|
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
| Line 17: |
Line 17: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:* | | {{#Wiki_filter:consumers |
| :-= -consumers Power ..... ') _, '.:-ft -*' i Pri J: 27 POWERING MICHlliAN'S PROGRESS Palisades Nuclear Plant: 27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway, Covert, Ml 49043 5/26/95 \\aoi bt> | | * ~---~. :-= |
| D 3\d.1-\'\S T | | Power - ..... |
| I\* | | _, '.:-ft -*' |
| \-e. \ j PALISADES PLANT -COMMENTS ON PROPOSED GENERIC LETTER: PRESSURE LOCKING AND Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 THERMAL BINDING OF SAFETY RELATED POWER OPERATED GATE VALVES On March 27, 1995, the NRC provided a new proposed Generic Letter in the Federal Register pertaining to the evaluation of the effects of pressure locking and thermal binding on power-operated safety-related gate valves. The submittal requested comments by 4/26/95 and a Palisades Plant review has created the following comment for your review, 1. Would it be possible for further guidance to be provided in the generic letter to cover the same areas of questions that arose from Generic Letter 89-10,including issues from Supplement 1, such as: a. Evaluation of valves that are normally open, and must remain open for their safety function, but could conceivably be mispositioned inadvertently at the beginning of a postulated event, (mispositioning or position changeable valves) ? b. Evaluation of valves in piping systems only ? c. Definition of "safety-related" ? d. Possible generic exclusion of safety-related power-operated valves in certain plant systems, like Service Water, Component Cooling Water, Chemical and Volume Control, or Concentrated Boric Acid Systems that have not experienced this historical phenomena | | ~ ') |
| ? 5. The use of degraded air system pressure evaluations, similar to degraded voltage effects for MOVs ?
| | i Pri J: 27 POWERING MICHlliAN'S PROGRESS Palisades Nuclear Plant: 27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway, Covert, Ml 49043 5/26/95 |
| ___ | | \\aoi bt> \=-~J'5T°tC\ |
| Engineer ' 9505230073 950526----PDR I&E MISC PDR A CMS ENERGY COMPANY}}
| | Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch D 3\d.1-\'\S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 T I\* |
| | ~~'r'C\O\.\.~\\, |
| | ~u..~ \-e. \ j PALISADES PLANT - COMMENTS ON PROPOSED GENERIC LETTER: PRESSURE LOCKING AND THERMAL BINDING OF SAFETY RELATED POWER OPERATED GATE VALVES On March 27, 1995, the NRC provided a new proposed Generic Letter in the Federal Register pertaining to the evaluation of the effects of pressure locking and thermal binding on power-operated safety-related gate valves. The submittal requested comments by 4/26/95 and a Palisades Plant review has created the following comment for your review, |
| | : 1. Would it be possible for further guidance to be provided in the generic letter to cover the same areas of questions that arose from Generic Letter 89-10,including issues from Supplement 1, such as: |
| | : a. Evaluation of valves that are normally open, and must remain open for their safety function, but could conceivably be mispositioned inadvertently at the beginning of a postulated event, (mispositioning or position changeable valves) ? |
| | : b. Evaluation of valves in piping systems only ? |
| | : c. Definition of "safety-related" ? |
| | : d. Possible generic exclusion of safety-related power-operated valves in certain plant systems, like Service Water, Component Cooling Water, Chemical and Volume Control, or Concentrated Boric Acid Systems that have not experienced this historical phenomena ? |
| | : 5. The use of degraded air system pressure evaluations, similar to degraded voltage effects for MOVs ? |
| | p~~)~* |
| | ___ E.11lisade~_Lj_~e_nsing Engineer |
| | ' 9505230073 950526- - - - -- |
| | PDR I&E MISC PDR l)nr..--.-~; |
| | t;-.,;,u(jJ~ |
| | A CMS ENERGY COMPANY}} |
|
|---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20217N7201998-03-31031 March 1998
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50.55a,inservice Inspection & Inservice Testing of Nuclear Power Plant Components
ML20203J9661998-02-27027 February 1998
Comment on GL 98-XX, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps
ML18067A6301997-07-0707 July 1997
Comment Supporting NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Re Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Charges,Tests or Experiments).
DD-97-15, Director'S Decision DD-97-15 Re Petitioners Request That NRC Prohibit Loading of VSC-24 Until Coc,Sar & SER Amended Following Independent third-party Review of VSC-24 Design. No Adequate Basis Exists for Granting Petitioners Request1997-06-18018 June 1997
Director'S Decision DD-97-15 Re Petitioners Request That NRC Prohibit Loading of VSC-24 Until Coc,Sar & SER Amended Following Independent third-party Review of VSC-24 Design. No Adequate Basis Exists for Granting Petitioners Request
ML20115H7061996-06-0404 June 1996
Submits Addl Info to Support Petition for Rulemaking PRM-72-3 Re Amend to SAR
ML18065A0761995-09-13013 September 1995
Comment on Draft Rg DG-1043 Re Proposed Rev 2 to Rg 1.149. New Malfunction Tests Required by Revised Rg Can Be Tested at Required 25% Per Year & Reported in Next 4-yr Testing Rept W/O Rev to Test Plan
ML20086D9031995-06-29029 June 1995
Comments on Proposed Generic Ltr Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval.Proposed GL Also Avoids Unnecessary Expense for Requirements That Provide No Benefit
ML18064A8201995-06-27027 June 1995
Comment on Proposed GL Re Relocation of Pressure Temperature Limit Curves & Low Temperature Overpressure Protection Sys Limits.Supports Issuance of Ltr
ML20085E6541995-06-13013 June 1995
Comment Re Draft NUREG/BR-0199, Responsiveness to Public. Expresses Concern on Dry Cask Storage W/Exemption Given to VSC-24 Cask & Procedures for Unloading & Transport at Plant
ML18064A7681995-05-26026 May 1995
Comment on Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power Operated Gate Valves.
ML20073M0621994-09-29029 September 1994
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Addition of NUHOMS 52B Dry Casks to List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks. Objects to Proposed Rule Because of Substantial Differences Between Fuel Rods & Assemblies at Different Plant
ML20056E5101993-08-11011 August 1993
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning
ML20012G5301993-02-26026 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Suggests That NRC Conduct Formal Hearing
ML20012G5311993-02-24024 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5331993-02-23023 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5341993-02-23023 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5321993-02-23023 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5231993-02-20020 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5251993-02-15015 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20128L9531993-02-10010 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127E8851993-01-15015 January 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127E8631993-01-14014 January 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127F0561993-01-0808 January 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116N9171992-11-12012 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116K9591992-11-0909 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Concerns Noted
ML20116L4651992-11-0606 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L0501992-11-0303 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Concerns Noted
ML20116K7851992-11-0303 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L1811992-11-0202 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L2051992-11-0202 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L3341992-10-30030 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Can Not Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998
ML20116L2881992-10-26026 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L1311992-10-22022 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Cannot Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998
ML20116L2841992-10-22022 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L2681992-10-22022 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Can Not Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998
ML20116K9861992-10-22022 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Deadly Waste Cannot Be Stored Safely.Doe Stated Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998
ML20127E1371992-09-16016 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A4721992-09-14014 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A4081992-09-14014 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A4011992-09-14014 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A3981992-09-11011 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127D6611992-09-0909 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A3831992-09-0909 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A4521992-09-0909 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127D6241992-09-0909 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127D9421992-09-0909 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127D6331992-09-0909 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A4111992-09-0808 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A3671992-09-0808 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127D7191992-09-0606 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
1998-03-31
[Table view]
Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20217N7201998-03-31031 March 1998
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Proposed Changes to 10CFR50.55a,inservice Inspection & Inservice Testing of Nuclear Power Plant Components
ML20203J9661998-02-27027 February 1998
Comment on GL 98-XX, Yr 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps
ML18067A6301997-07-0707 July 1997
Comment Supporting NUREG-1606, Proposed Regulatory Guidance Re Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Charges,Tests or Experiments).
ML20115H7061996-06-0404 June 1996
Submits Addl Info to Support Petition for Rulemaking PRM-72-3 Re Amend to SAR
ML18065A0761995-09-13013 September 1995
Comment on Draft Rg DG-1043 Re Proposed Rev 2 to Rg 1.149. New Malfunction Tests Required by Revised Rg Can Be Tested at Required 25% Per Year & Reported in Next 4-yr Testing Rept W/O Rev to Test Plan
ML20086D9031995-06-29029 June 1995
Comments on Proposed Generic Ltr Re Process for Changes to Security Plans W/O Prior NRC Approval.Proposed GL Also Avoids Unnecessary Expense for Requirements That Provide No Benefit
ML18064A8201995-06-27027 June 1995
Comment on Proposed GL Re Relocation of Pressure Temperature Limit Curves & Low Temperature Overpressure Protection Sys Limits.Supports Issuance of Ltr
ML20085E6541995-06-13013 June 1995
Comment Re Draft NUREG/BR-0199, Responsiveness to Public. Expresses Concern on Dry Cask Storage W/Exemption Given to VSC-24 Cask & Procedures for Unloading & Transport at Plant
ML18064A7681995-05-26026 May 1995
Comment on Proposed GL, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power Operated Gate Valves.
ML20073M0621994-09-29029 September 1994
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Addition of NUHOMS 52B Dry Casks to List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks. Objects to Proposed Rule Because of Substantial Differences Between Fuel Rods & Assemblies at Different Plant
ML20056E5101993-08-11011 August 1993
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning
ML20012G5301993-02-26026 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Suggests That NRC Conduct Formal Hearing
ML20012G5311993-02-24024 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5331993-02-23023 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5341993-02-23023 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5321993-02-23023 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5231993-02-20020 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20012G5251993-02-15015 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20128L9531993-02-10010 February 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127E8851993-01-15015 January 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127E8631993-01-14014 January 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127F0561993-01-0808 January 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116N9171992-11-12012 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116K9591992-11-0909 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Concerns Noted
ML20116L4651992-11-0606 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116K7851992-11-0303 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L0501992-11-0303 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Concerns Noted
ML20116L1811992-11-0202 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L2051992-11-0202 November 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L3341992-10-30030 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Can Not Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998
ML20116L2881992-10-26026 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116L2681992-10-22022 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Can Not Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998
ML20116L2841992-10-22022 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20116K9861992-10-22022 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Deadly Waste Cannot Be Stored Safely.Doe Stated Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998
ML20116L1311992-10-22022 October 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule.Waste Cannot Be Stored Safely.Doe Will Not Be Liable for Wastes If Interim Site Not Built by 1998
ML20127E1371992-09-16016 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A4011992-09-14014 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A4081992-09-14014 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A4721992-09-14014 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A3981992-09-11011 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A4521992-09-0909 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127D6241992-09-0909 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127D9421992-09-0909 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127D6331992-09-0909 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127D6611992-09-0909 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A3831992-09-0909 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A4111992-09-0808 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A3671992-09-0808 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20127D7191992-09-0606 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
ML20106A4401992-09-0606 September 1992
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Approval of Two Addl Dry Cask Storage Designs.Opposes Rule
1998-03-31
[Table view] |
Text
consumers
Power - .....
_, '.:-ft -*'
~ ')
i Pri J: 27 POWERING MICHlliAN'S PROGRESS Palisades Nuclear Plant: 27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway, Covert, Ml 49043 5/26/95
\\aoi bt> \=-~J'5T°tC\
Chief, Rules Review and Directives Branch D 3\d.1-\'\S U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 T I\*
~~'r'C\O\.\.~\\,
~u..~ \-e. \ j PALISADES PLANT - COMMENTS ON PROPOSED GENERIC LETTER: PRESSURE LOCKING AND THERMAL BINDING OF SAFETY RELATED POWER OPERATED GATE VALVES On March 27, 1995, the NRC provided a new proposed Generic Letter in the Federal Register pertaining to the evaluation of the effects of pressure locking and thermal binding on power-operated safety-related gate valves. The submittal requested comments by 4/26/95 and a Palisades Plant review has created the following comment for your review,
- 1. Would it be possible for further guidance to be provided in the generic letter to cover the same areas of questions that arose from Generic Letter 89-10,including issues from Supplement 1, such as:
- a. Evaluation of valves that are normally open, and must remain open for their safety function, but could conceivably be mispositioned inadvertently at the beginning of a postulated event, (mispositioning or position changeable valves) ?
- b. Evaluation of valves in piping systems only ?
- c. Definition of "safety-related" ?
- d. Possible generic exclusion of safety-related power-operated valves in certain plant systems, like Service Water, Component Cooling Water, Chemical and Volume Control, or Concentrated Boric Acid Systems that have not experienced this historical phenomena ?
- 5. The use of degraded air system pressure evaluations, similar to degraded voltage effects for MOVs ?
p~~)~*
___ E.11lisade~_Lj_~e_nsing Engineer
' 9505230073 950526- - - - --
PDR I&E MISC PDR l)nr..--.-~;
t;-.,;,u(jJ~
A CMS ENERGY COMPANY
