR 50.90, an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 850 hours35.417 days <br />5.06 weeks <br />1.164 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 15 months, which is August 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review.
Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6256.
1
Respectfully, Dennis Galvin, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 2-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-261 2
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 360 Mail Envelope Properties (Dennis.Galvin@nrc.gov20180509185300)
Subject:
H. B. Robinson Steam Electric Plant, Unit No. 2 - Acceptance Of Requested Licensing Action Re: Amendment Request Proposing To Adopt 10 CFR 50.69, "Risk-Informed Categorization and Treatment of Structures, Systems, and Components for Nuclear Power Reactors Sent Date: 5/9/2018 6:53:32 PM Received Date: 5/9/2018 6:53:00 PM From: Galvin, Dennis Created By: Dennis.Galvin@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Ellis, Kevin Michael" <Kevin.Ellis@duke-energy.com>
Tracking Status: None "Nicole D. Edwards (Nicole.Edwards@duke-energy.com)" <Nicole.Edwards@duke-energy.com>
Tracking Status: None "Tindell, Brian" <Brian.Tindell@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Miller, Ed" <Ed.Miller@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Arthur.Zaremba@duke-energy.com" <Arthur.Zaremba@duke-energy.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3944 5/9/2018 6:53:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: