IR 05000338/2006302
| ML081840484 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 07/02/2008 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-II |
| To: | |
| References | |
| 50-338/06-302 | |
| Download: ML081840484 (40) | |
Text
Draft Submittal (Pink Paper)
/J ()~/fl !JJJ;-J/t ol{){)6-J 0 2
!?E i/J-f!-b
- !f?o (J/U T 7 E rJ
-
,0 VJ H i) Iv{ Jr-::>
DRAFT Written Exam Quality Checklist (ES-401-6)
& Written Exam Sample Plan
DRAFT Comments on North Anna Administrative Walk-Through Exam.
~in 1A 1-PT-23 QPTR Determination Review:
This JPM IS a go/no-go with only one critical step. It should have a Key that will be kept with the exam material in ADAMS.
",,-
Ad in 1B Calc te the maximum allowable reactor vessel Hydrogen venting time.
Need change inif ting cue to:
Perform step 22 of 1-R-1.3 to determine.....
A~ 2 O-PT-BO AC Sou"rc Operability Verification" At step 6 have the applicant apply appropriate TIS, and LCO entry.
A in 3 Assess personnel exposure.
This PM is a math problem and does not discriminate between a competent operator and a non-competent operator. Need to develop something more discriminating.
Admin 4 Event Classification. No discriminating value, no pars. Need something more discriminatin DRAFT Comments on North Anna Administrative Walk-Through Exam.
Admin 1A 1-PT-23 QPTR Determination Review:
This JPM is a go/no-go with only one critical step. It should have a Key that will be kept with the exam material in ADAMS.
Admin 1B Calculate the maximum allowable reactor vessel Hydrogen venting time.
Need to change initiating cue to:
i\\_,, ~
Perform step 22 of 1-FR-1.3 to determine.~
-'
Admin 2 O-PT-80 AC Sources Operability Verification.
At step 6 have the applicant apply the appropriate T/S, and LCO entry.
Admin 3 Assess personnel exposure.
This JPM is a math problem and does not discriminate between a competent operator and,?.
non-competent operator. Need to develop something more discriminating. (Ai>DefJ ~)
Admin 4 EyeDtClassification. No discriminating value, no pars. Need something more discriminatrng:~
DRAFT
DRAFT ES-401, Rev. 9 North Anna 2006-302 RO Written Examination Review Worksheet 1. I 2.
I 4. Job Content Flaws I
5. Other I
6.
Q# I LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
T/F Icred'lpartiall JOb-' MinutiaI #/ IBaCk-I Q= I SRO I U/EiS Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only 7.
Explanation Form ES-401-9 Instructions
[Refer to Section 0 of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
1.
Enter the level of knowledge (LOK) of each question as either (F)undamental or (H)igher cognitive level.
2.
Enter the level of difficulty (LOO) of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - difficult) rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
3.
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus to elicit the correct answer (e.g., unclear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
- The stem or distractors contain cues (i.e., clues, specific determiners, phrasing, length, etc).
- The answer choices are a collection of unrelated true/false statements.
- The distractors are not credible; single implausible distractors should be repaired, more than one is unacceptable.
- One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g., if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stem).
4.
Check the appropriate box if a job content error is identified:
The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the question has a valid KIA but, as written, is not operational in content).
- The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e., it is not required to be known from memory).
- The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
- The question requires reverse logic or application compared to the job requirements.
5.
Check questions that are sampled for conformance with the approved KIA and those that are designated SRO-only (KIA and license level mismatches are unacceptable).
6.
Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (U)nsatisfactory (requiring repair or replacement), in need of (E)ditorial enhancement,
or (S)atisfactory?
7.
At a minimum, explain any "U" ratings (e.g., how the Appendix B psychometric attributes are not being met).
H
S I002K3.03 Question appears to match KIA. BANK DR4Fr
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SAO U/E/S Explanation Focu Dis!.
Link units ward KIA Only s
F
X X
U 003A1.03 Question appears to match KIA. All the distractors can be considered correct. Stem should read "Which ONE of the following describes the effect on Rep temperatures, and the action that is required to mitigate the event" or something similar. Also need to work on how to make the distractors incorrect. Need to rework question. NEW
H
X U
003AA2.04 Question appears to match KIA. Will NI's actually reach these values? Does the plant have a positive or negative flux trip? If it does the reactor will trip before these conditions can be reached. Need to verify that the plant could actually get to these conditions with only one dropped rod. NEW.
F
X E
003K6.04 Question appears to match the KIA.
(2)
Very simple What is the PDTT, is this a credible distractor. BANK
H
S 004K5.35 Question appears to match the KIA.
SAT NEW
H
S 005K5.02 Kind of matches KIA, NPSH relates to subcooling. BANK
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LaD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Cred o Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back -
Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focu Dis!.
Link units ward KIA Only s
F
S 006K6.19 Question appears to match KIA.
Question is actually at the fundamental leveL If you took the conditions in the top of the stem and placed them in the Which ONE of the.....statement the question would be the same. SAT NEW.
H
X E
007A3.01 Question appears to match the KIA.
simple What is the POD, is this a credible distractor. BANK
F
S 007EA2.05 Question appears to match the KIA.
Kind of simple, but matches KIA. SAT NEW
H
X U
007K3.01 Question appears to match KIA. What (2)
makes the distractors credible. Need to have some numbers that are variations of the psia/psig relationship. The correct answer is the only answer with a.something in it. Fix distractors to make others plausible. (the set point should be a distractor also.
NEW
F
X U
008A4.07 Question appears to match KIA. If (2)
primary grade water is not able to be sent to the CC Surge tank then distractors A and B are not credible. (What is the back up source for makeup to the CC surge tank). NEW
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back -
Q=
SRO U/EJS Explanation Focu Dis!.
Link units ward KIA Only s
H
X U
008AA1.02 Question appears to match KIA. Due (2)
to the way the stem is worded, distractors A and D are not credible. The stem states in accordance with ES-1.2 Continuous Action Page. Only two of hese items are on the continuous action page.
Need to reword stem to allow distractors A and D to become credible. NEW.
H
X E
009EK3.27 Question appears to match KIA.
Distractor D as written is not credible. The reason that is listed in the distractor analysis is much more credible. Use it. Otherwise question is SAT.
(Minimize subcoollnq to maintain pressureizer level above the lower limit to allow pressurizer heater operation to reduce the rate of increase of pressurizer level) BANK
F
S 01 0K2.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT NEW.
H
X U
012A2.07 Question appears to match KIA.
(3)
Distractors need some work. Distractor A second part, to make this credible put some actions listed in ARP. What other annunciators would come in based on a DC power supply failure? Distractors need some work. BANK
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SAO UlEtS Explanation Focu Dis!.
Link units ward KJA Only s
H
S 012A3.05 Question appears to match KIA. SAT BANK
H
S 013A1.06 Question kind of matches KIA. SAT BANK
H
X E
014K5.02 Question appears to match KIA.
(2)
Distractors C and 0 do not appear to be credible.
Why would anyone think that the reactor would trip, and that only 2 group step counters would reset to zero. Work on C and 0 distractors.
H
S 015AA1.07 Question appears to match KIA. SAT.
NEW
F
X U
017K1.01 Question does not meet the KIA. The KIA is for the Core Exit Thermocouple system and the knowledge of the physical connections and or cause-effect relationships between the system and the plant computer. Needs to be written to match KIA. NEW
H
S 022K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT BANK
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO U/EiS Explanation Focu Dis!.
Link units ward KIA Only s
H
E 022AK 3.05 Question appears to match KIA. How does a loss of power render the blender inoperable. Is this credible? Otherwise question appears to be sat. Is this based on procedure guidance? NEW.
H
E 025AA1.03 Question kind of matches KIA. Use of the word "Preferred" in the stem should be avoided because if it is preferred, it is not required.
Maybe use lAW AP11. Otherwise SAT. NEW
F
S 026A4.0 1 Question appears to match KIA. SAT BANK
H
E 027AK2.03 Question appears to match KIA. An applicant could by knowing that one of the channels opens the sprays and a PORV could discount distractor A. Try something like this:
(A) Initiate an open signal to both spray valves and 1455C (8) Initiate an open signal to both spray valves and 1456C (C) Initiate an open signal to 1455C ONLY (0) Initiate an open signal to 1456C ONLY
1.
2.
3. Psychom etric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Othe r 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/EIS Explanation Focu Dlst.
Link units ward KIA Only s
H
S 029A4.04 Question appears to match KIA. Fuel building is capitalized in A, and Containment is not in C. They should be the same. Pick one.
Otherwise SAT. NEW
F
X X
U 029EG2.2.22 Question kind of matches KIA. The knowledge of limiting conditions for operation as well as safety limits are not being tested. This is a good attempt. C and D have ATWS in the distractor and ATWS is stated in the stem which directs the applicant to either Cor D. The applicant need only know that AMSAC trips the turbine. Needs some work. NEW The first A in AMSAC stands for ATWS. Page 33 of 49 Topic 7.1 Reactor Protection System lesson plan 77-A.
F
E 033K5.04 Question appears to match KIA. This is one way that SDM is being maintained there are other ways to prevent criticality such as fuel placement, boron spacers Boroflex panels, etc.
NEW
H
S 034A4.02 Question appears to match KIA. SAT NEW
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/EIS Explanation FOGU Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only s
F
X U
035K4.03 Question appears to match a portion of he KlA*, the reset of these signals is not tested.
Can this be put into the question? NEW
F
E 036AA1.04 Question kind of matches KIA. The AP calls for a safe location. Need to make sure that the other locations are not "safe". Otherwise SAT. NEW
F
E 038EA2.16 Question matches KIA Not sure D is otally credible, might use open two PORVs. E-3 does not direct opening 2 PORVs so it would be plausible and wrong. NEW
H
X U
039A2.05 Question appears to match KIA.
Distractors C and D are not credible.
Even if the the main turbine was in imp out reactor power will increase some what due to the inefficient dumping of steam straight to the condenser. Attempt to word question using Mwe to further differentiate right from wrong. NEW
F
E 039K1.04 Kind of matches KIA, no mention of RCS temperature although that is what is being controlled. Low level of discrimination. Look at using tave-tref and tave and t-no-Ioad. BANK
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO U/EIS Explanation Focu Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only s
H/F
X U
045A2.12 Question matches KIA. Do rods have to be withdrawn in manual after the RCS boration?
The AR states to manually withdraw control rods.
If this is correct, manual needs to be in the distractors. This question could also be considered as memory for actions contained in the AR. NEW
H
E 056AK1.03 Question appears to match KIA. No value was determined from an incorrect use of RCS pressure (1865). This would make a good distractor along with Thot, and CETCs. Attempt to place a value based on this for one of the distractors. NEW
F
X U
056G2.1.30 Question kind of matches KIA. If suction pressure decreases, so will discharge pressure, therefore 0 could be considered correct.
This question is very simple, is there not someth ing that is controlled locally like a start stop switch or breaker that could be operated on a control room evacuation or plant fire? BANK
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/EIS Explanation Focu Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only s
H
S 057AA2.15 Question appears to match KIA. Kind of simple. NEW.
(Could any of the associated control signals cause a reactor trip allowing B to be correct)?
F
X X
U 058AK1.01 Question does not appears to match KIA. There is no loss of DC power. Distractor D does not appear to be credible. NEW Rated as a fundamental knowledge, This question could be asked by Just using the stem without the conditions. NEW
F
X U
059K1.03 Question kind of matches KIA. This question is asking what does P-14 do? Maybe a reason why would help tie it to the KIA better.
NEW This is a fundamental level question. If you took away the stem you could ask which one of
~he following is correct and the answer would be the same. NEW
H
X E
059K3.02 Question appears to match KIA. Where does the FF to the SG get measured. If the leak was down steam of these flow measurement devices then the FF/SF mismatch would not be seen and no reactor trip will occur, and C would be the correct answer. NEW
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/EIS Explanation Focu Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only s
F
E 061AK1.01 Question appears to match KIA. Very simple. Use a value higher than E-7 so that some knowledge is tested. (One could get this correct ust by guessing the highest value listed must be correct. NEW
H
E The sample plan has this KIA listed as 061K6.08 which has an importance factor of 2.1 for ROs.
The question is actually written to 061K6.02 which has an importance factor of 2.6 for ROs. Does the turbine driven if it starts feed all three steam generators? Some assumptions need to be taken as written. Leave the KIA as is (061K6.02) and ensure that the correct answer is the only correct answer. NEW
H
X X
X U
062AG2.4.6 Question appears to match KIA.
However, the step in E-O states if less than 4 service water pumps are running then ensure Unit 2 operator initiates 0-AP-47. This is different than the correct answer in the question. Need to find a resolution. Maybe you sent me the incorrect reference. NEW
H
S 062K2.01 Question appears to match KIA SAT.
BANK
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO U/E/S Explanation Focu Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only s
H
X X
U 063K2.01 Question does not really meet the KIA.
The KIA asks for the knowledge of electrical power supplies to Major DC loads. By stating that DC power was loss to the 2J bus (I understand hat control power could be considered a major DC load) but all the question requires is that the applicant know what comes off of 2J AC bus.
Furthermore can you have a loss of DC power to only one bus. Can this be verified? This question requires some more work. BANK
H
S 064A3.01 Question appears to match KIA The distractor analysis states that D is the correct answer. Although the check is on B, and the explanation supports selection B. If B is the correct answer, then question appears to be SAT.
NEW
H
X U
065AG2.1.23 This question is based on a note at the beginning of AP-28, and with pressurizer level approaching this level the reactor should be tripped. I am not sure this meets the intent of the KIA. If any other scenario was taking place or if nothing else was taking place, this still would be he correct action to take. I believe the intent of he KIA is to show the ability to perform actions lAW a Loss of instrument air, not a loss of pressurizer level unless they are related. NEW
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SAO U/E/S Explanation Focu Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only s
F
X U
069AK1.01 Question does not really meet the KIA here is not a loss of containment integrity involved. In fact this is the design accident that
~he containment can survive and maintain integrity. Needs more work. Is Not NEW. BANK
F
S 073A1.01 Question appears to match KIA.
Do the vacuum pumps trip due to the discharge valves going closed, or is it a direct trip? It may be better to pursue this. BANK.
H
X X
U 076G2.1.2 Question appears to match KIA.
Required action in accordance with? D distractor does not appear to be credible. It would be more credible to commence a shutdown within one hour and be in cold shutdown in.... Do you expect ROs to know technical specifications of this nature.
BANK
F
S*
076K1.17 *Assuming these pumps are from the Service Water system this question matches the KIA. If not we have more work to do. Otherwise SAT. NEW
F
S 078G2.1.28 Question appears to match KIA.
Distractors A and C need to say automatically closes above 90 psig increasing instead of at.
This is not credible. Otherwise SAT. NEW
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SRO U/EiS Explanation Focu Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only s
F
S 078K4.01 Question appears to match KIA Very simple. NEW
F
S 086G2.1.28 Kind of matches KIA. SAT BANK
F
S 103K4.01 Question appears to match KIA. NEW
H
S WE03EA2.1 Question appears to match KIA SAT BANK
F
S
~E04EK3.4 Question appears to match KIA. SAT BANK
H
X U
WE05EK1.3 Does not really match KIA. There are annunciators in the stem but also a statement that all attempts to establish AFW were unsuccessful.
So there are no remedial actions based on the annunciators. See if we can work on something to ie it to the KIA BAN.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LaD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/EIS Explanation Focu Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only s
H
X X
U WE06EK3.1 Question does not really meet the KIA. The only tie to the degraded core cooling is that you discuss you are there in the stem. The injection of the accumulators at any time could cause the same problem. I understand that it is in a note at the beginning of the procedure, but the applicant is not figuring out that he has degraded core conditions, you are telling him that he does.
Also teaching in the distractors, you list four of the six CSFs. This question needs some work.
BANK
H
E WE09EA1.3 Question appears to match KIA.
Distractor C is not credible, Why would you attempt to block low pressure SI prior to going below 2000 psig? Cooldown continues throughout he procedure until the unit is on RHA. BANK
H
S WE10EK2.2 Question appears to match KIA.
SAT BANK
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- 1 Back-Q=
SRO U/EIS Explanation Focu Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only s
H
U WE11 EK2.1 Question appears to match KIA.
How does one verify that NO back flow is occurring from the RWST to the CTMT sump?
Distractors A and B do not mention quench spray pumps. But Distractors C and 0 state to secure all pumps. So with only two pumps listed in A and B why would you pick them. Not Credible.
Verifying no back flow is not credible unless you can come up with a way this is accomplished.
BANK
H
E WE12EK2.1 Question appears to match KIA. Not enough procedures steps included in material to verify that this is the correct actions lAW your procedures. Provide more info. BANK
H
S IWE15EG2.1.23 Question appears to match KIA.
SAT NEW.
F
E G2.1.1 Kind of matches KIA, better matches 2.1.29. Under what KIA did this question appear on the 2004 North Anna Exam? Wait on determination until this is researched. BANK
F
S G2.1.22 Question appears to match KIA. SAT MOD
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back-Q=
SAO U/EiS Explanation Focu Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only s
F
U G2.1.3 Question Matches KIA. But has little discriminatory value. What is included in a short-term relief? Distractor D is not credible BANK
F
S G2.2.11 Question appears to match KIA SAT NEW
F
S G2.2.24 Question appears to match KIA. SAT NEW. Question is at the Fundamental level.
F
X E
2.2.4 Question appears to match KIA. Very Simple BANK Explain plausibility of Band D.
F
X E
G2.3.2 Question appears to match KIA. This is a NOT question and should be avoided. BANK
F
E G2.3.9 Question appears to match KIA. There is no documentation to prove that 100A or 101 cannot be used. Is there any documentation, or do we need to say lAW 1-0P-21.2 after containment? NEW
H
E G2.4.14 Question Kind of matches KIA. Distractor D is not credible. BANK
1.
2.
3. Psychometric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 6.
7.
Q#
LOK LOD (F/H)
(1-5)
Stem Cues T/F Credo Partial Job-Minutia
- /
Back*
Q=
SRO UlEtS Explanation Focu Dist.
Link units ward KIA Only s
F
X E
G2.4.43 Question appears to match KIA. Is the notification time normally the job of the RO?
Otherwise SAT. NEW I
I General Comment; the material included for support of the correct answer was usually satisfactory. The information on why a distractor was credible on not credible was not. For example the PDn was used several times but no information was given as to what drains to it, its location, and what makes it a credible distractor.
23 Unsats 23 enhancements 29 satisfactory =75 total RO questions.
Several questions off of 2004 exam 8 questions that do not match the KI ES-401 DRAFT Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility:
I.h r-.""
Date of Exam:
/1// /f/ O ~
Exam Level: RO *
SRo D
-
Initial Item Description a
b*
c-1.
Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.
-)<..
tY~
2.
a.
NRC J<JAs are referenced for all questions.
Y<-
{r 1 b.
Facilitv leamlna obiectives are referenced as available.
3.
SRO Questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-101
<<"
""~j 4.
The sampling process was random and systematic (If more than 4 RO or 2 SRO questions were repeated from the last 2 NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR OL program office).
5.
Question duplication from the license screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (chack the item that applies ) and appears appropriate:
@ A tha audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or
_
the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started; or
_
the examinations were developed Independently; or
_
the licensee certifies that there Is no duplication; or other (explain)
t:kt t;L fJ-?
-
t'lJ r...r c"',.rtt"1IP * ftl$r -f: bf/
'l-lcIW~
6.
Bank use meets limits (no more than 75 percent Bank Modified New fromthe bank, at least 10 percent new, and the rest new or modified); enter the actual RO I SRQ-only H4fJI'A t.J'{. I
~',4 flJ.7~,."" Y-
~
Question distribution(s) at right.
7.
Between 50 and 60 percent of the questions on the RO Memory CIA exam are written at the comprehension! analysis level; the SRO exam may exceed 60 percent If the randomly
)!dcj, selected J<JAs support the higher cognitive levels; enter I
&t'1/ f l4-1,L- "'7 the actual RO I SRO Question distribution(s) at riQhl.
<<:
8.
Referenceslhandouts provided do not give away answers fL
[1...-5 or aid in the elimination of dislractors.
9.
Question content conforms with specific J<JA statements in the previously approved examination outline and Is appropriate for the lier to which they are assigned; 1(
iv7 deviations are justified.
10.
Question osvchometric aualitv and format meet the auldelines In ES Aooendix B.
r
/;.-7 11.
The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple choice items; yt.--
(;..j the lotal is correct and aqrees with the value on the cover sheel.
t~"~~
Date a. Author
<;jUjOb b. Facility Reviewer (*)
'~:Sb.w:-: ~~
~
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
---
d. NRC Regional Supervisor
---
Note:
- The facility reviewer's initials/signature are not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
- indeoendent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "CO; chief examiner concurrence reauired.
ES-401, Page 29 of 33
- - ~~ ~~ ~,- ~ - --, _.
_....-.,............,- - _._ --
Form ES-401 2 ES-401 PWR Examination Outline Facilitv: North Anna Date of Exarr Tier Group RO KIA Category Points SRO-On l~ Points K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G*
Total K IA A2 G'" Total 1.
3
3
3 3 I 18 Emerqency
&
2
1
2
9 Abnorma Plant lIer Evoulutiom Totals
4
5
4
2.
3
3
2
3
3
2
Plant
1
1
1
0
0
2
Systems Tier Total s
3
4
3
3
4
38 3. Generic Knowledge and
2
4
2
4 Abilities Category
3
2
1. Ensure that at least two topics from every KIA category are sampled within each tier of the RO outline (Le., the Tier Totals" in each KIA category shall not be less than two). Refer to Section D.1.c for additional guidance regarding SRO sampling.
2. The point total for each group and tier in the proposed outline must match that specified in the table. The final point total for each group and tier may deviate by +/-1 from that specified in the table based on NRC revisions. The final RO exam must total 75 points and the SRO-only exam must total 25 points.
3. Select topics from many systems and evolutions; avoid selecting more than two KiA topics from a given system or evolution unless they relate to plant-specific priorities.
4. Systems/evolutions within each group are identified on the associated outline.
5. The shaded areas are not applicable to the category/tier.
6.* The generic (G) KlAs in Tiers 1 and 2 shall be selected from Section 2 of the KIA Catalog, but the topics must be relevant to the applicable evolution or system. The SRO KlAs must also be linked to 10 CFR 55.43 or an SRQ-levelleaming objective.
7. On the following pages, enter the KIA numbers, a brief description of each topic, the topics'
importance ratings (IR) for the applicable license level, and the point tota ls for each system and category. Enter the group and tier totals for each category in the table above; summarize all the SRo-only knowledge and non-A2 ability categories in the columns labeled "K" and "A". Use duplicate pages for RO and SRO-only exams.
8. For Tier 3, enter the KIA numbers, descriptions, importance ratings, and point totals on Form E8-401-3.
9. Refer to ES-401, Attachment 2, for guidance regard ing the elimination of inappropriate KIA NUREG-1021, Revision 9 2 2 of 34
Tier 1 Group 1 ime/Safety Function K1 K2 K3 Ai A2 G KA Question Type KIA Toplc(s)
RQTSRO
.eactor Tnp -
0
0
0 007EA2.05 Ability to determineand interpretthe Reactortrip first-out indication 3.4 3.9 tabilization -
following as they applyto (EMERGENCY ecovery/1 PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.10/43.5/
45.13)
ressurizer Vapor
0
1
0 008AA1.02 Ability to operate and/ or monitorthe HPIpumpto control PZR level/pressure 4.1 3.9 pace Accident/3 following as they applyto (ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.7/45.5/
45.6)
mall Break LOCA/ 3
0
0
0 009EK3.27 Knowledge of the reasons for the following Manualdepressunzation or HPI 3.6 3.8 responses as they applyto (EMERGENCY recirculationfor sustained high pressure PLANTEVOLUTlON):(CFR: 41.5/41.10/
45.6/45.13)
arge Break LOCA/ 3
0
0
0 011EK2.02 Knowledge of the interrelations between KIARandomlyRejected 2.6 2.7 (EMERGENCY PLANTEVOLUTION) and the following:(CFR: 41.7 /45.7 /45.8)
I
.CP Malfunctions / 4
0
1 0 o 015AA1.07 Ability to operate and/ or monitor the RCPseal water injection subsystem 3.5 3.4 following asthey applyto (ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.7/45.5/
45.6)
assof RxCoolant
0
0 0 o 022AK3.05 Knowledge of the reasons for the following Needto avoid planttransients 3.2 3.4 lakeup/2 responses as they applyto (ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.5/41.10 /
45.6/45.13)
oss of RHR System /
0
1 0 o 025AA1.19 Ability to operate and / or monitorthe Block orifice bypass valve controller and 2.6 2.4 following asthey applyto (ABNORMAL indicators PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.7/45.5/
45.6)
-
-
-
A ** __** _ "
A""''....
Tier 1 Group 1 me/Safety Function K1 K2 K3 A1 A2 G KA Question Type -
KIA Topic(s)
._---_._ ~ -
)SS of Component
0
0 a 0 026AK2 Knowledge of the interrelations between KIARandomly Rejected
I a Doling Water / 8 (ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION) and the i
following:(CFR:41.7/45.7/45.8)
II
'essurizer Pressure
1
0
0 027AK2.03 Knowledge of the interrelations between Controllers and positioners 2.6 2.8 antral System (ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION) andthe alfunction / 3 following:(CFR: 41.7/45.7/45.8)
rWS/1
0
0
1 029EG2.2.22 ThisIs a Generic, no stem statementIs Knowledge of limiting conditions for 3.4 4.1 associated.
operations and safetylimits.
.eam Gen.Tube
0
0
0 038EA2.16 Abilityto determineand interpretthe Actions to betaken if S/G goes solidand 4.2 4.6 upture/ 3 following as they applyto (EMERGENCY water enterssteam line PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.10/ 43.5 /
45.13)
- eam LineRupture-
0 a
0 0 040AK2.02 KnOWledge of the interrelations between KIARandomly Rejected 2.6 2.6
<<iessive Heat (ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION) andthe
'ansfer / 4 following:(CFR:41.7/45.7/45.8)
iss of Main
0
0
0 054AA1.01 Ability to operate and/ or monitorthe KIARandomly Rejected 4.5 4.4 sedwater / 4 following as they applyto (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.7/45.5/
45.6)
tation Blackout/ 6
0
0
o 055EG2.1.27 This is a Generic, no stemstatementIS KIARandomly Rejected 2.8 2.9 associated.
)55 of Off-site Power/
0
0
o 056AK1.03 Knowledge of the operational implications Definition of subcooling: use of steam 3.1 3.4 of the following concepts asthey applyto tablesto determine it the (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.8to 41.10145.3)
Tier 1 Group 1 Question Type KIA Topic(s)
RO - SRO Ime/Safety Function K1 K2 K3 A1 A2 G KA
)5S of Vital AC lnst.
0
0
0 057AA2.02 Ability to determineand Interpret the Coreflood tank pressure and level 3.7 3.8 us /6 following as they applyto ABNORMAL Indicators PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.10/43.5/
45.13)
)5S of DC Power/6
0
0
0 058AK1.01 Knowledge of the operational Implications Battery chargerequipmentand 2.8 3.1 of the following concepts as theyapplyto instrumentation the (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.8to 41.10 /45.3)
- ISS of Nuclear Svc
0
0
1 062AG2.4.6 Thisis a Generic,no stem statementis Knowledge symptombased EOP 3.1
later /4 associated.
mitigation strategies.
oss of InstrumentAir /
0 0 a a 1 065AG2.1.23 ThisIs a Generic,no stemstatementis Ability to perform specificsystem and 3.9
associated.
integrated plant procedures duringall modesof plant operation.
OCAOutside
0
0
0 WE04EK3.4 Knowledge of the reasons for the following RO or SROfunction within the control 3.6 3.8 ontainment /3 responses as theyapplyto (EMERGENCY roomteam as appropriate to the PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR:41.5/41.10 /
assigned position, In such a waythat 45.6/45.13)
procedures are adheredto andthe limitations in the facilities licenseand amendments are not violated.
DSSof Emergency
1
0 0 a WE11EK2.1 Knowledge of the Interrelations between Components and functionsof control 3.6 3.9 oolant Recirc. /4 (EMERGENCY PLANTEVOLUTION) and andsafety systems, including the following:(CFR: 41.7 /45.7 /45.8)
instrumentation, signals, interlocks, failure modesand automaticand manual features.
team LineRupture-
1 a
0 a WE12EK2.1 Knowledge of the interrelations between Components and functionsof control 3.4 3.7 xcessive Heat (EMERGENCY PLANTEVOLUTION) and andsafetysystems, Including ransfer14 the following:(CFR: 41.7/45.7/45.8)
instrumentation, signals, interlocks, failure modesand automaticand manual feature Tier 1 Group 1 lme/Safety Function K1 K2 K3 A1 A2 G KA Question Type
--~----KiA-Topic(s)
0
0
0 WE05EK1.3 Knowledge of the operational implications Annunciators andconditions indicating 3.9 4.1 ransfer-Lossof of the following concepts astheyapplyto signals, and remedial actions associated econdary Heat Sink/
the EMERGENCY PLANT with the (Loss of Secondary HeatSink).
EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.8to 41.10 /45.3)
_..----- - - --
.-
Tier 1 Group 2 arneI Safety Function K3 A1 A2 G KA Question Type
.*
K/A Topic(s}
.ontinuous RodWithdr a a
0
0 001AA1.06 Ability to operate and/ or monitorthe KiA Randomly Rejected
2.9 following astheyapply to (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.7/45.5/
45.6)
iropped Control Rod /
0
0
0 003AA2.04 Ability to determine andinterpret the Rod motion stops dueto dropped rod 3.4 3.6 following astheyapply to ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.10/43.5/
45.13)
ioperable/Stuck Contn a
0
0 0 005AA2.01 Ability to determine andinterpret the KiARandomly Rejected 3.3 4.1 following astheyapply to ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.10/43.5/
45.13)
.mergency Boration /1
0
0
0 024AK1.02 Knowledge ofthe operational implications of KiA Randomly Rejected
. 3.6 3.9 the following concepts astheyapplyto the (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR:
41.8to 41.10/ 45.3)
ressurizer Level Malfu
0
0 0 o 028AK1.01 Knowledge of theoperatlonallmplications of KIA Randomly Rejected 2.8 3.1 the following concepts astheyapplyto the (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR:
41.8to 41.10 /45.3)
assof Source Range I
0
0 0 oI032AK2.01 Knowledge of theinterrelations between KIA Randomly Rejected 2.7 3.1 (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION) and the following:(CFR: 41.7 /45.7 /45.8)
assof Intermediate R~
0
0 0 o 033AK1.01 Knowledge oftheoperational implications of KIA Randomly Rejected 2.7
the following concepts astheyapplytothe (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR:
41.8to 41.10 / 45.3)
uel Handling Accident
0 a
0 o 036AA1.03 Ability to operate and/ or monitor the Reactor-building containment evacuation 3.5 3.9 following astheyapply to (ABNORMAL alarm enable switch
Tier 1 Group 2 ame/ SafetyFunction K1 K2 K3 Ai A2 G KA Question Type KIA Topic(s)
RO SRO PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.7145.51 45.6)
team GeneratorTube
0
0
0 037AA2.01 Ability to determineand interpretthe KIARandomlyRejected
3.4 following as theyapplyto ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.10/43.5/
45.13)
assof CondenserVac 0 a
0
0 051AA2.02 Abilityto determineandinterpretthe KIARandomlyRejected 3.9 4.1 following asthey applyto ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR:41.10/43.5/
45.13)
ccidental Liquid Rad\\l\\i 0
0
0 a 059AK3.03 Knowledge of the reasons for the following KIARandomlyRejected
3.7 responses asthey applyto (ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR:41.5/41.10 /
45.6/45.13)
ccidentalGaseous Ra
0
0
o 060AK1.04 Knowledge of the operational implications of KIARandomlyRejected 2.5 3.7 the following concepts as they applyto the (ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR:
41.8 to 41.10/45.3)
RM System Alarms / i
0 a
0 o 061AK1.01 Knowledge of the operational implicationsof Detector limitations 2.5 2.9 the following concepts as they applyto the (ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR:
41.8 to 41.10145.3)
lant Fire On-site /98
0
0 0 o 067AK3.04 KnOWledge of the reasonsfor the following KIARandomlyRejected 3.3 4.1 responses asthey applyto (ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR:41.5/41.10/
45.6/45.13)
ontrol Room Evac. I 8
0
0
0 068AK1 KnOWledge of the operational implications of KIARandomlyRejected
0 the following concepts as they applyto the (ABNORMAL PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR:
.
Tier 1 Group 2 arne / Safety Function K1 K2 K3 A1 A2 G KA Question Type KIA Topic(s)
ossof CTMTIntegrity,
0
0
0 1069AK1.01 Knowledge of the operational implications of Effectof pressure on leakrate 2.6 3.1 the following concepts astheyapplyto the (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR:
41.8to 41.10 /45.3)
lad. CoreCooling /4
0
0 a 0 074EK3.10 Knowledge of the reasons for the following KIA Randomly Rejected 3,5 3.8 responses asthey applyto (EMERGENCY PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.5/41.10 /
45.6/45.13)
ligh Reactor Coolant /J a
0
0 0 076AA1.04 Ability to operate and/ or monitorthe KIA Randomly Rejected 3.2 3.4 following astheyapplyto (ABNORMAL PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.7/45.5/
45.6)
- ediagnosis /3
0
0
o WE01 EG2.2.Z Thisisa Generic, no stemstatement IS KIA Randomly Rejected 3.4 4.1 associated.
team Generator Over-a a a
0 o WE13EK2.1 Knowledge of the interrelations between KIA Randomly Rejected 3.0 3.1 (EMERGENCY PLANT EVOLUTION) and the following:(CFR: 41.7/45.7 /45.8)
ontainment Flooding/
0
0
1 WE15EG2.1.3~
Thisis a Generic, nostemstatement is lAbility to recognize indications for system 3.4 14 associated.
operating parameters which are entry-level conditions fortechnical specifications.
igh Containment Radi
0
0 0 o WE16EA2.2 Ability to determine andinterpret the KIARandomly Rejected 3.0 3.3 following astheyapplyto (EMERGENCY PLANT EVOLUTlON):(CFR: 41.10/43.5/
45.13)
I Termination /3
0
0
o WE02EK2.1 Knowledge of theInterrelations between KIARandomly Rejected 3.4 Tier 1 Group 2
--
- - -
-
-
-
-:;-:-:-
KA Question Type KIA Topic(s)
RO SRO arneI Safety Function K1 K2 K3 A1 A2 G (EMERGENCY PLANTEVOLUTION) and the following:(CFR: 41.7/45.7/45.8)
)CA Cooldown - Depi
0 a a
0 WE03EA2.1 Ability to determine and interpret the Facility conditions andselection of 3.4 4.2 following astheyapplyto (EMERGENCY appropriate procedures during abnormal PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.10 /43.5/
andemergency operations.
45.13)
atural Circ./ 4
0 a
0 a WE09EA1.3 Ability to operate andI or monitorthe Desired operating results during abnormal 3.5 3.8 following astheyapplyto (EMERGENCY andemergency situations.
PLANTEVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.7/45.5/
45.6)
atural Circ. With Sean
1
0
0 WE10EK2.2 KnOWledge of the Interrelations between Facility's heat removal systems, including 3.6 3.9 (EMERGENCY PLANT EVOLUTION) and primary coolant, emergency coolant, the the following:(CFR: 41.7/45.7/45.8)
decay heat removal systems andrelations between the proper operation of these systems to the operation of the facility.
0 0 a 0 o WE08EG2.1.3~
Thisis a Generic, nostem statement Is KiA Randomly Rejected 3.4 3.8 associated.
egraded Core Coolin&
0
a
o WE06EK3.1 KnOWledge of the reasons for the following Facility operating characteristics during 3.4 3.8 responses astheyapplyto (EMERGENCY transient conditions, including coolant PLANT EVOLUTION):(CFR: 41.5/41.10/
chemistry andthe effects of temperature, 45.6/45.13)
pressure and reactivity changes and operating limitations and reasons for these operating characteristics.
aturated CoreCooling a
a a a 0 o WE07EG2.4.4~
ThisIsa Generic, no stemstatement is KiA Randomly Rejected
4 associated.
JSS of CTMTIntegrity.
0
a
o WE14EG2.4.4~
Thisis a Generic, nostem statement is KiA Randomly Rejected
4 associate Tier 2 Group 1 me I Safety-Functio K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 KG A1 A~ A3 A4 G Question Type KIA Toplc(s)
0
0
1
0
0 0 Knowledge of the effectthat a loss or Containment isolationvalvesaffectmg 003K6.04 12.8
~.1 imp malfunction of the following will have on RCPoperation the (SYSTEM):(CFR: 41.7/45.7)
temical and
0
0
0
0
0 0 Knowledge of the operational Typesand effectsof radiation, dosimetry 004K5.17 12.6
~.1 alums Control implications of the following conceptsas andshielding-time-distance they applyto the (SYSTEM):(CFR: 41.5 /
45.7)
esidual Heat
0
0
0
0
0 0 Knowledge of the operational Needfor adequate subcoollng 005K5.02
~.4
~.5 emoval implications of the following conceptsas theyapplyto the (SYSTEM):(CFR: 41.5/
45.7)
mergency Core
0
0 o 1 o 0 o 0 0 IKnowledge of the effectthat a loss or HPI/LPI systems (mode change)
006K6.19
[7
~.9 Doling malfunction of the following will have on the (SYSTEM):(CFR: 41.7/45.7)
ressurlzer o 0 0 o 0 o 0
1
0 Ability to monitorautomatic operations of Components which discharge to the PRT *007A3.01
[7 12.9 elief/Quench Tank the (SYSTEM) Includlng:(CFR: 41.7/
45.5)
omponentCooling o 0 o 0 a 0 o 0 o 1 o Ability to manuallyoperate and/or Control of minimum levelin the CCWS 008A4.07 D.9 12.9 later monitorin the control room:(CFR:41.7 /
surgetank 45.5to 45.8)
ressurizer
1 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 Knowledge of electrical powersupplies Controller for PZRsprayvalve 010K2.02 i:'.5 12.7 ressure Control to the following:(CFR: 41.7)
eactor Protection o 0 o a a 0 o 0 1 o a Ability to monitorautomatic operations of Single and multiple channel trip 012A3.05 3.6
~.7 the (SYSTEM) Includlng:(CFR: 41.7/
indicators 45.5)
ngineered Safety a 0 o 0 o 0 1 o 0 a o Ability to predictand/ormonitorchanges RWSTlevel 013A1.06
- 3.6 3.9 1\\.._...... n "nne
Tier 2 Group 1 A'). A3 A4
_._-
_._--~- --,.---
me I Safety Functio K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 G
Question Type KIA Topfc(s)
KA RO SHO iatures Actuation in parameters associated withoperating the (SYSTEM) controls inciuding:(CFR:
41.5/45.5)
mtalnment
0
0
0
0
0 0 Knowledge of the effectthat a loss or Containment instrumentation readings 022K3.02 3.0 13.3
)oling malfunction ofthe (SYSTEM) will have on thefollowing:(CFR: 41.7145.6)
eCondenser
0
0
0 0
0
0 KIARejected 025A2.04
P
- mtainment Spray
0
0
0
0
1 0 Ability to manually operate and/or CSS controls 026A4.01 4.5
~.3 monitorin the control room:(CFR: 41.71 45.5to 45.8)
ainand Reheat o 0
0 o 0
1
0 0 Ability to (a) predict the impactsof the Increasing steamdemand, its 039A2.05
~.3
~.6
- eam following onthe (SYSTEM) and(b)
relationship to increases in reactor power based onthosepredictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those abnormal operation:(CFR: 41.5/43.51 45.3/45.13)
ain Feedwater 1 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 IKnowledge ofthe physical connections S/GS 059K1.03
~.1
~.3 and/orcausa-effect relationships between (SYSTEM) andthe following:(CFR: 41.2to 41.9/45.7 to 45.8)
Jxiliary/Emergency o 0 o 0 o 1 o 0 o 0 o KnOWledge of the effectthat a lossor Pumps 061K6.08 f6
~.7 sedwater malfunction of the following will haveon the (SYSTEM):(CFR: 41.7/45.7)
- Electrical
1 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o Knowledge of electrical powersupplies Majorsystem loads 062K2.01 3.3
~.4 istribution to the following:(CFR: 41.7)
. -. -"..""'-
Tier 2 Group 1
--,---
me I Safety Functlo K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G Question Type KIA Topic(s)
1
0
0
0
0 0 Knowledge of electrical power supplies Major DC loads 063K2.01 2.9
~.1 istribution to the following:(CFR:41.7)
l1ergencyDiesel
0
0
0
0
0 0 Abilityto monitor automaticoperations of Automaticstart of compressorand ED/G 064A3.01 4.1
~.O enerator the (SYSTEM) including:(CFR: 41.7/
45.5)
rocess Radiation
0
0
0
0
0 0 Abilityto predictand/or monitor changes Radiation levels 073A1.01
- 3.2 3.5 onitoring in parametersassociated with operating the (SYSTEM) controlsincluding
- (CFR:
41.5/45.5)
ervice Water
0
0
0
0
0 1 This is a Generic, no stem statementis
!Knowledge of operator responsibilities 076GG2.1.2
~.O 4.0 associated.
during all modes of plant operation.
strument Air
0
0 o 0 o 0 o 0 1 This is a Generic,no stem statementIs Knowledge of the purpose and function 078GG2.1.28 ;3.2 3.3 associated.
of majorsystem components and controls.
ontainment o 0 o 1 o 0
0 o 0 o Knowledge of (SYSTEM) design Vacuum breaker protection 103K4.01
- 3.0 3.7 feature(s) and or interlock{s)which provide for the followlng
- (CFR: 41.7}
eactor Protection o 0 o 0 o 0
1 o 0 o Abilityto (a) predictthe impacts of the Incorrectchannel bypassing 012A2.03
- 3.4 3.7 following on the (SYSTEM) and (b)
based on those predictions, use proceduresto correct, control, or mitigatethe consequences of those abnormaloperation:(CFR: 41.5/43.51 45.3/45.13)
ressurizer o 0
0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o KnOWledge of the effect that a loss or Containment 007K3.01 3.3 13.6 elieflQuenchTank malfunctionof the (SYSTEM) will have on the following:(CFR: 41.7/45.6)
.
. - -
Tier 2 Group 1 me I Safety Functio K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 A2 A3 A4 G Question Type KIA Topic(s)
0
0
0
0
0 0 Knowledge of the physical connections PRMS 076K1.17
~.6
~.7 and/orcause-effect relationships between (SYSTEM) andthe following:(CFR: 41.2to 41.9/45.7 to 45.8)
sin and Reheat
0
0
0 0 0
0 0 Knowledge of the physical connections
.RCS temperature monitoring andcontrol 039K1.04 3.1 3.1 eam and/orcause-effect relationships between (SYSTEM) andthe following:(CFR: 41.2to 41.9/45.7 to 45.8)
rin Feedwater
0
0
0 a 0
0 0 Knowledge of the effectthat a loss or AFWsystem 059K3.02
~.6 3.7 malfunction ofthe (SYSTEM) will have onthe followlng:(CFR: 41.7 /45.6)
iactor Coolant 0 0
0 o 0 1 o 0 0 o Ability to predict and/ormonitorchanges RCP motorstatorwinding temperatures 003A1.03
~.6 2.6 imp in parameters associated with operating the (SYSTEM) controls including:(CFR:
41.S/45.S}
essurizer o 0
0 o 0 0 o 0
0 KIA Rejected 007K4.01 p
D
!lief/Quench Tank trurnent Air o 0
1 o 0 o 0 o 0 o Knowledge of (SYSTEM) design Manual/automatic transfers of control 078K4.01 2.7 2.9 feature(s) andor interlock(s) which provide for the following:(CFR: 41.7)
Tier 2 Group 2 me JSafety Functio K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1~ M M ~
Question Type KIATopic(s)
0
0
0
0
0 0 ThisIsa Generic, no stem statement is K/A Randomly Rejected 028GG2.4.50 3.3 3.3 ecombiner and associated.
.uge Control Dntainment Purge
0
0
0
0
1 0 AbIlity to manuallyoperate and/or Containment evacuation signal 029A4.04 3.5 3.6 monitor In the control room:(CFR: 41.7/
45.5to 45.8)
cent Fuel Pool
0
1
0
0 o 0 o Knowledge of (SYSTEM) design Adequate 80M (boron concentration)
033K4.05 3.1 3.3 Doling feature(s) and or interlock(s) which provide for the following:(CFR: 41.7)
rel Handling
0 o 0 o 0 o 0
1 o Ability to manuallyoperate and/or Neutron levels 034A4.02 3.5 3.9 qulprnent monitor in the control room:(CFR: 41.7/
45.5to 45.8)
- eam Generator
0
1 o 0 o 0 o 0 o Knowledge of (SYSTEM) design Automatic blowdown andsample line 035K4.03 2.6 2.8 feature(s) and or Interlock(s) which isolation and reset provide for the following:(CFR: 41.7)
- eam
0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o Ability to (a) predictthe impactsof the IKIA Randomly Rejected 041A2.02 3.6 3.9 umplTurbine following onthe (SYSTEM) and (b)
(passControl based on thosepredictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those abnormal operation:(CFR: 41.5/43.5 /
45.3/45.13)
ainTurbine o 0 o 0 o 0
1 o 0 o Ability to (a) predictthe impactsof the Control rod insertion limitsexceeded 045A2.12 2.5 2.8 enerator following on the (SYSTEM) and (b)
(stabilize secondary)
based onthose predictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those abnormal operation:(CFR: 41.5/43.5 /
45.3/45.13)
Tier 2 Group 2 K3 K5 K6 A1 1'\\2 ~3 M P Question Type KIA Toplcls)
-
~RO meI Safety Functio K1 K2 K4 RO mdenserAir
0
0
0
0
0 0 Ability to (a) predict the Impacts of the KiA Randomly Rejected 055A2
0 smoval following onthe (SYSTEM) and(b)
based onthosepredictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those abnormal operation:(CFR: 41.5/43.51 45.3/45.13)
~uid Radwaste
0
0 o 0
0
0 o Ability to (a) predict the impacts of the KiA Randomly Rejected 068A2.03 2.5 2.6 following onthe (SYSTEM) and(b)
based onthosepredictions, use procedures to correct, control, or mitigate the consequences of those abnormal operation:(CFR: 41.5/43.51 45.3/45.13)
asteGasDisposal
0 o 0 o 0
0 Q o 0 Knowledge of the effectthat a lossor KiA Randomly Rejected 071K6
10 malfunction ofthe following will have on the (SYSTEM):(CFR: 41.7/45.7)
ea Radiation 0 o 0 o 0 o 0
0 o 0 IAbility to manually operate.andlor KJA Randomly Rejected 072A4.03 3.1 3.1
)nitoring monitor in thecontrol room:(CFR: 41.71 45.5to 45.8)
rculating Water o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o Ability to manually operate andlor KJA Randomly Rejected 075A4.01 3.2 3.2 monitor inthecontrol room:(CFR: 41.71 45.5to 45.8)
ation Air o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 IKnOWledge of the effectthata lossor IKiA Randomly Rejected 079K3
0 malfunction ofthe (SYSTEM) will have onthefollowing:(CFR: 41.7/45.6)
'e Protection o a o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 1 Thisis a Generic, nostemstatement Is KnOWledge ofthe purpose andfunction 086G2.1.28 3.2 3.3 associated.
of majorsystem components and controls.
-
Tier 2 Group 2 ne f Safety Functlo K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 ru A.3 ~4 ~
Question Type KIA Toplc(s)
0
0 0 0
0
0 0 Knowledge of electrical power supplies KiARandomly Rejected 001K2.05 3.1 3.5 to thefoliowing:(CFR: 41.7)
iactor Coolant
0 1 0
0
0
0 0 Knowledge of the effectthata lossor Containment 002K3.03 4.2 4.6 malfunction ofthe (SYSTEM) willhave onthefollowing:(CFR: 41.7 /45.6)
essurizer Level
0
0
0
0
0 0 Knowledge of the effectthata lossor KiA Randomly Rejected 011K3.02 3.5 3.7 mtrol malfunction of the (SYSTEM) will have onthefollowing:(CFR: 41.7 145.6}
>d Position
0
0 1 0
0
0 0 Knowledge ofthe operational RPIS Independent of demand position 014K5.02 2.8 3.3
- lication implications of thefollowing concepts as theyapply to the (SYSTEM):(CFR: 41.5/
45.7)
rclear
0 0 o 0
0
0
0 Ability to monitor automatic operations of KiARandomly Rejected 015A3.02 13.7 3.9 strumentation the (SYSTEM) Including:{CFR: 41.7/
45.5)
on-nuclear
0 0 o 0
0
0 o 0 Ability to monitor automatic operations of KiARandomly Rejected 016A3.01 2.9 2.9 strumentation the (SYSTEM) including:(CFR: 41.7/
45.5)
-core 1 0 o 0 o 0
0 0 o 0 Knowledge ofthe physical connections Plant computer 017K1.01 3.2 3.2 smperature and/or cause-effect relationships onltor between (SYSTEM) andthe foliowing:(CFR: 41.2to 41.9/45.7 to 45.8)
antainrnent Iodine
0 o 0 o 0
0 0 o 0 Knowledge Ofthe effect thata lossor KIARandomly Rejected 027K3
0 srnoval malfunction of the (SYSTEM) willhave onthefollowing:(CFR: 41.7/45.6)
andensate
0 o 0 o 0 a 0 0 o 1 Thisisa Generic, nostem statement is Ability to locate and operate 056G2.1.30 3.9 3.4
. - _.........
->_.~
Tier 2 Group 2 me I Safety Functlo K1 K2 K3 K4 K5 K6 A1 ~ ~3 1\\4 G Question Type KIA Topic(s)
components, including local control Tier 3 Group
-
---
Topic RO SRO induct of Operations 02.1.3 Knowledge ofshiftturnover practices.
3.4 induct ofOperations G2.1.22 Ability todetermine Mode ofOperation.
2.8 3.3 induct of Operations G2.I.1 Knowledge ofconduct ofoperations requirements.
3.7 3.8
[uipment Control G2.2.11 Knowledge ofthe process forcontrolling temporary changes.
2.5 3.4
[uipment Control 02.2.24 Ability to analyze the affeetofmaintenance activities onLeO status.
2.6 3.8
[uipment Control G2.2A (multi-unit) Ability to ex-plain thevariations in control board layouts, systems, 2.8
instrumentation and procedural actions between units at a facility.
idiation Control G2.3.9 Knowledge oftbeprocessforperforming a containment purge.
2.5 3.4 idiation Control G2.3.2 Knowledge offacility ALARA program.
2.5 2.9 nergency Procedures/Plan G2.4.14 Knowledge ofgeneral guidelines forEOPflowchart use.
3.9 nergency ProceduresIPlan G2.4.43 Knowledge ofemergency communications systems and techniques.
2.8 3.5
-
August 8, 2006