ML111650038: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 13: Line 13:
| page count = 19
| page count = 19
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Seabrook Station Assessment MeetingSeabrook StationSafety Performance in 2010
&&U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events2010 Reactor Oversight ProcessNuclear Regulatory Commission -Region I 1
NRC Representatives*James Clifford-Deputy Dir ector, Division of Reactor Projects*Arthur Burritt -Branch Chief *William Raymond -Senior Resident Inspector
*Jonathan Johnson -Resident Inspector 2
Agenda*Introduction*Discussion of safety performance at Seabrook*Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of Japan events*NRC to address public questions
*Closing remarks 3
*NextEra operated Seabrook safely and in a manner thatpreserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
NRC Assessment Summary Seabrook*Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix*Baseline inspections planned for 2011 4
*6753hours of inspection and related activities
*2 resident inspectors on site -residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant events atanytime Inspection Activities 2010 Seabrook at any time*3  major team inspections
*CDBI*Emergency Planning
*PI&R 5
*AllGreenPerformanceJanuary 1 through December 31, 2010Performance Indicator and Inspection Results Seabrook All Green Performance Indicators
*3 Green inspection finding 6
NRC Action Matrix Licensee ResponseRegulatory Response Degraded CornerstoneMultiple Repetitive Degraded CornerstoneUnacceptable PerformanceAll Inputs are Green; Cornerstone Objectives FullyMet1 or 2 White Inputs; Cornerstone Objectives FullyMet2 White or 1 Yellow Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/
ModerateMultiple Yellow Inputs or 1 Red Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/
SignificantOverall Unacceptable Performance; Plants not permitted to Operatew/inthis
*Increasing safety significance
*IncreasingNRC inspection efforts
*Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement
*Increasing regulatory actions Fully Met Fully Met Moderate Degradation in Safety Performance Significant Degradation in Safety Performance Operate w/in this Column; Unacceptable Margin to Safety
*Seabrook was operated safely
*Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
*Baselineinspectionsplannedfor2011 2010 Seabrook Assessment Summary Baseline inspections planned for 2011 8 Seabrook Assessment MeetingU.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9
U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Safe*NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand external events
*NRCrequiresadefense
-in-depthapproachto NRC requires a defense indepth approach to safety*NRC performs independent safety inspections
*NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements 10 Designed forSite Specific Natural Events*Earthquakes*Tsunamis*Hurricanes
*Floods
*Tornadoes 11 The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth*Redundant and diverse safety systems*Multiplephysicalbarriersto
*Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material*Testing and inspection of systems important to safety*Emergency planning 12 NRC Independent Safety InspectionsReactor Oversight Program
*NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security
*At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant
*NRC specialists conduct additional inspections at each nuclear plant 13 NRC Requires Safety ImprovementsNRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements:
*NRC operating experience program 14*Rulemaking (Station Blackout)
*Post TMI Actions
*Post 9/11 Orders
*Generic Safety Issues NRC Response to Events in Japan *NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review*Near-term actions (<90 days)conductingadditional 15-conducting additional inspections-identifying near term operational issues*Longer-term actions Director's Comments Jim Clifford 16 Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Region I Meeting Ground Rules1.Please be respectful to the speaker -only one speaker at a time2.See NRC staff if you have procedural questions/concerns or still want to sign up.3.NRC staff members will be available after the meeting to talk to those interested 17 Questions 18 Contacting the NRC*Report a safety concern
*1-800-695-7403
*allegation@nrc.gov
*General questions
*www.nrc.gov
*Region I Public Affairs
*Diane Screnci, 610-332-5330 or diane.screnci@nrc.gov
*Neil Sheehan, 610-332-5331 or neil.sheehan@nrc.gov 19}}

Revision as of 23:22, 6 August 2018

Seabrook Aam Slides, June 8, 2011
ML111650038
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/08/2011
From: Burritt A L
Reactor Projects Branch 3
To:
burritt al
References
Download: ML111650038 (19)


Text

Seabrook Station Assessment MeetingSeabrook StationSafety Performance in 2010

&&U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events2010 Reactor Oversight ProcessNuclear Regulatory Commission -Region I 1

NRC Representatives*James Clifford-Deputy Dir ector, Division of Reactor Projects*Arthur Burritt -Branch Chief *William Raymond -Senior Resident Inspector

  • Jonathan Johnson -Resident Inspector 2

Agenda*Introduction*Discussion of safety performance at Seabrook*Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of Japan events*NRC to address public questions

  • Closing remarks 3
  • NextEra operated Seabrook safely and in a manner thatpreserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.

NRC Assessment Summary Seabrook*Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix*Baseline inspections planned for 2011 4

  • 6753hours of inspection and related activities
  • 2 resident inspectors on site -residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant events atanytime Inspection Activities 2010 Seabrook at any time*3 major team inspections
  • CDBI*Emergency Planning
  • PI&R 5
  • AllGreenPerformanceJanuary 1 through December 31, 2010Performance Indicator and Inspection Results Seabrook All Green Performance Indicators
  • 3 Green inspection finding 6

NRC Action Matrix Licensee ResponseRegulatory Response Degraded CornerstoneMultiple Repetitive Degraded CornerstoneUnacceptable PerformanceAll Inputs are Green; Cornerstone Objectives FullyMet1 or 2 White Inputs; Cornerstone Objectives FullyMet2 White or 1 Yellow Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/

ModerateMultiple Yellow Inputs or 1 Red Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/

SignificantOverall Unacceptable Performance; Plants not permitted to Operatew/inthis

  • Increasing safety significance
  • IncreasingNRC inspection efforts
  • Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement
  • Increasing regulatory actions Fully Met Fully Met Moderate Degradation in Safety Performance Significant Degradation in Safety Performance Operate w/in this Column; Unacceptable Margin to Safety
  • Seabrook was operated safely
  • Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
  • Baselineinspectionsplannedfor2011 2010 Seabrook Assessment Summary Baseline inspections planned for 2011 8 Seabrook Assessment MeetingU.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9

U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Safe*NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand external events

  • NRCrequiresadefense

-in-depthapproachto NRC requires a defense indepth approach to safety*NRC performs independent safety inspections

  • NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements 10 Designed forSite Specific Natural Events*Earthquakes*Tsunamis*Hurricanes
  • Floods
  • Tornadoes 11 The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth*Redundant and diverse safety systems*Multiplephysicalbarriersto
  • Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material*Testing and inspection of systems important to safety*Emergency planning 12 NRC Independent Safety InspectionsReactor Oversight Program
  • NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security
  • At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant
  • NRC specialists conduct additional inspections at each nuclear plant 13 NRC Requires Safety ImprovementsNRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements:
  • NRC operating experience program 14*Rulemaking (Station Blackout)
  • Post TMI Actions
  • Post 9/11 Orders
  • Generic Safety Issues NRC Response to Events in Japan *NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review*Near-term actions (<90 days)conductingadditional 15-conducting additional inspections-identifying near term operational issues*Longer-term actions Director's Comments Jim Clifford 16 Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Region I Meeting Ground Rules1.Please be respectful to the speaker -only one speaker at a time2.See NRC staff if you have procedural questions/concerns or still want to sign up.3.NRC staff members will be available after the meeting to talk to those interested 17 Questions 18 Contacting the NRC*Report a safety concern
  • 1-800-695-7403
  • allegation@nrc.gov
  • General questions
  • www.nrc.gov
  • Region I Public Affairs
  • Diane Screnci, 610-332-5330 or diane.screnci@nrc.gov
  • Neil Sheehan, 610-332-5331 or neil.sheehan@nrc.gov 19