ML17331A089: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 20: Line 20:


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Application foramendtoLicense.DPR-58;changing TStoallow'-Iinterimpluggingcriteriaof1.0voltforCycle14.,Technical summarysupporting validity6'continued use.ofWestinghouse ReptWCAP-13187 encl.DISTRIBUTION CODE:0001DCOPIESRECEIVED:LTR
Application for amend to License.DPR-58;changing TS to allow'-I interim plugging criteria of 1.0 volt for Cycle 14.,Technical summary supporting validity 6'continued use.of Westinghouse Rept WCAP-13187 encl.DISTRIBUTION CODE: 0001D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR
/~ENCL/'IZE:ig+~+$TITLE:ORSubmittal:
/~ENCL/'IZE: i g+~+$TITLE: OR Submittal:
GeneralDistribution
General Distribution
/DNOTES:-+-=;ACCEZ,ERXV@~
/D NOTES:-+-=;ACCEZ,ERXV@~
OOCVMENTDISVagVTION.SYSTEM ACCESSION N]9R:9303160107 DOC.DATE:
OOCVMENT DISVagVTION.SYSTEM ACCESSION N]9R:9303160107 DOC.DATE: 93/03/10'OTARIZED:
93/03/10'OTARIZED:
YES" DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power'lant, Unit 1, Indiana M 05000315 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION FITZPATRICK,E.
YES"DOCKETFACIL:50-315 DonaldC.CookNuclearPower'lant, Unit1,IndianaM05000315AUTH.NAMEAUTHORAFFILIATION FITZPATRICK,E.
Indiana Michigan Power Co.-(formerly'Indiana
IndianaMichiganPowerCo.-(formerly'Indiana
&Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E.
&MichiganEleRECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E.
Document Control Branch (Document'-Control Desk)RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 LA DEAN,W INTERNAL: NRR/DE/EELB NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS2 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL''2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.1 1 k"RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 PD NRR/DORS/OTSB NRR/DSSA/SCSB NRR/DSSA/SRXB REG FILE'1-NSIC-COPIES LTTR ENCL 1.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0'1.1 1".1 A D D A NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
DocumentControlBranch(Document'-Control Desk)RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1LADEAN,WINTERNAL:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!CONTACI'IIE DOCUMENT COi!'I'ROL DIMK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.504-2065)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTR!BUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!D TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 16 ENCL 14
NRR/DE/EELB NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS2EXTERNAL:
\~~o'i indiana Michigan Power Company P.O.Box 16631 t:olumbus, OH 43216 AEP:NRC:1166G Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Docket No.50-315 License No.DPR-58 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE TO ALLOW INTERIM PLUGGING CRITERIA OF 1.0 VOLT FOR CYCLE 14 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Attn: T.E.Murley March 10, 1993  
NRCPDRCOPIESLTTRENCL''221111111110.11k"RECIPIENT IDCODE/NAME PD3-1PDNRR/DORS/OTSB NRR/DSSA/SCSB NRR/DSSA/SRXB REGFILE'1-NSIC-COPIESLTTRENCL1.111111110'1.11".1ADDANOTETOALL"RIDS"RECIPIENTS:
PLEASEHELPUSTOREDUCEWASTE!CONTACI'IIE DOCUMENTCOi!'I'ROL DIMK,ROOMPl-37(EXT.504-2065)
TOELIMINATE YOURNAMEFROMDISTR!BUTION LISTSFORDOCUMENTS YOUDON'TNEED!DTOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
LTTR16ENCL14
\~~o'i indianaMichiganPowerCompanyP.O.Box16631t:olumbus, OH43216AEP:NRC:1166G DonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnit1DocketNo.50-315LicenseNo.DPR-58TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGETOALLOWINTERIMPLUGGINGCRITERIAOF1.0VOLTFORCYCLE14U.S.NuclearRegulatory Commission DocumentControlDeskWashington, D.C.20555Attn:T.E.MurleyMarch10,1993


==DearDr.Murley:==
==Dear Dr.Murley:==
Thisletteranditsattachments constitute anapplication foranamendment totheTechnical Specifications (T/Ss)ofDonaldC.CookNuclearPlantUnit1inaccordance with10CFR50.90.Itisrequested thattheamendment totheT/Ssforsteamgenerator interimpluggingcriteria, asoutlinedintheNRCletterofJuly29,1992forlicenseAmendment No.166forfuelcycle13,beextendedtofuelcycle14oftheCookNuclearPlantUnit1.Thisextension isessential whileourT/Sammendment toallowalternate pluggingcriteriaisbeingreviewedbytheNRC(AEP:NRC:1166, March20,1992).Attachment 1providesatechnical summaryoftherecentsteamgenerator tubeinterimpluggingcriteriavoltageevaluations andtubesampleanalysisresults.Theseevaluations andresultssupportthevalidityandcontinued useoftheWestinghouse ReportWCAP-13187 insupportofthe1volt.interimpluggingcriteriaforfuelcycle14.Notechnical changesweremadetotheinterimpluggingcriteriaT/Ssrequirements usedforfuelcycle13.T/Schangesweremadeonlytoreference fuelcycle14intheappropriate T/Sparagraphs wherefuelcycle13waspreviously referenced.
This letter and its attachments constitute an application for an amendment to the Technical Specifications (T/Ss)of Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 in accordance with 10 CFR 50.90.It is requested that the amendment to the T/Ss for steam generator interim plugging criteria, as outlined in the NRC letter of July 29, 1992 for license Amendment No.166 for fuel cycle 13, be extended to fuel cycle 14 of the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1.This extension is essential while our T/S ammendment to allow alternate plugging criteria is being reviewed by the NRC (AEP:NRC:1166, March 20, 1992).Attachment 1 provides a technical summary of the recent steam generator tube interim plugging criteria voltage evaluations and tube sample analysis results.These evaluations and results support the validity and continued use of the Westinghouse Report WCAP-13187 in support of the 1 volt.interim plugging criteria for fuel cycle 14.No technical changes were made to the interim plugging criteria T/Ss requirements used for fuel cycle 13.T/S changes were made only to reference fuel cycle 14 in the appropriate T/S paragraphs where fuel cycle 13 was previously referenced.
Adetaileddescription oftheproposedchangesandouranalysesconcerning significant hazardsconsiderations arerepeatedfromourprevioussubmittal andareincludedinAttachment 2tothisletterforyourconvenience.
A detailed description of the proposed changes and our analyses concerning significant hazards considerations are repeated from our previous submittal and are included in Attachment 2 to this letter for your convenience.
Attachment 3containstheproposed3f'te19303i60i07 9303i0PDRADOCK050003i5PPGRoor l1ia~
Attachment 3 contains the proposed 3f'te 1 9303i60i07 9303i0 PDR ADOCK 050003i5 P PGR oor l 1 i a~
Dr.T.E.Murley-2-AEP:NRC:1166G revisedT/Spages.Attachment 4containsthemarked-up copiesoftheexistingT/Ss.Webelievethattheproposedchangeswillnotresultin(1)asignificant changeinthetypesofeffluents orasignificant increaseintheamountofanyeffluents thatmaybereleasedoffsite,or(2)asignificant increaseinindividual orcumulative occupational radiation exposure.
Dr.T.E.Murley-2-AEP:NRC:1166G revised T/S pages.Attachment 4 contains the marked-up copies of the existing T/Ss.We believe that the proposed changes will not result in (1)a significant change in the types of effluents or a significant increase in the amount of any effluents that may be released offsite, or (2)a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.These proposed changes have been reviewed by the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee and the corporate Nuclear Safety and Design Review Committee.
TheseproposedchangeshavebeenreviewedbythePlantNuclearSafetyReviewCommittee andthecorporate NuclearSafetyandDesignReviewCommittee.
In compliance with the requirements of lOCFR50.91(b)(1), copies of this letter and its attachments have been transmitted to Mr.J.R.Padgett of the Michigan Public Service Commission and to the Michigan Department of Public Health.Please contact us if you have any questions concerning this license amendment request.This letter is submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)and, as such, an oath statement is enclosed.Sincerely, pg+p~j Vice President eh Attachments Enclosure cc: A.A.Blind-Bridgman J.R.Padgett G.Charnoff A.B.Davis-Region III NRC Resident Inspector-Bridgman NFEM Section Chief Dr.T.E.Murley-3-AEP:NRC:1166G bc: S.J.Brewer D.H.Malin/K.J.Toth J.D.Benes/J.R.Jensen M.L.Horvath-Bridgman J.B.Shinnock W.G.Smith, Jr.W.M.Dean, NRC-Washington, D.C.AEP:NRC:1166G DC-N-6015.1 a COUNTY OF FRANKLIN E.E.Fitzpatrick, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the Vice President of licensee Indiana Michigan Power Company, that he has read the forgoing response to AEP:NRC:1166G
Incompliance withtherequirements oflOCFR50.91(b)(1),
-Technical Specification Change To Allow Interim Plugging Criteria Of 1.0 Volt For Cycle 14 and knows the contents thereof;and that said contents are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.Subscribed and sworn to before me this~~day of 199 H 40TARY PUBLIC RlTA D.HILL NOTARY PUBLIC.STATE OF OIUO l'4*h 4 r.~
copiesofthisletteranditsattachments havebeentransmitted toMr.J.R.PadgettoftheMichiganPublicServiceCommission andtotheMichiganDepartment ofPublicHealth.Pleasecontactusifyouhaveanyquestions concerning thislicenseamendment request.Thisletterissubmitted pursuantto10CFR50.54(f)and,assuch,anoathstatement isenclosed.
ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP NRC'1166G TECHNICAL  
Sincerely, pg+p~jVicePresident ehAttachments Enclosure cc:A.A.Blind-BridgmanJ.R.PadgettG.CharnoffA.B.Davis-RegionIIINRCResidentInspector
 
-BridgmanNFEMSectionChief Dr.T.E.Murley-3-AEP:NRC:1166G bc:S.J.BrewerD.H.Malin/K.J.TothJ.D.Benes/J.R.JensenM.L.Horvath-BridgmanJ.B.ShinnockW.G.Smith,Jr.W.M.Dean,NRC-Washington, D.C.AEP:NRC:1166G DC-N-6015.1 aCOUNTYOFFRANKLINE.E.Fitzpatrick, beingdulysworn,deposesandsaysthatheistheVicePresident oflicenseeIndianaMichiganPowerCompany,thathehasreadtheforgoingresponsetoAEP:NRC:1166G
==SUMMARY==
-Technical Specification ChangeToAllowInterimPluggingCriteriaOf1.0VoltForCycle14andknowsthecontentsthereof;andthatsaidcontentsaretruetothebestofhisknowledge andbelief.Subscribed andsworntobeforemethis~~dayof199H40TARYPUBLICRlTAD.HILLNOTARYPUBLIC.STATEOFOIUO l'4*h4r.~
OF THE RECENT STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INTERIM PLUGGING CRITERIA VOLTAGE EVALUATIONS TUBE SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:1166G Page 1 The technical basis for implementing the interim plugging criteria for fuel cycle 13 was based on submittal documents AEP:NRC:1166, 1166A, 1166B, 1166C, and 1166D.Included as an attachment was Westinghouse Report, WCAP-13187 titled"D.C.Cook Unit 1 Steam Generator Tube Plugging Criteria for Indications at Tube Support Plates" dated March 1992.The WCAP contains the technical approach for achieving assurance of tube structural integrity based on eddy current bobbin coil voltage repair criteria.Application of the WCAP tube repair voltage criteria is based on voltage growth rates from the prior two operating cycles of 0.8 and 0.7 volts.Analysis of voltage growth" rate done for fuel cycle 13, at the end of fuel cycle 12 in 1992, showed the largest voltage growth was 0.49 volts.This is well below the projected growth rates referenced by the WCAP.Analysis for the maximum end of cycle voltage proj ected for indications left in service below 1.0 volt was 1.40 volts.This indication voltage is well within the structural limits proposed by the WCAP structural voltage limits for potential tube leakage and burst.NRC submittal letter AEP:NRC:1166F contains the full report on evaluations performed to estimate the projected EOC voltage growth rate as well as leakrate and burst probabi.lity.
ATTACHMENT 1TOAEPNRC'1166G TECHNICAL SUMMARYOFTHERECENTSTEAMGENERATOR TUBEINTERIMPLUGGINGCRITERIAVOLTAGEEVALUATIONS TUBESAMPLEANALYSISRESULTS ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP:NRC:1166G Page1Thetechnical basisforimplementing theinterimpluggingcriteriaforfuelcycle13wasbasedonsubmittal documents AEP:NRC:1166, 1166A,1166B,1166C,and1166D.Includedasanattachment wasWestinghouse Report,WCAP-13187 titled"D.C.CookUnit1SteamGenerator TubePluggingCriteriaforIndications atTubeSupportPlates"datedMarch1992.TheWCAPcontainsthetechnical approachforachieving assurance oftubestructural integrity basedoneddycurrentbobbincoilvoltagerepaircriteria.
In addition, tube samples were removed from steam generator No.12 as part of the T/Ss alternate plugging criteria for metallographic evaluation, leak testing, and burst testing.The following table summarizes the results on those tube samples leak and burst tested at the first and second support plate (SP)elevati.ons.
Application oftheWCAPtuberepairvoltagecriteriaisbasedonvoltagegrowthratesfromthepriortwooperating cyclesof0.8and0.7volts.Analysisofvoltagegrowth"ratedoneforfuelcycle13,attheendoffuelcycle12in1992,showedthelargestvoltagegrowthwas0.49volts.Thisiswellbelowtheprojected growthratesreferenced bytheWCAP.Analysisforthemaximumendofcyclevoltageprojectedforindications leftinservicebelow1.0voltwas1.40volts.Thisindication voltageiswellwithinthestructural limitsproposedbytheWCAPstructural voltagelimitsforpotential tubeleakageandburst.NRCsubmittal letterAEP:NRC:1166F containsthefullreportonevaluations performed toestimatetheprojected EOCvoltagegrowthrateaswellasleakrateandburstprobabi.lity.
Suamary Table Tube Leak and Burst Test Data Location Field E/C~XD DP C tt Rll-C60/SPI 1.1 Volt,BC SAI, RPC Leak~lt.P I Not Done Burst t PI 9,100 SEH Fractography
Inaddition, tubesampleswereremovedfromsteamgenerator No.12aspartoftheT/Ssalternate pluggingcriteriaformetallographic evaluation, leaktesting,andbursttesting.Thefollowing tablesummarizes theresultsonthosetubesamplesleakandbursttestedatthefirstandsecondsupportplate(SP)elevati.ons.
~Dth X~AD tt I 54 32 Rll-C60/SP2 1.4 Volt,BC HAI,RPC Rlg-C16/SP1 1.4 Volt,BC SAI,RPC Not Done>2,650 (ET)*No Leakage 9,350 10P725 52 38 28 Rlg-C21/SPl 2.0 Volt, BC SAI, RPC>2,650 (ET)*No Leakage 10,200 Rlg-C21/SP2 NDD,BC NDD,RPC*ET~Test done at elevated Not Done temperature.
SuamaryTableTubeLeakandBurstTestDataLocationFieldE/C~XDDPCttRll-C60/SPI 1.1Volt,BCSAI,RPCLeak~lt.PINotDoneBursttPI9,100SEHFractography
11,200 38 No Data ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP'NRC'1166G Page 2 The corrosion was confined to the support plate region and had combinations of axially oriented intergranular stress corrosion'cracking and intergranular cellular corrosion.
~DthX~ADttI5432Rll-C60/SP2 1.4Volt,BCHAI,RPCRlg-C16/SP1 1.4Volt,BCSAI,RPCNotDone>2,650(ET)*NoLeakage9,35010P725523828Rlg-C21/SPl 2.0Volt,BCSAI,RPC>2,650(ET)*NoLeakage10,200Rlg-C21/SP2 NDD,BCNDD,RPC*ET~TestdoneatelevatedNotDonetemperature.
The corrosion was of OD origin, and it occurred in either 360'ands or isolated patches.The SP2 region of tube R18-C21 had the shallowest maximum crack depth (38%throughwall) found.Its eddy current signal would not be expected to be detected with a high probability.
11,20038NoData ATTACHMENT 1TOAEP'NRC'1166G Page2Thecorrosion wasconfinedtothesupportplateregionandhadcombinations ofaxiallyorientedintergranular stresscorrosion
The first support plate crevice regions of tubes R18-C16 and R18-C21 were leak tested at elevated temperature and pressure.Neither tube leaked through existing corrosion networks at normal operating conditions (1500 psi.differential pr~ssure with primary side at 2250 psi and secondary side at 750 psi)or at steam line break conditions (2650 psi differential pressure with the primary side at 3000 psi and the secondary side at 350 psi).Room temperature burst tests wer'e conducted at a higher pressurization rate of 1000 psi/sec on SP1 of tubes Rll-C60, R18-C16 and R18-C21 and SP2 of tubes Rll-C60 and R18-C21.All burst at high burst pressures (9,100;10,725;10,200;9,350 and 11,200 psig, respectively) and had axial burst openings.Virgin tubing burst, typically between 11,500 and 12,000 psig.In conclusion, the results of the voltage growth rate evaluations and tube sample leak and burst were well within the guidelines established in the WCAP.Also, the voltage growth rate is almost half of what was found for the two prior fuel cycles.Therefore, based on a low voltage growth rate, and leak and burst test results, the WCAP is still considered a technically appropriate and bounding document applicable to the next fuel cycle, cycle 14.Furthermore, the eddy current inspection, reporting, and leakage requirements as previousily stated in the T/Ss for fuel cycle 13, will be maintained for fuel cycle 14.
'cracking andintergranular cellularcorrosion.
ATTACHMENT 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION EVALUATION IN SUPPORT OF THE INTERIM PLUGGING CRITERIA Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G INTRODUCTION Page 1 A license amendment is proposed to preclude unnecessarily plugging steam generator tubes due to the occurrence of outer diameter initiated stress corrosion cracking (ODSCC)at the tube support plates in the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 steam generators.
Thecorrosion wasofODorigin,anditoccurredineither360'andsorisolatedpatches.TheSP2regionoftubeR18-C21hadtheshallowest maximumcrackdepth(38%throughwall) found.Itseddycurrentsignalwouldnotbeexpectedtobedetectedwithahighprobability.
Using the existing Technical Specifications (T/Ss)steam generator tube plugging criteria of 40$tube wall penetration as determined by non-destructive examination (NDE), many of the tubes with crack indications would needlessly have to be removed from service.The interim plugging criteria for tube support plate elevation ODSCC occurring in the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 steam generators may result in tubes with both partial and through-wall cracks returning to service.In the limiting case, it is demonstrated that the presence of through-wall cracks alone is not reason enough to remove a tube from service.DESCRIPTION OF THE AMENDMENT REQUEST As required'by 10 CFR 50.91(a)(1), an analysis is provided to demonstrate that the proposed license amendment to implement an interim steam generator tube plugging criteria for the tube support plate elevations at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 involves no significant hazards considerations.
ThefirstsupportplatecreviceregionsoftubesR18-C16andR18-C21wereleaktestedatelevatedtemperature andpressure.
The interim plugging criteria involve a correlation between eddy current bobbin coil signal amplitude (voltage)and tube burst and leakage capability.
Neithertubeleakedthroughexistingcorrosion networksatnormaloperating conditions (1500psi.differential pr~ssurewithprimarysideat2250psiandsecondary sideat750psi)oratsteamlinebreakconditions (2650psidifferential pressurewiththeprimarysideat3000psiandthesecondary sideat350psi).Roomtemperature bursttestswer'econducted atahigherpressurization rateof1000psi/seconSP1oftubesRll-C60,R18-C16andR18-C21andSP2oftubesRll-C60andR18-C21.Allburstathighburstpressures (9,100;10,725;10,200;9,350and11,200psig,respectively) andhadaxialburstopenings.
The plugging criteria is based on testing of laboratory-induced ODSCC specimens, extensive examination of pulled tubes from operating steam generators (industry wide), and field experience with leakage due to indications at, the tube support plates (world wide).Specifically, crack indications with bobbin coil voltages less than or equal to 1.0 volt, regardless of indicated depth, do not require remedial action if postulated steam line break leakage can be shown to be acceptable.
Virgintubingburst,typically between11,500and12,000psig.Inconclusion, theresultsofthevoltagegrowthrateevaluations andtubesampleleakandburstwerewellwithintheguidelines established intheWCAP.Also,thevoltagegrowthrateisalmosthalfofwhatwasfoundforthetwopriorfuelcycles.Therefore, basedonalowvoltagegrowthrate,andleakandbursttestresults,theWCAPisstillconsidered atechnically appropriate andboundingdocumentapplicable tothenextfuelcycle,cycle14.Furthermore, theeddycurrentinspection, reporting, andleakagerequirements aspreviousily statedintheT/Ssforfuelcycle13,willbemaintained forfuelcycle14.
Crack indications with bobbin coil signal amplitudes exceeding 1.0 volt must be either plugged or repaired.O The proposed amendment would maintain the previously modified T/Ss"3.4.5"Steam Generators," 3.4.6,"Reactor Coolant System Leakage," and the associated bases incorporated for the 1 volt interim plugging criteria.These provide tube inspection requirements and acceptance criteria to determine the level of degradation for which a tube experiencing ODSCC at the tube support'late elevations.
ATTACHMENT 2toAEP:NRC:1166G NOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSCONSIDERATION EVALUATION INSUPPORTOFTHEINTERIMPLUGGINGCRITERIA Attachment 2toAEP:NRC:1166G INTRODUCTION Page1Alicenseamendment isproposedtoprecludeunnecessarily pluggingsteamgenerator tubesduetotheoccurrence ofouterdiameterinitiated stresscorrosion cracking(ODSCC)atthetubesupportplatesintheCookNuclearPlantUnit1steamgenerators.
may'emain in service in the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 steam generators.
UsingtheexistingTechnical Specifications (T/Ss)steamgenerator tubepluggingcriteriaof40$tubewallpenetration asdetermined bynon-destructive examination (NDE),manyofthetubeswithcrackindications wouldneedlessly havetoberemovedfromservice.Theinterimpluggingcriteriafortubesupportplateelevation ODSCCoccurring intheCookNuclearPlantUnit1steamgenerators mayresultintubeswithbothpartialandthrough-wall cracksreturning toservice.Inthelimitingcase,itisdemonstrated thatthepresenceofthrough-wall cracksaloneisnotreasonenoughtoremoveatubefromservice.DESCRIPTION OFTHEAMENDMENT REQUESTAsrequired'by10CFR50.91(a)(1),
Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G EVALUATION Page 2 Steam Generator Tube Inte rit Discussion In the development of the interim plugging criteria, Regulatory Guides (RG)1.121,"Bases for Plugging Degraded PWR Steam Generator Tubes," and 1.83"Inservice Inspection of PWR Steam Generator Tubes," are used as the bases for determining that steam generator tube integrity considerations are maintained within acceptable limits.Regulatory Guide 1.121 describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for meeting General Design Criteria (GDC)2, 4, 14, 15, 31, and 32 by reducing the probability and consequences of steam generator tube rupture through determining the limiting safe conditions of tube wall degradation.
ananalysisisprovidedtodemonstrate thattheproposedlicenseamendment toimplement aninterimsteamgenerator tubepluggingcriteriaforthetubesupportplateelevations atCookNuclearPlantUnit1involvesnosignificant hazardsconsiderations.
Tubes with unacceptable cracking, as established by inservice inspection, should be repaired or r'emoved from service by plugging.This RG uses safety factors on loads for tube burst that are consistent with the requirements of Section III of the ASME Code.For the tube support plate elevation degradation occurring in the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 steam generators, tube burst criteria are inherently satisfied during normal operating conditions by the presence of the tube support plate.The presence of the tube support plate enhances the integrity of the degraded tubes in that region by precluding tube deformation beyond the diameter of the drilled hole.It is not certain whether the tube support plate would function to provide a similar constraining effect during accident condition loadings.Therefore, no credit is taken in the development of the plugging criteria for the presence of the tube support plate during accident condition loadings.Conservatively, based on the existing data base, burst testing shows that the safety requirements for tube burst margins during both normal and accident condition loadings can be satisfied with bobbin coil signal amplitudes less than 6.8 volts, regardless of the depth of tube wall penetration cracking.Regulatory Guide 1.83 describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing GDC 14, 15, 31, and 32 through periodic inservice inspection for the detection of significant tube wall degradation.
Theinterimpluggingcriteriainvolveacorrelation betweeneddycurrentbobbincoilsignalamplitude (voltage) andtubeburstandleakagecapability.
Upon implementation of the plugging criteria, tube leakage considerations must also be addressed.
Thepluggingcriteriaisbasedontestingoflaboratory-induced ODSCCspecimens, extensive examination ofpulledtubesfromoperating steamgenerators (industry wide),andfieldexperience withleakageduetoindications at,thetubesupportplates(worldwide).Specifically, crackindications withbobbincoilvoltageslessthanorequalto1.0volt,regardless ofindicated depth,donotrequireremedialactionifpostulated steamlinebreakleakagecanbeshowntobeacceptable.
It must be determined that the cracks will not leak excessively during all plant conditions.
Crackindications withbobbincoilsignalamplitudes exceeding 1.0voltmustbeeitherpluggedorrepaired.
For the interim tube plugging criteria developed for the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 steam generator tubes, little or no leakage is expected during normal operating conditions even with the presence of through-wall cracks.Industry wide, the crack'orphology of SCC at tube support plate intersections is best described as short, tight, axially oriented microcracks separated Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G.Page 3 by ligaments of non-degraded material.The same morphology is judged to be present in the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit.1 steam generators.
OTheproposedamendment wouldmaintainthepreviously modifiedT/Ss"3.4.5"SteamGenerators,"
Tube pull examination results from 1983 indicated axial SCC in its early stages.The depths of the evidenced degradation (determined by destructive exam)showed the maximum depth of penetration to be approximately 10%through-wall.
3.4.6,"ReactorCoolantSystemLeakage,"
The rotating pancake coil (RPC)testing performed during the 1989 and 1992 outages has confirmed that axially oriented SCC cracks exist at the tube support plate intersections.
andtheassociated basesincorporated forthe1voltinterimpluggingcriteria.
Based on the RPC testing results and relatively small amplitude bobbin voltages coupled with low bobbin voltage growth rates, it is concluded that axially oriented ODSCC best defines the degradation morphology occurring at the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 tube support plate intersections.
Theseprovidetubeinspection requirements andacceptance criteriatodetermine thelevelofdegradation forwhichatubeexperiencing ODSCCatthetubesupport'late elevations.
Tube pulls during the summer 1992 refueling outage were destructively examined and confirm the tube degradation phenomena occurring at the tube support plates.No leakage during normal operating conditions has been observed at the support plates in the field at similar plants for crack indications with signal amplitudes less than 7.7 volts.Additionally, no primary-to-secondary leakage at the tube support plate has been detected in U.S.plants.Relative to the expected leakage during accident condition loadings, the limiting event with respect to primary-to-secondary leakage is a postulated steam line break event.Laboratory data for pulled tubes from other plants and model boiler specimens show limited leakage for indications under 10.0 volts during a postulated steam line break (SLB)condition (see Section 9.0 of WCAP-13187).
may'emain inserviceintheCookNuclearPlantUnit1steamgenerators.
Additional Considerations The proposed amendment would preclude approximately 10 manrem occupational radiation exposure that would otherwise be incurred by plant workers involved in tube plugging or repair operations.
Attachment 2toAEP:NRC:1166G EVALUATION Page2SteamGenerator TubeInteritDiscussion Inthedevelopment oftheinterimpluggingcriteria, Regulatory Guides(RG)1.121,"BasesforPluggingDegradedPWRSteamGenerator Tubes,"and1.83"Inservice Inspection ofPWRSteamGenerator Tubes,"areusedasthebasesfordetermining thatsteamgenerator tubeintegrity considerations aremaintained withinacceptable limits.Regulatory Guide1.121describes amethodacceptable totheNRCstaffformeetingGeneralDesignCriteria(GDC)2,4,14,15,31,and32byreducingtheprobability andconsequences ofsteamgenerator tuberupturethroughdetermining thelimitingsafeconditions oftubewalldegradation.
The proposed amendment would minimize the loss of margin in reactor coolant flow through the steam generator in LOCA analyses.The proposed amendment would avoid loss of margin in reactor coolant system flow and therefore assist in demonstrating that minimum flow rates are maintained in excess of those required for operation at full power.Reduction in the amount of tube plugging required can reduce the length of plant outages and reduc'e the time that the steam generator is open to the containment environment during an outage, thereby minimizing airborne contamination and exposure.In addition, we will perform 100$bobbin coil inspection of the hot leg tubes to identify new areas of concern that may arise by providing a level of inservice inspection that is far in excess of the current T/Ss requirements.
Tubeswithunacceptable
Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS ANALYSIS Page 4 We have evaluated the proposed T/S changes and have determined that they do not represent a significant hazards consideration based on the criteria established in 10 CFR 50.92(c).Operation of the Cook Nuclear Plant in accordance with the proposed amendment will not: 1)Involve a si nificant increase in the robabilit or conse uences of an accident reviousl evaluated Testing of model boiler specimens for free standing tubes at room temperature conditions show burst pressures in excess of 5,000 psi for indications of ODSCC with voltage measurements as high as 19 volts.Burst testing performed on pulled tubes from other plants with up to 10 volt indications show burst pressures in excess of 5,900 psi at room temperatures Correcting for the effects of temperature on material properties and minimum strength levels (as the burst testing was done at room temperature), tube burst capability significantly exceeds the RG 1.121 criteria, requiring the maintenance of a margin of three times normal operating pressure differential on tube burst if through-wall cracks are present.Based on the existing data base, this criteria is satisfied with bobbin coil indications with signal amplitudes less than 6.8 volts, regardless of the indicated depth measurement.
: cracking, asestablished byinservice inspection, shouldberepairedorr'emovedfromservicebyplugging.
This structural limit is based on a-95%lower tolerance limit (LTL)confidence level of the data.The 1.0 volt plugging criteria compare favorably with the structural limit considering expected growth rates of ODSCC at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1.Alternate crack morphologies can correspond to 6.8 volts so that a unique crack length is not defined by a burst-pressure-to-voltage correlation.
ThisRGusessafetyfactorsonloadsfortubeburstthatareconsistent withtherequirements ofSectionIIIoftheASMECode.Forthetubesupportplateelevation degradation occurring intheCookNuclearPlantUnit1steamgenerators, tubeburstcriteriaareinherently satisfied duringnormaloperating conditions bythepresenceofthetubesupportplate.Thepresenceofthetubesupportplateenhancestheintegrity ofthedegradedtubesinthatregionbyprecluding tubedeformation beyondthediameterofthedrilledhole.Itisnotcertainwhetherthetubesupportplatewouldfunctiontoprovideasimilarconstraining effectduringaccidentcondition loadings.
However, relative to'xpected leakage during normal operating conditions, no field leakage has been reported at other plants from tubes with indications with a voltage level of under 7.7 volts.Also, a qualitative assessment is made between the beginning-of-cycle (BOC)1.0 volt tube plu'gging criteria and the current 40$allowable tube wall penetration plugging criteria at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1.An ODSCC-degraded tube support plate intersection with a 4.0 volt bobbin coil response is expected to.burst at approximately 7,400 psi, using the mean curve of Figure 9-2 of WCAP-13187.While the-95%LTL curve is used in the application of the plugging criteria, the mean curve must be used for Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G Page 5 this specific comparison in order to adequately compare the two data sets used.Per VCAP-13187, a comparison of the material properties at 650'F and room temperature condition properties showed that the elevated temperature properties are approximately 0.86 of the room temperature properties.
Therefore, nocreditistakeninthedevelopment ofthepluggingcriteriaforthepresenceofthetubesupportplateduringaccidentcondition loadings.
Therefore, the temperature-adjusted burst pressure for a 4.0 volts bobbin coil indication is expected to be approximately 6,400 psi.Figure 11 of NUREG-0718 plots the burst pressures of thinned 0.875 x 0.050 inch steam generator tubes.At 408 actual uniform wall thinning, extending 0.75 inch in axial length, the burst pressure is 6,800 psi.The NUREG test data is obtained at a temperature of 600 F, compared to the Westinghouse data noted above, which is adjusted for 650'F.The NUREG results at 40$actual thinning are comparable to the 4.0 volts BOC criteria expected burst pressure (6,800 psi versus 6,300 psi).The burst pressure for non-thinned tubes with partial depth cracks up to 0.75 inch in length is slightly lower than for uniform thinning up to depths of about 60%.Also, NUREG-0718 information can be used to estimate the burst pressure for a tube which has been slotted, simulating an axial crack.The expected burst pressure for a 40$deep, 0.75-inch long EDM slot using NUREG-0718 is approximately 6,000 psi.Therefore, it is judged that the margin of safety corresponding to the current 40%by NDE depth based plugging criteria is not significantly reduced upon implementation of a 4.0 volts bobbin coil criterion, which is higher than this proposed interim plugging criterion of 1.0 volt.Relative to the expected leakage during accident condition loadings, the accidents that are affected by primary-to-secondary leakage and steam release to the environment are: feedwater system malfunction, loss of external electrical load and/or turbine trip, loss of all AC power to station auxiliaries, major secondary system pipe failure, steam generator tube rupture, reactor coolant pump locked rotor, and rupture of a control rod drive mechanism housing.Of these, the major secondary system pipe failure is the most'imiting for Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 in considering the potential for off-site doses.Upon implementation of the interim plugging criteria, it will be verified that the distribution of cracking indications at the tube support plate intersections is such that primary-to-secondary leakage would result in site boundary doses within a small fraction of the 10 CFR 100 guideline, i.e., 30 rem thyroid, during a postulated SLB event.Data indicates that a Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G Page 6 threshold voltage of 2.8 volts would result in through-wall cracks with the potential to leak at SLB conditions.
Conservatively, basedontheexistingdatabase,bursttestingshowsthatthesafetyrequirements fortubeburstmarginsduringbothnormalandaccidentcondition loadingscanbesatisfied withbobbincoilsignalamplitudes lessthan6.8volts,regardless ofthedepthoftubewallpenetration cracking.
Application of the proposed plugging criteria requires that the current distribution of number of indications versus voltage be obtained.The indicated bobbin coil voltage is then combined with the rate of change in voltage measurement to establish an end-of-cycle (EOC)voltage distribution and, thus, leak rate during SLB pressure differential.
Regulatory Guide1.83describes amethodacceptable totheNRCstaffforimplementing GDC14,15,31,and32throughperiodicinservice inspection forthedetection ofsignificant tubewalldegradation.
If it is found that the proj ected SLB leakage for degraded intersections planned to be left in service exceeds 120 gpm, then additional tubes will be plugged to reduce projected SLB leakage below 120 gpm.Monte Carlo analyses results based on the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 growth rate and assumed eddy current uncertainties indicate that over 4,000 indications, all with a (BOC)bobbin coil voltage of 2.0 volts, would contribute less than 1 gpm leakage at SLB conditions.
Uponimplementation ofthepluggingcriteria, tubeleakageconsiderations mustalsobeaddressed.
Based on the inspection results from the last outage (1992), indications left in service are expected to have a total predicted SLB leak rate of 0.0 gpm at EOC conditions.
Itmustbedetermined thatthecrackswillnotleakexcessively duringallplantconditions.
2)Create the ossibilit of a new or different kind of accident from an reviousl anal zed Implementation of the proposed amendment does not introduce any significant changes to the plant design basis.Use of the criteria does not provide a mechanism that could result in an accident outside of the region of the tube support plate elevations.
Fortheinterimtubepluggingcriteriadeveloped fortheCookNuclearPlantUnit1steamgenerator tubes,littleornoleakageisexpectedduringnormaloperating conditions evenwiththepresenceofthrough-wall cracks.Industrywide,thecrack'orphology ofSCCattubesupportplateintersections isbestdescribed asshort,tight,axiallyorientedmicrocracks separated Attachment 2toAEP:NRC:1166G
Neither a single nor multiple tube rupture event would be expected in a steam generator in which the plugging criteria has been applied (during all plant conditions).
.Page3byligaments ofnon-degraded material.
The bobbin coil signal amplitude plugging criteria is established such that neither operational leakage nor excessive leakage during a postulated SLB condition are anticipated.
Thesamemorphology isjudgedtobepresentintheCookNuclearPlantUnit.1steamgenerators.
Indiana and Michigan Power Company will implement a maximum leakage rate limit of 150 gpd (0.1 gpm)per steam generator to help preclude the potential for excessive leakage during all plant conditions upon application of the interim'lugging criteria.The current technical specification limit on primary-to-secondary leakage at operating conditions is a maximum of 1.0 gpm"(1440 gpd)for all steam generators or a maximum of 500 gpd for any one steam generator.
Tubepullexamination resultsfrom1983indicated axialSCCinitsearlystages.Thedepthsoftheevidenced degradation (determined bydestructive exam)showedthemaximumdepthofpenetration tobeapproximately 10%through-wall.
The RG 1.121 criteria for establishing operational leakage rate limits that require plant shutdown are based upon leak-before-break considerations to detect a free span crack before potential tube rupture,'he 150 Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G Page 7 gpd limit provides for leakage detection and plant shutdown in the event of the occurrence of an unexpected single crack resulting in leakage that is associated with the longest: permissible crack length.Regulatory Guide 1.121 acceptance criteria (Item 3 of Section 3.2 of WCAP-13187) for establishing operating leakage limits are based on leak-before-break considerations such that plane shutdown is initiated if the leakage associated with the longest permissible crack is exceeded.The longest permissible crack is the length that provides a factor of safety of three against bursting at normal operating pressure differential.
Therotatingpancakecoil(RPC)testingperformed duringthe1989and1992outageshasconfirmed thataxiallyorientedSCCcracksexistatthetubesupportplateintersections.
A voltage amplitude of 6.8 volts for typical ODSCC corresponds to meeting this tube burst requirement at the-95%LTL uncertainty limit on the burst correlation.
BasedontheRPCtestingresultsandrelatively smallamplitude bobbinvoltagescoupledwithlowbobbinvoltagegrowthrates,itisconcluded thataxiallyorientedODSCCbestdefinesthedegradation morphology occurring attheCookNuclearPlantUnit1tubesupportplateintersections.
Alternate crack morphologies can correspond to 6.8 volts so that a unique crack length is not defined by the burst pressure versus voltage correlation.
Tubepullsduringthesummer1992refueling outageweredestructively examinedandconfirmthetubedegradation phenomena occurring atthetubesupportplates.Noleakageduringnormaloperating conditions hasbeenobservedatthesupportplatesinthefieldatsimilarplantsforcrackindications withsignalamplitudes lessthan7.7volts.Additionally, noprimary-to-secondary leakageatthetubesupportplatehasbeendetectedinU.S.plants.Relativetotheexpectedleakageduringaccidentcondition
Consequently, typical burst pressure versus through-wall crack length'orrelations are used below to define the"longest permissible crack" for evaluating operating leakage limits.The single through-wall crack lengths that, result in tube burst at three times normal operating pressure differential and SLB conditions, are about 0.44 inch and 0.84 inch, xespectively.
: loadings, thelimitingeventwithrespecttoprimary-to-secondary leakageisapostulated steamlinebreakevent.Laboratory dataforpulledtubesfromotherplantsandmodelboilerspecimens showlimitedleakageforindications under10.0voltsduringapostulated steamlinebreak(SLB)condition (seeSection9.0ofWCAP-13187).
Nominal leakage for these crack lengths would range from 0.1 gpm to 4 gpm, respectively, while lower 95%confidence level leak rates would range from about 0.01 gpm to 0.5 gpm, respectively.
Additional Considerations Theproposedamendment wouldprecludeapproximately 10manremoccupational radiation exposurethatwouldotherwise beincurredbyplantworkersinvolvedintubepluggingorrepairoperations.
An operating leak rate limit of 150 gpd will be implemented in application of the interim tube plugging criteria.This leakage limit provides for detection of 0.4 inch long cracks at nominal leak rates and 0.6 inch long cracks at the-95%LTL confidence level leak rates.Thus, the 150 gpd limit provides for plant shutdown prior to reaching critical crack lengths for SLB conditions at leak rates less than a-95$LTL confidence level and for three times normal operating pressure differential at less than nominal leak rates.3)'nvolve a si nificant reduction in a mar in of safet The use of the int crim plugging criteria fox'he tube support plate at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 is demonstrated to maintain steam generator tube integrity commensurate
Theproposedamendment wouldminimizethelossofmargininreactorcoolantflowthroughthesteamgenerator inLOCAanalyses.
'with the requirements of RG 1.121.Regulatory Guide 1.121 describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for meeting GDC 14, 15, 31, and 32 by reducing the probability of the
Theproposedamendment wouldavoidlossofmargininreactorcoolantsystemflowandtherefore assistindemonstrating thatminimumflowratesaremaintained inexcessofthoserequiredforoperation atfullpower.Reduction intheamountoftubepluggingrequiredcanreducethelengthofplantoutagesandreduc'ethetimethatthesteamgenerator isopentothecontainment environment duringanoutage,therebyminimizing airbornecontamination andexposure.
~)'I~g~Attachment 2 to AEP;NRC;1166G Page 8 consequences of steam generator tube rupture.This is accomplished by determining the limiting conditions of degradation of steam generator tubing, as established by inservice inspection.
Inaddition, wewillperform100$bobbincoilinspection ofthehotlegtubestoidentifynewareasofconcernthatmayarisebyproviding alevelofinservice inspection thatisfarinexcessofthecurrentT/Ssrequirements.
Tubes with unacceptable cracking will be removed from service.The most'imiting effect would be a possible increase in leakage during a steam line break event.Once the interim plugging criteria is applied, excessive leakage during a steam line break event is precluded by verifying that the expected end-of-cycle distribution of crack indications't the tube support plate elevations would result in minimal and acceptable primary-to-secondary leakage during all plant conditions.
Attachment 2toAEP:NRC:1166G NOSIGNIFICANT HAZARDSANALYSISPage4Wehaveevaluated theproposedT/Schangesandhavedetermined thattheydonotrepresent asignificant hazardsconsideration basedonthecriteriaestablished in10CFR50.92(c).
This helps to demonstrate that radiological conditions are less than a small fraction of the 10 CFR 100 guideline.
Operation oftheCookNuclearPlantinaccordance withtheproposedamendment willnot:1)Involveasinificantincreaseintherobabilit orconseuencesofanaccidentreviouslevaluated Testingofmodelboilerspecimens forfreestandingtubesatroomtemperature conditions showburstpressures inexcessof5,000psiforindications ofODSCCwithvoltagemeasurements ashighas19volts.Bursttestingperformed onpulledtubesfromotherplantswithupto10voltindications showburstpressures inexcessof5,900psiatroomtemperatures Correcting fortheeffectsoftemperature onmaterialproperties andminimumstrengthlevels(asthebursttestingwasdoneatroomtemperature),
In addressing the combined effects of a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA)and a safe shutdown earthquake (SSE)on the steam generator component (as required by GDC 2), it has been determined that tube collapse may occur in the steam generators at some plants.This is the case as the tube support plates may become deformed as a result of lateral loads at the wedge suppo'rts at the periphery of the plate due to the combined effects of the LOCA rarefaction wave and SSE loadings.The resulting pressure differential on the deformed tubes may cause some of the tubes to collapse.There are two issues associated with steam generator tube collapse.First, the collapse of steam generator tubing reduces'the RCS flow area through the tubes.The reduction in flow area increases the resistance to flow of steam from the.core during a LOCA which, in turn, may potentially increase peak clad temperature.
tubeburstcapability significantly exceedstheRG1.121criteria, requiring themaintenance ofamarginofthreetimesnormaloperating pressuredifferential ontubeburstifthrough-wall cracksarepresent.Basedontheexistingdatabase,thiscriteriaissatisfied withbobbincoilindications withsignalamplitudes lessthan6.8volts,regardless oftheindicated depthmeasurement.
Second, there is a potential that partial through-wall cracks in tubes could progress to through-wall cracks during tube deformation or collapse.Consequently, since the leak-before-break methodology is applicable to the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 reactor coolant system primary loops, the probability of breaks in the primary loop piping is sufficiently low that they need not'e considered in the structural design basis of the plant.Excluding breaks in the RCS primary loops, the LOCA loads from the large branch line breaks were analyzed for Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 and were found to be of insufficient magnitude to result in steam generator tube collapse or significant deformation.
Thisstructural limitisbasedona-95%lowertolerance limit(LTL)confidence levelofthedata.The1.0voltpluggingcriteriacomparefavorably withthestructural limitconsidering expectedgrowthratesofODSCCatCookNuclearPlantUnit1.Alternate crackmorphologies cancorrespond to6.8voltssothatauniquecracklengthisnotdefinedbyaburst-pressure-to-voltage correlation.
Attachment, 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G Page 9 Regardless of whether or not leak-before-break is applied to the primary loop piping at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1, any flow area reduction is expected to be minimal (much less than 1%)and PCT margin is available to account for this potential effect.Analyses results show that no tubes near wedge locations are expected to collapse or deform to the degree that secondary-to-primary in-leakage would be increased over current expected levels.For all other steam generator tubes, the possibility of secondary-to-primary leakage in the event of a combined LOCA and SSE event is not significant.
However,relativeto'xpected leakageduringnormaloperating conditions, nofieldleakagehasbeenreportedatotherplantsfromtubeswithindications withavoltagelevelofunder7.7volts.Also,aqualitative assessment ismadebetweenthebeginning-of-cycle (BOC)1.0volttubeplu'gging criteriaandthecurrent40$allowable tubewallpenetration pluggingcriteriaatCookNuclearPlantUnit1.AnODSCC-degradedtubesupportplateintersection witha4.0voltbobbincoilresponseisexpectedto.burstatapproximately 7,400psi,usingthemeancurveofFigure9-2ofWCAP-13187.Whilethe-95%LTLcurveisusedintheapplication ofthepluggingcriteria, themeancurvemustbeusedfor Attachment 2toAEP:NRC:1166G Page5thisspecificcomparison inordertoadequately comparethetwodatasetsused.PerVCAP-13187, acomparison ofthematerialproperties at650'Fandroomtemperature condition properties showedthattheelevatedtemperature properties areapproximately 0.86oftheroomtemperature properties.
In actuality, the amount of secondary-to-primary leakage in the event of a combined LOCA and SSE is expected to be less than that currently allowed, i.e., 500 gpd per steam generator.
Therefore, thetemperature-adjusted burstpressurefora4.0voltsbobbincoilindication isexpectedtobeapproximately 6,400psi.Figure11ofNUREG-0718 plotstheburstpressures ofthinned0.875x0.050inchsteamgenerator tubes.At408actualuniformwallthinning, extending 0.75inchinaxiallength,theburstpressureis6,800psi.TheNUREGtestdataisobtainedatatemperature of600F,comparedtotheWestinghouse datanotedabove,whichisadjustedfor650'F.TheNUREGresultsat40$actualthinningarecomparable tothe4.0voltsBOCcriteriaexpectedburstpressure(6,800psiversus6,300psi).Theburstpressurefornon-thinned tubeswithpartialdepthcracksupto0.75inchinlengthisslightlylowerthanforuniformthinninguptodepthsofabout60%.Also,NUREG-0718 information canbeusedtoestimatetheburstpressureforatubewhichhasbeenslotted,simulating anaxialcrack.Theexpectedburstpressurefora40$deep,0.75-inch longEDMslotusingNUREG-0718 isapproximately 6,000psi.Therefore, itisjudgedthatthemarginofsafetycorresponding tothecurrent40%byNDEdepthbasedpluggingcriteriaisnotsignificantly reduceduponimplementation ofa4.0voltsbobbincoilcriterion, whichishigherthanthisproposedinterimpluggingcriterion of1.0volt.Relativetotheexpectedleakageduringaccidentcondition
Furthermore, secondary-to-primary in-leakage would be less than primary-to-secondary leakage for the same pressure differential since the cracks would tend to close under a secondary-to-primary pressure differential..
: loadings, theaccidents thatareaffectedbyprimary-to-secondary leakageandsteamreleasetotheenvironment are:feedwater systemmalfunction, lossofexternalelectrical loadand/orturbinetrip,lossofallACpowertostationauxiliaries, majorsecondary systempipefailure,steamgenerator tuberupture,reactorcoolantpumplockedrotor,andruptureofacontrolroddrivemechanism housing.Ofthese,themajorsecondary systempipefailureisthemost'imitingforCookNuclearPlantUnit1inconsidering thepotential foroff-sitedoses.Uponimplementation oftheinterimpluggingcriteria, itwillbeverifiedthatthedistribution ofcrackingindications atthetubesupportplateintersections issuchthatprimary-to-secondary leakagewouldresultinsiteboundarydoseswithinasmallfractionofthe10CFR100guideline, i.e.,30remthyroid,duringapostulated SLBevent.Dataindicates thata Attachment 2toAEP:NRC:1166G Page6threshold voltageof2.8voltswouldresultinthrough-wall crackswiththepotential toleakatSLBconditions.
Also, the presence of the tube support plate is expected to reduce the amount of in-leakage.
Application oftheproposedpluggingcriteriarequiresthatthecurrentdistribution ofnumberofindications versusvoltagebeobtained.
Addressing RG 1.83 considerations, implementation of the interim plugging criteria is supplemented by 100$inspection requirements at the tube support plate elevations having ODSCC indications, reduced operating leak rate limits, and eddy current inspection guidelines to provide consistency in voltage normalization.
Theindicated bobbincoilvoltageisthencombinedwiththerateofchangeinvoltagemeasurement toestablish anend-of-cycle (EOC)voltagedistribution and,thus,leakrateduringSLBpressuredifferential.
As noted previously, implementation of the interim plugging criteria will decrease the number of tubes which must be repaired or taken out of service by plugging.The installation of steam generator tube plugs reduces the RCS flow margin and, thus, implementation of the interim plugging criteria will maintain the margin of flow that would otherwise be reduced in the event of increased tube plugging.Based on the above, it is concluded that the proposed change does not result in a significant reduction in margin with respect to plant safety as defined in the Final Safety-Analysis Report or any bases of the plant Technical Specifications.
IfitisfoundthattheprojectedSLBleakagefordegradedintersections plannedtobeleftinserviceexceeds120gpm,thenadditional tubeswillbepluggedtoreduceprojected SLBleakagebelow120gpm.MonteCarloanalysesresultsbasedontheCookNuclearPlantUnit1growthrateandassumededdycurrentuncertainties indicatethatover4,000indications, allwitha(BOC)bobbincoilvoltageof2.0volts,wouldcontribute lessthan1gpmleakageatSLBconditions.
CONCLUSION Based'on the preceding analysis, it is concluded that using the tube support plate elevation bobbin coil signal amplitude interim steam generator tube plugging criteria for removing tubes from Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G Page 10 service at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 is accept able and the proposed license amendment does not involve a Significant Hazards Consideration as defined in 10 CFR 50.92.}}
Basedontheinspection resultsfromthelastoutage(1992),indications leftinserviceareexpectedtohaveatotalpredicted SLBleakrateof0.0gpmatEOCconditions.
2)Createtheossibilit ofanewordifferent kindofaccidentfromanreviouslanalzedImplementation oftheproposedamendment doesnotintroduce anysignificant changestotheplantdesignbasis.Useofthecriteriadoesnotprovideamechanism thatcouldresultinanaccidentoutsideoftheregionofthetubesupportplateelevations.
Neitherasinglenormultipletuberuptureeventwouldbeexpectedinasteamgenerator inwhichthepluggingcriteriahasbeenapplied(duringallplantconditions).
Thebobbincoilsignalamplitude pluggingcriteriaisestablished suchthatneitheroperational leakagenorexcessive leakageduringapostulated SLBcondition areanticipated.
IndianaandMichiganPowerCompanywillimplement amaximumleakageratelimitof150gpd(0.1gpm)persteamgenerator tohelpprecludethepotential forexcessive leakageduringallplantconditions uponapplication oftheinterim'luggingcriteria.
Thecurrenttechnical specification limitonprimary-to-secondary leakageatoperating conditions isamaximumof1.0gpm"(1440 gpd)forallsteamgenerators oramaximumof500gpdforanyonesteamgenerator.
TheRG1.121criteriaforestablishing operational leakageratelimitsthatrequireplantshutdownarebaseduponleak-before-break considerations todetectafreespancrackbeforepotential tuberupture,'he 150 Attachment 2toAEP:NRC:1166G Page7gpdlimitprovidesforleakagedetection andplantshutdownintheeventoftheoccurrence ofanunexpected singlecrackresulting inleakagethatisassociated withthelongest:permissible cracklength.Regulatory Guide1.121acceptance criteria(Item3ofSection3.2ofWCAP-13187) forestablishing operating leakagelimitsarebasedonleak-before-break considerations suchthatplaneshutdownisinitiated iftheleakageassociated withthelongestpermissible crackisexceeded.
Thelongestpermissible crackisthelengththatprovidesafactorofsafetyofthreeagainstburstingatnormaloperating pressuredifferential.
Avoltageamplitude of6.8voltsfortypicalODSCCcorresponds tomeetingthistubeburstrequirement atthe-95%LTLuncertainty limitontheburstcorrelation.
Alternate crackmorphologies cancorrespond to6.8voltssothatauniquecracklengthisnotdefinedbytheburstpressureversusvoltagecorrelation.
Consequently, typicalburstpressureversusthrough-wall cracklength'orrelations areusedbelowtodefinethe"longestpermissible crack"forevaluating operating leakagelimits.Thesinglethrough-wall cracklengthsthat,resultintubeburstatthreetimesnormaloperating pressuredifferential andSLBconditions, areabout0.44inchand0.84inch,xespectively.
Nominalleakageforthesecracklengthswouldrangefrom0.1gpmto4gpm,respectively, whilelower95%confidence levelleakrateswouldrangefromabout0.01gpmto0.5gpm,respectively.
Anoperating leakratelimitof150gpdwillbeimplemented inapplication oftheinterimtubepluggingcriteria.
Thisleakagelimitprovidesfordetection of0.4inchlongcracksatnominalleakratesand0.6inchlongcracksatthe-95%LTLconfidence levelleakrates.Thus,the150gpdlimitprovidesforplantshutdownpriortoreachingcriticalcracklengthsforSLBconditions atleakrateslessthana-95$LTLconfidence levelandforthreetimesnormaloperating pressuredifferential atlessthannominalleakrates.3)'nvolveasinificantreduction inamarinofsafetTheuseoftheintcrimpluggingcriteriafox'hetubesupportplateatCookNuclearPlantUnit1isdemonstrated tomaintainsteamgenerator tubeintegrity commensurate
'withtherequirements ofRG1.121.Regulatory Guide1.121describes amethodacceptable totheNRCstaffformeetingGDC14,15,31,and32byreducingtheprobability ofthe
~)'I~g~Attachment 2toAEP;NRC;1166G Page8consequences ofsteamgenerator tuberupture.Thisisaccomplished bydetermining thelimitingconditions ofdegradation ofsteamgenerator tubing,asestablished byinservice inspection.
Tubeswithunacceptable crackingwillberemovedfromservice.Themost'imiting effectwouldbeapossibleincreaseinleakageduringasteamlinebreakevent.Oncetheinterimpluggingcriteriaisapplied,excessive leakageduringasteamlinebreakeventisprecluded byverifying thattheexpectedend-of-cycle distribution ofcrackindications't thetubesupportplateelevations wouldresultinminimalandacceptable primary-to-secondary leakageduringallplantconditions.
Thishelpstodemonstrate thatradiological conditions arelessthanasmallfractionofthe10CFR100guideline.
Inaddressing thecombinedeffectsofaloss-of-coolant accident(LOCA)andasafeshutdownearthquake (SSE)onthesteamgenerator component (asrequiredbyGDC2),ithasbeendetermined thattubecollapsemayoccurinthesteamgenerators atsomeplants.Thisisthecaseasthetubesupportplatesmaybecomedeformedasaresultoflateralloadsatthewedgesuppo'rts attheperiphery oftheplateduetothecombinedeffectsoftheLOCArarefaction waveandSSEloadings.
Theresulting pressuredifferential onthedeformedtubesmaycausesomeofthetubestocollapse.
Therearetwoissuesassociated withsteamgenerator tubecollapse.
First,thecollapseofsteamgenerator tubingreduces'theRCSflowareathroughthetubes.Thereduction inflowareaincreases theresistance toflowofsteamfromthe.coreduringaLOCAwhich,inturn,maypotentially increasepeakcladtemperature.
Second,thereisapotential thatpartialthrough-wall cracksintubescouldprogresstothrough-wall cracksduringtubedeformation orcollapse.
Consequently, sincetheleak-before-break methodology isapplicable totheCookNuclearPlantUnit1reactorcoolantsystemprimaryloops,theprobability ofbreaksintheprimarylooppipingissufficiently lowthattheyneednot'econsidered inthestructural designbasisoftheplant.Excluding breaksintheRCSprimaryloops,theLOCAloadsfromthelargebranchlinebreakswereanalyzedforCookNuclearPlantUnit1andwerefoundtobeofinsufficient magnitude toresultinsteamgenerator tubecollapseorsignificant deformation.
Attachment, 2toAEP:NRC:1166G Page9Regardless ofwhetherornotleak-before-break isappliedtotheprimarylooppipingatCookNuclearPlantUnit1,anyflowareareduction isexpectedtobeminimal(muchlessthan1%)andPCTmarginisavailable toaccountforthispotential effect.Analysesresultsshowthatnotubesnearwedgelocations areexpectedtocollapseordeformtothedegreethatsecondary-to-primary in-leakage wouldbeincreased overcurrentexpectedlevels.Forallothersteamgenerator tubes,thepossibility ofsecondary-to-primaryleakageintheeventofacombinedLOCAandSSEeventisnotsignificant.
Inactuality, theamountofsecondary-to-primary leakageintheeventofacombinedLOCAandSSEisexpectedtobelessthanthatcurrently allowed,i.e.,500gpdpersteamgenerator.
Furthermore, secondary-to-primary in-leakage wouldbelessthanprimary-to-secondary leakageforthesamepressuredifferential sincethecrackswouldtendtocloseunderasecondary-to-primarypressuredifferential..
Also,thepresenceofthetubesupportplateisexpectedtoreducetheamountofin-leakage.
Addressing RG1.83considerations, implementation oftheinterimpluggingcriteriaissupplemented by100$inspection requirements atthetubesupportplateelevations havingODSCCindications, reducedoperating leakratelimits,andeddycurrentinspection guidelines toprovideconsistency involtagenormalization.
Asnotedpreviously, implementation oftheinterimpluggingcriteriawilldecreasethenumberoftubeswhichmustberepairedortakenoutofservicebyplugging.
Theinstallation ofsteamgenerator tubeplugsreducestheRCSflowmarginand,thus,implementation oftheinterimpluggingcriteriawillmaintainthemarginofflowthatwouldotherwise bereducedintheeventofincreased tubeplugging.
Basedontheabove,itisconcluded thattheproposedchangedoesnotresultinasignificant reduction inmarginwithrespecttoplantsafetyasdefinedintheFinalSafety-AnalysisReportoranybasesoftheplantTechnical Specifications.
CONCLUSION Based'onthepreceding
: analysis, itisconcluded thatusingthetubesupportplateelevation bobbincoilsignalamplitude interimsteamgenerator tubepluggingcriteriaforremovingtubesfrom Attachment 2toAEP:NRC:1166G Page10serviceatCookNuclearPlantUnit1isacceptableandtheproposedlicenseamendment doesnotinvolveaSignificant HazardsConsideration asdefinedin10CFR50.92.}}

Revision as of 08:37, 6 July 2018

Application for Amend to License DPR-58,changing TS to Allow Interim Plugging Criteria of 1.0 Volt for Cycle 14.Technical Summary Supporting Validity & Continued Use of Westinghouse Rept WCAP-13187 Encl
ML17331A089
Person / Time
Site: Cook American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 03/10/1993
From: FITZPATRICK E
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: MURLEY T E
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML17331A090 List:
References
AEP:NRC:1166C, NUDOCS 9303160107
Download: ML17331A089 (22)


Text

SUBJECT:

Application for amend to License.DPR-58;changing TS to allow'-I interim plugging criteria of 1.0 volt for Cycle 14.,Technical summary supporting validity 6'continued use.of Westinghouse Rept WCAP-13187 encl.DISTRIBUTION CODE: 0001D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR

/~ENCL/'IZE: i g+~+$TITLE: OR Submittal:

General Distribution

/D NOTES:-+-=;ACCEZ,ERXV@~

OOCVMENT DISVagVTION.SYSTEM ACCESSION N]9R:9303160107 DOC.DATE: 93/03/10'OTARIZED:

YES" DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C.Cook Nuclear Power'lant, Unit 1, Indiana M 05000315 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION FITZPATRICK,E.

Indiana Michigan Power Co.-(formerly'Indiana

&Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MURLEY,T.E.

Document Control Branch (Document'-Control Desk)RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 LA DEAN,W INTERNAL: NRR/DE/EELB NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT OGC/HDS2 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.1 1 k"RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD3-1 PD NRR/DORS/OTSB NRR/DSSA/SCSB NRR/DSSA/SRXB REG FILE'1-NSIC-COPIES LTTR ENCL 1.1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0'1.1 1".1 A D D A NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!CONTACI'IIE DOCUMENT COi!'I'ROL DIMK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.504-2065)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTR!BUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!D TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 16 ENCL 14

\~~o'i indiana Michigan Power Company P.O.Box 16631 t:olumbus, OH 43216 AEP:NRC:1166G Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Docket No.50-315 License No.DPR-58 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGE TO ALLOW INTERIM PLUGGING CRITERIA OF 1.0 VOLT FOR CYCLE 14 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Attn: T.E.Murley March 10, 1993

Dear Dr.Murley:

This letter and its attachments constitute an application for an amendment to the Technical Specifications (T/Ss)of Donald C.Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 in accordance with 10 CFR 50.90.It is requested that the amendment to the T/Ss for steam generator interim plugging criteria, as outlined in the NRC letter of July 29, 1992 for license Amendment No.166 for fuel cycle 13, be extended to fuel cycle 14 of the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1.This extension is essential while our T/S ammendment to allow alternate plugging criteria is being reviewed by the NRC (AEP:NRC:1166, March 20, 1992).Attachment 1 provides a technical summary of the recent steam generator tube interim plugging criteria voltage evaluations and tube sample analysis results.These evaluations and results support the validity and continued use of the Westinghouse Report WCAP-13187 in support of the 1 volt.interim plugging criteria for fuel cycle 14.No technical changes were made to the interim plugging criteria T/Ss requirements used for fuel cycle 13.T/S changes were made only to reference fuel cycle 14 in the appropriate T/S paragraphs where fuel cycle 13 was previously referenced.

A detailed description of the proposed changes and our analyses concerning significant hazards considerations are repeated from our previous submittal and are included in Attachment 2 to this letter for your convenience.

Attachment 3 contains the proposed 3f'te 1 9303i60i07 9303i0 PDR ADOCK 050003i5 P PGR oor l 1 i a~

Dr.T.E.Murley-2-AEP:NRC:1166G revised T/S pages.Attachment 4 contains the marked-up copies of the existing T/Ss.We believe that the proposed changes will not result in (1)a significant change in the types of effluents or a significant increase in the amount of any effluents that may be released offsite, or (2)a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure.These proposed changes have been reviewed by the Plant Nuclear Safety Review Committee and the corporate Nuclear Safety and Design Review Committee.

In compliance with the requirements of lOCFR50.91(b)(1), copies of this letter and its attachments have been transmitted to Mr.J.R.Padgett of the Michigan Public Service Commission and to the Michigan Department of Public Health.Please contact us if you have any questions concerning this license amendment request.This letter is submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f)and, as such, an oath statement is enclosed.Sincerely, pg+p~j Vice President eh Attachments Enclosure cc: A.A.Blind-Bridgman J.R.Padgett G.Charnoff A.B.Davis-Region III NRC Resident Inspector-Bridgman NFEM Section Chief Dr.T.E.Murley-3-AEP:NRC:1166G bc: S.J.Brewer D.H.Malin/K.J.Toth J.D.Benes/J.R.Jensen M.L.Horvath-Bridgman J.B.Shinnock W.G.Smith, Jr.W.M.Dean, NRC-Washington, D.C.AEP:NRC:1166G DC-N-6015.1 a COUNTY OF FRANKLIN E.E.Fitzpatrick, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the Vice President of licensee Indiana Michigan Power Company, that he has read the forgoing response to AEP:NRC:1166G

-Technical Specification Change To Allow Interim Plugging Criteria Of 1.0 Volt For Cycle 14 and knows the contents thereof;and that said contents are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.Subscribed and sworn to before me this~~day of 199 H 40TARY PUBLIC RlTA D.HILL NOTARY PUBLIC.STATE OF OIUO l'4*h 4 r.~

ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP NRC'1166G TECHNICAL

SUMMARY

OF THE RECENT STEAM GENERATOR TUBE INTERIM PLUGGING CRITERIA VOLTAGE EVALUATIONS TUBE SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:1166G Page 1 The technical basis for implementing the interim plugging criteria for fuel cycle 13 was based on submittal documents AEP:NRC:1166, 1166A, 1166B, 1166C, and 1166D.Included as an attachment was Westinghouse Report, WCAP-13187 titled"D.C.Cook Unit 1 Steam Generator Tube Plugging Criteria for Indications at Tube Support Plates" dated March 1992.The WCAP contains the technical approach for achieving assurance of tube structural integrity based on eddy current bobbin coil voltage repair criteria.Application of the WCAP tube repair voltage criteria is based on voltage growth rates from the prior two operating cycles of 0.8 and 0.7 volts.Analysis of voltage growth" rate done for fuel cycle 13, at the end of fuel cycle 12 in 1992, showed the largest voltage growth was 0.49 volts.This is well below the projected growth rates referenced by the WCAP.Analysis for the maximum end of cycle voltage proj ected for indications left in service below 1.0 volt was 1.40 volts.This indication voltage is well within the structural limits proposed by the WCAP structural voltage limits for potential tube leakage and burst.NRC submittal letter AEP:NRC:1166F contains the full report on evaluations performed to estimate the projected EOC voltage growth rate as well as leakrate and burst probabi.lity.

In addition, tube samples were removed from steam generator No.12 as part of the T/Ss alternate plugging criteria for metallographic evaluation, leak testing, and burst testing.The following table summarizes the results on those tube samples leak and burst tested at the first and second support plate (SP)elevati.ons.

Suamary Table Tube Leak and Burst Test Data Location Field E/C~XD DP C tt Rll-C60/SPI 1.1 Volt,BC SAI, RPC Leak~lt.P I Not Done Burst t PI 9,100 SEH Fractography

~Dth X~AD tt I 54 32 Rll-C60/SP2 1.4 Volt,BC HAI,RPC Rlg-C16/SP1 1.4 Volt,BC SAI,RPC Not Done>2,650 (ET)*No Leakage 9,350 10P725 52 38 28 Rlg-C21/SPl 2.0 Volt, BC SAI, RPC>2,650 (ET)*No Leakage 10,200 Rlg-C21/SP2 NDD,BC NDD,RPC*ET~Test done at elevated Not Done temperature.

11,200 38 No Data ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP'NRC'1166G Page 2 The corrosion was confined to the support plate region and had combinations of axially oriented intergranular stress corrosion'cracking and intergranular cellular corrosion.

The corrosion was of OD origin, and it occurred in either 360'ands or isolated patches.The SP2 region of tube R18-C21 had the shallowest maximum crack depth (38%throughwall) found.Its eddy current signal would not be expected to be detected with a high probability.

The first support plate crevice regions of tubes R18-C16 and R18-C21 were leak tested at elevated temperature and pressure.Neither tube leaked through existing corrosion networks at normal operating conditions (1500 psi.differential pr~ssure with primary side at 2250 psi and secondary side at 750 psi)or at steam line break conditions (2650 psi differential pressure with the primary side at 3000 psi and the secondary side at 350 psi).Room temperature burst tests wer'e conducted at a higher pressurization rate of 1000 psi/sec on SP1 of tubes Rll-C60, R18-C16 and R18-C21 and SP2 of tubes Rll-C60 and R18-C21.All burst at high burst pressures (9,100;10,725;10,200;9,350 and 11,200 psig, respectively) and had axial burst openings.Virgin tubing burst, typically between 11,500 and 12,000 psig.In conclusion, the results of the voltage growth rate evaluations and tube sample leak and burst were well within the guidelines established in the WCAP.Also, the voltage growth rate is almost half of what was found for the two prior fuel cycles.Therefore, based on a low voltage growth rate, and leak and burst test results, the WCAP is still considered a technically appropriate and bounding document applicable to the next fuel cycle, cycle 14.Furthermore, the eddy current inspection, reporting, and leakage requirements as previousily stated in the T/Ss for fuel cycle 13, will be maintained for fuel cycle 14.

ATTACHMENT 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS CONSIDERATION EVALUATION IN SUPPORT OF THE INTERIM PLUGGING CRITERIA Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G INTRODUCTION Page 1 A license amendment is proposed to preclude unnecessarily plugging steam generator tubes due to the occurrence of outer diameter initiated stress corrosion cracking (ODSCC)at the tube support plates in the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 steam generators.

Using the existing Technical Specifications (T/Ss)steam generator tube plugging criteria of 40$tube wall penetration as determined by non-destructive examination (NDE), many of the tubes with crack indications would needlessly have to be removed from service.The interim plugging criteria for tube support plate elevation ODSCC occurring in the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 steam generators may result in tubes with both partial and through-wall cracks returning to service.In the limiting case, it is demonstrated that the presence of through-wall cracks alone is not reason enough to remove a tube from service.DESCRIPTION OF THE AMENDMENT REQUEST As required'by 10 CFR 50.91(a)(1), an analysis is provided to demonstrate that the proposed license amendment to implement an interim steam generator tube plugging criteria for the tube support plate elevations at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 involves no significant hazards considerations.

The interim plugging criteria involve a correlation between eddy current bobbin coil signal amplitude (voltage)and tube burst and leakage capability.

The plugging criteria is based on testing of laboratory-induced ODSCC specimens, extensive examination of pulled tubes from operating steam generators (industry wide), and field experience with leakage due to indications at, the tube support plates (world wide).Specifically, crack indications with bobbin coil voltages less than or equal to 1.0 volt, regardless of indicated depth, do not require remedial action if postulated steam line break leakage can be shown to be acceptable.

Crack indications with bobbin coil signal amplitudes exceeding 1.0 volt must be either plugged or repaired.O The proposed amendment would maintain the previously modified T/Ss"3.4.5"Steam Generators," 3.4.6,"Reactor Coolant System Leakage," and the associated bases incorporated for the 1 volt interim plugging criteria.These provide tube inspection requirements and acceptance criteria to determine the level of degradation for which a tube experiencing ODSCC at the tube support'late elevations.

may'emain in service in the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 steam generators.

Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G EVALUATION Page 2 Steam Generator Tube Inte rit Discussion In the development of the interim plugging criteria, Regulatory Guides (RG)1.121,"Bases for Plugging Degraded PWR Steam Generator Tubes," and 1.83"Inservice Inspection of PWR Steam Generator Tubes," are used as the bases for determining that steam generator tube integrity considerations are maintained within acceptable limits.Regulatory Guide 1.121 describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for meeting General Design Criteria (GDC)2, 4, 14, 15, 31, and 32 by reducing the probability and consequences of steam generator tube rupture through determining the limiting safe conditions of tube wall degradation.

Tubes with unacceptable cracking, as established by inservice inspection, should be repaired or r'emoved from service by plugging.This RG uses safety factors on loads for tube burst that are consistent with the requirements of Section III of the ASME Code.For the tube support plate elevation degradation occurring in the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 steam generators, tube burst criteria are inherently satisfied during normal operating conditions by the presence of the tube support plate.The presence of the tube support plate enhances the integrity of the degraded tubes in that region by precluding tube deformation beyond the diameter of the drilled hole.It is not certain whether the tube support plate would function to provide a similar constraining effect during accident condition loadings.Therefore, no credit is taken in the development of the plugging criteria for the presence of the tube support plate during accident condition loadings.Conservatively, based on the existing data base, burst testing shows that the safety requirements for tube burst margins during both normal and accident condition loadings can be satisfied with bobbin coil signal amplitudes less than 6.8 volts, regardless of the depth of tube wall penetration cracking.Regulatory Guide 1.83 describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing GDC 14, 15, 31, and 32 through periodic inservice inspection for the detection of significant tube wall degradation.

Upon implementation of the plugging criteria, tube leakage considerations must also be addressed.

It must be determined that the cracks will not leak excessively during all plant conditions.

For the interim tube plugging criteria developed for the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 steam generator tubes, little or no leakage is expected during normal operating conditions even with the presence of through-wall cracks.Industry wide, the crack'orphology of SCC at tube support plate intersections is best described as short, tight, axially oriented microcracks separated Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G.Page 3 by ligaments of non-degraded material.The same morphology is judged to be present in the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit.1 steam generators.

Tube pull examination results from 1983 indicated axial SCC in its early stages.The depths of the evidenced degradation (determined by destructive exam)showed the maximum depth of penetration to be approximately 10%through-wall.

The rotating pancake coil (RPC)testing performed during the 1989 and 1992 outages has confirmed that axially oriented SCC cracks exist at the tube support plate intersections.

Based on the RPC testing results and relatively small amplitude bobbin voltages coupled with low bobbin voltage growth rates, it is concluded that axially oriented ODSCC best defines the degradation morphology occurring at the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 tube support plate intersections.

Tube pulls during the summer 1992 refueling outage were destructively examined and confirm the tube degradation phenomena occurring at the tube support plates.No leakage during normal operating conditions has been observed at the support plates in the field at similar plants for crack indications with signal amplitudes less than 7.7 volts.Additionally, no primary-to-secondary leakage at the tube support plate has been detected in U.S.plants.Relative to the expected leakage during accident condition loadings, the limiting event with respect to primary-to-secondary leakage is a postulated steam line break event.Laboratory data for pulled tubes from other plants and model boiler specimens show limited leakage for indications under 10.0 volts during a postulated steam line break (SLB)condition (see Section 9.0 of WCAP-13187).

Additional Considerations The proposed amendment would preclude approximately 10 manrem occupational radiation exposure that would otherwise be incurred by plant workers involved in tube plugging or repair operations.

The proposed amendment would minimize the loss of margin in reactor coolant flow through the steam generator in LOCA analyses.The proposed amendment would avoid loss of margin in reactor coolant system flow and therefore assist in demonstrating that minimum flow rates are maintained in excess of those required for operation at full power.Reduction in the amount of tube plugging required can reduce the length of plant outages and reduc'e the time that the steam generator is open to the containment environment during an outage, thereby minimizing airborne contamination and exposure.In addition, we will perform 100$bobbin coil inspection of the hot leg tubes to identify new areas of concern that may arise by providing a level of inservice inspection that is far in excess of the current T/Ss requirements.

Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G NO SIGNIFICANT HAZARDS ANALYSIS Page 4 We have evaluated the proposed T/S changes and have determined that they do not represent a significant hazards consideration based on the criteria established in 10 CFR 50.92(c).Operation of the Cook Nuclear Plant in accordance with the proposed amendment will not: 1)Involve a si nificant increase in the robabilit or conse uences of an accident reviousl evaluated Testing of model boiler specimens for free standing tubes at room temperature conditions show burst pressures in excess of 5,000 psi for indications of ODSCC with voltage measurements as high as 19 volts.Burst testing performed on pulled tubes from other plants with up to 10 volt indications show burst pressures in excess of 5,900 psi at room temperatures Correcting for the effects of temperature on material properties and minimum strength levels (as the burst testing was done at room temperature), tube burst capability significantly exceeds the RG 1.121 criteria, requiring the maintenance of a margin of three times normal operating pressure differential on tube burst if through-wall cracks are present.Based on the existing data base, this criteria is satisfied with bobbin coil indications with signal amplitudes less than 6.8 volts, regardless of the indicated depth measurement.

This structural limit is based on a-95%lower tolerance limit (LTL)confidence level of the data.The 1.0 volt plugging criteria compare favorably with the structural limit considering expected growth rates of ODSCC at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1.Alternate crack morphologies can correspond to 6.8 volts so that a unique crack length is not defined by a burst-pressure-to-voltage correlation.

However, relative to'xpected leakage during normal operating conditions, no field leakage has been reported at other plants from tubes with indications with a voltage level of under 7.7 volts.Also, a qualitative assessment is made between the beginning-of-cycle (BOC)1.0 volt tube plu'gging criteria and the current 40$allowable tube wall penetration plugging criteria at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1.An ODSCC-degraded tube support plate intersection with a 4.0 volt bobbin coil response is expected to.burst at approximately 7,400 psi, using the mean curve of Figure 9-2 of WCAP-13187.While the-95%LTL curve is used in the application of the plugging criteria, the mean curve must be used for Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G Page 5 this specific comparison in order to adequately compare the two data sets used.Per VCAP-13187, a comparison of the material properties at 650'F and room temperature condition properties showed that the elevated temperature properties are approximately 0.86 of the room temperature properties.

Therefore, the temperature-adjusted burst pressure for a 4.0 volts bobbin coil indication is expected to be approximately 6,400 psi.Figure 11 of NUREG-0718 plots the burst pressures of thinned 0.875 x 0.050 inch steam generator tubes.At 408 actual uniform wall thinning, extending 0.75 inch in axial length, the burst pressure is 6,800 psi.The NUREG test data is obtained at a temperature of 600 F, compared to the Westinghouse data noted above, which is adjusted for 650'F.The NUREG results at 40$actual thinning are comparable to the 4.0 volts BOC criteria expected burst pressure (6,800 psi versus 6,300 psi).The burst pressure for non-thinned tubes with partial depth cracks up to 0.75 inch in length is slightly lower than for uniform thinning up to depths of about 60%.Also, NUREG-0718 information can be used to estimate the burst pressure for a tube which has been slotted, simulating an axial crack.The expected burst pressure for a 40$deep, 0.75-inch long EDM slot using NUREG-0718 is approximately 6,000 psi.Therefore, it is judged that the margin of safety corresponding to the current 40%by NDE depth based plugging criteria is not significantly reduced upon implementation of a 4.0 volts bobbin coil criterion, which is higher than this proposed interim plugging criterion of 1.0 volt.Relative to the expected leakage during accident condition loadings, the accidents that are affected by primary-to-secondary leakage and steam release to the environment are: feedwater system malfunction, loss of external electrical load and/or turbine trip, loss of all AC power to station auxiliaries, major secondary system pipe failure, steam generator tube rupture, reactor coolant pump locked rotor, and rupture of a control rod drive mechanism housing.Of these, the major secondary system pipe failure is the most'imiting for Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 in considering the potential for off-site doses.Upon implementation of the interim plugging criteria, it will be verified that the distribution of cracking indications at the tube support plate intersections is such that primary-to-secondary leakage would result in site boundary doses within a small fraction of the 10 CFR 100 guideline, i.e., 30 rem thyroid, during a postulated SLB event.Data indicates that a Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G Page 6 threshold voltage of 2.8 volts would result in through-wall cracks with the potential to leak at SLB conditions.

Application of the proposed plugging criteria requires that the current distribution of number of indications versus voltage be obtained.The indicated bobbin coil voltage is then combined with the rate of change in voltage measurement to establish an end-of-cycle (EOC)voltage distribution and, thus, leak rate during SLB pressure differential.

If it is found that the proj ected SLB leakage for degraded intersections planned to be left in service exceeds 120 gpm, then additional tubes will be plugged to reduce projected SLB leakage below 120 gpm.Monte Carlo analyses results based on the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 growth rate and assumed eddy current uncertainties indicate that over 4,000 indications, all with a (BOC)bobbin coil voltage of 2.0 volts, would contribute less than 1 gpm leakage at SLB conditions.

Based on the inspection results from the last outage (1992), indications left in service are expected to have a total predicted SLB leak rate of 0.0 gpm at EOC conditions.

2)Create the ossibilit of a new or different kind of accident from an reviousl anal zed Implementation of the proposed amendment does not introduce any significant changes to the plant design basis.Use of the criteria does not provide a mechanism that could result in an accident outside of the region of the tube support plate elevations.

Neither a single nor multiple tube rupture event would be expected in a steam generator in which the plugging criteria has been applied (during all plant conditions).

The bobbin coil signal amplitude plugging criteria is established such that neither operational leakage nor excessive leakage during a postulated SLB condition are anticipated.

Indiana and Michigan Power Company will implement a maximum leakage rate limit of 150 gpd (0.1 gpm)per steam generator to help preclude the potential for excessive leakage during all plant conditions upon application of the interim'lugging criteria.The current technical specification limit on primary-to-secondary leakage at operating conditions is a maximum of 1.0 gpm"(1440 gpd)for all steam generators or a maximum of 500 gpd for any one steam generator.

The RG 1.121 criteria for establishing operational leakage rate limits that require plant shutdown are based upon leak-before-break considerations to detect a free span crack before potential tube rupture,'he 150 Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G Page 7 gpd limit provides for leakage detection and plant shutdown in the event of the occurrence of an unexpected single crack resulting in leakage that is associated with the longest: permissible crack length.Regulatory Guide 1.121 acceptance criteria (Item 3 of Section 3.2 of WCAP-13187) for establishing operating leakage limits are based on leak-before-break considerations such that plane shutdown is initiated if the leakage associated with the longest permissible crack is exceeded.The longest permissible crack is the length that provides a factor of safety of three against bursting at normal operating pressure differential.

A voltage amplitude of 6.8 volts for typical ODSCC corresponds to meeting this tube burst requirement at the-95%LTL uncertainty limit on the burst correlation.

Alternate crack morphologies can correspond to 6.8 volts so that a unique crack length is not defined by the burst pressure versus voltage correlation.

Consequently, typical burst pressure versus through-wall crack length'orrelations are used below to define the"longest permissible crack" for evaluating operating leakage limits.The single through-wall crack lengths that, result in tube burst at three times normal operating pressure differential and SLB conditions, are about 0.44 inch and 0.84 inch, xespectively.

Nominal leakage for these crack lengths would range from 0.1 gpm to 4 gpm, respectively, while lower 95%confidence level leak rates would range from about 0.01 gpm to 0.5 gpm, respectively.

An operating leak rate limit of 150 gpd will be implemented in application of the interim tube plugging criteria.This leakage limit provides for detection of 0.4 inch long cracks at nominal leak rates and 0.6 inch long cracks at the-95%LTL confidence level leak rates.Thus, the 150 gpd limit provides for plant shutdown prior to reaching critical crack lengths for SLB conditions at leak rates less than a-95$LTL confidence level and for three times normal operating pressure differential at less than nominal leak rates.3)'nvolve a si nificant reduction in a mar in of safet The use of the int crim plugging criteria fox'he tube support plate at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 is demonstrated to maintain steam generator tube integrity commensurate

'with the requirements of RG 1.121.Regulatory Guide 1.121 describes a method acceptable to the NRC staff for meeting GDC 14, 15, 31, and 32 by reducing the probability of the

~)'I~g~Attachment 2 to AEP;NRC;1166G Page 8 consequences of steam generator tube rupture.This is accomplished by determining the limiting conditions of degradation of steam generator tubing, as established by inservice inspection.

Tubes with unacceptable cracking will be removed from service.The most'imiting effect would be a possible increase in leakage during a steam line break event.Once the interim plugging criteria is applied, excessive leakage during a steam line break event is precluded by verifying that the expected end-of-cycle distribution of crack indications't the tube support plate elevations would result in minimal and acceptable primary-to-secondary leakage during all plant conditions.

This helps to demonstrate that radiological conditions are less than a small fraction of the 10 CFR 100 guideline.

In addressing the combined effects of a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA)and a safe shutdown earthquake (SSE)on the steam generator component (as required by GDC 2), it has been determined that tube collapse may occur in the steam generators at some plants.This is the case as the tube support plates may become deformed as a result of lateral loads at the wedge suppo'rts at the periphery of the plate due to the combined effects of the LOCA rarefaction wave and SSE loadings.The resulting pressure differential on the deformed tubes may cause some of the tubes to collapse.There are two issues associated with steam generator tube collapse.First, the collapse of steam generator tubing reduces'the RCS flow area through the tubes.The reduction in flow area increases the resistance to flow of steam from the.core during a LOCA which, in turn, may potentially increase peak clad temperature.

Second, there is a potential that partial through-wall cracks in tubes could progress to through-wall cracks during tube deformation or collapse.Consequently, since the leak-before-break methodology is applicable to the Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 reactor coolant system primary loops, the probability of breaks in the primary loop piping is sufficiently low that they need not'e considered in the structural design basis of the plant.Excluding breaks in the RCS primary loops, the LOCA loads from the large branch line breaks were analyzed for Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 and were found to be of insufficient magnitude to result in steam generator tube collapse or significant deformation.

Attachment, 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G Page 9 Regardless of whether or not leak-before-break is applied to the primary loop piping at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1, any flow area reduction is expected to be minimal (much less than 1%)and PCT margin is available to account for this potential effect.Analyses results show that no tubes near wedge locations are expected to collapse or deform to the degree that secondary-to-primary in-leakage would be increased over current expected levels.For all other steam generator tubes, the possibility of secondary-to-primary leakage in the event of a combined LOCA and SSE event is not significant.

In actuality, the amount of secondary-to-primary leakage in the event of a combined LOCA and SSE is expected to be less than that currently allowed, i.e., 500 gpd per steam generator.

Furthermore, secondary-to-primary in-leakage would be less than primary-to-secondary leakage for the same pressure differential since the cracks would tend to close under a secondary-to-primary pressure differential..

Also, the presence of the tube support plate is expected to reduce the amount of in-leakage.

Addressing RG 1.83 considerations, implementation of the interim plugging criteria is supplemented by 100$inspection requirements at the tube support plate elevations having ODSCC indications, reduced operating leak rate limits, and eddy current inspection guidelines to provide consistency in voltage normalization.

As noted previously, implementation of the interim plugging criteria will decrease the number of tubes which must be repaired or taken out of service by plugging.The installation of steam generator tube plugs reduces the RCS flow margin and, thus, implementation of the interim plugging criteria will maintain the margin of flow that would otherwise be reduced in the event of increased tube plugging.Based on the above, it is concluded that the proposed change does not result in a significant reduction in margin with respect to plant safety as defined in the Final Safety-Analysis Report or any bases of the plant Technical Specifications.

CONCLUSION Based'on the preceding analysis, it is concluded that using the tube support plate elevation bobbin coil signal amplitude interim steam generator tube plugging criteria for removing tubes from Attachment 2 to AEP:NRC:1166G Page 10 service at Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 is accept able and the proposed license amendment does not involve a Significant Hazards Consideration as defined in 10 CFR 50.92.