ML17205A285: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403Written Examination GradingQuality Checklist Form ES-403-1FacilityDate of Exam:Exam Level: RO ÉSRO XItem Description lnitialsabc1. Clean answer sheets copied before gradingRTVh2Answer key changes and question deletions justified anddocumented
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facility Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO ÉSRO X Item Description lnitials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading RTV h 2 Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
("",'a)Lr+^,-r3.Applicants' scores checked for addition errors(reviewers spot check > 25o/o of examinations)
("",'a)Lr+^,-r 3.Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25o/o of examinations)
K(4TL_/4.Grading for all borderline cases (80 x2o/o overall and 70 or 80,as appicable,  
K(4 TL_/4.Grading for all borderline cases (80 x2o/o overall and 70 or 80, as appicable, +4o/o on the SRO-nly) reviewed in detail (^"n")w TL/5. All other faili/ur"justified ng examinations checked to ensure that grades (^.,"f It-,.,+rL-t 6.Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants  
+4o/o on the SRO-nly) reviewed in detail (^"n")wTL/5. All other faili/ur"justified ng examinations checked to ensure that grades(^.,"fIt-,.,+rL-t6.Performance on missed questions checked for trainingdeficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity ofquestions missed by half or more of the applicants  
(^u+")tt+TL/I Printed Name/Signature Date R t c/¿r/r-r a. Grader Ro^l"rt c.o b. FacilityReviewer(*)
(^u+")tt+TL/IPrinted Name/Signature DateR t c/¿r/r-ra. GraderRo^l"rt c.ob. FacilityReviewer(*)
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)7 6l,l>u,-d. NRC Supervisor  
: c. NRC Chief Examiner  
(")t ,\.(.)The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.}}
(*)76l,l>u,-d. NRC Supervisor  
(")t,\.(.)The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by theNRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.}}

Revision as of 19:49, 7 July 2018

2017 Point Beach Nuclear Plant Initial License Examination Form ES-403-1
ML17205A285
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/23/2017
From: Seymour J L
Operations Branch III
To:
Point Beach
Shared Package
ML16319A340 List:
References
Download: ML17205A285 (1)


Text

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facility Date of Exam: Exam Level: RO ÉSRO X Item Description lnitials a b c 1. Clean answer sheets copied before grading RTV h 2 Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented

("",'a)Lr+^,-r 3.Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25o/o of examinations)

K(4 TL_/4.Grading for all borderline cases (80 x2o/o overall and 70 or 80, as appicable, +4o/o on the SRO-nly) reviewed in detail (^"n")w TL/5. All other faili/ur"justified ng examinations checked to ensure that grades (^.,"f It-,.,+rL-t 6.Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants

(^u+")tt+TL/I Printed Name/Signature Date R t c/¿r/r-r a. Grader Ro^l"rt c.o b. FacilityReviewer(*)

c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)7 6l,l>u,-d. NRC Supervisor

(")t ,\.(.)The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.