|
|
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
Line 2: |
Line 2: |
| | number = ML061640031 | | | number = ML061640031 |
| | issue date = 05/30/2006 | | | issue date = 05/30/2006 |
| | title = 2006/05/30-Letter from Diane Curran Submitting the Originals of Several Documents for Which Copies of Faxed Signature Pages Were Filed on May 26, 2006 in Connection with the Massachusetts Attorney General'S Hearing Request and Backfit Petit | | | title = Letter from Diane Curran Submitting the Originals of Several Documents for Which Copies of Faxed Signature Pages Were Filed on May 26, 2006 in Connection with the Massachusetts Attorney General'S Hearing Request and Backfit Petition |
| | author name = Curran D | | | author name = Curran D |
| | author affiliation = Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, LLP | | | author affiliation = Harmon, Curran, Spielberg & Eisenberg, LLP |
Line 46: |
Line 46: |
| expressed herein are based on my b professional judgment. | | expressed herein are based on my b professional judgment. |
| Executed on 25 May 2006. | | Executed on 25 May 2006. |
| _ _
| |
|
| |
|
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of) | | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of) |
Latest revision as of 03:52, 14 March 2020
|
---|
Category:Legal-Intervention Petition
MONTHYEARML11346A3012011-06-27027 June 2011 Declaration of Joseph R. Lynch, Lori Ann Potts, and Dr. Kevin R. O'Kula in Support of Entergy'S Answer Opposing Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Regarding Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post-Fukushima ML1107503812011-03-10010 March 2011 Entergy'S Response to New England Coalition'S Motion for Stay and Request for Further Opportunity for Hearings ML1102503532011-01-0101 January 2011 Pilgrim Watch Reply to Entergy'S Request to Change the Hearing Date ML1100401252010-12-27027 December 2010 Entergy Answer Opposing Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention ML1036300302010-12-23023 December 2010 Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to New England Coalition'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-19 ML1033403292010-11-22022 November 2010 Entergy'S Answer Opposing New England Coalition'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-19 ML1033403262010-11-22022 November 2010 Pilgrim Watch Reply to Order (October 26, 2010) - Questions from Board Majority Regarding the Mechanics of Computing Mean Consequences ML1030810622010-11-0303 November 2010 Response to Pilgrim Watch October 27 Letter Regarding Pilgrim Watch 6th and 7th Supplemental Disclosures ML1028711332010-10-0808 October 2010 Pilgrim Watch Reply to Entergy'S & NRC Staff'S Briefs Regarding Timeliness of Pilgrim Watch'S Raising Averaging Practice Concerns ML1028002492010-09-30030 September 2010 New England Coalition'S Answer & Opposition to Entergy'S Motion to Strike Declaration of Paul Blanch ML1027203992010-09-21021 September 2010 Entergy'S Response to Pilgrim Watch'S Memo Re Proposed Schedule ML1027307882010-09-21021 September 2010 Pilgrim Watch'S Reply to Entergy'S Response to Pilgrim Watch'S Memo Regarding Proposed Schedule ML1027307892010-09-21021 September 2010 Memo Regarding Proposed Schedule ML1027204022010-09-20020 September 2010 New England Coalition'S Reply to NRC Staff and Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee Opposition to New England Coalition'S Motion to Reopen the Hearing & Reply to NRC Staff'S Answer to Proposed New Contention ML1026003772010-09-14014 September 2010 Entergy'S Answer Opposing New England Coalition'S Motion to Reopen ML1021104482010-07-25025 July 2010 Pilgrim Watch Notice to Commission Regarding New and Significant Information Pertaining to Pilgrim Watch'S Petition for Review of LBP-06-848 ML1020900242010-07-19019 July 2010 Pilgrim Watch 2.206 Petition Regarding Inadequacy of Entergy'S Management of Non-Environmentally Qualified Inaccessible Cables & Wiring at Pilgrim Station ML1018000932010-06-28028 June 2010 NRC Staff'S Opposition to Pilgrim Watch'S Motion Requesting Leave to File Response to Judge Paul B. Abramson Decision on Recusal Motion (June 10, 2010) ML1018004862010-06-23023 June 2010 Entergy'S Opposition to Pilgrim Watch'S Motion Requesting Leave to File Response to Judge Abramson'S Decision on Recusal Motion ML1017301832010-06-16016 June 2010 Pilgrim Watch Response to Judge Paul B. Abramson Decision on Recusal Motion ML1014605742010-05-21021 May 2010 Entergy'S Opposition to Pilgrim Watch Motion to Disqualify Judge Abramson ML1014402032010-05-17017 May 2010 Entergy'S Reply to Pilgrim Watch'S Response to Aslb'S May 5, 2010 Order ML1014503232010-05-17017 May 2010 Pilgrim Watch'S Reply to NRC Staff'S Initial Brief to the Board'S Order (Regarding Deadlines for Submission of Parties) ML1015404212010-05-17017 May 2010 Pilgrim Watch'S Reply to Entergy'S Submission on Scope and Schedule for Remanded Hearing ML1014107432010-05-12012 May 2010 Entergy'S Submission on Scope and Schedule for Remanded Hearing ML1014107452010-05-12012 May 2010 Pilgrim Watch Response to Aslb'S May 5, 2010 Order ML1010504322010-04-15015 April 2010 NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to Pilgrim Watch'S Motion for Reconsideration of CLI-10-11 ML1010408202010-04-0808 April 2010 Entergy'S Opposition to Pilgrim Watch'S Motion for Reconsideration of CLI-10-11 ML1010408192010-04-0707 April 2010 Entergy'S Opposition to Pilgrim Watch'S Motion to Reschedule Telephone Conference ML1010408212010-04-0707 April 2010 Entergy'S Opposition to Town of Plymouth'S Motion to Reschedule Telephone Conference ML1007403702010-03-12012 March 2010 Entergy'S Response in Opposition to New England Coalition'S Stay Request ML1004808082010-02-0202 February 2010 Pilgrim Watch'S Reply to NRC Staff'S Response to Pilgrim Watch Notice to Commission Regarding New & Significant Information Pertaining to Pilgrim Watch'S Petition for Review of LBP-06-848 ML0922400652009-08-0303 August 2009 Entergy'S Response in Opposition to New England Coalition'S Petition for Review of LBP-09-09 ML0921202202009-07-23023 July 2009 New England Coalition'S Petition for Review of the Licensing Board'S Full Initial Decision, LBP-09-09 ML0916702632009-06-0808 June 2009 New England Coalition'S Opposition to Entergy'S Motion to Strike New England Coalition'S Reply to NRC Staff and Entergy Oppositions to Nec'S Motion to File a Timely New Contention ML0915404042009-05-26026 May 2009 Nec'S Reply to NRC Staff and Entergy Oppositions to Nec'S Motion to File a Timely New Contention ML0914203732009-05-18018 May 2009 Entergy'S Opposition to Nec'S Motion to File a Timely New Contention ML0913400192009-05-0707 May 2009 New England Coalition'S Reply to Nrc'S Staff and Entergy Answers to New England Coalition'S Motion to Hold in Abeyance Action on It'S Proposed Contention Until Issuance of NRC Staff Supplemental Safety Evaluation Report ML0912708592009-05-0101 May 2009 Entergy'S Opposition to New England Coalition'S Motion to Hold Action on Proposed Contention in Abeyance Until Issuance of NRC Staff Supplemental Safety Evaluation Report ML0908404222009-03-10010 March 2009 Final Calculations of Record for the Confirmatory Environmentally Assisted Fatigue (Cufen) Analyses on the Reactor Pressure Vessel Core Spray (CS) and Recirculation Outlet (RO) Nozzles at Vermont Yankee ML0912101052009-03-0909 March 2009 New England Coalition'S Petition for Leave Reply to Entergy Responses to New England Coalition'S Motion to Alter or Amend the Schedule in the Above Captioned Proceeding ML0907711422009-03-0909 March 2009 Entergy'S Opposition to New England Coalition'S Motion to Alter or Amend the Schedule ML0901400782009-01-0707 January 2009 Entergy'S Opposition to New England Coalition'S Motion for Reconsideration of the Licensing Board'S Partial Initial Decision ML0901400792008-12-29029 December 2008 Entergy'S Answer Opposing Motion by New York Et Al. for Leave to Submit Brief Amici Curiae ML0836600342008-12-19019 December 2008 Vermont Department of Public Service Opposition to Petition for Review of Partial Initial Decision LBP-08-25 ML0901602092008-12-19019 December 2008 New England Coalition'S Response to NRC Staff'S Petition for Review of the Licensing Board'S Partial Initial Decision, LBP-08-25 ML0900606092008-12-19019 December 2008 Entergy'S Answer in Support of NRC Staff'S Petition for Review of the Licensing Board'S Partial Initial Decision ML0836401982008-12-11011 December 2008 Entergy'S Answer to Commonwealth of Massachusetts Petition for Review of LBP-08-25 and Request for Consolidated Ruling ML0835205232008-12-10010 December 2008 Entergy'S Response in Opposition to New England Coalition'S Motion to Extend Time to File Petition for Review ML0835100872008-12-0404 December 2008 Entergy'S Opposition to New England Coalition'S Motion to Extend Time to File Motion for Reconsideration 2011-06-27
[Table view] Category:Responses and Contentions
MONTHYEARML11346A3012011-06-27027 June 2011 Declaration of Joseph R. Lynch, Lori Ann Potts, and Dr. Kevin R. O'Kula in Support of Entergy'S Answer Opposing Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention Regarding Inadequacy of Environmental Report, Post-Fukushima ML1107503812011-03-10010 March 2011 Entergy'S Response to New England Coalition'S Motion for Stay and Request for Further Opportunity for Hearings ML1102503532011-01-0101 January 2011 Pilgrim Watch Reply to Entergy'S Request to Change the Hearing Date ML1100401252010-12-27027 December 2010 Entergy Answer Opposing Pilgrim Watch Request for Hearing on a New Contention ML1036300302010-12-23023 December 2010 Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to New England Coalition'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-19 ML1033403292010-11-22022 November 2010 Entergy'S Answer Opposing New England Coalition'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-19 ML1033403262010-11-22022 November 2010 Pilgrim Watch Reply to Order (October 26, 2010) - Questions from Board Majority Regarding the Mechanics of Computing Mean Consequences ML1030810622010-11-0303 November 2010 Response to Pilgrim Watch October 27 Letter Regarding Pilgrim Watch 6th and 7th Supplemental Disclosures ML1028711332010-10-0808 October 2010 Pilgrim Watch Reply to Entergy'S & NRC Staff'S Briefs Regarding Timeliness of Pilgrim Watch'S Raising Averaging Practice Concerns ML1028002492010-09-30030 September 2010 New England Coalition'S Answer & Opposition to Entergy'S Motion to Strike Declaration of Paul Blanch ML1027203992010-09-21021 September 2010 Entergy'S Response to Pilgrim Watch'S Memo Re Proposed Schedule ML1027307882010-09-21021 September 2010 Pilgrim Watch'S Reply to Entergy'S Response to Pilgrim Watch'S Memo Regarding Proposed Schedule ML1027307892010-09-21021 September 2010 Memo Regarding Proposed Schedule ML1027204022010-09-20020 September 2010 New England Coalition'S Reply to NRC Staff and Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee Opposition to New England Coalition'S Motion to Reopen the Hearing & Reply to NRC Staff'S Answer to Proposed New Contention ML1026003772010-09-14014 September 2010 Entergy'S Answer Opposing New England Coalition'S Motion to Reopen ML1021104482010-07-25025 July 2010 Pilgrim Watch Notice to Commission Regarding New and Significant Information Pertaining to Pilgrim Watch'S Petition for Review of LBP-06-848 ML1020900242010-07-19019 July 2010 Pilgrim Watch 2.206 Petition Regarding Inadequacy of Entergy'S Management of Non-Environmentally Qualified Inaccessible Cables & Wiring at Pilgrim Station ML1018000932010-06-28028 June 2010 NRC Staff'S Opposition to Pilgrim Watch'S Motion Requesting Leave to File Response to Judge Paul B. Abramson Decision on Recusal Motion (June 10, 2010) ML1018004862010-06-23023 June 2010 Entergy'S Opposition to Pilgrim Watch'S Motion Requesting Leave to File Response to Judge Abramson'S Decision on Recusal Motion ML1017301832010-06-16016 June 2010 Pilgrim Watch Response to Judge Paul B. Abramson Decision on Recusal Motion ML1014605742010-05-21021 May 2010 Entergy'S Opposition to Pilgrim Watch Motion to Disqualify Judge Abramson ML1014402032010-05-17017 May 2010 Entergy'S Reply to Pilgrim Watch'S Response to Aslb'S May 5, 2010 Order ML1014503232010-05-17017 May 2010 Pilgrim Watch'S Reply to NRC Staff'S Initial Brief to the Board'S Order (Regarding Deadlines for Submission of Parties) ML1015404212010-05-17017 May 2010 Pilgrim Watch'S Reply to Entergy'S Submission on Scope and Schedule for Remanded Hearing ML1014107432010-05-12012 May 2010 Entergy'S Submission on Scope and Schedule for Remanded Hearing ML1014107452010-05-12012 May 2010 Pilgrim Watch Response to Aslb'S May 5, 2010 Order ML1010504322010-04-15015 April 2010 NRC Staff'S Response in Opposition to Pilgrim Watch'S Motion for Reconsideration of CLI-10-11 ML1010408202010-04-0808 April 2010 Entergy'S Opposition to Pilgrim Watch'S Motion for Reconsideration of CLI-10-11 ML1010408192010-04-0707 April 2010 Entergy'S Opposition to Pilgrim Watch'S Motion to Reschedule Telephone Conference ML1010408212010-04-0707 April 2010 Entergy'S Opposition to Town of Plymouth'S Motion to Reschedule Telephone Conference ML1007403702010-03-12012 March 2010 Entergy'S Response in Opposition to New England Coalition'S Stay Request ML1004808082010-02-0202 February 2010 Pilgrim Watch'S Reply to NRC Staff'S Response to Pilgrim Watch Notice to Commission Regarding New & Significant Information Pertaining to Pilgrim Watch'S Petition for Review of LBP-06-848 ML0922400652009-08-0303 August 2009 Entergy'S Response in Opposition to New England Coalition'S Petition for Review of LBP-09-09 ML0921202202009-07-23023 July 2009 New England Coalition'S Petition for Review of the Licensing Board'S Full Initial Decision, LBP-09-09 ML0916702632009-06-0808 June 2009 New England Coalition'S Opposition to Entergy'S Motion to Strike New England Coalition'S Reply to NRC Staff and Entergy Oppositions to Nec'S Motion to File a Timely New Contention ML0915404042009-05-26026 May 2009 Nec'S Reply to NRC Staff and Entergy Oppositions to Nec'S Motion to File a Timely New Contention ML0914203732009-05-18018 May 2009 Entergy'S Opposition to Nec'S Motion to File a Timely New Contention ML0913400192009-05-0707 May 2009 New England Coalition'S Reply to Nrc'S Staff and Entergy Answers to New England Coalition'S Motion to Hold in Abeyance Action on It'S Proposed Contention Until Issuance of NRC Staff Supplemental Safety Evaluation Report ML0912708592009-05-0101 May 2009 Entergy'S Opposition to New England Coalition'S Motion to Hold Action on Proposed Contention in Abeyance Until Issuance of NRC Staff Supplemental Safety Evaluation Report ML0908404222009-03-10010 March 2009 Final Calculations of Record for the Confirmatory Environmentally Assisted Fatigue (Cufen) Analyses on the Reactor Pressure Vessel Core Spray (CS) and Recirculation Outlet (RO) Nozzles at Vermont Yankee ML0912101052009-03-0909 March 2009 New England Coalition'S Petition for Leave Reply to Entergy Responses to New England Coalition'S Motion to Alter or Amend the Schedule in the Above Captioned Proceeding ML0907711422009-03-0909 March 2009 Entergy'S Opposition to New England Coalition'S Motion to Alter or Amend the Schedule ML0901400782009-01-0707 January 2009 Entergy'S Opposition to New England Coalition'S Motion for Reconsideration of the Licensing Board'S Partial Initial Decision ML0901400792008-12-29029 December 2008 Entergy'S Answer Opposing Motion by New York Et Al. for Leave to Submit Brief Amici Curiae ML0836600342008-12-19019 December 2008 Vermont Department of Public Service Opposition to Petition for Review of Partial Initial Decision LBP-08-25 ML0901602092008-12-19019 December 2008 New England Coalition'S Response to NRC Staff'S Petition for Review of the Licensing Board'S Partial Initial Decision, LBP-08-25 ML0900606092008-12-19019 December 2008 Entergy'S Answer in Support of NRC Staff'S Petition for Review of the Licensing Board'S Partial Initial Decision ML0836401982008-12-11011 December 2008 Entergy'S Answer to Commonwealth of Massachusetts Petition for Review of LBP-08-25 and Request for Consolidated Ruling ML0835205232008-12-10010 December 2008 Entergy'S Response in Opposition to New England Coalition'S Motion to Extend Time to File Petition for Review ML0835100872008-12-0404 December 2008 Entergy'S Opposition to New England Coalition'S Motion to Extend Time to File Motion for Reconsideration 2011-06-27
[Table view] |
Text
HARMON, CURRAN, SPIELBERG:ý EISENBERG, LLP 1726 M Street, NW, Suite 600 Washington. DC 20036 328-3500 (1.202) (202) 328-6918 fax DOCKETED May 30, 2006 USNRC May 30, 2006 (3:30pmn)
BY FEDERAL EXPRESS Office of the Secretary OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ADJUDICATIONS STAFF 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852 301-415-1966
SUBJECT:
Filing of originaldocuments in Pilgrim and Vermiont Yankee License Renewval Proceedings
Dear Madam/Sir:
On behalf of the Massachusetts Attorney General, I am submitting the originals of several documents for which I filed copies of faxed signature pages on May 26, 2006 in connection with the Massachusetts Attorney General's hearing request and backfit petition in the Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee license renewal cases. They consist of declarations by Dr. Jan Beyea (Exhibit 2 to Pilgrim and Vermont Yankee hearing requests) and notices of appearance for Matthew Brock.
Sincerely, Thn~e urr'an Cc w/o enclosures: Susan L. Uttal, NRC OGC David R. Lewis, counsel for Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
Terence A. Burke, counsel for Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.
--re0,tojd-,e '::ý50cy -.031
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of)
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. ) Docket No. 50-271 (Vermont Yankee)
Nuclear Power Station))
DECLARATION OF DR. JAN BEYEA IN SUPPORT OF MASSACHUSETTS ATTORNEY GENERAL'S CONTENTION AND PETITION FOR BACKFIT ORDER 1, Jan, Beyea, declare as follows:
- 1. 1 am senior scientist at Consulting in the Public Interest, providing scientific assistance to not-for-profits, universities, government, and injured plaintiffs.
- 2. In support of the Massachusetts Attorney General's request for hearing, petition to intervene and backfit petition respect to the license renewal proceeding for the Vermont Yankee nuclear power plant, I have prepared a report entitled "report to the Massachusetts Attorney General on the Potential Consequences of a Spent-Fuel Pool Fire at the Pilgrim or Vermont Yankee Nuclear Plant (May 25, 2006). In preparing my report, I reviewed the environmental report, the 1972 EIS, the FSAR, and the NRC's 1996 generic relicensing EIS. In addition, I reviewed technical documents relating to risks of spent fuel storage at this facility, which are identified in my Report. One of those documents was the report of Gordon Thompson, Ph.D.
- 3. The technical factual statements in my report are true and correct to the best of mry knowledge, and the technical opinions expressed therein are based on my best professional judgment.
- 4. 1 am an expert regarding the consequences of both real and hypothetical nuclear accidents, as well as strategies for mitigation. I also have expertise in technical safety and environmental analysis related to nuclear facilities. My Curriculum Vitae is provided here as Attachment A.
2
- 6. After receiving my Ph.D. in nuclear physics from Columbia University, I taught environmental studies at Holy Cross College. Next, I did research at Princeton's Center For Energy and Environmental Studies modeling the consequences of nuclear accidents.
I then spent 15 years at the National Audubon Society as Senior Policy Scientist, and ultimately as Chief Scientist and Vice President.
- 7. 1 am the author of over 100 articles and reports tha span a diverse range of topics. I am a regular peer reviewer of articles for scientific journals. One of my specialties is geographic exposure modeling of toxic releases. My reconstruction of exposures following the TMI accident has been used in radiation epidemiologic studies. My reconstructions of historical exposures to traffic pollution are being used in two ongoing epidemniologic studies of breast cancer. I am a co-author of studies on risks and consequences of spent-fuel-pool fires. I presented a briefing on this work to a committee of the National Research Council that was studying risks of spent fuel.
- 8. 1 am prepared to testify as an expert witness on behalf of the Massachusetts Attorney General with respect to the facts and opinions set forth in my Report.
I declare, under penalty of pedrjuy, that the foregoing facts provided in my Declaration are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and that the opinions (L
expressed herein are based on my b professional judgment.
Executed on 25 May 2006.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE COMMISSION In the Matter of)
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. )Docket No. 50-271 (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power )
Station))
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE BY MATTHEW BROCK Pursuant to 10 C.F.R. § 2.314(b), Matthew Brock hereby enters an appearance in this proceeding as duly authorized legal counsel for the Massachusetts Attorney General.
Undersigned counsel is a member in good standing of the bars of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of New Hampshire, State of Maine; United States District Courts for Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Maine; and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the D.C. and First Circuits.
Respectfully submitted, Matthew Brock Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Division One Ashburton Place, Rm. 1813 Boston, MA 02108-1 598 (617) 727-2200 matthexv.brock~ia2apo.state.ma.us May 26, 2006