ML070940510: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML070940510
| number = ML070940510
| issue date = 04/05/2007
| issue date = 04/05/2007
| title = 04/05/2007 Meeting Slides - Fermi Annual Meeting CY2006 Reactor Oversight Program
| title = Meeting Slides - Fermi Annual Meeting CY2006 Reactor Oversight Program
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Fermi 2 Annual Assessment MeetingCY2006Reactor Oversight Program Monroe, MI April 5, 2007 Purpose of Today's MeetingA public forum for discussion of the licensee's performanceNRC will discuss the licensee performance
{{#Wiki_filter:Fermi 2 Annual Assessment Meeting CY2006 Reactor Oversight Program Monroe, MI April 5, 2007


issues identified in the annual assessment letterLicensee will be given the opportunity to  
urpose of Todays Meeting A public forum for discussion of the licensees performance NRC will discuss the licensee performance issues identified in the annual assessment letter Licensee will be given the opportunity to respond to the information in the letter and inform the NRC of new or existing programs to maintain or improve their performance


respond to the information in the letter and  
genda Introduction Review of the Reactor Oversight Process National Summary of Plant Performance Discussion of Fermi 2 Plant Performance Licensee Response and Remarks NRC Closing Remarks Break NRC available to address public questions


inform the NRC of new or existing programs to
Region III Organization James L. Caldwell Regional Administrator Geoffrey E. Grant Deputy Regional Administrator Mark A Satorius                                      Cynthia D. Pederson DRP Division Director                            Director, Division of Reactor Safety K. Steven West                                          Anne T. Boland DRP Deputy Division Director                                  Deputy Director Christine A. Lipa Regional Specialists Branch Chief Robert Lerch, Project Engineer Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Alexander Garmoe, Reactor Engineer Gregory Kolcum, Reactor Engineer Michael Morris, Senior Resident Inspector Adam Wilson, Reactor Engineer Tim Steadham, Resident Inspector Frank Tran, Reactor Engineer


maintain or improve their performance AgendaIntroduction  Review of the Reactor Oversight ProcessNational Summary of Plant PerformanceDiscussion of Fermi 2 Plant PerformanceLicensee Response and RemarksNRC Closing RemarksBreakNRC available to address public questions James L. Caldw e ll Regio n al Administrator Geoffr ey E. Grant Deput y Regi onal Administrator Ma rk A Sa torius DRP Divisio n Director K. Steven West DRP Depu ty Divisi o n Director Cy nt hia D. Pederson Director, D i vision of Reactor S a fety Anne T. Boland Deput y Director Christine A. Li pa Branch Ch ief Regional Specialist s Fermi 2 N u clear Pow e r Plant Michael Morris, Senior Resident I n spector Tim Steadham, Resident I n spector Robert Le rch, Project Engi neer Alex ander Garmoe, R e a c tor Engi neer Gregory Kolcum, Re actor Engi neer Adam Wilso n , Reactor En gi neer Frank Tran, Reactor Eng i neer Region III Organization NRC RepresentativesChristine A. Lipa, Branch Chief(630) 829-9619R. Michael Morris, Senior Resident Inspector(734) 586-2798Timothy C. Steadham, Resident Inspector(734) 586-2798Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh, Project Manager, NRR (Headquarters)(301) 415-5735 NRC Performance GoalsSafety: Ensure protection of public health and safety and the environmentSecurity: Ensure the secure use and management of radioactive materialsOpenness: Ensure openness in our regulatory processEffectiveness
NRC Representatives Christine A. Lipa, Branch Chief (630) 829-9619 R. Michael Morris, Senior Resident Inspector (734) 586-2798 Timothy C. Steadham, Resident Inspector (734) 586-2798 Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh, Project Manager, NRR (Headquarters)
: Ensure that NRC actions are effective, efficient, realistic, and timelyManagement
(301) 415-5735
: Ensure excellence in agency management to carry out the NRC'sstrategic


objective Reactor Oversight Process3 Strategic Performance Areas are divided into 7 Cornerstones of SafetyFindings and Performance Indicators are assigned a
NRC Performance Goals Safety: Ensure protection of public health and safety and the environment Security: Ensure the secure use and management of radioactive materials Openness: Ensure openness in our regulatory process Effectiveness: Ensure that NRC actions are effective, efficient, realistic, and timely Management: Ensure excellence in agency management to carry out the NRCs strategic objective


CornerstoneFindings can be assigned a cross-cutting aspect, which is a causal factor for the performance deficiency"Substantive Cross-Cutting Issues"can be determined if there are numerous findings with a common cross-
Reactor Oversight Process 3 Strategic Performance Areas are divided into 7 Cornerstones of Safety Findings and Performance Indicators are assigned a Cornerstone Findings can be assigned a cross-cutting aspect, which is a causal factor for the performance deficiency Substantive Cross-Cutting Issues can be determined if there are numerous findings with a common cross-cutting aspect or theme Human Performance, Problem Identification and Resolution, and Safety Conscious Work Environment


cutting aspect or themeHuman Performance, Problem Identification and Resolution, and Safety Conscious Work Environment SafetyCornerstonesSignificance ThresholdAction MatrixPerformance IndicatorResultsRegulatory ResponseStrategicPerformance AreasSafetyCornerstonesBaseline Inspection ResultsSignificance ThresholdSignificance ThresholdPerformance IndicatorResultsStrategicPerformance AreasAction Matrix Reactor Oversight Process Baseline Inspection ExamplesPost Maintenance Testing~80 hrs annual Equipment Alignment   
Reactor Oversight Process Strategic Performance Areas Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection                   Performance Indicator Performance   Indicator Results                                  Results Results Significance                    Significance Significance Threshold                     Threshold Threshold Action ActionMatrix Matrix Regulatory Response
~80 hrs annual Triennial Fire Protection    
~200 hrs triennialOperator Response   
~125 hrs annualEmergency Preparedness  ~80 hrs annualRadiation Release Controls~110 hrs biennialOccupational Radiation Protection ~90 hrs annualCorrective Action Program Review~250 hrs biennialCorrective Action Case Reviews~60 hrs annualDesign Basis Inspections
~400 hrs biennial Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green: Implement Baseline Inspection program White: Increase NRC oversight with 95001 inspection Yellow Yellow: Increase NRC oversight with 95002 inspection Red: Increase NRC oversight with 95003 inspection Inspection Findings Green: Very Low safety significance White: Low to Moderate safety significance (95001)
Yellow Yellow: Substantial safety significance (95002)
Red: High safety significance (95003)
LicenseeResponseRegulatory ResponseDegraded CornerstoneMultiple/Rep.
Degraded CornerstoneUnacceptable Performance Action MatrixIncreased safety significance of findings and performance indicators results in movement to the rightMovement to the right results in:Additional NRC inspectionsIncreased Management InvolvementIncreased Regulatory Actions National Plant Performance Status at End of CY 2006 Licensee Response 70 Regulatory Response 24 Degraded Cornerstone 6Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone3 Unacceptable 0 Total 103 National Plant Performance Performance Indicator Results (end of CY 2006)
Green: 1843 White: 11 Yellow Yellow: 0 Red: 0 Total Inspection Findings (CY 2006)
Green: 676 White: 13 Yellow Yellow: 0 Red: 0 Fermi Assessment ActivitiesJanuary 1 -December 31, 2006Refueling Outage March 24 -May 11NRC Special InspectionInitiated on August 29 in response to the identification of undersized control power transformers, which rendered all four EDGsinoperableInspection of Permanent Plant Modifications conducted July 17 -Aug 3 (IR 2006-011)
Fermi Assessment ResultsPlant performance for all four quarters of the assessment period was within the Licensee Response  


Column of the Action MatrixSubstantive cross-cutting issue in the area of Problem
aseline Inspection Examples Post Maintenance Testing          ~80 hrs annual Equipment Alignment              ~80 hrs annual Triennial Fire Protection        ~200 hrs triennial Operator Response                ~125 hrs annual Emergency Preparedness            ~80 hrs annual Radiation Release Controls        ~110 hrs biennial Occupational Radiation Protection ~90 hrs annual Corrective Action Program Review  ~250 hrs biennial Corrective Action Case Reviews    ~60 hrs annual Design Basis Inspections          ~400 hrs biennial


Identification and Resolution was opened on August 31Ineffective evaluations in the Corrective Action ProgramSubstantive Cross-cutting issue has been closed as a result of adequate corrective actions by the licenseeRegulatory Actions:14 Green Non-Cited Violations (NCV) 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Licensee Response Licensee Response Licensee Response Licensee Response Annual Assessment SummaryJanuary 1 -December 31, 2006Detroit Edison operated Fermi 2 in a manner that preserved public health and safety All cornerstone objectives were met with no greater than Green findings or performance indicators identified during the assessment periodNRC plans baseline inspections at Fermi 2 for the
ignificance Threshold Performance Indicators Green:  Implement Baseline Inspection program White:  Increase NRC oversight with 95001 inspection Yellow:
Yellow  Increase NRC oversight with 95002 inspection Red:   Increase NRC oversight with 95003 inspection Inspection Findings Green:  Very Low safety significance White:  Low to Moderate safety significance (95001)
Yellow:
Yellow  Substantial safety significance (95002)
Red:    High safety significance (95003)


CY2007 assessment periodComponent Design Basis Inspection: June 25 -July 27Problem Identification and Resolution: Aug 27 -Sep 14 Contacting the NRCFor general information or questions:www.nrc.govSelect "What We Do"for Public AffairsTo report a safety concern:   (800) 695-7403 Allegation@nrc.govTo report an emergency:(301) 816-5100 (call collect)
ction Matrix Licensee    Regulatory    Degraded    Multiple/Rep. Unacceptable Response    Response      Cornerstone Degraded      Performance Cornerstone Increased safety significance of findings and performance indicators results in movement to the right Movement to the right results in:
Reference SourcesReactor Oversight Processhttp://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.htmlPublic Electronic Reading Roomhttp://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.htmlPublic Document Room1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free)
Additional NRC inspections Increased Management Involvement Increased Regulatory Actions
Licensee Remarks Fermi Representatives Fermi 2 Annual Assessment MeetingCY2006Reactor Oversight Program Questions and Comments from members of the publicInformation on the NRC and our as sessment processes is available at this meeting. We encourage you to take copies of this information home with you.}}
 
National Plant Performance Status at End of CY 2006 Licensee Response                        70 Regulatory Response                      24 Degraded Cornerstone                      6 Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone  3 Unacceptable                              0 Total                                    103
 
National Plant Performance Performance Indicator Results (end of CY 2006)
Green:      1843 White:      11 Yellow:
Yellow      0 Red:        0 Total Inspection Findings (CY 2006)
Green:      676 White:      13 Yellow:
Yellow      0 Red:        0
 
ermi Assessment Activities January 1 - December 31, 2006 Refueling Outage March 24 - May 11 NRC Special Inspection Initiated on August 29 in response to the identification of undersized control power transformers, which rendered all four EDGs inoperable Inspection of Permanent Plant Modifications conducted July 17 - Aug 3 (IR 2006-011)
 
Fermi Assessment Results 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter  3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Licensee    Licensee    Licensee    Licensee Response    Response      Response  Response Plant performance for all four quarters of the assessment period was within the Licensee Response Column of the Action Matrix Substantive cross-cutting issue in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution was opened on August 31 Ineffective evaluations in the Corrective Action Program Substantive Cross-cutting issue has been closed as a result of adequate corrective actions by the licensee Regulatory Actions:
14 Green Non-Cited Violations (NCV)
 
nnual Assessment Summary January 1 - December 31, 2006 Detroit Edison operated Fermi 2 in a manner that preserved public health and safety All cornerstone objectives were met with no greater than Green findings or performance indicators identified during the assessment period NRC plans baseline inspections at Fermi 2 for the CY2007 assessment period Component Design Basis Inspection: June 25 - July 27 Problem Identification and Resolution: Aug 27 - Sep 14
 
ontacting the NRC For general information or questions:
www.nrc.gov Select What We Do for Public Affairs To report a safety concern:
(800) 695-7403 Allegation@nrc.gov To report an emergency:
(301) 816-5100 (call collect)
 
eference Sources Reactor Oversight Process http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html Public Electronic Reading Room http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html Public Document Room 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free)
 
icensee Remarks Fermi Representatives
 
Fermi 2 Annual Assessment Meeting CY2006 Reactor Oversight Program Questions and Comments from members of the public Information on the NRC and our assessment processes is available at this meeting. We encourage you to take copies of this information home with you.}}

Latest revision as of 13:58, 7 December 2019

Meeting Slides - Fermi Annual Meeting CY2006 Reactor Oversight Program
ML070940510
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/05/2007
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
References
Download: ML070940510 (20)


Text

Fermi 2 Annual Assessment Meeting CY2006 Reactor Oversight Program Monroe, MI April 5, 2007

urpose of Todays Meeting A public forum for discussion of the licensees performance NRC will discuss the licensee performance issues identified in the annual assessment letter Licensee will be given the opportunity to respond to the information in the letter and inform the NRC of new or existing programs to maintain or improve their performance

genda Introduction Review of the Reactor Oversight Process National Summary of Plant Performance Discussion of Fermi 2 Plant Performance Licensee Response and Remarks NRC Closing Remarks Break NRC available to address public questions

Region III Organization James L. Caldwell Regional Administrator Geoffrey E. Grant Deputy Regional Administrator Mark A Satorius Cynthia D. Pederson DRP Division Director Director, Division of Reactor Safety K. Steven West Anne T. Boland DRP Deputy Division Director Deputy Director Christine A. Lipa Regional Specialists Branch Chief Robert Lerch, Project Engineer Fermi 2 Nuclear Power Plant Alexander Garmoe, Reactor Engineer Gregory Kolcum, Reactor Engineer Michael Morris, Senior Resident Inspector Adam Wilson, Reactor Engineer Tim Steadham, Resident Inspector Frank Tran, Reactor Engineer

NRC Representatives Christine A. Lipa, Branch Chief (630) 829-9619 R. Michael Morris, Senior Resident Inspector (734) 586-2798 Timothy C. Steadham, Resident Inspector (734) 586-2798 Meghan Thorpe-Kavanaugh, Project Manager, NRR (Headquarters)

(301) 415-5735

NRC Performance Goals Safety: Ensure protection of public health and safety and the environment Security: Ensure the secure use and management of radioactive materials Openness: Ensure openness in our regulatory process Effectiveness: Ensure that NRC actions are effective, efficient, realistic, and timely Management: Ensure excellence in agency management to carry out the NRCs strategic objective

Reactor Oversight Process 3 Strategic Performance Areas are divided into 7 Cornerstones of Safety Findings and Performance Indicators are assigned a Cornerstone Findings can be assigned a cross-cutting aspect, which is a causal factor for the performance deficiency Substantive Cross-Cutting Issues can be determined if there are numerous findings with a common cross-cutting aspect or theme Human Performance, Problem Identification and Resolution, and Safety Conscious Work Environment

Reactor Oversight Process Strategic Performance Areas Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection Performance Indicator Performance Indicator Results Results Results Significance Significance Significance Threshold Threshold Threshold Action ActionMatrix Matrix Regulatory Response

aseline Inspection Examples Post Maintenance Testing ~80 hrs annual Equipment Alignment ~80 hrs annual Triennial Fire Protection ~200 hrs triennial Operator Response ~125 hrs annual Emergency Preparedness ~80 hrs annual Radiation Release Controls ~110 hrs biennial Occupational Radiation Protection ~90 hrs annual Corrective Action Program Review ~250 hrs biennial Corrective Action Case Reviews ~60 hrs annual Design Basis Inspections ~400 hrs biennial

ignificance Threshold Performance Indicators Green: Implement Baseline Inspection program White: Increase NRC oversight with 95001 inspection Yellow:

Yellow Increase NRC oversight with 95002 inspection Red: Increase NRC oversight with 95003 inspection Inspection Findings Green: Very Low safety significance White: Low to Moderate safety significance (95001)

Yellow:

Yellow Substantial safety significance (95002)

Red: High safety significance (95003)

ction Matrix Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Rep. Unacceptable Response Response Cornerstone Degraded Performance Cornerstone Increased safety significance of findings and performance indicators results in movement to the right Movement to the right results in:

Additional NRC inspections Increased Management Involvement Increased Regulatory Actions

National Plant Performance Status at End of CY 2006 Licensee Response 70 Regulatory Response 24 Degraded Cornerstone 6 Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone 3 Unacceptable 0 Total 103

National Plant Performance Performance Indicator Results (end of CY 2006)

Green: 1843 White: 11 Yellow:

Yellow 0 Red: 0 Total Inspection Findings (CY 2006)

Green: 676 White: 13 Yellow:

Yellow 0 Red: 0

ermi Assessment Activities January 1 - December 31, 2006 Refueling Outage March 24 - May 11 NRC Special Inspection Initiated on August 29 in response to the identification of undersized control power transformers, which rendered all four EDGs inoperable Inspection of Permanent Plant Modifications conducted July 17 - Aug 3 (IR 2006-011)

Fermi Assessment Results 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Licensee Licensee Licensee Licensee Response Response Response Response Plant performance for all four quarters of the assessment period was within the Licensee Response Column of the Action Matrix Substantive cross-cutting issue in the area of Problem Identification and Resolution was opened on August 31 Ineffective evaluations in the Corrective Action Program Substantive Cross-cutting issue has been closed as a result of adequate corrective actions by the licensee Regulatory Actions:

14 Green Non-Cited Violations (NCV)

nnual Assessment Summary January 1 - December 31, 2006 Detroit Edison operated Fermi 2 in a manner that preserved public health and safety All cornerstone objectives were met with no greater than Green findings or performance indicators identified during the assessment period NRC plans baseline inspections at Fermi 2 for the CY2007 assessment period Component Design Basis Inspection: June 25 - July 27 Problem Identification and Resolution: Aug 27 - Sep 14

ontacting the NRC For general information or questions:

www.nrc.gov Select What We Do for Public Affairs To report a safety concern:

(800) 695-7403 Allegation@nrc.gov To report an emergency:

(301) 816-5100 (call collect)

eference Sources Reactor Oversight Process http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html Public Electronic Reading Room http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html Public Document Room 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free)

icensee Remarks Fermi Representatives

Fermi 2 Annual Assessment Meeting CY2006 Reactor Oversight Program Questions and Comments from members of the public Information on the NRC and our assessment processes is available at this meeting. We encourage you to take copies of this information home with you.