ML11263A073: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:I.-j 4 Doyle, Daniel From: Doyle, Daniel Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:39 PM To: Logan, Dennis Cc: Perkins, Leslie; Imboden, Andy
==Subject:==
RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Categories:
Salem Hope Creek Ok, please let me know when you have an expected completion date.Dan Doyle Project Manager Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-3748 From: Logan, Dennis Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:37 PM To: Beissel, Dennis; Doyle, Daniel Cc: Imboden, Andy
==Subject:==
RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Dan, Mine will take longer. I am still trying to find some of the background documents and to determine how long response will take.Dennis L From: Beissel, Dennis Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:34 PM To: Doyle, Daniel Cc: Imboden, Andy
==Subject:==
RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Hi Dan, I will do the response to comments for SHP, but I don't think they can be done by next Thursday Feb 3. A more realistic date considering my current workload is COB Feb 1 5 th I discussed this with Andy and he agrees with my assessment.
Of course, I will try to finish these sooner. Thanks, Dennis From: Doyle, Daniel Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:14 PM To: Beissel, Dennis Cc: Perkins, Leslie
==Subject:==
Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Dennis, Please take a look at the attached hydro comments for the Salem/Hope Creek DSEIS.They are mostly from the state of NJ Dept of Environmental Protection.
32 Note that comments SHC-W-21 through SHC-W-28 (from the New Jersey Geological Survey) are actually about the applicant's ER, not the DSEIS.I attached the comment letter from NJ so you can take a look at that.. .the comments from the NJ Geological people are on pp 6-8 of the pdf.I would like to receive your responses by next Thursday (Feb 3).FYI: Salem ER: http://www.nrc.qov/reactors/operatinq/licensinq/renewal/apilications/salem/salem-envir-rpt.pdf Hope Creek ER: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensinq/renewal/applications/hope-creek/hope-creek-envir-rpt.pdf Thanks, Dan Doyle Project Manager Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission daniel.dovle~a, nrc.qov (301) 415-3748 33}}

Revision as of 02:55, 3 August 2018

Email from D. Doyle, NRR to D. Beissel, NRR Salem/Hope Creek Hydro Comments
ML11263A073
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 01/28/2011
From: Doyle D I
Division of License Renewal
To: Logan D T
Division of License Renewal
References
FOIA/PA-2011-0113
Download: ML11263A073 (2)


Text

I.-j 4 Doyle, Daniel From: Doyle, Daniel Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:39 PM To: Logan, Dennis Cc: Perkins, Leslie; Imboden, Andy

Subject:

RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Categories:

Salem Hope Creek Ok, please let me know when you have an expected completion date.Dan Doyle Project Manager Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-3748 From: Logan, Dennis Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:37 PM To: Beissel, Dennis; Doyle, Daniel Cc: Imboden, Andy

Subject:

RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Dan, Mine will take longer. I am still trying to find some of the background documents and to determine how long response will take.Dennis L From: Beissel, Dennis Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:34 PM To: Doyle, Daniel Cc: Imboden, Andy

Subject:

RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Hi Dan, I will do the response to comments for SHP, but I don't think they can be done by next Thursday Feb 3. A more realistic date considering my current workload is COB Feb 1 5 th I discussed this with Andy and he agrees with my assessment.

Of course, I will try to finish these sooner. Thanks, Dennis From: Doyle, Daniel Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:14 PM To: Beissel, Dennis Cc: Perkins, Leslie

Subject:

Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Dennis, Please take a look at the attached hydro comments for the Salem/Hope Creek DSEIS.They are mostly from the state of NJ Dept of Environmental Protection.

32 Note that comments SHC-W-21 through SHC-W-28 (from the New Jersey Geological Survey) are actually about the applicant's ER, not the DSEIS.I attached the comment letter from NJ so you can take a look at that.. .the comments from the NJ Geological people are on pp 6-8 of the pdf.I would like to receive your responses by next Thursday (Feb 3).FYI: Salem ER: http://www.nrc.qov/reactors/operatinq/licensinq/renewal/apilications/salem/salem-envir-rpt.pdf Hope Creek ER: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensinq/renewal/applications/hope-creek/hope-creek-envir-rpt.pdf Thanks, Dan Doyle Project Manager Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission daniel.dovle~a, nrc.qov (301) 415-3748 33