|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20086R8251984-02-27027 February 1984 Forwards Brief on Issues Re Liability for Fees & Expenses. Related Correspondence ML20083H6231984-01-0404 January 1984 Forwards Vs Boyer Executed Affidavit Which Should Be Filed W/Util 831229 Papers ML20083J5681983-12-29029 December 1983 Forwards Objection to ASLB 831230 Proposed Decision & Order Dismissing Proceeding W/Prejudice.Motion for Summary Decision & for Termination of Proceedings as Moot & W/O Prejudice Encl ML20042C0981982-03-26026 March 1982 Concurs W/Bwr Owners Group 820205 Ltr Re Schedule of NUREG- 0737,Item II.K.3.18, Mod of Automatic Depressurization System (ADS) Logic. Suppl to Original Study Proposed in 820205 Ltr Will Be Submitted by 820930 ML20005B5031981-07-0202 July 1981 Informs That Study Completion & Final Rept Submittal Re Quarry Blasting & Concrete Curing Are Scheduled for Sept 1981,in Response to NRC 810421 Request for Addl Info ML19346A3491981-06-11011 June 1981 Notifies That Error Appears in Page 5 of Brief Re State of Nj Participation Before ASLB as Interested State.Nj Never Participated in Proceedings ML20002A9971980-12-0505 December 1980 Requests That Util CP Application Be Withdrawn W/O Prejudice & CP Proceedings Be Terminated.Motion Encl ML20062J2801980-10-0202 October 1980 Responds to NRC Request for Info Re Implementation of TMI-2 Action Plan Requirements.Initiation Levels of HPCI & RCIC Sys Should Be Separated So That RCIC Sys Will Initiate Higher Water Level than HPCI Sys ML19338C6471980-08-12012 August 1980 Requests Info Re Fulton,Pa Proposed Nuclear Plant Site ML19330C3711980-07-0808 July 1980 Requests Placement of Pk Allison on Official Svc List as Representative of Fulton Township.Wj Sidebottom No Longer Represents Township.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20125D6481979-11-30030 November 1979 Responds to Re Util Application for Early Site Review at Fulton Township.Commission in Process of Reviewing Application to Determine Suitability for Docketing for Hearing ML20125D6431979-11-30030 November 1979 Forwards 791130 Response to T Spackman Re Util Application for Early Site Review at Fulton Township.Ex Parte Communication Rule Prevents Substantive Response ML20125D6511979-11-27027 November 1979 Forwards T Spackman Re Util Application for Early Site Review at Fulton Township.Requests Comments ML20125D6541979-11-18018 November 1979 Requests That NRC Cancel Util Application for Early Site Review at Fulton Township.Plant Would Infringe on Rights of Property Owners in Immediate Vicinity.Util Should Reapply When Specific Plans for Plant Have Been Made ML19250A5041979-10-17017 October 1979 Forwards Response to NRC 790913 Request for Implementation of Actions Contained in NUREG-0578 Re TMI-2 Lessons Learned Task Force short-term Recommendations.Response Is Consistent W/Bwr Owners Group Recommendations ML19248D2471979-07-10010 July 1979 Requests Careful Consideration of Martic Township Supervisors Resolution Opposing Early Site Review ML19207C4771979-07-10010 July 1979 Requests Careful Consideration of Martic County,Pa Supervisors 790604 Resolution Opposing Early Site Review. Portion of State of PA Should Not Have Clustering of Nuclear Facilities ML19253A2211979-06-0404 June 1979 Submits 790604 Resolution Opposing Early Site Review & Requesting Rejection of Application.Reasons for Opposition Include Excessive Density of Nuclear Facilities in Area & Lack of Emergency Evacuation & Sheltering Plan ML19225C4941979-05-29029 May 1979 Urges NRC to Deny Any Early Site Review Requests for Facility ML19254D5871979-05-23023 May 1979 Forwards Ny Times 790506 Article Re Siting of Nuclear Reactors.Requests Comment ML19248C9261979-05-14014 May 1979 Supplements Response to IE Bulletin 79-08.Review Under Way. No Tech Spec Changes Anticipated ML19261D7751979-05-0505 May 1979 Urges on Behalf of Peach Bottom Township,Pa That Site Be Reviewed at Time Plant Needs to Be Constructed ML19261D7831979-04-30030 April 1979 Opposes Const of Addl Nuclear Facility in Area ML19254D5861979-04-12012 April 1979 Submits Three Requests from Lancaster County Planning Commission:Denial of Early Site Review Application,Shutdown of TMI-2 Until Waste Removed & Request for NRC Comments on Other Nuclear Accidents & Significance to Lancaster County ML19261D7811979-04-0707 April 1979 Requests,On Behalf of Drumore Township,Pa Supervisors, Termination of Early Site Review Plan.Opposes Const of Any Type of Electrical Generating Plant ML19261D7851979-03-0202 March 1979 Opposes Application for Early Site Review ML19269C8531979-01-16016 January 1979 Informs Since Const Permit Application Has Returned to Normal Licensing Path,Util Will Resume Normal Communications W/Parties & Will Send No More Monthly Rept Ltrs ML19322A1391978-12-14014 December 1978 Informs NRC That Planning Commission Will Be Spokesman for County of Lancaster ML20147J2931978-12-0606 December 1978 Emphasizes Importance of Submmiting Accurate & Complete Info to NRC by Licensees & Applicants.Info Submitted Must Be Substantiated by Data & Calculations.Licensee Must Notify NRC of Any Inaccuracies or Enforcemment Action Will Result ML20148S9271978-11-21021 November 1978 Responds to Requesting Advice from NRC in Presenting Case Against the Choice of Fulton Site for Nuc Plant ML20150C3261978-11-14014 November 1978 Forwards League of Women Voters of Us Natl Energy Position Paper.Paper Discusses Energy Growth Rate,Energy Source Mix & Fed Policies & Reg Actions ML20148K3911978-11-0808 November 1978 Ack Receipt of to R Denise of Nrc.Nrc Will Cooperate W/League of Women Voters of Lancaster County to Hold General Meeting Re Subj Facil.S Kirslis Will Be Sent as NRC Representative to Discuss Lic & Regulatory Process ML19261D7861978-07-0505 July 1978 Opposes Application for Early Site Review.Requests Termination of Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19261D7801978-05-31031 May 1978 Advises That Fulton Township,Pa Planning Commission Opposes Const of Electrical Generating Plant on Proposed Site. Requests Termination of Util Application ML19261D7791978-05-12012 May 1978 Responds to 780501 Ltr Re Proposed Meeting on Behalf of Fulton Township,Pa,Requesting That NRC Not Grant Early Site Review ML19241B1881978-03-0808 March 1978 Responds to 780130 Ltr Re Site Info.Intends to File Amend to CP Application for Adjudicatory Early Site Review. Terminating Proceedings Would Waste Applicable Work Already Completed 1984-02-27
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20086R8251984-02-27027 February 1984 Forwards Brief on Issues Re Liability for Fees & Expenses. Related Correspondence ML20083H6231984-01-0404 January 1984 Forwards Vs Boyer Executed Affidavit Which Should Be Filed W/Util 831229 Papers ML20083J5681983-12-29029 December 1983 Forwards Objection to ASLB 831230 Proposed Decision & Order Dismissing Proceeding W/Prejudice.Motion for Summary Decision & for Termination of Proceedings as Moot & W/O Prejudice Encl ML20042C0981982-03-26026 March 1982 Concurs W/Bwr Owners Group 820205 Ltr Re Schedule of NUREG- 0737,Item II.K.3.18, Mod of Automatic Depressurization System (ADS) Logic. Suppl to Original Study Proposed in 820205 Ltr Will Be Submitted by 820930 ML20005B5031981-07-0202 July 1981 Informs That Study Completion & Final Rept Submittal Re Quarry Blasting & Concrete Curing Are Scheduled for Sept 1981,in Response to NRC 810421 Request for Addl Info ML19346A3491981-06-11011 June 1981 Notifies That Error Appears in Page 5 of Brief Re State of Nj Participation Before ASLB as Interested State.Nj Never Participated in Proceedings ML20002A9971980-12-0505 December 1980 Requests That Util CP Application Be Withdrawn W/O Prejudice & CP Proceedings Be Terminated.Motion Encl ML20062J2801980-10-0202 October 1980 Responds to NRC Request for Info Re Implementation of TMI-2 Action Plan Requirements.Initiation Levels of HPCI & RCIC Sys Should Be Separated So That RCIC Sys Will Initiate Higher Water Level than HPCI Sys ML19338C6471980-08-12012 August 1980 Requests Info Re Fulton,Pa Proposed Nuclear Plant Site ML19330C3711980-07-0808 July 1980 Requests Placement of Pk Allison on Official Svc List as Representative of Fulton Township.Wj Sidebottom No Longer Represents Township.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20125D6511979-11-27027 November 1979 Forwards T Spackman Re Util Application for Early Site Review at Fulton Township.Requests Comments ML20125D6541979-11-18018 November 1979 Requests That NRC Cancel Util Application for Early Site Review at Fulton Township.Plant Would Infringe on Rights of Property Owners in Immediate Vicinity.Util Should Reapply When Specific Plans for Plant Have Been Made ML19250A5041979-10-17017 October 1979 Forwards Response to NRC 790913 Request for Implementation of Actions Contained in NUREG-0578 Re TMI-2 Lessons Learned Task Force short-term Recommendations.Response Is Consistent W/Bwr Owners Group Recommendations ML19248D2471979-07-10010 July 1979 Requests Careful Consideration of Martic Township Supervisors Resolution Opposing Early Site Review ML19207C4771979-07-10010 July 1979 Requests Careful Consideration of Martic County,Pa Supervisors 790604 Resolution Opposing Early Site Review. Portion of State of PA Should Not Have Clustering of Nuclear Facilities ML19253A2211979-06-0404 June 1979 Submits 790604 Resolution Opposing Early Site Review & Requesting Rejection of Application.Reasons for Opposition Include Excessive Density of Nuclear Facilities in Area & Lack of Emergency Evacuation & Sheltering Plan ML19225C4941979-05-29029 May 1979 Urges NRC to Deny Any Early Site Review Requests for Facility ML19254D5871979-05-23023 May 1979 Forwards Ny Times 790506 Article Re Siting of Nuclear Reactors.Requests Comment ML19248C9261979-05-14014 May 1979 Supplements Response to IE Bulletin 79-08.Review Under Way. No Tech Spec Changes Anticipated ML19261D7751979-05-0505 May 1979 Urges on Behalf of Peach Bottom Township,Pa That Site Be Reviewed at Time Plant Needs to Be Constructed ML19261D7831979-04-30030 April 1979 Opposes Const of Addl Nuclear Facility in Area ML19254D5861979-04-12012 April 1979 Submits Three Requests from Lancaster County Planning Commission:Denial of Early Site Review Application,Shutdown of TMI-2 Until Waste Removed & Request for NRC Comments on Other Nuclear Accidents & Significance to Lancaster County ML19261D7811979-04-0707 April 1979 Requests,On Behalf of Drumore Township,Pa Supervisors, Termination of Early Site Review Plan.Opposes Const of Any Type of Electrical Generating Plant ML19261D7851979-03-0202 March 1979 Opposes Application for Early Site Review ML19269C8531979-01-16016 January 1979 Informs Since Const Permit Application Has Returned to Normal Licensing Path,Util Will Resume Normal Communications W/Parties & Will Send No More Monthly Rept Ltrs ML19322A1391978-12-14014 December 1978 Informs NRC That Planning Commission Will Be Spokesman for County of Lancaster ML20150C3261978-11-14014 November 1978 Forwards League of Women Voters of Us Natl Energy Position Paper.Paper Discusses Energy Growth Rate,Energy Source Mix & Fed Policies & Reg Actions ML19261D7861978-07-0505 July 1978 Opposes Application for Early Site Review.Requests Termination of Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19261D7801978-05-31031 May 1978 Advises That Fulton Township,Pa Planning Commission Opposes Const of Electrical Generating Plant on Proposed Site. Requests Termination of Util Application ML19261D7791978-05-12012 May 1978 Responds to 780501 Ltr Re Proposed Meeting on Behalf of Fulton Township,Pa,Requesting That NRC Not Grant Early Site Review ML19241B1881978-03-0808 March 1978 Responds to 780130 Ltr Re Site Info.Intends to File Amend to CP Application for Adjudicatory Early Site Review. Terminating Proceedings Would Waste Applicable Work Already Completed 1984-02-27
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA TO NRC
MONTHYEARML19338C6471980-08-12012 August 1980 Requests Info Re Fulton,Pa Proposed Nuclear Plant Site ML20125D6541979-11-18018 November 1979 Requests That NRC Cancel Util Application for Early Site Review at Fulton Township.Plant Would Infringe on Rights of Property Owners in Immediate Vicinity.Util Should Reapply When Specific Plans for Plant Have Been Made ML20150C3261978-11-14014 November 1978 Forwards League of Women Voters of Us Natl Energy Position Paper.Paper Discusses Energy Growth Rate,Energy Source Mix & Fed Policies & Reg Actions 1980-08-12
[Table view] |
Text
- - - - .
7
. t,
, n
- .(
m i
Box 88-A, RD #1 .
Peach Bottom, PA .
17563 :
November 18, 1979 [
Mr. Victor Gilinsky QQy2()]h7$
C< nissioner {
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 ~
Dear Mr. Gilinsky,
f I liked your letter to the edi.or of the New York Times straightening them out on plutoniur creation in nuclear plants.
But I am not writing just to tell ou that.
i lme Nuclear Regulatory Commi sion is not helping its already =t tarnished image by allowing a uti lity to perpetuate an application to construct a theoretical plant which, if ever conceptualized, might not even be of nuclear nat ure. And, by permitting your staff to cooperate in this wild goose chase, you are needlessly tampering with the rights of property owners in this area.
What I am talking about in the Philadelphia Electric Company's application for a constructior permit for a plant in Fulton Town-ship, Lancaster County, Penns.lvania, originally docketed in 1973.
Subsequently, the plant was cancelled and in 1978 the NRC staff moved to terminate the.appli ation. But PE, in an effort to preserve its status, requested an Ea: .y Site Review. This, in itself, would be an exercise in futility, as the site was exhaustively examined at the time of the origina] application and nothing new has entered the picture, not even plan- for another plant. In fact, as you will note in the enclosed clipring, the utility admits it has no plans 1 and that it only latched ato the ESR request because it happened ..I to be available. "
Not only is the EST revealed as a mere pretext but your staff, from news reports, is it no position to give it their attention in what appears to be the lorseeable future. To add insult to injury, if this completely unnt;essary site evaluation were to be under- 1 taken at some distant coint in time, the utility would then have, believe it or not, anc*.her six years to make up its mind if it H wanted to build a plant or not.
1 do not need tc tell you that it is this sort of thing that serves to reinforce c.he public's image of inefficiency and waste in the administrative tranches of the government. But even more i.mportantly it is creating and perpetuating a cloud over the titles
' to land that would be subject to condemnation should such a plant ever be built. While the PE application is allowed to continue, 90023257 8001150 r
.,,,.,m. , j, -+- - ' -
p Mr. Victor Gilinsky November 18, 1979 none of the affected property owners _11 be able to sell their land for its true market value even assumi .g they could find a buyer, p And the way things are going, this s'.uation could continue on into r the next century. Unless that is, y ur commission acts as I i:
believe it should, by ordering the J . application cancelled, the ESR denied, and the utility instruc ad to reapply only when it has specific plans for a plant. I hop < that you will do so.
t I am one of the property owne s affected by the plant and I speak for my neighbors as well as ayself. We have tried to get action on this through existing p ocedural channels but were met by, I regret to say, the typical bur ( iucratic obfuscation that appears to be associated with this type f action.
We are making, we feel, a ' ary reasonable request and one that is within the pwoers nf your co mission to grant. We ask that you free us from this unjust threat to our property by rescinding the utility's application.
Sincerely, Thomas Spackman II TSII/gs BCC--Honorable Robert S. Walker
Dear Bob,
We are still trying. ,
Actually, it is a complete waste of time and taxpayers' money for the NRC to " study" this ESR thing. Senseless. Ridiculous. But unless the Commissioner tells them otherwise, their confounded rules and procedures insist, so they believe, that they have to go through the motions -- but they can put it off indefinitely.
Meanwhile we poor peons sweat it out. What we especially need is to see that Gilinsky personally gets this letter and reads.
Do you think your office could see that this is done?
Best regards, d
)0,/'-
9002325B l-
~
t$Sii,W"^
-Plant Aot f e .
n
+. .;. - x '
syee in ruimn No Plans for 10 Yrs'.
(Continued %, Page Onel A-Plant Not f all to justry extra p . erat. ion capae:ty.
me Pon s,,e sae m,,,e there have been a : urce of local controver. . r
% sy for many years l.
an l m a Ongmally c: :.ng for a nuclear plant.
.=e f y, b .
Ii I a 1i those plans wera < uttled in 1975 when the
~
reactor suppbe: aMed. Opposition to the QP plant has come a am local, state and feJeral 1 WOef a2s(uyS a
representative and a local and nuclear gm.
Negatise waedon here intensified fol-Philadelphia Eleetne Co has no plans lowig the TW Mile Island nucler acei-for be:;6ng any type of power plant on its dent. Three Je Island ts operated by Met-Fulton Township site. in so;;&weste n Lan- mp an E m Co of Reading.not PE.
t caner County. m de next ten yers. 2 PE. c Hw amments came m respcnse spckesman said today. w a gn-i ;ntsa:of Pums,yMma s as Ron Harper of'Phladelph:a Electne a at futt.re state efficiais %ednesday.
said. "We don't hase any planned plants...Within a 109ear plan =ng penod. g ' Finished'in Penna.
we see no need to base a new project m d
( Th . tate s tcp energy and environmen-semee Nothingis on the draw 14 boar sJ should a plar.t be built there. it u ould
< tal ofh . .:ls saad nuclear power is firdshed m not cecessanly be a nut: ear plant. Hbper i Pennrf.vania as a future source of acw vee. -
added. "We are not comm:tteo to btuldmg a inca!, eneratig capacity. ! q nucient plant on that site. Defirutely not." 1 don't thmk we can g ) out '.0 morrow I
and .dk about bui!6ng a nui. ear plant m , i Reason for Review Per syivaniaf said state Puebe Utbty Ce .rassion Chairman W. Wilson Goode.
PE currently is trymg to get an early Goode and state Environmental Re-site review for the Fulton Twp tract grom se rees Secretuy Clifford L. Jones spokein the Nuclear Regulatory Commusjon. But. P. aburgh to the Pennsylvania Electric As-Ha per said, this does not rnean it wants to U'uild a nuclear plant on the s:te. PE is using Bod" men said ecal was the only pracu-
.e reslew process merely to rnark the tract a w J of enerD for Pennsylvan a
- y rar ' a land bank." to keep an eventual con- '
s rue ton eption open, he saJd.
' toch a move would not be possible Prodiets Brownouls wna coal or oil plants. he said. where feder.
- f rettalators offer noth:r.g eomparable ta an Their remarks contrasted sharply with
> those of PEA president Brooke R. Hart-
erl v site review. , man. who pre 6eted brownouts and bla$
'The only power plant PE has under i co ist uctionis the LimenckNuciear Gener- I ouu in Pennsylvan:a by 1990 if new plana, both ecal and nuclear aren't planced soon.
it: r.r Station. Monteemery Coun v. Now 50 l pe -6ent completed 'sts Un:t ):s expected to "Given the generat cg capaesty new e l
- .4 en ime m 1925. its Un 2
- n ISSI. Place or under censtruction." lbr man said. "Pennsylvama would expenence Previous Fenition brownouts or power interrupuons as scen a.s 1985 w:th a moderate 4 percent rate of b'n Ma . PE said it was net necessarily powM *tneny usage?
And there was more pessitnism from l cer. I"utte to bu:16ng twin ructors on the Sta R. ragm Sample, ebirman and ebe!
esite whiensFreadsoverfultonand ,
Dru tr.cre townsh:ps. executsve.of Consobdauen Coal Co.
Seing granted :he erly site review -w, ve been heanng a lot cf talk fcr a u egulatory proces lo tirne." Samp es said. "but the e's been we she :d :: PEspeed dec.ce upiothe buli r,d a nu: lear stat;on a lack of a .y real thmg happen:ng on conver.
sion to eca; *
- . t . e icias or !?Ks. a PE spc4esman said 3 , g be>"d EI n bee ~v.' Harper ruled out such a plant ded for at least the r, ext 10 years, made e aJ too apem for u'Edu to tum t . e.n m cases where existmg oth or c:P..g electricity cemand est: mates which .re<! plants could be eenverted to ecal (a
-See A PLANT -Page 2 Thert are 70 such eons erdble plants in
' the country now, Snmples said. Cent erdnt
- them to coal could save an esurnated 106
. milbon bure!s of oil per year,if regulate s edopted rnore reasonable pobese m g ant.
Ing the perr:uts, he added.
"We can bum coal, and we can ha.e
, reasonable 21 cuabry standards." he sa:d.
"But l'.:s k:nd ci flexib!!::v d.,er-Jt seem to
- tt amor.: de b.true r ra.'
}
. .