ML042990558: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 09/23/2004
| issue date = 09/23/2004
| title = RB-09-2004 - Draft - Outline Comments
| title = RB-09-2004 - Draft - Outline Comments
| author name = Gody A T
| author name = Gody A
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS/OB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV/DRS/OB
| addressee name = Hinnenkamp P D
| addressee name = Hinnenkamp P
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Operations, Inc
| docket = 05000458
| docket = 05000458
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:DRAFT OUTLINE COM MENTS Admi nist rat ive JPMs*Radiation control topic involving entry and exit from the RCA for bot h the RO and SRO is too simpl e and shoul d not b e used. Resolution: T he JPM will be more challenging be cause the en try will involv e an additiona l entry in to a high radia tion area.Walk-throughs
{{#Wiki_filter:DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Administrative JPMs
*What walk-throughs will be performed together?
* Radiation control topic involving entry and exit from the RCA for both the RO and SRO is too simple and should not be used. Resolution: The JPM will be more challenging because the entry will involve an additional entry into a high radiation area.
ANS: JPMs 6, 7, an d 8 and JP Ms 2 and 3 w ill be pe rfo rme d si mul tan eou sly.*Any repeat use of previo us NRC ex am material? If so how much (i n percentage) is the repeat? ANS: One JPM, #200
Walk-throughs
-08, is the only part of the ex am that is repea ted from the last N RC ex am.Scenarios*Identi fy the actual attrib utes gi ven o n ES-3 01-4*Form ES-301-5, S cenario 1, R O: The BOP does n ot have a normal evol ution and th e RO numb er 4 for Instrume nt/comp onent shoul d be n umber 5. Resolution: Will mak e changes to th e ES-301-5 for ms.*Form ES-301-5, S cenario 1, S RO-I: As RO, the n umber 4 for instrument/co mponent shoul d be n umber 5. Resolution: Will mak e changes to the ES-301-5 forms.*I would like each spe cific appli cant to have their ow n ES-301-5.
* What walk-throughs will be performed together? ANS: JPMs 6, 7, and 8 and JPMs 2 and 3 will be performed simultaneously.
Written*Pleas e inc lude the KA descri ption on the referen ce wr itten exam.*For K/As that re quire the use o f procedures, be su re that the questio n references a procedure.
* Any repeat use of previous NRC exam material? If so how much (in percentage) is the repeat? ANS: One JPM, #200-08, is the only part of the exam that is repeated from the last NRC exam.
*Need a cross-referenc e betw een th e outl ine s ubject and th e questi on dev elope d to addres s this subjec t. Resolution: A cross referen ce will be developed
Scenarios
.*Record of rejected K As, SRO Page 1 5th table en try, why rejected?
* Identify the actual attributes given on ES-301-4
ANS: A gree, the KA s ho ul d n ot be re je ct ed. W il l d ev el op a q ue st io n f or th is KA.General*Would like a sepa rate l istin g of the P RA an d IPE insi ghts (ES 201-2 item 4 a).*Any repeats from the audit ex amination (ES 201-2, item 3a (3))? ANS: No  
* Form ES-301-5, Scenario 1, RO: The BOP does not have a normal evolution and the RO number 4 for Instrument/component should be number 5. Resolution: Will make changes to the ES-301-5 forms.
*Which W/T JPM meets the response to th e emergency or a bnormal condi tion (ES 201
* Form ES-301-5, Scenario 1, SRO-I: As RO, the number 4 for instrument/component should be number 5. Resolution: Will make changes to the ES-301-5 forms.
-2, item 3b(3))?
* I would like each specific applicant to have their own ES-301-5.
ANS: In-plant walk-throughs 1 and 2.*Is any SROU going to take only the 25 questio n test? ANS: No}}
Written
* Please include the KA description on the reference written exam.
* For K/As that require the use of procedures, be sure that the question references a procedure.
* Need a cross-reference between the outline subject and the question developed to address this subject. Resolution: A cross reference will be developed.
* Record of rejected KAs, SRO Page 1 5th table entry, why rejected? ANS: Agree, the KA should not be rejected. Will develop a question for this KA.
General
* Would like a separate listing of the PRA and IPE insights (ES 201-2 item 4a).
* Any repeats from the audit examination (ES 201-2, item 3a(3))? ANS: No
* Which W/T JPM meets the response to the emergency or abnormal condition (ES 201-2, item 3b(3))? ANS: In-plant walk-throughs 1 and 2.
* Is any SROU going to take only the 25 question test? ANS: No}}

Latest revision as of 00:51, 24 November 2019

RB-09-2004 - Draft - Outline Comments
ML042990558
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/23/2004
From: Gody A
Operations Branch IV
To: Hinnenkamp P
Entergy Operations
References
50-458/04-301, RB-09-2004 50-458/04-301
Download: ML042990558 (2)
v • d • e


Text

DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Administrative JPMs

  • Radiation control topic involving entry and exit from the RCA for both the RO and SRO is too simple and should not be used. Resolution: The JPM will be more challenging because the entry will involve an additional entry into a high radiation area.

Walk-throughs

  • What walk-throughs will be performed together? ANS: JPMs 6, 7, and 8 and JPMs 2 and 3 will be performed simultaneously.
  • Any repeat use of previous NRC exam material? If so how much (in percentage) is the repeat? ANS: One JPM, #200-08, is the only part of the exam that is repeated from the last NRC exam.

Scenarios

  • Identify the actual attributes given on ES-301-4
  • Form ES-301-5, Scenario 1, RO: The BOP does not have a normal evolution and the RO number 4 for Instrument/component should be number 5. Resolution: Will make changes to the ES-301-5 forms.
  • Form ES-301-5, Scenario 1, SRO-I: As RO, the number 4 for instrument/component should be number 5. Resolution: Will make changes to the ES-301-5 forms.
  • I would like each specific applicant to have their own ES-301-5.

Written

  • Please include the KA description on the reference written exam.
  • For K/As that require the use of procedures, be sure that the question references a procedure.
  • Need a cross-reference between the outline subject and the question developed to address this subject. Resolution: A cross reference will be developed.
  • Record of rejected KAs, SRO Page 1 5th table entry, why rejected? ANS: Agree, the KA should not be rejected. Will develop a question for this KA.

General

  • Would like a separate listing of the PRA and IPE insights (ES 201-2 item 4a).
  • Any repeats from the audit examination (ES 201-2, item 3a(3))? ANS: No
  • Which W/T JPM meets the response to the emergency or abnormal condition (ES 201-2, item 3b(3))? ANS: In-plant walk-throughs 1 and 2.
  • Is any SROU going to take only the 25 question test? ANS: No
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML042990558&oldid=2199004"