05000456/FIN-2011003-08: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| identified by = NRC | | identified by = NRC | ||
| Inspection procedure = IP 71152 | | Inspection procedure = IP 71152 | ||
| Inspector = A Garmoe, D Betancourt, E Duncan, J Benjamin, J Gilliam, J Robbins, M Perry, N Adorno, N Feliz, | | Inspector = A Garmoe, D Betancourt, E Duncan, J Benjamin, J Gilliam, J Robbins, M Perry, N Adorno, N Feliz Adorno, R Ng, T Bilik, T Go, V Meghani | ||
| CCA = P.3 | | CCA = P.3 | ||
| INPO aspect = PI.3 | | INPO aspect = PI.3 | ||
| description = The inspectors identified a finding of very low safety significance and an associated NCV of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings, related to an inadequate quality review of temporarily constructed scaffolds installed throughout the plant. Specifically, the licensee failed to adhere to procedural requirements associated with installed temporary scaffolds prior to reaching 90 days in service. The procedural action required that the temporary scaffold be converted to a permanent scaffold or that a 10 CFR Part 50.59 evaluation be performed for the specific scaffold to ensure that the temporary scaffold did not adversely affect structures, system and components (SSCs) before reaching 90 days in service. Corrective actions included implementing the procedural requirements for the identified scaffolds and entering the issue into the corrective action program as IR 1206426. The inspectors determined that the failure to adhere to the standards of a quality procedure was a performance deficiency. This issue was determined to be more that minor in accordance with IMC 0612, Appendix B, Issue Screening, because the performance deficiency, if left uncorrected, would have the potential to become a more a more significant safety concern. Specifically, by not taking the actions prescribed by procedure, the temporary structures would not have an adequate qualification if left in the plant for greater than 90 days and may not meet all standards of the stations licensing basis. The inspectors determined the finding could be evaluated using the SDP in accordance with IMC 0609, Significance Determination Process, Attachment 4, Phase I - Initial Screening and Characterization of findings, Table 4a for the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone and answered No to the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone questions. Specifically, the issue did not result in the actual loss of the operability or functionality of a safety system. Therefore, the finding screened as having very low safety significance (Green). The inspectors determined that this finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the Corrective Action Program component of the Problem Identification and Resolution cross-cutting area (P.1(d)) because the licensee did not take appropriate correct actions to address safety issues and adverse trends in a timely manner, commensurate with their safety significance and complexity. Specifically, the licensee did not take appropriate corrective actions to address a very similar issue identified as NRC inspection finding 05000456/2010004-01; 05000457/2010004-01, Failure to Follow Procedures for Temporary Scaffolds. | | description = The inspectors identified a finding of very low safety significance and an associated NCV of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion V, Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings, related to an inadequate quality review of temporarily constructed scaffolds installed throughout the plant. Specifically, the licensee failed to adhere to procedural requirements associated with installed temporary scaffolds prior to reaching 90 days in service. The procedural action required that the temporary scaffold be converted to a permanent scaffold or that a 10 CFR Part 50.59 evaluation be performed for the specific scaffold to ensure that the temporary scaffold did not adversely affect structures, system and components (SSCs) before reaching 90 days in service. Corrective actions included implementing the procedural requirements for the identified scaffolds and entering the issue into the corrective action program as IR 1206426. The inspectors determined that the failure to adhere to the standards of a quality procedure was a performance deficiency. This issue was determined to be more that minor in accordance with IMC 0612, Appendix B, Issue Screening, because the performance deficiency, if left uncorrected, would have the potential to become a more a more significant safety concern. Specifically, by not taking the actions prescribed by procedure, the temporary structures would not have an adequate qualification if left in the plant for greater than 90 days and may not meet all standards of the stations licensing basis. The inspectors determined the finding could be evaluated using the SDP in accordance with IMC 0609, Significance Determination Process, Attachment 4, Phase I - Initial Screening and Characterization of findings, Table 4a for the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone and answered No to the Mitigating Systems Cornerstone questions. Specifically, the issue did not result in the actual loss of the operability or functionality of a safety system. Therefore, the finding screened as having very low safety significance (Green). The inspectors determined that this finding had a cross-cutting aspect in the Corrective Action Program component of the Problem Identification and Resolution cross-cutting area (P.1(d)) because the licensee did not take appropriate correct actions to address safety issues and adverse trends in a timely manner, commensurate with their safety significance and complexity. Specifically, the licensee did not take appropriate corrective actions to address a very similar issue identified as NRC inspection finding 05000456/2010004-01; 05000457/2010004-01, Failure to Follow Procedures for Temporary Scaffolds. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:42, 20 February 2018
| Site: | Braidwood  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000456/2011003 Section 4OA2 |
| Date counted | Jun 30, 2011 (2011Q2) |
| Type: | NCV: Green |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71152 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | A Garmoe D Betancourt E Duncan J Benjamin J Gilliam J Robbins M Perry N Adorno N Feliz Adorno R Ng T Bilik T Go V Meghani |
| CCA | P.3, Resolution |
| INPO aspect | PI.3 |
| ' | |