ML20086D818: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 15:23, 15 April 2020
Text
._ _ . _ _ . _ . . _ _
f l'
~
&/ J l
i NSP l l NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY M IN N E A PO L.a s. M IN N E SOTA S S401 June 7, 1976 - x
. .x s - :U N
'\
, .; ~ ,
'* D Dj[5 .. ,
Mr Victor Stello, Director Division of Operating Reactors i~h % jJg. y, T .
U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission (y';3 i
cu, ;.,7;f '(
,?/
Washington, DC 20555 '
- 1. , , , ,
s
Dear Mr Stello:
'Q@,
MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-22 Response to 5/20/76 Inquiry Concerning I LPCI Design
)
i Your May 20, 1976 letter identified a potential design deficiency related to LPCI pump cavitation and motor overload. Monticello has the Loop Selection Logic System and does not have the LPCI modification. Therefore, item a j of your letter is applicable and item b .is not.
The Monticello piping layout and pump data have been reviewed. At runout
[ flow the NPSH requirements of the pump are met. The pump characteristic l curves show that at high flows, the brake horsepower and motor current de-A crease. Therefore, the Monticello LPCI pumps are not subject to damage due
(
to cavitation or motor overload in the runout condition.
Yours Very truly, L 0 Mayer, PE Manager, Nuclear Support Services bb1 LQ4/MHV/ deb cc: J G Keppler C Charnoff i MPCA I Attn: J W Ferman 8312050151 780426 PDR ADOCK 05000263 g PDR COPY SENT REGION A_
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. ._.