IR 05000338/2006302

Retake Exam 05000338-06-302 Draft Sample Plan & Written Exam Quality Checklist (ES-401-6)

ML081840484
Person / Time
Site:	North Anna
Issue date:	07/02/2008
From:	NRC/RGN-II
To:
References
50-338/06-302
Download: ML081840484 (40)

Text

Draft Submittal (Pink Paper)

/J ()~/fl !JJJ ;-J/t ol {){) 6 -J 0 2

!?E i/J-f!-b

- !f?o (J/U T 7 E rJ

- ,0 VJ H i) Iv{ J r-::>

DRAFT Written Exam Quality Checklist (ES-401-6)

& Written Exam Sample Plan

DRAFT Comments on North Anna Administrative Walk-Through Exam.

~in 1A 1-PT-23 QPTR Determination Review:

This JPM IS a go/no-go with only one critical step . It should have a Key that will be kept with the exam material in ADAMS .

",,-

Ad in 1B Calc te the maximum allowable reactor vessel Hydrogen venting time.

Need change inif ting cue to:

Perform step 22 of 1- R-1.3 to determine.....

A~ 2 O-PT-BO AC Sou"rc Operability Verification" At step 6 have the applicant apply appropriate TIS , and LCO entry .

A in 3 Assess personnel exposure.

This PM is a math problem and does not discrim inate between a competent operator and a non-competent operator. Need to develop something more discriminating.

Admin 4 Event Classification. No discriminating value, no pars . Need something more discriminatin DRAFT Comments on North Anna Administrative Walk-Through Exam.

Admin 1A 1-PT-23 QPTR Determination Review:

This JPM is a go/no-go with only one critical step. It should have a Key that will be kept with the exam material in ADAMS.

Admin 1B Calculate the maximum allowable reactor vessel Hydrogen venting time.

Need to change initiating cue to: i\_, , ~

Perform step 22 of 1-FR-1.3 to determine.~

-'

Admin 2 O-PT-80 AC Sources Operability Verification.

At step 6 have the applicant apply the appropriate T/S, and LCO entry.

Admin 3 Assess personnel exposure.

This JPM is a math problem and does not discriminate between a competent operator and ,?.

non-competent operator. Need to develop something more discriminating. (Ai>DefJ ~)

Admin 4 EyeDt Classification. No discriminating value, no pars. Need something more discriminatrng:~

DRAFT

DRAFT ES-401, Rev. 9 North Anna 2006-302 RO Written Examination Review Worksheet Form ES-401-9 I LOK I LOD I 4 . Job Content Flaws I 5. Other I .

Q#

(F/H) (1-5) T/F Icred'lpartiall JOb-' Minutia Dist . Link I I#/ BaCk-I Q=

units ward KIA I SRO Only I U/EiS Explanation Inst ructions

[Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts .] Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level. Enter the level of difficulty (LOO) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable). Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:

• The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).

• The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).

• The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements .

• The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable .

• One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem). Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:

• The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content).

• The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).

• The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons) .

• The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements. Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable). Based on the reviewer's judgment , is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement ,

or (S)atisfactory? At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).

1 H 2 S I002K3 .03 Question appears to match KIA. BANK DR4Fr . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred o Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SAO U/E/S Explanat ion Focu Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only s

2 F 2 X X U 003A1.03 Question appears to match KIA. All the distractors can be considered correct. Stem should read "W hich ONE of the following describes the effect on Rep temperatures, and the action that is required to mitigate the event" or someth ing similar. Also need to work on how to make the distractors incorrect. Need to rework question. NEW 3 H 2 X U 003AA2.04 Question appears to match KIA. Wi ll NI's actually reach these values? Does the plant have a positive or negative flux trip? If it does the reactor will trip before these conditions can be reached. Need to verify that the plant could actually get to these cond itions with only one dropped rod. NE F 2 X E 003K6 .04 Quest ion appea rs to match the KI Very simple What is the PDTT, is this a credible (2)

distractor. BANK 5 H 3 S 004K5.35 Question appears to match the KI SAT NEW 6 H 2 S 005K5 .02 Kind of matches KIA, NPSH relates to subcooling. BANK . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LaD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred o Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back - Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focu Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only s

7 F 2 S 006K6.19 Question appears to match KI Question is actually at the fundamental leveL If you took the conditions in the top of the stem and placed them in the Which ONE of the .....statement the question would be the same. SAT NEW.

8 H 2 X E 007A3.01 Question appears to match the KI simple What is the POD, is this a credible distractor. BANK 9 F 2 S 007EA2.05 Question appears to match the KI Kind of simple, but matches KIA. SAT NEW 10 H 2 X U 007K3.01 Question appears to match KIA. What makes the distractors credible. Need to have (2)

some numbers that are variations of the psia/psig relationship. The correct answer is the only answer with a .something in it. Fix distractors to make others plausible. (the set point should be a distractor also. NEW 11 F 2 X U 008A4 .07 Question appears to match KIA. If primary grade water is not able to be sent to the (2)

CC Surge tank then distractors A and B are not credible. (What is the back up source for makeup to the CC surge tank). NEW . 3. Psychom etric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minut ia #1 Back - Q= SRO U/EJS Explanation Focu Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only s

12 H 2 X U 008AA 1.02 Question appears to match KIA. Due to the way the stem is worded, distractors A and D (2)

are not credible. The stem states in accordance with ES-1.2 Continuous Action Page. Only two of hese items are on the continuous action pag Need to reword stem to allow distractors A and D to become credible. NEW.

13 H 2 X E 009EK3.27 Question appears to match KI Distractor D as written is not credible. The reason that is listed in the distractor analys is is much more credible. Use it. Otherwise question is SA (Minimize subcoollnq to maintain pressureizer level above the lower limit to allow pressurizer heater operation to reduce the rate of increase of pressurizer level) BANK 14 F 3 S 01 0K2.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT NEW .

15 H 3 X U 012A2.07 Question appears to match KI Distractors need some work. Distractor A second (3)

part, to make this credible put some actions listed in ARP. What other annunciators would come in based on a DC power supply failure? Distractors need some work. BANK . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Othe r .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred o Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SAO Ul EtS Explanation Focu Dis!. Link units ward KJA Only s

16 H 2 S 012A3.05 Question appears to match KIA. SAT BANK 17 H 3 S 013A1.06 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT BANK 18 H 2 X E 014K5.02 Question appears to match KI Distractors C and 0 do not appea r to be cred ibl (2)

Why would anyone think that the reactor would trip, and that only 2 group step counters would reset to zero. Work on C and 0 distractors.

19 H 2 S 015AA1 .07 Question appears to match KIA. SAT .

NEW 20 F 1 X U 017K1 .01 Question does not meet the KIA. The KIA is for the Core Exit Thermocouple system and the knowledge of the physical connections and or cause-effect relationships between the system and the plant computer. Needs to be written to match KIA. NEW 21 H 2 S 022K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT BANK . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/ H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job - Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/EiS Explanation Focu Dis!. Link units ward KIA Only s

22 H 2 E 022AK 3.05 Question appears to match KIA. How does a loss of power render the blender inoperable. Is this credible? Otherwise quest ion appears to be sat. Is this based on procedure guidance? NEW.

23 H 2 E 025AA1 .03 Question kind of matches KIA. Use of the word "Preferred" in the stem should be avoided because if it is preferred, it is not require Maybe use lAW AP11. Otherw ise SAT. NEW 24 F 2 S 026A4.0 1 Question appears to match KIA. SAT BANK 25 H 2 E 027AK2.03 Question appears to match KIA. An applicant could by knowing that one of the channels opens the sprays and a PORV could discount distractor A. Try something like this:

(A) Initiate an open signal to both spray valves and 1455C (8) Initiate an open signal to both spray valves and 1456C (C) Initiate an open signal to 1455C ONLY (0) Initiate an open signal to 1456C ONLY . 3. Psychom etric Flaws 4. Job Cont ent Flaws 5. Othe r .

Q# LOK LOD (F/ H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/EIS Explanation Focu Dls Link units ward KIA Only s

26 H 2 S 029A4.04 Question appears to match KIA. Fuel building is capitalized in A, and Containment is not in C. They should be the same . Pick one .

Otherwise SAT. NEW 27 F 2 X X U 029EG2.2.22 Question kind of matches KIA. The knowledge of limiting conditio ns for operation as well as safety limits are not being tested. Th is is a good attempt. C and D have ATWS in the distractor and ATWS is stated in the stem which directs the applicant to either Cor D. The applicant need only know that AMSAC trips the turbine. Needs some work. NEW The first A in AMSAC stands for ATWS. Page 33 of 49 Topic 7.1 Reactor Protect ion System lesso n plan 77-A.

28 F 2 E 033K5 .04 Question appears to match KIA. This is one way that SDM is being maintained there are other ways to prevent criticality such as fuel placement, boron spacers Boroflex panels , et NEW 29 H 2 S 034A4 .02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT NEW . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/EIS Explanation FOGU Dis Link units ward KIA Only s

30 F 2 X U 035K4.03 Question appears to match a portion of he KlA*, the reset of these signals is not teste Can this be put into the question? NEW 31 F 2 E 036AA 1.04 Question kind of matches KIA. The AP calls for a safe location. Need to make sure that the other locations are not "safe". Otherwise SAT. NEW 32 F 2 E 038EA2.16 Question matches KIA Not sure D is otally credible, might use open two PORVs. E-3 does not direct opening 2 PORVs so it would be plausible and wrong. NEW 33 H 2 X U 039A2.05 Question appears to match KI Distractors C and D are not credible. Even if the the main turbine was in imp out reactor power will increase some what due to the inefficient dumping of steam straight to the condenser. Attempt to word question using Mwe to further differentiate right from wrong. NEW 34 F 2 E 039K1.04 Kind of matches KIA, no mention of RCS temperature although that is what is being controlled. Low level of discrimination. Look at using tave-tref and tave and t-no-Ioad. BANK . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred o Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/EIS Explanation Focu Dis Link units ward KIA Only s

35 H/F 2 X U 045A2.12 Question matches KIA. Do rods have to be withdrawn in manual after the RCS boration?

The AR states to manually withd raw control rods .

If this is correct, manual needs to be in the distractors. This question could also be considered as memory for actions contained in the AR. NEW 36 H 2 E 056AK1.03 Question appears to match KIA. No value was determined from an incorrect use of RCS pressure (1865) . This would make a good distractor along with Thot, and CETCs. Attempt to place a value based on this for one of the distractors. NEW 37 F 1 X U 056G2.1.30 Question kind of matches KIA. If suction pressure decreases, so will discharge pressure, therefore 0 could be considered correc This question is very simple, is there not someth ing that is controlled locally like a start stop switch or breaker that could be operated on a control room evacuation or plant fire? BANK . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/EIS Explanation Focu Dis Link units ward KIA Only s

38 H 2 S 057AA2.15 Question appears to match KIA. Kind of simple. NE (Could any of the associated control signals cause a reactor trip allowing B to be correct)?

39 F 2 X X U 058AK1.01 Question does not appears to match KIA. There is no loss of DC power. Distractor D does not appear to be credible. NEW Rated as a fundamental knowledge, This question could be asked by Just using the stem without the conditions. NEW 40 F 2 X U 059K1.03 Question kind of matches KIA. This question is asking what does P-14 do? Maybe a reason why would help tie it to the KIA bette NEW This is a fundamental level question. If you took away the stem you could ask which one of

~he following is correct and the answer would be the same. NEW 41 H 2 X E 059K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. Where does the FF to the SG get measured. If the leak was down steam of these flow measurement devices then the FF/SF mismatch would not be seen and no reactor trip will occur, and C would be the correct answer. NEW . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Conte nt Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/EIS Explan ation Focu Dis Link units ward KIA Only s

42 F 2 E 061AK1.01 Question appears to match KIA. Very simple . Use a value higher than E-7 so that some knowledge is tested . (One could get this correct ust by guessing the highest value listed must be correct. NEW 43 H 2 E The sample plan has this KIA listed as 061K6.08 which has an importance factor of 2.1 for RO The question is actually written to 061 K6.02 which has an importance factor of 2.6 for ROs. Does the turbine driven if it starts feed all three steam generators? Some assumptions need to be taken as written . Leave the KIA as is (061 K6.02) and ensure that the correct answer is the only correct answer. NEW 44 H 2 X X X U 062AG2.4.6 Question appears to match KI However, the step in E-O states if less than 4 service water pumps are running then ensure Unit 2 operator initiates 0-AP-47. This is different than the correct answer in the question. Need to find a resolution. Maybe you sent me the incorrect reference. NEW 45 H 2 S 062K2.01 Question appears to match KIA SA BANK . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/E/S Explanation Focu Dis Link units ward KIA Only s

46 H 2 X X U 063K2.01 Question does not really meet the KI The KIA asks for the knowledge of electrical power supplies to Major DC loads. By stating that DC power was loss to the 2J bus (I understand hat control power could be considered a major DC load) but all the question requires is that the applicant know what comes off of 2J AC bu Furthermore can you have a loss of DC power to only one bus. Can this be verified? This question requires some more work. BANK 47 H 2 S 064A3.01 Question appears to match KIA The distractor analysis states that D is the correct answer. Although the check is on B, and the explanation supports selection B. If B is the correct answer, then question appears to be SA NEW 48 H 2 X U 065AG2.1.23 This question is based on a note at the beginning of AP-28, and with pressurizer level approaching this level the reactor should be tripped. I am not sure this meets the intent of the KIA. If any other scenario was taking place or if nothing else was taking place, this still would be he correct action to take. I believe the intent of he KIA is to show the ability to perform actions lAW a Loss of instrument air, not a loss of pressurizer level unless they are related. NEW . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Cred o Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SAO U/E/S Explanation Focu Dis Link units ward KIA Only s

49 F 2 X U 069AK1.01 Question does not really meet the KIA here is not a loss of containment integrity involved . In fact this is the design accident that

~he containment can survive and maintain integrity. Needs more work . Is Not NEW . BANK 50 F 2 S 073A1.01 Question appears to match KIA. Do the vacuum pumps trip due to the discharge valves going closed, or is it a direct trip? It may be better to pursue this. BANK.

51 H 2 X X U 076G2.1 .2 Question appears to match KI Required action in accordance with? D distractor does not appear to be cred ible. It would be more credible to commence a shutdown within one hour and be in cold shutdown in.... Do you expect ROs to know technical specifications of this natur BANK 52 F 2 S* 076K1 .17 *Assuming these pumps are from the Service Water system this question matches the KIA. If not we have more work to do. Otherwise SAT. NEW 53 F 2 S 078G2 .1.28 Question appears to match KI Distractors A and C need to say automatically closes above 90 psig increasing instead of a This is not credible . Otherwise SAT . NEW . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SRO U/EiS Explanation Focu Dis Link units ward KIA Only s

54 F 2 S 078K4.01 Question appears to match KIA Very simple. NEW 55 F 2 S 086G2.1.28 Kind of matches KIA. SAT BANK 56 F 2 S 103K4.01 Question appears to match KIA. NEW 57 H 2 S WE03EA2.1 Question appears to match KIA SAT BANK 58 F 2 S ~E04EK3.4 Question appears to match KIA. SAT BANK 59 H 2 X U WE05EK1.3 Does not really match KIA. There are annunciators in the stem but also a statement that all attempts to establish AFW were unsuccessfu So there are no remedial actions based on the annunciators. See if we can work on something to ie it to the KIA BAN . . Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LaD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/EIS Explanation Focu Dis Link units ward KIA Only s

60 H 2 X X U WE06EK3.1 Question does not really meet the KIA. The only tie to the degraded core cooling is that you discuss you are there in the stem. The injection of the accumulators at any time could cause the same problem. I understand that it is in a note at the beginning of the procedure, but the applicant is not figuring out that he has degraded core conditions, you are telling him that he doe Also teaching in the distractors, you list four of the six CSFs. This question needs some wor BANK 61 H 2 E WE09EA1.3 Question appears to match KI Distractor C is not credible, Why would you attempt to block low pressure SI prior to going below 2000 psig? Cooldown continues throughout he procedure until the unit is on RHA. BANK 62 H 2 S WE10EK2.2 Question appears to match KI SAT BANK . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #1 Back- Q= SRO U/EIS Explanation Focu Dis Link units ward KIA Only s

63 H 2 U WE11 EK2.1 Question appears to match KI How does one verify that NO back flow is occurring from the RWST to the CTMT sump?

Distractors A and B do not mention quench spray pumps. But Distractors C and 0 state to secure all pumps. So with only two pumps listed in A and B why would you pick them. Not Credibl Verifying no back flow is not credible unless you can come up with a way this is accomplishe BANK 64 H 2 E WE12EK2.1 Question appears to match KIA. Not enough procedures steps included in material to verify that this is the correct actions lAW your procedures. Provide more info. BANK 65 H 2 S IWE15EG2.1.23 Question appears to match KI SAT NEW.

66 F 2 E G2.1.1 Kind of matches KIA, better matches 2.1.29. Under what KIA did this question appear on the 2004 North Anna Exam? Wait on determination until this is researched. BANK 67 F 2 S G2.1.22 Question appears to match KIA. SAT MOD . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back- Q= SAO U/EiS Explanation Focu Dis Link units ward KIA Only s

68 F 1 U G2.1.3 Question Matches KIA. But has little discriminatory value. What is included in a short-term relief? Distractor D is not credible BANK 69 F 2 S G2.2.11 Question appears to match KIA SAT NEW 70 F 2 S G2.2.24 Question appears to match KIA. SAT NEW. Question is at the Fundamental level.

71 F 2 X E 2.2.4 Question appears to match KIA. Very Simple BANK Explain plausibility of Band D.

72 F 2 X E G2.3.2 Question appears to match KIA. This is a NOT question and should be avoided. BANK 73 F 2 E G2.3.9 Question appears to match KIA. There is no documentation to prove that 100A or 101 cannot be used. Is there any documentation, or do we need to say lAW 1-0P-21.2 after containment? NEW 74 H 2 E G2.4.14 Question Kind of matches KIA. Distractor D is not credible. BANK . 3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Cont ent Flaws 5. Other .

Q# LOK LOD (F/H) (1-5) Stem Cues T/ F Credo Partial Job- Minutia #/ Back* Q= SRO Ul EtS Explanation Focu Dis Link units ward KIA Only s

75 F 2 X E G2.4.43 Question appears to match KIA. Is the notification time normally the job of the RO?

Otherwise SAT. NEW I I Genera l Comment; the material included for support of the correct answer was usually satisfactory. The informat ion on why a distractor was credible on not credible was not. For example the PDn was used several times but no information was given as to what drains to it, its location , and what makes it a credible distractor.

23 Unsats 23 enhancements 29 satisfactory = 75 total RO questions.

Severa l questions off of 2004 exam 8 quest ions that do not match the KI DRAFT ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility : I. h r-."" Date of Exam : /1// /f/ O ~ Exam Level : RO * SRo D

-

Initial Item Description a b* c- Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility . -)<.. tY~ NRC J<JAs are referenced for all question Facilitv leam lna obiectives are referenced as available . Y<- {r 1 SRO Questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-101 <<" ""~j The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office) . Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (chack the item that applies ) and appears appropriate:

@ A tha audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or

_ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started ; or

_ the examinations were developed Independently; or

_ the licensee certifies that there Is no duplication; or other (explain) t:kt t;L fJ-?

- t'lJ r...r c"',.r tt"1IP * ftl$r -f: bf/ 'l-lcIW~ Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New from the bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRQ-only Question distribution(s) at righ H4fJI'A t.J'{. I ~' ,4 flJ.7~ ,.""

Y- ~ Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension! analys is level ;

the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent If the randomly selected J<JAs support the higher cognitive levels ; enter )!dcj, I

&t'1/ f l4- <<: 1,L- "'7 the actual RO I SRO Question distribution(s) at riQh . Referenceslhandouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of dislractors . fL [1...-5 Question content conforms with specific J<JA statements in the previously approved examination outline and Is appropriate for the lier to which they are assigned ; 1(

deviations are justified . iv7 1 Question osvchometric aualitv and format meet the auldelines In ES Aooendix r /;.-7 1 The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items ; yt.--

the lotal is correct and aqrees with the value on the cover shee (;..j t~"~~

Date

<;jUjOb

'~:Sb.w:-: ~~

a. Author Facility Reviewer (*) ~

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) --- NRC Regional Supervisor ---

Note: * The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examination # indeoendent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "CO; chief examiner concurrence reauired .

ES-401, Page 29 of 33

- - ~ ~ ~~ ~, - ~ - --, _ .

_....-.,. . . . . . , - - _ ._ --

ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Form ES-401 2 Fa cilitv: North Anna Date of Exarr Tier Group RO KIA Category Points SRO-On l~ Points K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G* Total K IA A2 G'" Total 1.

Emerqency 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 I 18

& 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 9 Abnorma Plant lIer Evou lutiom Totals 5 4 4 5 5 4 27 Plan t 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 2 2 10 Systems Tier Total s 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 38 3. Generic Knowledge and 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Abilities Category 3 3 2 2 10 1. Ensure that at least two topics from every KIA category are sampled within each tier of the RO outline (Le., the Tier Totals" in each KIA category shall not be less than two). Refer to Section D.1.c for additional guidance regarding SRO sampling .

2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/-1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 point . Select topics from many systems and evolutions ; avoid selecting mo re than two KiA topics from a given system or evolution unless they relate to plant-specific priorities .

4. Systems/evolutions with in each group are identified on the associated outl ine .

5. The shaded areas are not applicable to the category/tie .* The generic (G) KlAs in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the KIA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. The SRO KlAs must also be linked to 10 CFR 55.43 or an SRQ-levelleaming objectiv . On the following pages, enter the KIA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics'

importance ratings (IR) for the applicable license level, and the point tota ls for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; summarize all the SRo-only knowledge and non-A2 ability categories in the columns labeled "K" and "A" . Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exam . For Tier 3, enter the KIA numbers, descriptions, importance ratings, and point totals on Form E8-401 -3 .

9 . Refer to ES-401, Attachment 2, for guidance regard ing the elimination of inappropriate KIA NUREG-1021, Revision 9 2 2 of 34

Tier 1 Group 1 ime/Safety Function K1 K2 K3 Ai A2 G KA Question Type KIA Toplc(s) RQTSRO

.eactor Tnp - 0 0 0 0 1 0 007EA2.05 Ability to determine and interpretthe Reactortrip first-out indication .9 tabilization - following as they apply to (EMERGENCY ecovery/1 PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41 .10/43.5/

45.13)

ressurizer Vapor 0 0 0 1 0 0 008AA1 .02 Ability to operate and / or monitorthe HPI pump to control PZR level/pressure .9 pace Accident/3 following as they apply to (ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR: 41 .7/45.5/

45.6)

mall Break LOCA/ 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 009EK3.27 Knowledge of the reasons for the following Manual depressunzation or HPI .8 responses as they apply to (EMERGENCY recirculation for sustained high pressure PLANT EVOLUTlON):(CFR: 41 .5/41.10/

45.6/45.13)

arge Break LOCA/ 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 011EK2.02 Knowledge of the interrelations between KIA RandomlyRejected .7 (EMERGENCY PLANT EVOLUTION) and the following:(CFR: 41.7 /45.7 /45.8)

I

.CP Malfunctions / 4 0 0 0 1 0 o 015AA1 .07 Ability to operate and / or monitor the RCP seal water injection subsystem .4 following as they apply to (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41 .7 /45.5/

45.6)

ass of Rx Coolant 0 0 1 0 0 o 022AK3.05 Knowledge of the reasons for the following Need to avoid planttransients .4 lakeup/2 responses as they apply to (ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR: 41 .5/41.10 /

45.6/45.13)

oss of RHR System / 0 0 0 1 0 o 025AA1.19 Ability to operate and / or monitorthe Block orifice bypass valve controller and .4 following as they apply to (ABNORMAL indicators PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41 .7/45.5/

45.6)

- - -

A ** __ ** _ " A""'' ....

Tier 1 Group 1

- ._---_._~-

me/Safety Function K1 K2 K3 A1 A2 G KA Question Type KIA Topic(s) RO SRO

)SS of Component 0 0 0 0 a 0 026AK2 Knowledge of the interrelations between KIA Randomly Rejected 0 Ia Doling Water / 8 (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION) and the i following :(CFR: 41.7/45.7/45.8)

I I

'essurizer Pressure 0 1 0 0 0 0 027AK2.03 Knowledge of the interrelations between Controllers and positioners .8 antral System (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION) and the alfunction / 3 following:(CFR: 41.7/45.7/45.8)

rWS/1 0 0 0 0 0 1 029EG2.2.22 This Is a Generic, no stem statementIs Knowledge of limiting conditions for .1 associate operations and safety limits.

.eam Gen. Tube 0 0 0 0 1 0 038EA2.16 Abilityto determine and interpretthe Actions to be taken if S/G goes solid and .6 upture/ 3 following as they applyto (EMERGENCY water enters steam line PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41 .10 / 43.5 /

45.13)

eam Line Rupture- 0 0 a 0 0 0 040AK2.02 KnOWledge of the interrelations between KIA Randomly Rejected .6

<<iessive Heat (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION) and the

'ansfer / 4 following:(CFR: 41.7/45.7/45.8)

iss of Main 0 0 0 0 0 0 054AA1.01 Ability to operate and / or monitorthe KIA Randomly Rejected .4 sedwater / 4 following as they apply to (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.7/45.5/

45.6)

tation Blackout/ 6 0 0 0 0 0 o 055EG2.1.27 This is a Generic, no stem statement IS KIA Randomly Rejected .9 associate )55 of Off-site Power / 1 0 0 0 0 o 056AK1.03 Knowledge of the operational implications Definition of subcooling: use of steam .4 of the following concepts as they apply to tables to determine it the (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.8 to 41.10 145.3)

Tier 1 Group 1

-

Ime/Safety Function K1 K2 K3 A1 A2 G KA Question Type KIA Topic(s) RO SRO

)5S of Vital AC lns AA2.02 Ability to determine and Interpret the Core flood tank pressure and level .8 us /6 following as they apply to ABNORMAL Indicators PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41 .10/43.5/

45.13)

)5S of DC Power /6 1 0 0 0 0 0 058AK1 .01 Knowledge of the operational Implications Battery charger equipment and .1 of the following concepts as they apply to instrumentation the (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.8 to 41 .10 /45.3)

ISS of Nuclear Svc 0 0 0 0 0 1 062AG2. This is a Generic, no stem statementis Knowledge symptom based EOP later /4 associate mitigation strategies.

oss of InstrumentAir / 0 0 0 a a 1 065AG2.1 .23 This Is a Generic, no stem statementis Ability to perform specific system and associate integrated plant procedures during all modesof plant operation .

OCAOutside 0 0 1 0 0 0 WE04EK Knowledge of the reasons for the following RO or SRO function within the control .8 ontainment /3 responses as they apply to (EMERGENCY room team as appropriate to the PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR:41.5/41.10 / assigned position, In such a way that 45.6/45.13) procedures are adhered to and the limitations in the facilities license and amendments are not violate DSS of Emergency 0 1 0 0 0 a WE11EK Knowledge of the Interrelations between Components and functions of control .9 oolant Recirc. /4 (EMERGENCY PLANT EVOLUTION) and and safety systems, including the following:(CFR: 41.7 /45.7 /45.8) instrumentation, signals, interlocks, failure modes and automatic and manual feature team Line Rupture - 0 1 a 0 0 a WE12EK Knowledge of the interrelations between Components and functions of control .7 xcessive Heat (EMERGENCY PLANTEVOLUTION) and and safetysystems, Including ransfer 14 the following:(CFR: 41.7/45.7/45.8) instrumentation, signals, interlocks, failure modes and automatic and manual feature Tier 1 Group 1 lme/Safety Function K1 K2 K3 A1 A2 G KA Question Type --~----KiA- Topic(s) RO SRO adequate Heat 1 0 0 0 0 0 WE05EK1 .3 Knowledge of the operational implications Annunciators and conditions indicating 3.9 4.1 ransfer- Loss of of the following concepts as they applyto signals, and remedial actions associated econdary Heat Sink/ the EMERGENCY PLANT with the (Loss of Secondary HeatSink).

EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.8to 41.10 /45 .3)

_. ---- - - -- .-

Tier 1 Group 2

.*

arne I Safety Function K1 K2 K3 A1 A2 G KA Question Type K/A Topic(s} RO SRO

.ontinuous Rod Withdr a a 0 0 0 0 001AA1 .06 Ability to operate and/ or monitorthe KiA Randomly Rejected 3 following as they apply to (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41 .7 /45.5/

45.6)

iropped Control Rod / 0 0 0 0 1 0 003AA2.04 Ability to determine and interpret the Rod motion stops dueto dropped rod 3.4 following as they apply to ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.10/43.5/

45.13)

ioperable/Stuck Contn a 0 0 0 0 0 005AA2.01 Ability to determine and interpret the KiA Randomly Rejected 3.3 following as theyapply to ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41 .10 /43.5/

45.13)

.mergency Boration /1 0 0 0 0 0 0 024AK1.02 Knowledge of the operational implications of KiA Randomly Rejected . 3.6 the following concepts as they applyto the (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR:

41.8 to 41 .10/ 45.3)

ressurizer Level Malfu 0 0 0 0 0 o 028AK1 .01 Knowledge of the operatlonallmplications of KIA Randomly Rejected 2.8 the following concepts as they applyto the (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR:

41.8to 41.10 /45.3)

ass of Source Range I 0 0 0 0 0 o I032AK2.01 Knowledge of the interrelations between KIA Randomly Rejected 2.7 (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION) and the following:(CFR: 41.7 /45.7 /45.8)

ass of Intermediate R~ 0 0 0 0 0 o 033AK1.01 Knowledge of the operational implications of KIA Randomly Rejected 2.7 3 the following concepts as they applyto the (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR:

41.8 to 41.10 / 45.3)

uel Handling Accident 0 0 a 1 0 o 036AA1.03 Ability to operate and/ or monitor the Reactor-building containment evacuation 3.5 following asthey apply to (ABNORMAL alarm enable switch

Tier 1 Group 2 ame / Safety Function K1 K2 K3 Ai A2 G KA Question Type KIA Topic(s) RO SRO PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.7 145.51 45.6)

team Generator Tube 0 0 0 0 0 0 037AA2.01 Ability to determine and interpretthe KIA Randomly Rejected 3 following as they applyto ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.10 /43.5/

45.13)

ass of CondenserVac 0 a 0 0 0 0 051AA2.02 Abilityto determine and interpret the KIA Randomly Rejected 3.9 following asthey apply to ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR:41.10 /43.5/

45.13)

ccidental Liquid Rad\l\ i 0 0 0 0 0 a 059AK3.03 Knowledge of the reasons for the following KIA Randomly Rejected 3 responses as they applyto (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR:41.5/41.10 /

45.6/45.13)

ccidental Gaseous Ra 0 0 0 0 0 o 060AK1.04 Knowledge of the operational implications of KIA Randomly Rejected 2.5 the following concepts as they apply to the (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR:

41.8 to 41.10/45.3)

RM System Alarms / i 1 0 a 0 0 o 061AK1.01 Knowledge of the operational implications of Detector limitations 2.5 the following concepts as they apply to the (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR:

41.8 to 41 .10 145.3)

lant Fire On-site /98 0 0 0 0 0 o 067AK3.04 KnOWledge of the reasonsfor the following KIA Randomly Rejected 3.3 responses as they apply to (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR:41.5/41 .10/

45.6/45.13)

ontrol Room Evac. I 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 068AK1 KnOWledge of the operational implications of KIA Randomly Rejected 0 0 the following concepts as they applyto the (ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR:

.

Tier 1 Group 2 arne / Safety Function K1 K2 K3 A1 A2 G KA Question Type KIA Topic(s) RO SRO 41.8to 41.10 /45.3)

oss of CTMT Integrity , 1 0 0 0 0 0 1069AK1 .01 Knowledge of the operational implications of Effectof pressure on leak rate 2.6 the following concepts as they applyto the (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR:

41 .8 to 41.10 /45.3)

lad. Core Cooling /4 0 0 0 0 a 0 074EK3.10 Knowledge of the reasons for the following KIA Randomly Rejected 3,5 responses as they applyto (EMERGENCY PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41 .5/41.10 /

45.6/45.13)

ligh Reactor Coolant /J a 0 0 0 0 0 076AA1.04 Ability to operate and/ or monitor the KIA Randomly Rejected 3.2 following as theyapplyto (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41 .7/45.5/

45.6)

ediagnosis /3 0 0 0 0 0 o WE01 EG2. This is a Generic, no stem statement IS KIA Randomly Rejected 3.4 associate team Generator Over- a a a 0 0 o WE13EK Knowledge of the interrelations between KIA Randomly Rejected 3.0 (EMERGENCY PLANT EVOLUTION) and the following:(CFR: 41.7 /45.7 /45.8)

ontainment Flooding / 0 0 0 0 0 1 WE15EG2 .1 .3~ Thisis a Generic, no stem statement is lAbility to recognize indications for system 3.4 14 associate operating parameters which are entry-level conditions for technical specification igh Containment Radi 0 0 0 0 0 o WE16EA Ability to determine and interpret the KIARandomly Rejected 3.0 following as theyapplyto (EMERGENCY PLANT EVOLUTlON) :(CFR: 41 .10/43.5/

45.13)

I Termination /3 0 0 0 0 0 o WE02EK Knowledge of the Interrelations between KIARandomly Rejected .9

Tier 1 Group 2

-- - - - - - - - :;-:-:-

KIA Topic(s) RO SRO arne I Safety Function K1 K2 K3 A1 A2 G KA Question Type (EMERGENCY PLANTEVOLUTION) and the following:(CFR: 41.7 /45.7 /45.8)

)CA Cooldown - Depi 0 0 a a 1 0 WE03EA Ability to determine and interpret the Facility conditions and selection of 3.4 following as they applyto (EMERGENCY appropriate procedures during abnormal PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.10 /43.5/ and emergency operation .13)

atural Circ./ 4 0 0 a 1 0 a WE09EA Ability to operate and I or monitorthe Desired operating results during abnormal 3.5 following asthey applyto (EMERGENCY and emergency situation PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.7 /45.5/

45.6)

atural Circ. With Sean 0 1 0 0 0 0 WE10EK KnOWledge of the Interrelations between Facility's heat removal systems, including 3.6 (EMERGENCY PLANT EVOLUTION) and primary coolant, emergency coolant, the the following:(CFR: 41 .7/45.7/45.8) decay heat removal systems and relations between the proper operation of these systems to the operation of the facility.

CS Overcooling - PTS 0 0 0 a 0 o WE08EG2.1.3~ Thisis a Generic, no stem statement Is KiA Randomly Rejected 3.4 associate egraded Core Coolin& 0 0 1 a 0 o WE06EK KnOWledge of the reasons for the following Facility operating characteristics during 3.4 responses asthey applyto (EMERGENCY transient conditions, including coolant PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41 .5/41 .10/ chemistry and the effects of temperature, 45.6/45.13) pressure and reactivity changes and operating limitations and reasons for these operating characteristics.

aturated Core Cooling a a a a 0 o WE07EG2 .4.4~ This Is a Generic, no stem statement is KiA Randomly Rejected 4 4 associated.

JSS of CTMT Integrity . 0 0 0 a 0 o WE14EG2.4.4~ This is a Generic, no stem statement is KiA Randomly Rejected 4 4 associate Tier 2 Group 1 me I Safety-Functio K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 KG A1 A~ A3 A4 G Question Type KIA Toplc(s) r KA RO SRO sactor Coolant 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Knowledge of the effect that a loss or Containment isolation valves affectmg 003K6.04 12.8 ~.1 imp malfunction of the following will have on RCP operation the (SYSTEM):(CFR: 41 .7/45.7)

temical and 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Knowledge of the operational Types and effects of radiation, dosimetry 004K5.17 1 ~ .1 alums Control implications of the following concepts as and shielding-time-distance they applyto the (SYSTEM):(CFR: 41.5 /

45.7)

esidual Heat 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Knowledge of the operational Needfor adequate subcoollng 005K5.02 ~.4 ~ .5 emoval implications of the following conceptsas they apply to the (SYSTEM) :(CFR: 41.5/

45.7)

mergency Core 0 0 0 0 o 1 o 0 o 0 0 I Knowledge of the effect that a loss or HPI/LPI systems (mode change) 006K6.19 ~ .9 Doling malfunction of the following will have on the (SYSTEM):(CFR: 41.7/45.7) [7 ressurlzer o 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 1 0 0 Ability to monitor automatic operations of Components which discharge to the PRT * 007A3.01 12.9 elief/Quench Tank the (SYSTEM) Includlng:(CFR: 41.7/

45.5) [7 omponent Cooling o 0 o 0 a 0 o 0 o 1 o Ability to manuallyoperate and/or Control of minimum level in the CCWS 008A4.07 D.9 12.9 later monitorin the control room:(CFR: 41.7 / surge tank 45.5 to 45.8)

ressurizer 0 1 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 Knowledge of electrical powersupplies Controller for PZR sprayvalve 010K2.02 i:'.5 12.7 ressure Control to the following:(CFR: 41.7)

eactor Protection o 0 o a a 0 o 0 1 o a Ability to monitor automatic operations of Single and multiple channel trip 012A3.05 ~.7 the (SYSTEM) Includlng:(CFR: 41.7/ indicators 45.5)

ngineered Safety a 0 o 0 o 0 1 o 0 a o Ability to predictand/ormonitor changes RWSTlevel 013A1 .06 ;3.6 \ .. _ ...... n "nne

Tier 2 Group 1

_._- _._--~- --,.---

me I Safety Functio K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A'). A3 A4 G Question Type KIA Topfc(s) KA RO SHO iatures Actuation in parameters associated with operating the (SYSTEM) controls inciuding:(CFR:

41.5/45.5)

mtalnment 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Knowledge of the effectthat a loss or Containment instrumentation readings 022K3.02 3.0 13.3

)oling malfunction of the (SYSTEM) will have on the following:(CFR: 41.7 145.6)

e Condenser 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KIARejected 025A2.04 0 P

mtainment Spray 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Ability to manually operate and/or CSS controls 026A4.01 ~.3 monitorin the control room:(CFR: 41.71 45.5 to 45.8)

ain and Reheat o 0 0 0 o 0 0 1 0 0 0 Ability to (a) predict the impactsof the Increasing steam demand, its 039A2.05 ~.3 ~.6

eam following on the (SYSTEM) and (b) relationship to increases in reactor power based on thosepredictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those abnormal operation:(CFR: 41.5/43.51 45.3/45.13)

ain Feedwater 1 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 IKnowledge of the physical connections S/GS 059K1.03 ~.1 ~.3 and/orcausa-effect relationships between (SYSTEM) and the following:(CFR: 41.2to 41.9/45.7 to 45.8)

Jxiliary/Emergency o 0 o 0 o 1 o 0 o 0 o KnOWledge of the effectthat a loss or Pumps 061K6.08 f6 ~.7 sedwater malfunction of the following will haveon the (SYSTEM):(CFR: 41.7/45.7)

Electrical 0 1 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o Knowledge of electrical powersupplies Majorsystem loads 062K2.01 ~.4 istribution to the following

(CFR: 41.7)

. -"..""'-

-.

Tier 2 Group 1

- - , - --

me I Safety Functlo K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G Question Type KIA Topic(s) KA RO fIRO C Electrical 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Knowledge of electrical power supplies Major DC loads 063K2.01 2.9 ~ .1 istribution to the following:(CFR: 41 .7)

l1ergency Diesel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Abilityto monitor automatic operations of Automaticstart of compressor and ED/G 064A3.01 4.1 ~.O enerator the (SYSTEM) including:(CFR: 41.7/

45.5)

rocess Radiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Abilityto predict and/or monitor changes Radiation levels 073A1.01 ;3.2 onitoring in parameters associated with operating the (SYSTEM) controls including:(CFR:

41.5/45.5)

ervice Water 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 This is a Generic, no stem statement is ! Knowledge of operator responsibilities 076GG2.1.2 ~.O associate during all modes of plant operatio strument Air 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 1 This is a Generic, no stem statement Is Knowledge of the purpose and function 078GG2.1.28 ;3.2 associate of major system components and control ontainment o 0 o 1 o 0 0 0 o 0 o Knowledge of (SYSTEM) design Vacuum breaker protection 103K4.01 ;3.0 feature(s) and or interlock{s)which provide for the followlng:(CFR: 41 .7}

eactor Protection o 0 o 0 o 0 0 1 o 0 o Abilityto (a) predictthe impacts of the Incorrectchannel bypassing 012A2.03 ;3.4 following on the (SYSTEM) and (b)

based on those predictions, use proceduresto correct, control, or mitigatethe consequences of those abnormal operation:(CFR: 41.5/43.51 45.3/45.13)

ressurizer o 0 1 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o KnOWledge of the effect that a loss or Containment 007K3.01 .6 elieflQuench Tank malfunction of the (SYSTEM) will have on the following:(CFR: 41.7/45.6)

. . - -

Tier 2 Group 1 me I Safety Functio K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G Question Type KIA Topic(s) KA RO ~RO irvlce Water 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Knowledge of the physical connections PRMS 076K1.17 ~ .6 ~.7 and/orcause-effect relationships between (SYSTEM) and the following :(CFR: 41 .2 to 41 .9/45.7 to 45.8)

sin and Reheat 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Knowledge of the physical connections .RCS temperature monitoring and control 039K1.04 3.1 3.1 eam and/orcause-effect relationships between (SYSTEM) and the following:(CFR: 41.2to 41.9/45.7 to 45.8)

rin Feedwater 0 0 1 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 Knowledge of the effectthat a loss or AFWsystem 059K3.02 ~.6 malfunction of the (SYSTEM) will have on the followlng:(CFR: 41.7 /45.6)

iactor Coolant 0 0 0 0 o 0 1 o 0 0 o Ability to predict and/ormonitorchanges RCP motorstatorwinding temperatures 003A1.03 ~ .6 imp in parameters associated with operating the (SYSTEM) controls including :(CFR:

41 .S/45.S}

essurizer o 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 0 KIA Rejected 007K4.01 p D

!lief/Quench Tank trurnent Air o 0 0 1 o 0 o 0 o 0 o Knowledge of (SYSTEM) design Manual/automatic transfers of control 078K4.01 2.7 feature(s) and or interlock(s) which provide for the following:(CFR: 41 .7)

Tier 2 Group 2 me J Safety Functio K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 ~ M M ~ Question Type KIA Topic(s) KA RO SRO vdrogen 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 This Is a Generic, no stem statement is K/A Randomly Rejected 028GG2.4.50 3.3 3.3 ecombiner and associated.

.u ge Control Dntainment Purge 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 AbIlity to manually operate and/or Containment evacuation signal 029A4.04 3.5 monitor In the control room:(CFR: 41.7/

45.5to 45.8)

cent Fuel Pool 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 o 0 o Knowledge of (SYSTEM) design Adequate 80M (boron concentration) 033K4.05 3.1 3.3 Doling feature(s) and or interlock(s) which provide for the following:(CFR: 41.7)

rel Handling 0 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 1 o Ability to manuallyoperate and/or Neutron levels 034A4.02 3.5 3.9 qulprnent monitor in the control room:(CFR: 41.7/

45.5to 45.8)

eam Generator 0 0 0 1 o 0 o 0 o 0 o Knowledge of (SYSTEM) design Automatic blowdown and sample line 035K4.03 2.6 feature(s) and or Interlock(s) which isolation and reset provide for the following:(CFR: 41.7)

eam 0 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o Ability to (a) predictthe impactsof the IKIA Randomly Rejected 041A2.02 3.6 umplTurbine following on the (SYSTEM) and (b)

(passControl based on thosepredictions, use procedures to correct, control , or mitigate the consequences of those abnormal operation:(CFR: 41.5/43.5 /

45.3/45.13)

ainTurbine o 0 o 0 o 0 0 1 o 0 o Ability to (a) predictthe impactsof the Control rod insertion limitsexceeded 045A2.12 2.5 enerator following on the (SYSTEM) and (b) (stabilize secondary)

based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those abnormal operation:(CFR: 41.5/43.5 /

45.3 /45.13)

Tier 2 Group 2 K1 K2 K4 K5 K6 A1 1'\2 ~3

-

me I Safety Functio K3 M P Question Type KIA Toplcls) KA RO ~RO mdenserAir 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ability to (a) predict the Impacts of the KiA Randomly Rejected 055A2 0 0 smoval following on the (SYSTEM) and (b)

based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those abnormal operation:(CFR: 41 .5/43.51 45.3/45.13)

~uid Radwaste 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the KiA Randomly Rejected 068A2.03 2.5 following on the (SYSTEM) and (b)

based on those predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those abnormal operation:(CFR: 41 .5/43.51 45.3/45.13)

aste Gas Disposal 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 Q o 0 Knowledge of the effectthat a loss or KiA Randomly Rejected 071K6 0 10 malfunction of the following will have on the (SYSTEM):(CFR: 41.7/45.7)

ea Radiation 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 IAbility to manually operate.andlor KJA Randomly Rejected 072A4.03 3.1 3.1

)nitoring monitor in the control room :(CFR: 41.71 45.5to 45.8)

rculating Water o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o Ability to manually operate andlor KJA Randomly Rejected 075A4.01 3.2 monitor in the control room:(CFR: 41 .71 45.5 to 45.8)

ation Air o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 IKnOWledge of the effectthat a loss or IKiA Randomly Rejected 079K3 0 0 malfunction of the (SYSTEM) will have on the following:(CFR: 41.7/45.6)

'e Protection o a o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 1 Thisis a Generic, no stem statement Is KnOWledge of the purpose and function 086G2.1 .28 3.2 associate of majorsystem components and controls.

-

Tier 2 Group 2 ne f Safety Functlo K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 ru A.3 ~4 ~ Question Type KIA Toplc(s) KA RO r3RCf mtrot Rod Drive 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Knowledge of electrical power supplies KiA Randomly Rejected 001K2.05 3.1 to the foliowing:(CFR: 41.7)

iactor Coolant 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Knowledge of the effectthat a lossor Containment 002K3.03 4.2 malfunction of the (SYSTEM) will have on the following:(CFR: 41.7 /45.6)

essurizer Level 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Knowledge of the effectthat a lossor KiA Randomly Rejected 011K3.02 3.5 3.7 mtrol malfunction of the (SYSTEM) will have onthe following:(CFR: 41.7 145.6}

>d Position 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Knowledge of the operational RPIS Independent of demand position 014K5.02 2.8 3.3

lication implications of the following concepts as theyapply to the (SYSTEM):(CFR: 41.5/

45.7)

rclear 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ability to monitor automatic operations of KiA Randomly Rejected 015A3.02 13.7 3.9 stru mentation the (SYSTEM) Including:{CFR: 41.7/

45.5)

on-nuclear 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 Ability to monitor automatic operations of KiA Randomly Rejected 016A3.01 2.9 2.9 strumentation the (SYSTEM) including:(CFR: 41.7/

45.5)

-core 1 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 Knowledge of the physical connections Plant computer 017K1.01 3.2 3.2 smperature and/or cause-effect relationships onltor between (SYSTEM) andthe foliowing:(CFR: 41.2to 41.9/45.7 to 45.8)

antainrnent Iodine 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 o 0 Knowledge Ofthe effect that a lossor KIARandomly Rejected 027K3 0 0 srnoval malfunction of the (SYSTEM) will have on thefollowing:(CFR: 41.7/45.6)

andensate 0 0 o 0 o 0 a 0 0 o 1 Thisis a Generic, nostem statement is Ability to locate and operate 056G2.1.30 3.9 . - _......... ->_.~

Tier 2 Group 2 me I Safety Functlo K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 ~ ~3 1\4 G Question Type KIA Topic(s) KA RO SRO associate components, including local control Tier 3

- ---

Group KA Topic RO SRO induct of Operations 02. Knowledge of shift turnover practice .4 induct of Operations G2.1.22 Ability to determine Mode of Operatio .8 3.3 induct of Operations G2. Knowledge of conduct of operations requirement .7 3.8

[uipment Control G2.2.11 Knowledge of the process for controlling temporary change .5 3.4

[uipment Control 02.2.24 Ability to analyze the affeetofmaintenance activities on LeO statu .6 3.8

[uipment Control G2.2A (multi-unit) Ability to ex-plain the variations in control board layouts, systems, instrumentation and procedural actions between units at a facility.

idiation Control G2. Knowledge of tbeprocess for performing a containment purg .5 3.4 idiation Control G2. Knowledge of facility ALARA progra .5 nergency Procedures/Plan G2.4.14 Knowledge of general guidelines for EOPflowchart us .9 nergency ProceduresIPlan G2.4.43 Knowledge of emergency communications systems and technique .8 August 8, 2006