ML19282B980: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 25: Line 25:
Please note that on page 1 of the DEIS, the unit (Fahrenheit or Centigrade) of the cooling water to be raised by 12 degrees after passing through the condenser was not given.        Also, it is desirable to include a plan and location map of the selected site (Rock Point or Pilgrim) in the DEIS.
Please note that on page 1 of the DEIS, the unit (Fahrenheit or Centigrade) of the cooling water to be raised by 12 degrees after passing through the condenser was not given.        Also, it is desirable to include a plan and location map of the selected site (Rock Point or Pilgrim) in the DEIS.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement.
Sincerely,
Sincerely, (s    l n.ttjitw h e '
                                      '
(s    l n.ttjitw h e '
                           /dack$.Heinemann
                           /dack$.Heinemann
                           %dvisor on Environmental Quality b
                           %dvisor on Environmental Quality b
7903190200                                                          L D}}
7903190200                                                          L D}}

Latest revision as of 16:26, 1 February 2020

Responds to 790228 Ltr Requesting Comments on Draft Suppl to Fes (NUREG-0530).Notes Omission on Page 1 & Suggests Inclusion of Plan & Location Map of Selected Site
ML19282B980
Person / Time
Site: 05000471
Issue date: 03/14/1979
From: Heinemann J
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
To: Regan W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 7903190200
Download: ML19282B980 (1)


Text

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION WAS H INGTON, D.C. 20426 IN REPLY REFER TO:

March 14, 1979 Mr. William H. Regan Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis Nuclear Regulatory Coninissior Washington, D. C. 20555

Dear Mr. Regan:

I am replying to your request of February 28, 1979 to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for conments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, Unit 2. This Draft EIS has been reviewed by appropriate FERC staff components upon whose evaluation this response is based.

The staff concentrates its review of other agencies' environmental impact statements basically on those areas of the electric power, natural gas, and oil pipeline industries for which the Commission has jurisdiction by law, or where staff has special expertise in evaluating environmental impacts involved with the proposed action. It does not appear that there would be any significant impacts in these areas of concern nor serious conflicts with this agency's responsibilities should this action be undertaken.

Please note that on page 1 of the DEIS, the unit (Fahrenheit or Centigrade) of the cooling water to be raised by 12 degrees after passing through the condenser was not given. Also, it is desirable to include a plan and location map of the selected site (Rock Point or Pilgrim) in the DEIS.

Thank you for the opportunity to review this statement.

Sincerely, (s l n.ttjitw h e '

/dack$.Heinemann

%dvisor on Environmental Quality b

7903190200 L D