|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20094K9541992-03-13013 March 1992 Forwards Supplemental Info Addressing Reasons for Delays Which Have Occurred in Schedule for Const of fossil-fueled Electric Generating Facility at Inola Station Site ML20092M4001992-02-20020 February 1992 Submits Addresses for DM Saunders & Jg Aronson,Per Request in Connection w/920226 Meeting.Addresses for R Butkin & M Graham W/Ok State Government Also Listed ML20092K4941992-02-14014 February 1992 Confirms 920205 Telcon Requesting Meeting Between NRC & Util on 920226 for Util to Present Matl Re Status of Inola Station Site to Demonstrate That Owner Have Satisfied Conditions Contained in 830307 Order ML20209H1221987-02-0202 February 1987 Final Response to FOIA Request.App I Documents Encl & Available in Pdr.App J Documents Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) ML20207L1381986-11-10010 November 1986 FOIA Request for Info Between Connelly & Officials at NRC Technical Training Ctr in Chattanooga,Tn Re Requirements for Training of NRC Inspectors & for Info Re IE Investigation Into NRC Inspector Training Requirements ML20199E4721986-02-0606 February 1986 Responds to FOIA Request for SECY-85-367A & SECY-85-371. Forwards Portions of Documents Listed in App.Info Also Available in Pdr.App Documents Partially Withheld (Ref FOIA Exemption 5) CY-85-367, FOIA Request for SECY-85-367A & SECY-85-3711985-12-13013 December 1985 FOIA Request for SECY-85-367A & SECY-85-371 ML20138Q8301985-12-0303 December 1985 Further Response to FOIA Request for Records Re Voluntary or Required Redress of Sites Where Const Was Terminated, Including Crbr & Legal Analysis.Forwards App E Documents.App D & E Documents Available in Pdr.Photographs Also Available ML20132C1621985-09-18018 September 1985 Responds to 850612 & 14 Requests for Waiver of 10CFR170 Fees for Withdrawal of CP Application & for Informal Hearings.Requests Denied.Util Not Denied Opportunity in 1981 to Withdraw Application ML20134E3211985-08-14014 August 1985 Advises of Corporate Approval of Change in Planned Dates for Commercial Operation for coal-fired Inola Station,To Be Built on Site of Canceled Black Fox Station.Units 1 & 2 Scheduled for Completion in Dec 1996 & 1998,respectively ML20127A9961985-06-14014 June 1985 Forwards Application for Waiver of Withdrawal Fees Under 10CFR170.12(b) & Brief in Support of Application,Per 850129 Meeting ML20132B4151985-06-12012 June 1985 Forwards Application for Waiver of Withdrawal Fees Under 10CFR170.12(b).NRC Delays in Issuance of CPs Deprived Util of Opportunity to Effect Withdrawal Before 1981 Operative Date of Regulation Charging Withdrawal Fees ML20097C3231984-08-0909 August 1984 Responds to Questions Re Beam Stops ML20091R5721984-06-0808 June 1984 Requests Precise Delineation of Applicable Regulations & Accounting of Prof Staff Hours Expended Re Review Costs Charged for Withdrawal of CP Application.Waiver of Any Interest Penalty Requested ML20088A1641984-04-10010 April 1984 Reiterates 840322 Request for Return of Reed Rept Under 10CFR2.790(b)(5).Reconsideration of Positions Taken in Oct 1980 Split Vote Re Release of GE Repts Requested. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20087K0001984-03-22022 March 1984 Requests Reconsideration of 801009 Split Vote to Release Reed Rept & Sub-Task Force Repts.Return of Repts Requested. Separate Views of Commissioner Hendrie & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080F8011984-02-0303 February 1984 Requests Deletion of Gw Muench & Rl Range from Address Label ML20136E5971983-10-28028 October 1983 Advises of 831110 Site Visit to Observe Implementation of 820830 Soil Stabilization & Erosion Control Plan ML20069D8691982-09-20020 September 1982 Forwards Black Fox Station Soil Stabilization & Erosion Control Program, Per ASLB 820618 Memorandum & Order.Plan Addresses Concerns Raised in NRC 820602 Submittal ML20054K1531982-06-23023 June 1982 Informs That Final Deficiency Repts for Listed Nonconformances Will Not Be Submitted Until Final Decision Is Made Re Const of Projects ML20054J0181982-06-22022 June 1982 Ack Receipt of Re Withdrawal of CP Application. NRC Responded in Timely Manner to Util Given TMI Accident & Need to Ensure Implementation of Lessons Learned from Accident ML20053D1821982-05-28028 May 1982 Forwards JB West 820527 Affidavit on NRC Concerns Expressed During 820517 Site Visit Re Potential Offsite Environ Impact of Erosion & Siltation in Areas of Inclined Reactor Pressure Vessel Haul Road from Barge Slip Facilities ML20041A5611982-02-16016 February 1982 Announces Cancellation of Black Fox Station,Confirming 820216 Verbal Notification.Site Will Be Preserved for Const of Future Power Generation Projects ML20040A9621982-01-18018 January 1982 Forwards Ok Corporation Commission 820115 Decision in Cause 27068 Re Util Application for Rate Increase ML20039E8561982-01-0606 January 1982 Forwards DF Guyot Affidavit & Interim Containment Loads Rept,Mark III Containment, Revisions 3 & 4.Matls Pertinent to Contentions 3 & 16 Litigated in Dec 1978 & Feb 1979 ML20039B7051981-12-11011 December 1981 Forwards Response to NRC 811203 Ltr Requesting Updated Info on Generic Issues A-10,A-31,A-36,A-42,A-43,A-44,A-45,A-46, A-47 & A-48 for SER Suppl.Svc List Encl ML20039C6051981-12-0909 December 1981 Suppls Response to 810912 & 0603 Ltrs Re Nonconformance Noted in QA Program Insp Rept 99900526/80-01.Revised Drawing List for Black Fox Facility Will Not Be Completed Until Apr 1982 ML20005C1001981-11-0505 November 1981 Forwards Amend 18 to Psar.Amend Contains Matl Responsive to Two Hydrogen Control Requirements of near-term Cp/Mfg License Regulations Which Were Adopted by NRC on 810827. Related Correspondence ML20140B2771981-09-0909 September 1981 Forwards Amend 16 to Psar.Review Copies Forwarded w/810901 Ltr ML20010H4021981-09-0808 September 1981 Forwards Ok Corp Commission,Black Fox Station Economic Viability Study. Related Correspondence ML20140B2851981-09-0101 September 1981 Forwards Amend 16 to Psar.Remaining Copies Forthcoming.Amend Begins New Vol of Psar,Designated as Addendum I ML20010D1641981-08-18018 August 1981 Requests Svc List Be Revised Per Encl ML20009D9311981-07-0808 July 1981 Forwards Response to IE Bulletin 81-03, Flow Blockage of Cooling Water to Safety Sys Components by Corbicula Sp (Asiatic Clam) & Mytilus Sp (Mussel). ML20005A2541981-05-25025 May 1981 Responds to NRC 810423 Ltr Re Nonconformance Noted in QA Program Insp Rept 99900039/81-01.Corrective Actions:Quality Procedures Established to Ensure Control of Insp Activities in Accordance W/Ansi Requirements ML20005A2301981-05-18018 May 1981 Responds to NRC 810416 Ltr Requesting Info Re Status of Black Fox Unit 2 Reactor Vessel.No Activities Performed Since Last Visit ML20003E2571981-03-0202 March 1981 Forwards Ok Association of Electric Cooperatives 810122 Ltr Re Streamlining of Nuclear Plant Licensing & Development of Nuclear Power.Doe 810302 Response Encl ML20126E6991981-02-10010 February 1981 Opposes Facility ML20002D3261980-12-10010 December 1980 FOIA Request for Extracts of 27 safety-related Issues Identified by GE in Reed Rept ML20151B1111980-11-14014 November 1980 Suppls 800116 Response to FOIA Request for GE Reed Rept, & Excerpt Re 27 safety-related Issues.Forwards Commission Memo Re Release of Rept.Rept Cannot Be Released Pending Resolution of Claims.W/O Encl ML19345C2711980-10-29029 October 1980 Requests Info Re Facilities W/Active CPs Pending,License Definitions & Requirements for Floating Nuclear Plants ML19343A9241980-10-21021 October 1980 Petition Urging Support for Wide Use of Solar & Wind Power, & Phasing Out of Nuclear Power Plants,Especially Black Fox, as Soon as Possible ML19340B8331980-10-21021 October 1980 Petitions Govt Representatives to Promote Use of Solar & wind-powered Energy & Phase Out Operation of Nuclear Plants as Quickly as Possible ML19347B5701980-10-10010 October 1980 Demands,On Behalf of Ge,That NRC Return GE Reed Rept Immediately Due to NRC Denial of Request That Rept Be Withheld from Disclosure Under 10CFR2.790.Rept Must Not Be Placed in PDR ML19318B9751980-06-20020 June 1980 Advises That List of Matls to Be Used in Const of Fire Stops & Characteristics Re Flammability & Fire Retardancy Will Be Provided 1 Yr Subsequent to Receipt of CP ML19326D6371980-05-0505 May 1980 Opposes Const of Facilities Until Adequate Emergency Response Plan Can Be Developed.Recommends Responsibility for Emergency Response Plan Be Placed W/Independent Consulting Svc,Not State of Ok ML20126D3201980-04-0404 April 1980 Forwards Corp Commission of State of Ok 800403 Order Denying Request for Approval to Sell Bonds.Psc of Ok Presently Reviewing Order W/View of Filing Appeal W/Ok Supreme Court ML19309G5071980-04-0202 April 1980 Notifies That Representative of Intervenor State of Ok Will Attend NRC 800403 Meeting W/Cp Owners Group.Deplores Fact That Meeting Is First Interaction Between NRC & Applicants Re Development of Generic Policy ML20126D4031980-03-26026 March 1980 Forwards D Plant Expressing Concern Re Possible Meltdown at Facilities.Requests Response ML19309H4781980-03-26026 March 1980 Requests Response to Encl D&D Plant Request That Environ & Site Suitability Hearings in Licensing Proceeding Be Reopened to Address Class 9 Accidents ML18082A1641980-03-24024 March 1980 Forwards Licensee Supplemental Brief Re Motion for Directed Certification & for Stay.Pendency of Class 9 Issue Before Commission Noted in Licensee Motion for Directed Certification & for Stay.Discussed on Pages 7-10 1992-03-13
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20094K9541992-03-13013 March 1992 Forwards Supplemental Info Addressing Reasons for Delays Which Have Occurred in Schedule for Const of fossil-fueled Electric Generating Facility at Inola Station Site ML20092M4001992-02-20020 February 1992 Submits Addresses for DM Saunders & Jg Aronson,Per Request in Connection w/920226 Meeting.Addresses for R Butkin & M Graham W/Ok State Government Also Listed ML20092K4941992-02-14014 February 1992 Confirms 920205 Telcon Requesting Meeting Between NRC & Util on 920226 for Util to Present Matl Re Status of Inola Station Site to Demonstrate That Owner Have Satisfied Conditions Contained in 830307 Order ML20207L1381986-11-10010 November 1986 FOIA Request for Info Between Connelly & Officials at NRC Technical Training Ctr in Chattanooga,Tn Re Requirements for Training of NRC Inspectors & for Info Re IE Investigation Into NRC Inspector Training Requirements CY-85-367, FOIA Request for SECY-85-367A & SECY-85-3711985-12-13013 December 1985 FOIA Request for SECY-85-367A & SECY-85-371 ML20134E3211985-08-14014 August 1985 Advises of Corporate Approval of Change in Planned Dates for Commercial Operation for coal-fired Inola Station,To Be Built on Site of Canceled Black Fox Station.Units 1 & 2 Scheduled for Completion in Dec 1996 & 1998,respectively ML20127A9961985-06-14014 June 1985 Forwards Application for Waiver of Withdrawal Fees Under 10CFR170.12(b) & Brief in Support of Application,Per 850129 Meeting ML20132B4151985-06-12012 June 1985 Forwards Application for Waiver of Withdrawal Fees Under 10CFR170.12(b).NRC Delays in Issuance of CPs Deprived Util of Opportunity to Effect Withdrawal Before 1981 Operative Date of Regulation Charging Withdrawal Fees ML20097C3231984-08-0909 August 1984 Responds to Questions Re Beam Stops ML20091R5721984-06-0808 June 1984 Requests Precise Delineation of Applicable Regulations & Accounting of Prof Staff Hours Expended Re Review Costs Charged for Withdrawal of CP Application.Waiver of Any Interest Penalty Requested ML20088A1641984-04-10010 April 1984 Reiterates 840322 Request for Return of Reed Rept Under 10CFR2.790(b)(5).Reconsideration of Positions Taken in Oct 1980 Split Vote Re Release of GE Repts Requested. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20087K0001984-03-22022 March 1984 Requests Reconsideration of 801009 Split Vote to Release Reed Rept & Sub-Task Force Repts.Return of Repts Requested. Separate Views of Commissioner Hendrie & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080F8011984-02-0303 February 1984 Requests Deletion of Gw Muench & Rl Range from Address Label ML20069D8691982-09-20020 September 1982 Forwards Black Fox Station Soil Stabilization & Erosion Control Program, Per ASLB 820618 Memorandum & Order.Plan Addresses Concerns Raised in NRC 820602 Submittal ML20054K1531982-06-23023 June 1982 Informs That Final Deficiency Repts for Listed Nonconformances Will Not Be Submitted Until Final Decision Is Made Re Const of Projects ML20053D1821982-05-28028 May 1982 Forwards JB West 820527 Affidavit on NRC Concerns Expressed During 820517 Site Visit Re Potential Offsite Environ Impact of Erosion & Siltation in Areas of Inclined Reactor Pressure Vessel Haul Road from Barge Slip Facilities ML20041A5611982-02-16016 February 1982 Announces Cancellation of Black Fox Station,Confirming 820216 Verbal Notification.Site Will Be Preserved for Const of Future Power Generation Projects ML20040A9621982-01-18018 January 1982 Forwards Ok Corporation Commission 820115 Decision in Cause 27068 Re Util Application for Rate Increase ML20039E8561982-01-0606 January 1982 Forwards DF Guyot Affidavit & Interim Containment Loads Rept,Mark III Containment, Revisions 3 & 4.Matls Pertinent to Contentions 3 & 16 Litigated in Dec 1978 & Feb 1979 ML20039B7051981-12-11011 December 1981 Forwards Response to NRC 811203 Ltr Requesting Updated Info on Generic Issues A-10,A-31,A-36,A-42,A-43,A-44,A-45,A-46, A-47 & A-48 for SER Suppl.Svc List Encl ML20039C6051981-12-0909 December 1981 Suppls Response to 810912 & 0603 Ltrs Re Nonconformance Noted in QA Program Insp Rept 99900526/80-01.Revised Drawing List for Black Fox Facility Will Not Be Completed Until Apr 1982 ML20005C1001981-11-0505 November 1981 Forwards Amend 18 to Psar.Amend Contains Matl Responsive to Two Hydrogen Control Requirements of near-term Cp/Mfg License Regulations Which Were Adopted by NRC on 810827. Related Correspondence ML20140B2771981-09-0909 September 1981 Forwards Amend 16 to Psar.Review Copies Forwarded w/810901 Ltr ML20010H4021981-09-0808 September 1981 Forwards Ok Corp Commission,Black Fox Station Economic Viability Study. Related Correspondence ML20140B2851981-09-0101 September 1981 Forwards Amend 16 to Psar.Remaining Copies Forthcoming.Amend Begins New Vol of Psar,Designated as Addendum I ML20010D1641981-08-18018 August 1981 Requests Svc List Be Revised Per Encl ML20009D9311981-07-0808 July 1981 Forwards Response to IE Bulletin 81-03, Flow Blockage of Cooling Water to Safety Sys Components by Corbicula Sp (Asiatic Clam) & Mytilus Sp (Mussel). ML20005A2541981-05-25025 May 1981 Responds to NRC 810423 Ltr Re Nonconformance Noted in QA Program Insp Rept 99900039/81-01.Corrective Actions:Quality Procedures Established to Ensure Control of Insp Activities in Accordance W/Ansi Requirements ML20005A2301981-05-18018 May 1981 Responds to NRC 810416 Ltr Requesting Info Re Status of Black Fox Unit 2 Reactor Vessel.No Activities Performed Since Last Visit ML20003E2571981-03-0202 March 1981 Forwards Ok Association of Electric Cooperatives 810122 Ltr Re Streamlining of Nuclear Plant Licensing & Development of Nuclear Power.Doe 810302 Response Encl ML20126E6991981-02-10010 February 1981 Opposes Facility ML20002D3261980-12-10010 December 1980 FOIA Request for Extracts of 27 safety-related Issues Identified by GE in Reed Rept ML19345C2711980-10-29029 October 1980 Requests Info Re Facilities W/Active CPs Pending,License Definitions & Requirements for Floating Nuclear Plants ML19340B8331980-10-21021 October 1980 Petitions Govt Representatives to Promote Use of Solar & wind-powered Energy & Phase Out Operation of Nuclear Plants as Quickly as Possible ML19343A9241980-10-21021 October 1980 Petition Urging Support for Wide Use of Solar & Wind Power, & Phasing Out of Nuclear Power Plants,Especially Black Fox, as Soon as Possible ML19347B5701980-10-10010 October 1980 Demands,On Behalf of Ge,That NRC Return GE Reed Rept Immediately Due to NRC Denial of Request That Rept Be Withheld from Disclosure Under 10CFR2.790.Rept Must Not Be Placed in PDR ML19318B9751980-06-20020 June 1980 Advises That List of Matls to Be Used in Const of Fire Stops & Characteristics Re Flammability & Fire Retardancy Will Be Provided 1 Yr Subsequent to Receipt of CP ML19326D6371980-05-0505 May 1980 Opposes Const of Facilities Until Adequate Emergency Response Plan Can Be Developed.Recommends Responsibility for Emergency Response Plan Be Placed W/Independent Consulting Svc,Not State of Ok ML20126D3201980-04-0404 April 1980 Forwards Corp Commission of State of Ok 800403 Order Denying Request for Approval to Sell Bonds.Psc of Ok Presently Reviewing Order W/View of Filing Appeal W/Ok Supreme Court ML19309G5071980-04-0202 April 1980 Notifies That Representative of Intervenor State of Ok Will Attend NRC 800403 Meeting W/Cp Owners Group.Deplores Fact That Meeting Is First Interaction Between NRC & Applicants Re Development of Generic Policy ML20126D4031980-03-26026 March 1980 Forwards D Plant Expressing Concern Re Possible Meltdown at Facilities.Requests Response ML19309H4781980-03-26026 March 1980 Requests Response to Encl D&D Plant Request That Environ & Site Suitability Hearings in Licensing Proceeding Be Reopened to Address Class 9 Accidents ML18082A1641980-03-24024 March 1980 Forwards Licensee Supplemental Brief Re Motion for Directed Certification & for Stay.Pendency of Class 9 Issue Before Commission Noted in Licensee Motion for Directed Certification & for Stay.Discussed on Pages 7-10 ML19344D6921980-03-18018 March 1980 Submits Addl Info in Support of 800206 Request for Extension to Review ALAB-573 Class 9 Accident Issue.Lack of NRC Opposition to Ok Request & Recent Proliferation of Info Support Extension ML19309B5141980-03-15015 March 1980 Suggests Hearings on Const of Reactor Did Not Address Meltdown Issues.Tulsa Should Not Be Made Site for Potential Nuclear Mistake.Utils Should Build Plants Away from Populated Areas.Requests Reopening of Hearings ML19309B5241980-03-15015 March 1980 Requests That NRC Hold Meetings in Tulsa,Ok Re Emergency Evacuation Zone Around Nuclear Plants.Plans Should Be More Thorough to Protect People If Meltdown Should Occur ML20126C6161980-03-15015 March 1980 Expresses Concern Re NRC Refusal to Address Meltdown Issue at Hearings.Class 9 Accident Is Distinct Possibility & Should Be Thoroughly Examined.Environ & Site Suitablity Hearings Should Be Reopened ML20126C5581980-03-15015 March 1980 Suggests Local self-reliant,self-sufficient Communities Are Solution to Present Problems.Opposes All Forms of Nuclear Power.Min Amount of Energy from Coal & Gas Should Be Needed for Mfg Useful Tools,Bicycles & Efficient Tractors ML19312D4881980-02-29029 February 1980 Requests Reopening of Environ & Site Suitability Hearings for Facilities to Explore Issue of Meltdown ML20126C0301980-02-29029 February 1980 Urges Meetings in Tulsa,Ok Re Emergency Evacuation Area Around Facility.Current Plans Are Inadequate 1992-03-13
[Table view] Category:STATE/LOCAL GOVERNMENT TO NRC
MONTHYEARML19309G5071980-04-0202 April 1980 Notifies That Representative of Intervenor State of Ok Will Attend NRC 800403 Meeting W/Cp Owners Group.Deplores Fact That Meeting Is First Interaction Between NRC & Applicants Re Development of Generic Policy ML19344D6921980-03-18018 March 1980 Submits Addl Info in Support of 800206 Request for Extension to Review ALAB-573 Class 9 Accident Issue.Lack of NRC Opposition to Ok Request & Recent Proliferation of Info Support Extension ML19250B7811979-09-20020 September 1979 Forwards Response as Interested State to Applicants' Motion for Commission Action ML19209B0801979-08-27027 August 1979 Forwards Intervenor State of Ok 790827 Response to Util Request for Hearing & Motion to Establish Hearing Schedule ML19254B3031979-08-10010 August 1979 Notifies That All Parties to Proceeding Agree That Record Should Be Reopened to Consider Issues Raised by TMI Incident.Increased Costs Due to Delay in Const Must Be Balanced Against Cost of Retrofitting ML19208D6761979-06-20020 June 1979 Forwards Sections of Ok Ofc Civil Defense Plan for Plan Radiological Emergencies ML19289F1761979-04-20020 April 1979 Forwards Application & Complaint as Attachment to Motion of State of Ok for Indefinite Stay in Issuance of Initial Decision ML19282A3321979-04-19019 April 1979 Advises That Motion Has Been Filed to Stay Issuance of Initial Decision ML19273B2601979-02-26026 February 1979 Notes That Oklahoma Corp Commission Has Directed That Util Expense for Plant Be Borne by Stockholders.Util Has No Authority for Predicting 15% Rate of Return on Equity 1980-04-02
[Table view] |
Text
'd# /g' ' , -, g
/
i2f Qih3 b'G l* *\
- f. g/}
ATTORNEY GENERAL t' ^ ??3 p K.,# ;ss f' STATE OF OELAHO)1 A { ., j j((
STATE CAPITOL. cKL AHCht A CITY, oKL AH OM A 731C 5 f- -
April 20, 1979 e, . . _ _ .
~
NRCp q *IW~
Office of the Secretary 7 ROOM U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Attention: Chief, Docketing and Service Section Re: Application of Public Service Co., et al., Docket Nos. STN 50-556 and STN 50-557
Dear Mr. Secretary:
Please accept for filing the attachment to MOTION OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA FOR AN INDEFINATE STAY IN THE ISSUANCE OF AN INITIAL DECISION that through ine.dvertance was not attached to the aforesaid document when it was mailed. We sincerely regret any inconvenience this has caused to your staff.
Sincerely,
(. -
CHARLES S. ROGERS Assistant Attorney General One of the Attorneys for the State of Oklahoma CSR:dd cc: Hon. Sheldon Wolfe, Esq., Chairman, ASLB Hon. Frederick J. Shon, Member, ASLB Hon. Paul W. Purdon, Member ASLB All persons on Service List attached on the enclosed document.
2236 164 7 906 040$77 -
BEFORE THE CORPORATION CCMMLSHOACF OKLAHCMA g -s Q
N c\%
APPLICATION AND COMPLAINT OF THE h ed
N STATE OF OKLAHOMA, EX REL. JAN )
ERIC CARTWRIGHT ATTORNEY GENEPA1 Q) ,3 Glg ,y L AN INVESTIGATION, REVIEW AND /
H/
EXAMINATION OF THE PRACTICES, 6j j )) p V , , , -Cause ,No. 2 65 5,~,
RULES, REGULATIONS , PRESENT AND FUTURE CONSTRUCTION PROPOSALS AND
() e, ./
PROJECTS AND THE EFFECT THEREOF s- \
a . '-
ON THE RATEPAYERS OF THE PUBLIC ) , ,
SERVICE COMPANY OF OKLAHOMA ) _.
APPLICATION AND COMPLAINT _'~"
~ ..., ,
COMES NOW the State of Oklahoma, by and through its Attorney General Jan Eric Cartwright, and states:
- 1. Parties: Applicant is the State of Oklahoma, represented by Attorney General Jan Eric Cartwright, 112 State Capitol Building, Oklahema City, Oklahoma 73105, (405) 521-3921 and also represented by his assistants Charles S. Rogers and Richard F. Berger. The State of Oklahoma is interested on its cwn behalf, and on the behalf of its citizens who are also ratepayers of Public Service Company of Oklahoma (PSO) concerning the practices, rates, rules, regulations, present and future construction propossls and prajects of PSO and the probable effect thereof on ratepayers of PSO.
Respondent as to Section C. is Public Service Company of Oklahoma, an Oklahoma Corporation, located at 212 East 6th Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119.
- 2. Allegations of Fact:
A.
PSO proposes to construct a nuclear-powered electric generation facility located 23 miles east of Tulsa, Oklahoma, near Inola, Oklahoma in Rogers County. This facility, known as Black Fox Station, Units 1 and 2, will embody two boiling water reactors rated at 1150 MWe and is scheduled, subject to Atomic Safety Licensing Board (ASLB) approval of Construction and Operating permits, for operation as to the first unit in 1984 and the second in 1986. The facility is to be a joint project of PSO, Western Farmers Electrical Cooperative and Associated Electric Ccoperative, Inc. It is contemplated that PSO will operate the plant and will receive 60.870% of the output. Associated and Western Farmers will 65 c, a r ,
receive 21.739% and 17.391% respectively of the plant output.
Right to receive output from the plant is apportioned according to each company's agreel contribution to the cost of building Black Fox Station and is further affected by each company's participation in the cost of fueling each reactor.
As of June, 1977, the most recent estimate by PSO, et al, of the total cost of Black Fox Station was $2.042 billion. More recently, the Rural Electrification Administration (REA) estimated the facility would require S2.9 billion to complete. PSO's 1978 Annual Report states at page 14:
Due to longer delays than anticipated in the li:ensing process, a =ajor re-analysis of the scheduled completien dates and cost estimates must be performed. The conclusion of the hearings on March 1, 1979, set the basis for the review. The results of this re-analysis, which will resuTt in a signiticantly increased cost estimate will be available during the second quarter of 1979. (Erphasis added]
See also page 31 of Annual Report 1978.
As of December 31, 1978 approximately S53 million attributable to Black Fox Station had accumulated in PSO's Construction Work in Progress (CWIP) account, said figure including approximately S4 million of Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC).
In PSO's attempt to prove to the ASLB and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that they had reasonable assurance of obtaining funds necessary to design and construct Black Fox Station they presented financing projections premised upon a Capital Structure of 50% Deb t, 40% Ccmmon Equity and 10% Preferred Stock and a Rate of Return on Ccmmon Equity of 15%. All of PSO's Common Stock is owned by Central and South West Corporation.
The Company states that it intends to spend S242 million, including AFUDC for construction during 1979. 5100 million is to be raised through sale of first mortgage bonds. See, Annual Report 1978, p. 12. The Report is unclear as to the extent the monies referenced above are required for work on Black Fox Station.
The State of Oklahoma is interested in determing to the maximum extent possible, the expected cost of Black Fox Station.
The State is interested in determining whether the Company continues to consider the optimum financing structure 50% debt, 40% common y no .
2236 166
equity and 10% preferred stock. The State is interested in exploring what effect the recent "Three Mile Island" accident has had, and is expected to have, on the willingness of lenders to loan large sums of money for constructing nuclear power plants and precisely what assurances such lenders will require concerning repayment. The State is also interested whether a 154 rate of return on common equity is required to induce PSO's parent, Central and South West Corporation, to contribute the 40% of the cost of PSO's share of Black Fox.
The recent nuclear accident at Three Mile Island Generating Plant located near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania raises many serious issues of interest to the ratepayers of PSO which go beyond the primary and critical issues relative to the operational safety of nuclear powered generating plants. Recent reports state that the Three Mile Island Plant will be out of service for at least two years in order to repair and decontaminate the $1.5 billion facility.
These costs are expected to be flowed through to the ratepayers of Metropolitan Edison. Legal experts reportedly predict numerous lawsuits for damages by reason of the accident.
The State of Oklahoma is interested in learning what plans PSO, et al, have made for financing repair and decontamination of Black Fox Station and environs should an accident occur at the Station which results in major damage to the reactor and/or release of radioactive contamination. Specifically, the State is interested if PSO intends to directly rely upon the ratepayers of the Company to finance such repair and decontamination through surcharge of rates.
The Three Mile Island Generating Plant was reportedly insured by American Nuclear Insurers, (ANI) a pool of about 140 companies.
ANI has reportedly to-date issued S140 million in liability insurance for the Three Mile Island plant. The policy reportedly provides that if damages exceed $140 million, up to $340 million would be available by assessing other nuclear plants throughout the country
$5 million per reactor. The State of Oklahoma is interested in learning what, if any, insurance coverage PSO, et al, has acquired to cover damages caused by a nuclear accident at Black F0x Station.
C r Cri !
The State seeks to learn if PSO is indirectly liable for damage-claims arising from accidents in plants located in some other part of the nation. The State specifically is interested if the accident at Three Mile Island Plant presently makes PSO indirectly liable for damages caused by the recent accident.
Nuclear powered generating facilities are operated under stringent safeguards imposed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
A recent example of federal attention to the safety of operating commercial reactors is the recent shut-down of five eastern plants because of a flaw in the computer program used to calculate the plant's capacity to withstand trauma caused by earthquake, despite the fact that each of the plants shut down were in areas of minimal activity. The State is interested in PSO's evaluational process which led to the Company decision to build Black Fox Station. Were alternative energy sources considered? If so, why were they eliminated?
Did the Company prepare a formal, critical report which weighed these considerations or did the company entirely rely upon representa-tions made by vendors of the nuclear plant? In light of the large economic loss in investment due to the accident at Three Mile Island, has the company re-evaluated its position concerning the risks assumed through operating a nuclear powered generating facility.
The State is interested in learning factors which comprise the foundation for the company's decision in this regard.
B.
The State is interested in exploring present, future and forseeable construction projects of PSo relating to generation as well as ascertain the current and projected generation requirements of the Company in order to determine if the proposed construction of facilities is necessary to meet the needs of Oklahoma ratepayers.
The scope of the State's inquiry will include but not be limited to the following factors:
- 1. Af ter June 1, 1981, Ps0 will no longer be expected to provide unlimited capacity requirements to Grand River Dam Authority (GRDA) and forecasts its capacity sales to GRDA will cease after 1982:
- 2. The continuous yearly "off system" sales to other utilities; ae, ,
+ 2236 168
\ai
- 3. Current growth rates and existing excess capacity when projected to 1984 and 1986 (dates Black Fox Station goes "on line")
apparently will create further excess capacity as said project contemplates addition of two (2) boiling water reactors with a generation capability of 1,150 Mwe each
- 4. PSO has reportedly formulated plans to construct and place "on line" a total of four (4) additional nuclear generating plants, in addition to Black Fox Station, such capacity apparently greatly in excess of Oklahoma requirements, and;
- 5. Explore the extent of present and future construction intended to supply interstate markets through interconnection with other utility companies.
Excess capacity will result in serious economic impact on Oklahoma ratepayers and benefits will inure to the stockholders of PSO, a wholly owned subsidiary of Central and South West Corporation, not the ratepayers that make such construction possible.
C.
Net income for PSO increased by fifty-one perce t (51%) in 1978, as result of "off system" sales to electrical utilities, and record electric use by residential customers due to an extremely hot, dry su=cer and an unusually bitter, cold winter. The State of Oklahoma and thousands of other ratepayers and consumers have received no apparent benefit of "off system" sales, and PSO has reaped excessive profits at ratepayer expense due to want of proper weather normalization for rate-making purposes.
PSO engages in transfer of electrical power, " wheeling." for other public utility companies for compensation, and such profits are not passed on to the ratepayers of said Company.
- 3. Legal Authority: The Attorney General is authorized to bring this action by virtue of and pursuart tG 74 0.S. Supp. 1978 5 18b(c) upon written request by the HonF M. ' George !!igh, Governor of Oklahoma and also House Resolut ; 'p.. See also, Derryberry
- v. Kerr-McGee, 516 P. 2d 813 (Okl. 973' Le State v. District Court of Mayes County, 440 P. 2d 700 (Okl. 19671, The commission
(. has jurisdiction in the instant matter by virtue of Okla. Const.
art. 9, S 18-34 and 17 0.S. 1971 5 151.
.,a ;
,. s
4- Relief P.equested: The State respectfully requests the Commission to order hearings be held on a date certain and after proper hearings make findings of fact on the following matters:
A. What the projected cost will be for Black Fox Station.
B. Whether PSO can adequately finance its interest in Black Fox Station, taking into consideration inter alia, the ef fect of the recent accident at Tnree Mile Island on sale of bonds by the utility to fund said project.
C. What insurance coverage PSO has acquired to cover liability for damages flowing from an accident at Black Fox Station.
D. What contingency plans PSO has for financing repair and decontamination of Black Fox Station and environs resulting from the occurrence of an accident at the station.
E. Whether PSO currently is indirectly liable for damages flowing from the recent accident in Pennsylvania or if the Company is in any way liable by way of contract for monies necessary to cover liability for damage caused by a plant other than the one it proposes to operate.
F. Whether PSO reasonably concluded that its election to build a nuclear powered generating station rather than conventionally-fired plants, would ultimately benefit its ratepayers through lower costs over the lifetime of the plant, taking into consideration the risk of severe financial loss in the event of a nuclear accident at the plant, future regulatory action, and reliability of service of nuclear power plants.
G. Whether PSO's construction prcgram will result in burdensome excess capacity within its system.
H. That PSO's increased income due to off-system sales and improper weather normalization adjustment resulted in a ratepayer overcharge.
I. That profits from wheeling of electrical power resulted in windfall profits that have not been properly included in the company's rate structure, thereby resulting in overcharge to the ratepayer.
J. Such other findings of fact dictated by the record.
The State further requests that proper orders be issued:
A. Consistent with the findings made relative to financing and operating Black Fox Station.
B. That PSO specifically be ordered to refund overcharges due to off-system sales, improper weather normalization, and wheeling.
?hI 3t ~
r-Respectfully su tted,
' ' ~'
[' s
~
- JAN ERIC CARTWRIGHT j ATTOR.rY GENERAL OF OKLAHOMA ES S. ROGERS f
ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL
<(, .- .l'."_
RICHARD F. BERGER ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL 112 State Capitol Building Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105 (405) 521-3921 ATTORNEYS FOR THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 12th day of April,1979, a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was mailed, postage prepaid, to: Mr. R. O. Newman, President, Public Service Company of Oklahoma, 212 East 6th Street, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119 and to Mr.
Lee Cook, General Counsel, Oklahoma Corporation Commission, Jim Thorpe Building, Oklahoma City, O_k oma 73105.
LW
/
HARLES S. ROGERS 2236 171 4
s., .
CSR:glw