ML20015A471

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2019-11-Public Forms
ML20015A471
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2019
From: Greg Werner
Operations Branch IV
To:
Entergy Operations
References
Download: ML20015A471 (20)
v • d • e


Text

EXAM ASSIGNMENT TICKLER Chief:

Kirkland Facility:

RBS 11/26/2019 U/I:

Start of Op Test:

11/18/2019 11/22/2019 Due Date Date Complete Initials 3/18/2019 11/28/18 4/22/2019 11/13/18 4/22/2019 11/28/18 4/22/2019 N/A N/A 4/22/2019 12/6/18 5/6/2019 11/28/18 6/17/2019 3/5/19 7/1/2019 3/12/19 9/2/2019 4/10/19 9/9/2019 N/A N/A 9/30/2019 5/24/19 10/14/2019 6/11/19 10/14/2019 6/19/19 10/21/2019 10/21/19 10/21/2019 10/21/19 10/28/2019 10/24/19 11/4/2019 10/31/19 11/11/2019 11/6/19 11/11/2019 N/A N/A 11/11/2019 11/15/19 11/11/2019 11/18/19 11/11/2019 11/11/19 11/18/2019 11/18/19 11/29/2019 12/4/19 12/16/2019 11/29/19 12/24/2019 12/3/19 12/24/2019 12/5/19 12/31/2019 12/5/19 1/7/2020 12/9/19 1/14/2020 12/9/19 1/14/2020 12/17/19 1/14/2020 12/10/19 2/4/2020 N/A N/A 2/11/2020 1/15/20 2/18/2020 N/A N/A 3/17/2020 1/15/20 Rev. 9 Post exam comments and graded exams received ES-403-1 to BC Final Denial Letters mailed (if no request for informal review)

Replaces NUREG-1021, Revision 11, Forms ES-201-1 and ES-501-1 Post exam operating test comments reviewed and ES-303-1 updated Signed ES 303's to BC produced by CE License/Proposed Denial letters mailed; Facility notified of results SUNSI checklist complete and exam docs to ADAMS SUNSI checklist to LA Ref Mat'l Returned after Final Resolution of Appeals Examination Report Issued Approved scenarios and JPMs distributed to examiners Examiner's document op test results on ES 303's Final applications reviewed and audited; exam approval and waiver/excusal letters sent LA produces / BC signs Exam Approval Letter (ES-201 Att-5)

RPS/IP number of examinees updated print Report-21 Waivers/deferrals reviewed for impact on licensing decision Post exam written comments reviewed and incorporated and NRC grading completed Chief examiner review of operating test and/or written exam grading completed Branch Chief review of exam results completed On-site validation & 10% audit of license applications Final license applications & waiver/excusal requests due ES-201-4 prepared by LA Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee Document review on ES-401-9 Preliminary license applications & waiver/excusal requests due NRC Forms 398/396 Feedback approved by Branch Chief Examination review results discussed between NRC and facility licensee Date of Written Exam:

Description Notes Examination administration date confirmed For NRC prepared exams, arrangements made for the facility to submit reference materials End of Op Test:

Written Exam Developed By: NRC / Facility Operating Test Developed By: NRC / Facility NRC examiners and facility contact assigned Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due ES-201-2, 201-3, 301-1, 301-2, 301-5, D-1 Reference material due for NRC prepared exams ES-201 Att-3 Corporate Notification Letter sent ES-201 Att-4 produced by CE NRC developed written examination outline sent to facility contact ES-401-1/2 and ES-401-3 21 days after proposed denial letters mailed.

Preliminary license applications and waivers reviewed Request facility licensee management feedback on the exam Operating test outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee ES-201-2 signed by CE & BC Peer review of written exam complete Document review on ES-401-9 Proposed exams, outlines, supporting documentation, and reference materials due.

Exams prepared by the NRC are approved by BC and forwarded for facility licensee review Written exam and operating test reviews completed Written exams and operating tests approved by Branch Chief Administer Operating Test

password es1021

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 18 ~

Facility: River Bend Date of Examination: November~. 2019 Initials Item Task Description a

b*

c**

1.
a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.

-~

IQ*,r..e.

w

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with t-

~

R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.

I T

C. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

\\l-t£J

~

T E

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

i.L pr {P N

2.
a.

Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of t.. ~ F normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major s

transients.

I M

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u

mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule t... rv-- 1'),

L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A

least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T

applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R

C.

~ ?'

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in

(,

Section D.5, "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including overlap).

3.
a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1)

The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w

among the safety functions as specified on the form.

pr fL A

(2)

Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

\\L L

(3)

No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).

K (4)

The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

T (5)

The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H

tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R 0

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

u (1)

The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

l!- Ii> ~

G (2)

At least one task is new or significantly modified.

H (3)

No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.

C.

Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of Jl.. p).p, applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

4.
a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual k'.'.,... ~ lfi-plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

G

~ t,b vfJL,-

E

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

tl-E C.

R

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.

~ ~..p A

~ ~

L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

.,PY-

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

)L. fJf vfK-,

_!:nt~ Name/Signature Date

a.

Author Gabe Kimich

~-=-

2/22/2019

b.

Facility Reviewer (*)

Randv Crawford ~

/J '

2/22/2019 NRC Chief Examiner(#)

)o\\,,.V\\ 1L11* k.. I a"' cl.

,pf l/-" v r

'-,)./

l Js- /IC C.

d.

NRC Supervisor r-.v -*o..-.. c, w~ I 5rz: - - -. e;...J:::.,..._

e, ':/. Z

~ f/;;;,1ri I

.J

(~

I /

  • Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
  1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.

ES-401 Written Examination Quality Checklist Form ES-401-6 Facility: River Bend Date of Exam: November 26, 2019 Exam Level:

RO [l]

SRO ~

Initial Item Description a

b*

c*#

1.

Questions and answers are technically accurate and applicable to the facility.

tL

tO

~

2.
a.

NRC K/As are referenced for all questions.

I

b.

Facility learning objectives are referenced as available.

1L-

W C.

Correct answer explanation and distractor analysis provided (ES-401, D.2.g)

'jt/f, I

3.

SRO questions are appropriate in accordance with Section D.2.d of ES-401

\\v M)

~

4 The sampling process was random and systematic. (If more than four RO or two SRO questions were repeated from the last two NRC licensing exams, consult the NRR/NRO OL l(,

fv,>-

1tJL--

program office). (RO #5 & 64)

5.

Question duplication from the licensee screening/audit exam was controlled as indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate.

_ The audit exam was systematically and randomly developed, or

_ the audit exam was completed before the license exam was started, or it-for tt~

_ the examinations were developed independently, or

_X_ the licensee certifies that there is no duplication, or

_ other (explain).

6.

Bank use meets limits (no more than 75% from the bank, Bank Modified New

~

t<r-vj!Jt-at least 10% new, and the rest new or modified); enter the

~

,JJ+ ~

I actual RO/SRO-only question distribution(s) at right.

7.

Between 38 and 45 questions of the questions on the RO Memory exam and at least 13 questions of the questions on the C/A

~

w-vjZIL-SRO-only portion of the exam are written at the

~

4i /i4 I

comprehension/analysis level (see ES-401, D.2.c); enter 4l-J.4.6.

the actual RO/SRO-only question distribution(s) at right.

8.

References/handouts provided do not give away answers or aid in the elimination of

~

faJ

-.j{'IL distractors.

9.

Question content conforms to specific KIA statements in the previously approved examination

?-

I outline and is appropriate for the tier to which they are assigned; deviations are justified.

fa}

  • IL-
10.

Question psychometric quality and format meet the guidelines in Appendix B.

ll-

/IJ)

~

11.

The exam contains the required number of one-point, multiple-choice items; the total is

\\v I

correct and agrees with the value on the cover sheet.

tr

-le~

Printed Name/Signature Date

a.

Author Gabe Kimich / ~~~

October 31, 2019

~c""-vZ~

b.

Facility Reviewer(*)

Randv Crawford/

October 31, 2019 C.

NRC Chief Examiner(#)

J.,hvt IL 1, IL (;:),, d 41.~v~

11l4 /J 2

d.

NRC Regional Supervisor bf':\\(,i'\\.{ We\\'Aerl ~,,v(V\\ Y,,, l/o

,b ( :ar: {Jo/7'

)

./

(I I - -

V Note:

The facility reviewer's initials or signature are not applicable for NRG-developed examinations.

Independent NRC reviewer initials items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required0 Revision 1

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: River Bend Date of Examination: 11/18/2019 Operating Test Number:2019-11

1. General Criteria Initials a

b*

c*

a.

The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with i w 1'-'l samplinci requirements (e.q., 1 O CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

b.

There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered V-

~.µ-

during this examination.

c.

The operatinq test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s) (see Section D.1.a.).

V--

/W :.{'.b

d.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within l

M vp--

acceptable limits.

e.

It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent

{, /w- ~

applicants at the designated license level.

I

2. Walkthrough Criteria I -- I -- I -- I
a.

Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions

. initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee lL ;tr {i-operationally important specific performance criteria that include-detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b.

Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walkthrough

(-

outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and ES-301-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the

µ._ '/£-

acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with

~ tr" -p:-

Form ES-301-4, and a copy is attached.

~

me/,

o Date

a.

Author Gabe Kimich /

10/31 /19

b.

Facility Reviewer (*)

Randy Crawford / ~~~

10/31 /19 NRC Chief Examiner (#)

j e:v."' llii-k..i~"'d /JT..J r ~

~ /

/1 11'ri 1,i~

c.
d.

NRC Supervisor 0 re-, CTY' W.:rYttr// /~/~

Y:u V.,

I,_/ V 0 J

  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
  1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: River Bend Date of Exam: 11/18/2019 Scenario Numbers:

1/2/3/4 Operating Test No.:2019-11 QUALITATIVE ATIRIBUTES Initials a

b*

c*

1.

The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, IL

µ;)-- ft but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events.

il--

f1.<r,p-

3.

Each event description consists of the following:

the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event

~ /1&.p~

the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.

1l-M ~µ,

5.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete

'?--

~ p-evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.

IL--

Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.

t,-0. Pt-Cues are given.

7.

The simulator modeling is not altered.

~ H- "fr-

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 1 O CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance

\\l--

deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional

,<D ip1-fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.

(..-

A-fa--

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the

~ M

"/L-form along with the simulator scenarios).

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable

?--

I'-"' 'fa-rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified iL.

,..0 -P:-

on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when iL-

-j'~

possible.

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

~,,.,.

-p Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d)

Actual Attributes

1.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 2/2/3/2

\\l-ft()

iU-

2.

Abnormal events (2-4) 4/4/4/4 JL fo&

-ja:-

3.

Major transients (1-2) 1/2/1/1 IL Ml

.J,t-.

4.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 1/1/1/2

~ ~./L-

5.

Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (?. 1 per scenario 1/1/1/1 set)

IL

µ

~

6.

Preidentified critical tasks (> 2) 2/2 / 2/2 K-

V-- -fZ-
  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
  1. An independent NRG reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quali~ Checklist Facility: River Bend Date of Exam:11/26/19 Exam Level:

RO [j] SRO Item Description Initials a

b

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading

~ (1,

2.

Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required

\\L

('v-(N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted)

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)

~ (l__

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in

~ ;i-detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades

f;---

are justified

~

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of

~ ()-

questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature Date

a.

Grader 11/27/2019

b.

Facility Reviewer(*)

11/27/2019

c. NRC Chief Examiner(*)
d. NRC Supervisor(*)

(*)

The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

~

C

'P-

~

?fll-vp!-

p-

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Revision 1 Facility: River Bend Date of Exam: 11/18/2019 Operating Test No.: 2019-11 A

P P

L I

C A

N T

E V

E N

T T

Y P

E Scenarios 1

2 3

4 T

O T

A L

M I

N I

M U

M(*)

CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P R

I U

RO SRO-I SRO-U1 RX 0

1 1

1 1 0 NOR 0

0 0

1 1 1 I/C 6

6 12 4

4 2 MAJ 1

1 2

2 2 1 TS 2

2 4

0 2 2 RO SRO-I1 SRO-U RX 0

0 0

1 1 0 NOR 0

0 0

1 1 1 I/C 6

6 12 4

4 2 MAJ 2

1 3

2 2 1 TS 2

2 4

0 2 2 RO1 SRO-I SRO-U RX 0

0 0

0 1

1 0 NOR 0

0 0

0 1

1 1 I/C 3

3 4

10 4

4 2 MAJ 2

1 1

4 2

2 1 TS 0

0 0

0 0

2 2 RO2 SRO-I SRO-U RX 0

0 1

1 1

1 0 NOR 0

0 0

0 1

1 1 I/C 4

3 3

10 4

4 2 MAJ 2

1 1

4 2

2 1 TS 0

0 0

0 0

2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

4.

For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Revision 1 Facility: River Bend Date of Exam: 11/18/2019 Operating Test No.:2019-11 A

P P

L I

C A

N T

E V

E N

T T

Y P

E Scenarios 1

2 3

4 T

O T

A L

M I

N I

M U

M(*)

CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P R

I U

RO SRO-I2 SRO-U RX 0

0 1

1 1

1 0 NOR 0

0 0

0 1

1 1 I/C 6

6 3

15 4

4 2 MAJ 2

1 1

4 2

2 1 TS 2

2 0

4 0

2 2 RO SRO SRO-U RX 1

1 0 NOR 1

1 1 I/C 4

4 2 MAJ 2

2 1 TS 0

2 2 RO3 SRO-I SRO-U RX 0

0 0

0 1

1 0 NOR 0

0 0

0 1

1 1 I/C 3

3 4

10 4

4 2 MAJ 2

1 1

4 2

2 1 TS 0

0 0

0 0

2 2 RO4 SRO-I SRO-U RX 0

0 0

1 1 0 NOR 0

0 0

1 1 1 I/C 4

3 7

4 4 2 MAJ 2

1 3

2 2 1 TS 0

0 0

0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

4.

For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Revision 1 Facility: River Bend Date of Exam: 11/18/2019 Operating Test No.: 2019-11 A

P P

L I

C A

N T

E V

E N

T T

Y P

E Scenarios 1

2 3

4 T

O T

A L

M I

N I

M U

M(*)

CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P R

I U

RO SRO-I3 SRO-U RX 0

0 1

1 1

1 0 NOR 0

0 0

0 1

1 1 I/C 3

6 6

15 4

4 2 MAJ 2

1 1

4 2

2 1 TS 0

2 2

4 0

2 2 RO SRO-I4 SRO-U RX 0

0 0

0 1

1 0 NOR 0

0 0

0 1

1 1 I/C 6

3 4

13 4

4 2 MAJ 2

1 1

4 2

2 1 TS 2

0 0

2 0

2 2 RO5 SRO-I SRO-U RX 0

0 1

1 1

1 0 NOR 0

0 0

0 1

1 1 I/C 4

3 3

10 4

4 2 MAJ 2

1 1

4 2

2 1 TS 0

0 0

0 0

2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1

1 0 NOR 1

1 1 I/C 4

4 2 MAJ 2

2 1 TS 0

2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

4.

For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Revision 1 Facility: River Bend Date of Exam: 11/18/2019 Operating Test No.: 2019-11 A

P P

L I

C A

N T

E V

E N

T T

Y P

E Scenarios 1

2 3

4 T

O T

A L

M I

N I

M U

M(*)

CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P S

R O

A T

C B

O P

S R

O A

T C

B O

P R

I U

RO SRO-I5 SRO-U RX 0

0 1

1 1

1 0 NOR 0

0 0

0 1

1 1 I/C 3

6 6

15 4

4 2 MAJ 2

1 1

4 2

2 1 TS 0

2 2

4 0

2 2 RO SRO-I6 SRO-U RX 0

0 0

0 1

1 0 NOR 0

0 0

0 1

1 1 I/C 6

3 4

13 4

4 2 MAJ 2

1 1

4 2

2 1 TS 2

0 0

2 0

2 2 RO6 SRO-I SRO-U RX 0

0 1

1 1

1 0 NOR 0

0 0

0 1

1 1 I/C 4

3 3

10 4

4 2 MAJ 2

1 1

4 2

2 1 TS 0

0 0

0 0

2 2 RO SRO-I SRO-U RX 1

1 0 NOR 1

1 1 I/C 4

4 2 MAJ 2

2 1 TS 0

2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicants competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicants license level in the right-hand columns.

4.

For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Instructions:

Check the applicants license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES 303 1 and ES 303 3 describe the competency rating factors.)

Facility: River Bend Date of Examination: 11/18/2019 Operating Test No.: 2019-11 APPLICANTS RO (ATC)

SRO-I SRO-U RO (BOP)

SRO-I SRO-U RO SRO-I SRO-U RO SRO-I SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 1

2 3

4 Interpret/Diagnose Events and Conditions 1 5 6 7 2 3 5 6 7

1 5 6 8 2 3 7

2 3

6 8

1 2 4 5 6 8 2 4 6 7 3 4 5 6 7 8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 Comply with and Use Procedures (1) 1 5 6 7 2 3 5 6 7

1 5 6 8 1 2 3 7 2

3 6

8 1 2 4 5 6 8 2 4 6 7 3 4 5 6 7 8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 Operate Control Boards (2) 1 5 6 7 2 3 5 6 7

1 5 6 8 1 2 3 7 2

3 6

8 1 2 4 5 6 8 2 4 6 7 3 4 5 6 7 8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 Communicate and Interact 1 5 6 7 2 3 5 6 7

1 5 6 8 1 2 3 7 2

3 6

8 1 2 4 5 6 8 2 4 6 7 3 4 5 6 7 8 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 Demonstrate Supervisory Ability (3)

N/

A N/

A N/

A N/

A N/

A N/

A N/

A N/

A 1-8 1-8 1-8 1-8 Comply with and Use TS (3)

N/

A N/

A N/

A N/

A N/

A N/

A N/

A N/

A 2

4 1

2 2 3 2 4

Notes:

(1)

Includes TS compliance for an RO.

(2)

Optional for an SRO-U.

(3)

Only applicable to SROs.

  1. Candidates Exam Week Site / Docket # / Insp Rpt #

RO LSRO SROI SROU Type Exam Author Chief Examiner Examiners Assigned 11/17/2019 River Bend / 05000458 / 2019301 CAC #: 000500 6

0 6

1 FB-OR-INITIAL LICENSE EXAM ADMINIS TRATION (EXAD)

NFF Kirkland, John Hayes,Mahdi Hernandez,Nicholas Kennard,Michael Kirkland,John Osterholtz,Clyde Page 1 of 4 12/10/2019 7:42:21 AM Orgs: ALL Sites: RBS Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 From 10/01/2019 to 09/30/2020

Summary by Date RO SROI SROU LSRO Total 11/2019 6

6 1

0 13 Page 2 of 4 12/10/2019 7:42:21 AM Orgs: ALL Sites: RBS Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 From 10/01/2019 to 09/30/2020

Summary by Site RO SROI SROU LSRO Total River Bend 6

6 1

0 13 Page 3 of 4 12/10/2019 7:42:21 AM Orgs: ALL Sites: RBS Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 From 10/01/2019 to 09/30/2020

Summary by Region RO SROI SROU LSRO Total Region 4 6

6 1

0 13 Page 4 of 4 12/10/2019 7:42:21 AM Orgs: ALL Sites: RBS Exam Author: ALL Activity Codes: EXAD IP 21 Operator Licensing Exam Schedule Phase Code: 2 - Construction, 5 - Operational Region: 4 From 10/01/2019 to 09/30/2020

0 ES-201 1

Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of November 11, 2019 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of November 11, 2019. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRG.

PRINTED NAME 1.-...::..::::.::a...:..:::..:.a.:.,~~~

2.---..a;;;a.::.:...r....=,aa..::a...:"-----~~

JOB TITLE/ RESPONSIBILITY Exam Lead Exam Developer of> !SRO oPS J ll(A P~tt. R,t;v1Ew { wo1.f' cut:~)

s,'"""' Sup-\\-

0 5 A-rf lk,t-11)

NI ~I l "1'/1.IIOC.tlV(r

© I,.JO) VI D\\l"tl ~ ON'Tl'\\C.Tf'O (j'f' PHtxu~

C0,':1\\,/E)'l.'i,q,'i"l ()..V DATE NOTE

()

n ES-201 1

Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of November 11, 2019 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility ticensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of November 11, 2019. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

E JOB TITLE/ RESPONSIBILITY 1.----'--""'----=---.......__e_~,,r st,d".5 i,,J.1,,. -,;<4

~:

~ ::t?"-1 r ee* /HS ~

4.

___.{)...,f...._j._____~~~~~~~

~:

fj;1; Si<<t ">"/¥?"1!'L NOTES:

ES-201 1

Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of November 11, 2019 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of November 11, 2019. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

PRINTED NAME

1.

),I( a.:e

.&_dc-

2. Cl,d o" H;,e-

~:~~fa/hy

~: -~luf~

7. ~.~

~

a. Awt>A.,!w 84ff'Z.

1~.2r~~.:r

11. _______ _
12. _______ _
13. _______ _
14. _______ _
15. _______ _

NOTES:

JOB TITLE/ RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1)

DATE SIGNATURE (2)

DATE NOTE U (,.) 5,(0

?ft3./,-.gi;uf ~At?-

O ei T.lt.-fl.U..l N:6-

Kimich, Gabriel From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Tracking:

Good afternoon, Kimich, Gabriel Thursday, December 05, 2019 4:06 PM Tyson, Michael Matthew; Murray, Richard; Dwyer, Christopher; BAUDIER, JUSTIN; Scott, Bonnie; DABADIE, DAVID A; Dubois, Dominic; Griffin, Aline; Hooper, Clinton; Reeves, Steven lLO NRC Exam Security Recipient Tyson, Michael Matthew Murray, Richard Dwyer, Christopher BAUDIER, JUSTIN Scott, Bonnie DABADIE, DAVID A Dubois, Dominic Griffin, Aline Hooper, Clinton Reeves, Steven

Response

Yes: 12/5/2019 4:08 PM Yes: 12/5/2019 5:07 PM Yes: 12/6/2019 6:29 AM Yes: 12/9/2019 7:32 AM Yes: 12/6/2019 6:27 AM Yes: 12/5/2019 4:51 PM Yes: 12/9/2019 7:49 AM Please use the voting buttons to acknowledge you met the exam security requirements per NU REG 1021.

Vote YES if the following statement is true:

To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of November 18-26. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC.

Thanks, Gabe l
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20015A471&oldid=4633593"