ML20125D643

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards 791130 Response to T Spackman Re Util Application for Early Site Review at Fulton Township.Ex Parte Communication Rule Prevents Substantive Response
ML20125D643
Person / Time
Site: 05000463, 05000464
Issue date: 11/30/1979
From: Gilinsky V
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
To: Walker R
HOUSE OF REP.
Shared Package
ML20125D647 List:
References
NUDOCS 8001150155
Download: ML20125D643 (1)


Text


' '

8-[JImtug, P #o UNITED STATES SMM '

i x(f g NUCSAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

.g .

W ASHIN GTON. D.C. 20555

( C /& (

tv p

s.J o[/ .. r

    • ++*

OFFICE OF THE i COMMISSIONFR November 30, 1979 l

1 l

l The Honorable. Robert S. Walker United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515

Dear Congressman Walker:

I am enclosing a copy of my response to Mr. Thomas Spackman, of Peach Bottom, Pennsylvania. Regretably, the Commission's ex parte communication rule prevents me from giving Mr. Spackman a substantive answer. I know that this response smacks of bureaucratic obfuscation, but I think the rule, even if narrowly interpreted, is applicable in this instance. I might add that I have long disagreed with what I regard as an overly broad interpretation of this rule by the Commission.

Please let me knew if I can be of any further assistance i~n this matter.

Sincerely, t$. /

d th b 5, Victor Gilinsky Commissioner [-

Enclosure:

a/s 90023254 8001150 /8 [

R