ML101930192: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:....... | {{#Wiki_filter:....... | ||
i . SotSewa rt -Tritium questionaire for Rih sites wpd Pa f~e~ of .4-ONSITE GROUND/SURFACE WATER MONITORING QUESTIONNAIRE, Onsite RadiologicalEffluent/REMP MonitoringProgram Phase I Nearterrn response) | i . SotSewa rt -Tritium questionaire for Rih sites wpd Pa f~e~ of .4-ONSITE GROUND/SURFACE WATER MONITORING QUESTIONNAIRE, Onsite RadiologicalEffluent/REMP MonitoringProgram Phase I Nearterrn response) | ||
,Yes No | ,Yes No | ||
Line 39: | Line 36: | ||
77~ ~ | 77~ ~ | ||
Scott Stewart Tritium questionaire for RI).sites.wpd I. p1T(~J surrounding the main uod h tJo Q1 i ! | |||
Scott Stewart Tritium questionaire for RI).sites.wpd | |||
I. p1T(~J surrounding the main uod h tJo Q1 i ! | |||
J | J | ||
Latest revision as of 15:21, 21 March 2020
ML101930192 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Turkey Point |
Issue date: | 06/09/2010 |
From: | - No Known Affiliation |
To: | Office of Information Services |
References | |
FOIA/PA-2010-0209 | |
Download: ML101930192 (4) | |
Text
.......
i . SotSewa rt -Tritium questionaire for Rih sites wpd Pa f~e~ of .4-ONSITE GROUND/SURFACE WATER MONITORING QUESTIONNAIRE, Onsite RadiologicalEffluent/REMP MonitoringProgram Phase I Nearterrn response)
,Yes No
- 1. Does the licensee have radioactive groundwater monitoring wells, 0 l onsite?
IfYES: How many wells:'
Where are they located (e.9, distributed around/throughout the site, in a particular region of the site and/or near particular
, buildings/structures, etc.)
(a.) within the Protected Area El El
- (b.) within the Radiologically Restricted Area El El
ý,.i(c ) within th_owner-controlled area El El j . (d) at what frequency does the licensee sample/analyze the j I welisý Wý-e ) for what radionuclides does the licensee monitor Gamma emitters (gamma Spec) n []
If Yes - at what MDA Tritium If Yes - atwhat MDA Gross Beta X, Ote: If Yes - at what MDA
':":'*'";*Other:
If Yes - at what MDA 2 if the licensee does NOT have an onsite radioactive groundwater monitorlg program:
. ) Does the licensee plan to implement a groundwater
- rnonitorlng program?..
- El El If Yes, when and to what extent:
(b-) Does the licensee plan to take other measures to assure they can identify radioactive groundwater contamination 00 C]
S~ ~ ,.- ~. ~ -
77~ ~
Scott Stewart Tritium questionaire for RI).sites.wpd I. p1T(~J surrounding the main uod h tJo Q1 i !
J
'Scott Stewart .Tritium questionaire for RI Ites.w Pm!q (a),Is the system analyzed for radionuclides? " 5 (b.) at what frequency does the licensee sample/analyze the wells (c.) for what radionuclides does the licensee monitor Gamma emitters (gammaSpec) 5 5 If Yes - at what MDA Tritum E 5 If Yes - at what MDA Gross Beta 5 5 If Yes -at what MDA
- 4. Does the licensee have a surveillance program to periodically; (a..) walkdown outside areas around the site to look for potential leaks
- 5 and spills?
(b.).,ressurize buried radwaste lines to evaluate structural integrity and evaluate potential, for leaks~and spills?
5
- 5, D36es!the licensee performany other onsite monitoring (e.g. soil 5 3 s'ampling) to identify unexpected radioactive releases
- 6. Does the licensee's. radioactive liquid discharge line traverse any 5l
- non-licensee owned. areas (e.g., it Is on a right-of-way surrounded by private, properties)?
Yes No
- 7. If the licensee has a discharge pipe that runs underground orany 5]
underground piping that carries radioactive liquids, does the licensee perfom monitorintg along the discharge pathway to identify potential leaka'g e.
if YES H*iow frequently is the sampling performed:
Yes: No
- 8. HistoricalfOnsite Radioactive Contamination:
(a) Doel'the licensee have any history of radioactive spills and/or leaks U 5 outside of buildings/structures?
Are they documented in 10 CFR 50.75g file?
- E5 (b.) Has ýhe licensee identified onsite radioactive groundwater 3 5 contaminatUon?
- V.
/ .i'_
li tetecot art-ar dtum questionaire
-. Trtg.....Pa for R11 sites.wri .......... .... ..... g
. . l If'YES:
When was it identified - IF known:
Dates:
- "'"LER/Abnormal Event Report/Condition Report Nos:
orE A .*. -L (If available)
- To what extent - IF known [square footage, estimated ground depth of the contamination, estimated quantity (volume / concentration), etc.]
.- Ve. w,.r Sa m&--,.. coitecAcA ViZvcrF r(- -cT.,o.- QOrlh l(-CI
~x~e&LRCcc J~.e O-+e~c~~ix~ 'tmQCd-i 6's A- W' i,-Io mvund `1LP-vLL)AdA \/er5 Lw L4& (n-TEvi\csY11A U-nA-; gor o~ric4ebý--
. Hasthe contamination moved outside the El W Restricted Area or the owner-controlled area
'S G--:7.
- 9. Comments:
t+C-r JK-rER iN Tk CýO L-1N& C.A tOA L ~-IEt bst-A NLU) FoP. -tR~t-notA NkotjTý-LI( P AR-r C~ 'TthC
&oE-r*l : V . _ .. -to OAEI *2\z\,k >US-RO o*o-,,oT 0o" .*- 20,'o NMQx L2-EC-CEP- -VTCDR. -Rn , Ar oU-R\L f.'
ýI 5 E2_
-Vw C I sr A (V " S k0r S). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . N.. . ..
f\.,C-...
VA 5 4..........