ML15257A111: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| page count = 2 | | page count = 2 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:From:Harris, PaulTo:Rooks, Billie P.; Montecalvo, Michael; Smith, WillCc:Zaleski, Brian; Gordon, Mickey J.; Montgomery, Cheree S. | |||
==Subject:== | |||
RE: Error discovered on 2013 Annual Fatigue Mgmt report for VogtleDate:Monday, September 14, 2015 8:12:00 AMHi Billy, Thank you for letting us know. As you know, the annual Fatigue Reporting Form has a "Submission Update" feature, because the NRC staff understands that the reporting of Part 26 performance information may need updating due to on-going licensee corrective actions and reviews. http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1408/ML14085A233.pdf With your submission update, please consider a very short description placed in a "Summary of Corrective Actions" comment block on the Fatigue Form describing that Southern Nuclear self-identified a reporting discrepancy (as you described below) in the 2013 submission and corrects the official record with this submission update to the original 2013 report. | |||
You may use the NRC's Electronic Information Exchange submission portal, http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, for your updated submission as well. | |||
This email and both reports (the original 2013 submission and submission update) will be maintained as official records. | |||
Mike Montecalvo, NRR, has the overall agency lead for the Subpart I fatigue management provisions. And Will Smith, NSIR, has the technical lead for assessing Security Officer fatigue management implementation. Both these gentlemen will always be happy to answer any questions. | |||
R, PaulPaul HarrisU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission / Office of Nuclear Security and Incident ResponseDivision of Security Policy / Security Programs Support BranchSenior Program Manager, Fitness for Duty Programs, Drugs and Alcoholl E-mail: Paul.Harris@NRC.gov l Office: (301) 287-9294 l Fax: (301) 287-9347 l Cell: (240) 498-9691The information in this response is provided as a public service and solely for informational purposes and is not, nor should be deemed as, an official NRC position, opinion or guidance, or "a written interpretation by the General Counsel" under 10 CFR 26.7, on any matter to which the information may relate. The opinions, representations, positions, interpretations, guidance or recommendations which may be expressed by the NRC technical staff responding to an inquiry are solely the NRC technical staff's and do not necessarily represent the same for the NRC. Accordingly, the fact that the information was obtained through the NRC technical staff will not have a precedential effect in any legal or regulatory proceeding. From: Rooks, Billie P. [mailto:BPROOKS@southernco.com] Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 3:51 PMTo: Harris, Paul <Paul.Harris@nrc.gov>Cc: Zaleski, Brian <Brian.Zaleski@nrc.gov>; Gordon, Mickey J. <MJGORDON@southernco.com>; Montgomery, Cheree S. <CMONTGOM@southernco.com> | |||
==Subject:== | |||
[External_Sender] Error discovered on 2013 Annual Fatigue Mgmt report for Vogtle Paul, During our recent Fatigue Management program audit, we discovered an error in the Vogtle summary of the Fatigue Assessments on our 2013 Fatigue Management annual report. (Reference Vogtle CR # 10120709) | |||
I reported that we had 7 fatigue assessments performed for post-events. However, we discovered that one of the post-events was actually a For Cause fatigue assessment. The correct info is "Six post-event and one For Cause fatigue assessments". | |||
The Medical/FFD supervisor, performing the Fatigue Assessment, correctly classified the incident as a "For Cause" and also required a For Cause drug/alcohol test. | |||
The Security Captain classified the incident as a "post-event" on the Fatigue Assessment and in our Fatigue Management work hour tracking software, PQ&S, which is also used to manage the data on waivers, fatigue assessments, etc. I pulled the data from PQ&S for the 2013 report. I fully understand the importance of providing true and accurate information to the NRC. I plan to re-submit this report with the corrected information. I am reporting this directly to you so that you are aware of the reason for the changes to the report. | |||
Please call or email if you have any questions. Thanks. | |||
Billie Billie Rooks, BSN, RNMedical Services Manager Vogtle 3&4 Construction FFD/AA Oversight Fatigue Management Program Manager Southern Nuclear Office - 706-848-2772 l Cell - 706-834-8865 Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any attachments, contains or may contain proprietary & confidential information of Southern Company or its affiliates and is intended only for the addressee. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, be advised that any reading, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply message and delete this email message and any attachments from your system.}} | |||
Revision as of 10:04, 6 June 2018
| ML15257A111 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Vogtle  |
| Issue date: | 09/14/2015 |
| From: | Harris P W Division of Security Policy |
| To: | Montecalvo M T, Rooks B P Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response |
| HARRIS, PAUL | |
| References | |
| Download: ML15257A111 (2) | |
Text
From:Harris, PaulTo:Rooks, Billie P.; Montecalvo, Michael; Smith, WillCc:Zaleski, Brian; Gordon, Mickey J.; Montgomery, Cheree S.
Subject:
RE: Error discovered on 2013 Annual Fatigue Mgmt report for VogtleDate:Monday, September 14, 2015 8:12:00 AMHi Billy, Thank you for letting us know. As you know, the annual Fatigue Reporting Form has a "Submission Update" feature, because the NRC staff understands that the reporting of Part 26 performance information may need updating due to on-going licensee corrective actions and reviews. http://pbadupws.nrc.gov/docs/ML1408/ML14085A233.pdf With your submission update, please consider a very short description placed in a "Summary of Corrective Actions" comment block on the Fatigue Form describing that Southern Nuclear self-identified a reporting discrepancy (as you described below) in the 2013 submission and corrects the official record with this submission update to the original 2013 report.
You may use the NRC's Electronic Information Exchange submission portal, http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html, for your updated submission as well.
This email and both reports (the original 2013 submission and submission update) will be maintained as official records.
Mike Montecalvo, NRR, has the overall agency lead for the Subpart I fatigue management provisions. And Will Smith, NSIR, has the technical lead for assessing Security Officer fatigue management implementation. Both these gentlemen will always be happy to answer any questions.
R, PaulPaul HarrisU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission / Office of Nuclear Security and Incident ResponseDivision of Security Policy / Security Programs Support BranchSenior Program Manager, Fitness for Duty Programs, Drugs and Alcoholl E-mail: Paul.Harris@NRC.gov l Office: (301) 287-9294 l Fax: (301) 287-9347 l Cell: (240) 498-9691The information in this response is provided as a public service and solely for informational purposes and is not, nor should be deemed as, an official NRC position, opinion or guidance, or "a written interpretation by the General Counsel" under 10 CFR 26.7, on any matter to which the information may relate. The opinions, representations, positions, interpretations, guidance or recommendations which may be expressed by the NRC technical staff responding to an inquiry are solely the NRC technical staff's and do not necessarily represent the same for the NRC. Accordingly, the fact that the information was obtained through the NRC technical staff will not have a precedential effect in any legal or regulatory proceeding. From: Rooks, Billie P. [1] Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2015 3:51 PMTo: Harris, Paul <Paul.Harris@nrc.gov>Cc: Zaleski, Brian <Brian.Zaleski@nrc.gov>; Gordon, Mickey J. <MJGORDON@southernco.com>; Montgomery, Cheree S. <CMONTGOM@southernco.com>
Subject:
[External_Sender] Error discovered on 2013 Annual Fatigue Mgmt report for Vogtle Paul, During our recent Fatigue Management program audit, we discovered an error in the Vogtle summary of the Fatigue Assessments on our 2013 Fatigue Management annual report. (Reference Vogtle CR # 10120709)
I reported that we had 7 fatigue assessments performed for post-events. However, we discovered that one of the post-events was actually a For Cause fatigue assessment. The correct info is "Six post-event and one For Cause fatigue assessments".
The Medical/FFD supervisor, performing the Fatigue Assessment, correctly classified the incident as a "For Cause" and also required a For Cause drug/alcohol test.
The Security Captain classified the incident as a "post-event" on the Fatigue Assessment and in our Fatigue Management work hour tracking software, PQ&S, which is also used to manage the data on waivers, fatigue assessments, etc. I pulled the data from PQ&S for the 2013 report. I fully understand the importance of providing true and accurate information to the NRC. I plan to re-submit this report with the corrected information. I am reporting this directly to you so that you are aware of the reason for the changes to the report.
Please call or email if you have any questions. Thanks.
Billie Billie Rooks, BSN, RNMedical Services Manager Vogtle 3&4 Construction FFD/AA Oversight Fatigue Management Program Manager Southern Nuclear Office - 706-848-2772 l Cell - 706-834-8865 Confidentiality Notice: This email message, including any attachments, contains or may contain proprietary & confidential information of Southern Company or its affiliates and is intended only for the addressee. If you are not an intended recipient of this message, be advised that any reading, dissemination, forwarding, printing, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply message and delete this email message and any attachments from your system.