ML100740370

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Entergys Response in Opposition to New England Coalitions Stay Request
ML100740370
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 03/12/2010
From: Doris Lewis
Entergy Nuclear Operations, Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLP
To:
NRC/OCM
SECY RAS
References
2.206, 50-271-LR, ASLBP 06-849-03-LR, LBP-09-09, RAS M-439
Download: ML100740370 (8)
v • d • e


Text

DOCKETED USNRC March 12, 2010 (2:15pm)

OFFICE OF SECRETARY RULEMAKINGS AND ADJUDICATIONS STAFF March 12, 2010 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Commission In the Matter of

))

Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC

)

Docket No. 50-271 -LR and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

)

ASLBP No. 06-849-03-LR

)

(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station)

)

ENTERGY'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO NEW ENGLAND COALITION'S STAY REOUEST Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

("Entergy") submit this response opposing the stay requested in this docket in New England Coalition's ("NEC") March 2, 2010 letter to the Commission ("Request"). NEC requests that the Commission "stay any further action" on NEC's Petition for Review of the Licensing Board's Full Initial Decision, LBP-09-09 (July 23, 2009) ("Appeal") in the Vermont Yankee license renewal proceeding until NEC's February 8, 2010 petition under 10 C.F.R. § 2.206 ("2.206 Petition") and the Commission's March 1, 2010 Demand For Information ("DFI") are resolved.

For the reasons discussed below, NEC's Request is not only procedurally deficient but also baseless. It should therefore be denied.

First, NEC has not met any of the procedural or substantive requirements for requesting a stay. This alone is sufficient grounds for denial.

Second, apart from its deficiencies in form and substance, NEC's Request is not warranted by any facts. The issues that NEC has raised before the Commission in its Appeal in this license renewal proceeding are limited to: (1) whether the Licensing Board treated NEC's

witness fairly in the hearing on Entergy's program for managing the effects of environmentally assisted fatigue on VY's critical reactor components, and (2) whether the Board erred in later rejecting a late-filed contention on the same topic. See Appeal at 12, 14. Neither the 2.206 Petition nor the DFI have anything to do with these issues on appeal.,

NEC's Request and 2.206 Petition do not refer to, or even mention, environmentally assisted fatigue of reactor components. The Request and the 2.206 Petition focus entirely on the

"[i]ncreasing concentrations of radio-contaminants in the soil and groundwater" that have been recently discovered at Vermont Yankee and whose causes are under investigation. See 2.206 Petition at 1. There is no relationship between possible releases of radionuclides to the soil and groundwater and the issues that NEC has raised before the Commission in its Appeal in this matter.

Similarly, there is no relationship between the DFI and the issues raised by NEC's Appeal. The DFI has nothing to do with whether the Licensing Board treated NEC's witness fairly or whether it was correct in later denying admission of an additional late-filed contention on the same topic.

Moreover, none of Entergy's witnesses in the hearing before the Licensing Board in this NRC license renewal proceeding are the subject of the DFI. Further, NEC received extensive document disclosure in the adjudicatory proceeding, including the engineering calculations and analyses demonstrating that environmentally-assisted fatigue will be adequately managed.

NEC's own expert had the opportunity to examine this documentation. NEC also had the opportunity to submit proposed questions for the Licensing Board to ask Entergy's witnesses, Indeed, it is improper for a 10 C.F.R. § 2.206 petition to raise any matter that could be addressed in an ongoing licensing proceeding, particularly one where the petitioner is already a party. NRC Management Directive 8.11, "Review Process for 10 C.F.R. 2.206 Petitions" (Oct. 25, 2000), Handbook 8.11 at 11. See, e.g., Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station), DD-05-2, 62 N.R.C. 389, 390 (2005).

2

and the Board conducted an extensive examination of the witnesses. In sum, NEC had ample opportunity to litigate its Contention and probe the evidence.

Finally, any further delay in the resolution of NEC's Appeal would be contrary to the longstanding Commission commitment to the expeditious completion of adjudicatory proceedings. See, e.g*, Statement of Policy on the Conduct of Adjudicatory Proceedings, CLI-98-12, 48 N.R.C. 18, 24 (1998). As the Commission stated, "applicants for a license are...

entitled to a prompt resolution of disputes concerning their applications." Id. at 19. Consistent with the Commission's Policy Statement, Entergy urges the Commission to complete its review and render a timely decision on the issues that have been raised in NEC's Appeal in this proceeding.

For all of these reasons, the Commission should deny NEC's Request for a stay of action on NEC's Appeal in the Vermont Yankee license renewal proceeding.

Respectfully submitted,

[original signed by David R. Lewis]

David R. Lewis Matias F. Travieso-Diaz Blake J. Nelson PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 2300 N Street, NW Washington, DC 20037-1128 Tel. (202) 663-8000 Counsel for Entergy Dated: March 12, 2010 3

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Before the Commission In the Matter of Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.

(Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station)

))

)

)

)

Docket No. 50-271-LR ASLBP No. 06-849-03-LR CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of "Entergy's Response In Opposition To New England Coalition's Stay Request" dated March 12, 2010, were served on the persons listed below by deposit in the U.S. Mail, first class, postage prepaid, and where indicated by an asterisk by electronic mail, this 12th day of March, 2010.

  • Office of Commission Appellate Adjudication Mail Stop 0-16 C I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 OCAAmail@nrc.gov
  • Hon. Gregory B. Jaczko Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 chairman@nrc.gov
  • Hon. Dale E. Kline Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 cmrklein@nrc.gov
  • Secretary Att'n: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff Mail Stop 0-16 C I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 hearingdocket@nrc.gov
  • Hon. Kristine L. Svinicki Commissioner U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 cmrsvinicki@nrc.gov Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001
  • Administrative Judge Alex S. Karlin, Esq., Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Alex.Karlin@nrc.gov
  • Administrative Judge William H. Reed 1819 Edgewood Lane Charlottesville, VA 22902 whrcville@embarqmail.com
  • Raymond Shadis New England Coalition Pro Se Representative Post Office Box. 98 Edgecomb, ME 04556 shadis@prexar.com
  • Anthony Z. Roisman, Esq.

National Legal Scholars Law Firm 84 East Thetford Road Lyme, NH 03768 aroisman@nationallegalscholars.com

  • Peter L. Roth, Esq.

Office of the New Hampshire Attorney General 33 Capitol Street Concord, NH 03301 Peter.roth@doj.nh.gov

  • Administrative Judge Dr. Richard E. Wardwell Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Mail Stop T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 Richard.Wardwell@nrc.gov
  • Lloyd Subin, Esq.
  • Susan L. Uttal, Esq.
  • Maxwell C. Smith, Esq.
  • Mary B. Spencer, Esq.

Office of the General Counsel Mail Stop O-15-D21 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 lloyd.subin@nrc.gov; susan.uttal@nrc.gov; maxwell.smith@nrc.gov; Mary.Baty@nrc.gov

  • Sarah Hofmann, Esq.

Director of Public Advocacy Department of Public Service 112 State Street - Drawer 20 Montpelier, VT 05620-2601 Sarah.hofmann@state.vt.us

  • Matthew Brock Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General One Ashburton Place, 1 8 th Floor Boston, MA 02108 Matthew.Brock@state.ma.us
  • Zachary Kahn Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Mail Stop T-3 F23 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 zachary.kahn@nrc.gov

[original signed by David R. Lewis]

David Lewis 2

IHearing Docket From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Attachments:

Lewis, David R. [david.lewis@pillsburylaw.com]

Friday, March 12, 2010 2:15 PM OCAAMAIL Resource; Docket, Hearing; CHAIRMAN Resource; CMRSVINICKI Resource; CMRKLEIN; Karlin, Alex; Wardwell, Richard; whrcville@embarqmail.com; Uttal, Susan; Subin, Lloyd; Smith, Maxwell; Spencer, Mary; Mr. Raymond Shadis; Sarah.hofmann@state.vt.us; aroisman@nationallegalscholars.com; peter.roth@doj.nh.gov; Matthew.Brock@state.ma.us; Kahn, Zachary Travieso-Diaz, Matias F.

Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station), Docket No. 50-271-LR, ASLBP No. No. 06-849-03-LR Entergy Opposition to NEC Stay Reques.pdf Attached please find "Entergy's Response in Opposition to New England Coalition's Stay Request" in the above captioned proceeding. A copy of this pleading has also been served by mail. If you have any difficulty opening this attachment, please contact me at the number below.

David Lewis Counsel for Entergy

<<Entergy Opposition to NEC Stay Reques.pdf>>

David Lewis I Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP Tel: 202.663.84741 Fax: 202.663.8007 I Cell: 703.501.7708 2300 N Street, N.W. I Washington, DC 20037-1122 Email: david.lewisapillsburylaw.com Bio: www.pillsburylaw.com/firstname.lastname www.pillsburylaw.com 1

Received: from mail2.nrc.gov (148.184.176.43) by TWMSO1.nrc.gov (148.184.200.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.393.1; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:15:02 -0500 X-Ironport-ID: mail2 X-SBRS: 5.3 X-MID: 13749769 X-fn: Entergy Opposition to NEC Stay Reques.pdf X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result:

AI8BAEchmkvM4/81mWdsb2JhbACBRJk7AQEBAQEICwoHEyKuVwmNP4JqghEEgxc X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,627,1262581200";

d="pdf ?scan'208,217";a=" 13749769" Received: from sfmms08.pillsburywinthrop.com (HELO sfemf02.PillsburyWinthrop.com) ([204.227.255.8]) by mail2.nrc.gov with ESMTP; 12 Mar 2010 14:14:59 -0500 Received: from [172.17.1.202] by sfemf02.PillsburyWinthrop.com with ESMTP (SFPWSP SMTP Relay (Email Firewall v6.3.2)); Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:14:45 -0800 X-Server-Uuid: C488EB2B-C670-400C-9182-92FFDA1 BD321 Received: from DW2XM01.PillsburyWinthrop.com ([172.16.2.133]) by sfxims0l.PillsburyWinthrop.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:14:45 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0

Subject:

Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station), Docket No.

50-271-LR, ASLBP No. No. 06-849-03-LR Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:14:42 -0500 Message-ID:

<85B5D8EA8F1 20049BE3F87ECCABD510 EA86506@DW2XMO1.PillsburyWinthrop.com>

X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:

Thread-Topic: Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station), Docket No.

50-271-LR, ASLBP No. No. 06-849-03-LR thread-index: AcrCGEUsqj6Ot5GDTIeGf4YZo7uK9g==

From: "Lewis, David R." <david.lewis@pillsburylaw.com>

To: <OCAAMAIL@nrc.gov>, <hearingdocket@nrc.gov>, <chairman@nrc.gov>,

<cmrsvinicki@nrc.gov>, <cmrkleih@nrc.gov>, <ask2@nrc.gov>, <rew@nrc.gov>,

<whrcville@embarqmail.com>, <susan.uttal@nrc.gov>, <lloyd.subin@nrc.gov>,

<maxwell.smith@nrc.gov>, <Mary.Baty@nrc.gov>, "Mr. Raymond Shadis"

<shadis@prexar.com>, <Sarah.hofmann@state.vt.us>,

<aroisman@nationallegalscholars.com>, <peter.roth@doj.nh.gov>,

<Matthew.Brock@state.ma.us>, <zachary.kahn@nrc.gov>

CC: "Travieso-Diaz, Matias F." <matias.travieso-diaz@pillsburylaw.com>

Return-Path: david.lewis@pillsburylaw.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Mar 2010 19:14:45.0997 (UTC)

FILETIME=[4704A1 DO:01 CAC218]

X-WSS-ID: 67844D2F298550910-01-01 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;

boundary="---- =_NextPart_001_01CAC218.457F18BC"

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML100740370&oldid=5302613"