ML072820263: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Relicensing of Indian Point -Public Comment Page I of I IndianPointEIS  
{{#Wiki_filter:Relicensing of Indian Point - Public Comment                                                                                         Page I of I IndianPointEIS - Relicensing of Indian Point - Public Comment From:       "Costabile, Doreen" <DCostab@entergy.com>                                     e           /7 To:         <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>                                                   ;7c,'//&         ,
-Relicensing of Indian Point -Public Comment From: "Costabile, Doreen" <DCostab@entergy.com>
Date:       9/24/07 7:52 AM
e /7 To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>  
;7c,'//& , Date: 9/24/07 7:52 AM  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Relicensing of Indian Point -Public Comment I attended the September 19 public hearing on the re-licensing of Indian Point. Those opposed to the re-licensing continuously use the dense population of the surrounding area as reason to close Indian Point. I request that the NRC review census information from the time the Indian Point units were built to the most recent. I was born and raised in lower Westchester.
Relicensing of Indian Point - Public Comment I attended the September 19 public hearing on the re-licensing of Indian Point. Those opposed to the re-licensing continuously use the dense population of the surrounding area as reason to close Indian Point. I request that the NRC review census information from the time the Indian Point units were built to the most recent. I was born and raised in lower Westchester. In the late 1980's, like so many young couples just starting out, we headed "upstate" to Putnam County to find affordable housing. For the anti's that have moved into the area within the last 10-15 years, they didn't do their homework. They didn't do their homework with respect to the area to which they were moving. And they continue to not do their homework regarding nuclear power, which was evident by some of the incorrect statement of facts that were made at the hearing.
In the late 1980's, like so many young couples just starting out, we headed "upstate" to Putnam County to find affordable housing. For the anti's that have moved into the area within the last 10-15 years, they didn't do their homework.
This is America, and everyone is entitled to an opinion. However, if you don't like or are afraid of nuclear power, then don't move near a nuclear power plant. Don't move in and think, "Now that I'm here, the plant needs to close." Indian Point was there first, and as long as the plants are run safely, they should be allowed to continue to run. New York needs the power.
They didn't do their homework with respect to the area to which they were moving. And they continue to not do their homework regarding nuclear power, which was evident by some of the incorrect statement of facts that were made at the hearing.This is America, and everyone is entitled to an opinion. However, if you don't like or are afraid of nuclear power, then don't move near a nuclear power plant. Don't move in and think, "Now that I'm here, the plant needs to close." Indian Point was there first, and as long as the plants are run safely, they should be allowed to continue to run. New York needs the power.Thank you, Doreen Costabile-Ti-Ti.m~)9-J.. .rn C_--file://C:\temp\GW}
Thank you, Doreen Costabile
00002.HTM 10/01/2007 c:\temq \Gw}nnn3.TMP Mail Envelope Properties (46F7A4E2.D5E
                                                                                                                              -J              rn
: 11 : 11614)Page 1 1
                                                                                                              -Ti                             C_--
                                                                                                                - Ti
                                                                                                              .m~)
9 file://C:\temp\GW} 00002.HTM                                                                                                           10/01/2007
 
c:\temq
      \Gw}nnn3.TMP                                                                                 Page 1 1 Mail Envelope Properties       (46F7A4E2.D5E : 11 : 11614)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Creation Date From: Created By: Relicensing of Indian Point -Public Comment Mon, Sep 24, 2007 7:51 AM"Costabile, Doreen" <DCostab(@entergy.com>
Relicensing of Indian Point - Public Comment Creation Date            Mon, Sep 24, 2007 7:51 AM From:                    "Costabile, Doreen" <DCostab(@entergy.com>
DCostab(aentergy.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 IndianPointEIS Post Office TWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 Route nrc.gov Files MESSAGE TEXT.htm Mime.822 Options Expiration Date: Priority: ReplyRequested:
Created By:              DCostab(aentergy.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 IndianPointEIS Post Office                                                             Route TWGWPO03.HQGWDO01                                                       nrc.gov Files                             Size                Date & Time MESSAGE                         1256                Monday, September 24, 2007 7:51 AM TEXT.htm                         6712 Mime.822                         11233 Options Expiration Date:                 None Priority:                       Standard ReplyRequested:                 No Return Notification:             None Concealed  
Return Notification:
Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Security: Size 1256 6712 11233 Date & Time Monday, September 24, 2007 7:51 AM None Standard No None No Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled}}
No Security:                       Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled}}

Latest revision as of 10:47, 13 March 2020

Comment (8) of Doreen Costabile, Supporting Re-Licensing of Indian Point
ML072820263
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/24/2007
From: Costabile D
Entergy Corp
To:
Rulemaking, Directives, and Editing Branch
References
72FR45075 00008
Download: ML072820263 (2)


Text

Relicensing of Indian Point - Public Comment Page I of I IndianPointEIS - Relicensing of Indian Point - Public Comment From: "Costabile, Doreen" <DCostab@entergy.com> e /7 To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov> ;7c,'//& ,

Date: 9/24/07 7:52 AM

Subject:

Relicensing of Indian Point - Public Comment I attended the September 19 public hearing on the re-licensing of Indian Point. Those opposed to the re-licensing continuously use the dense population of the surrounding area as reason to close Indian Point. I request that the NRC review census information from the time the Indian Point units were built to the most recent. I was born and raised in lower Westchester. In the late 1980's, like so many young couples just starting out, we headed "upstate" to Putnam County to find affordable housing. For the anti's that have moved into the area within the last 10-15 years, they didn't do their homework. They didn't do their homework with respect to the area to which they were moving. And they continue to not do their homework regarding nuclear power, which was evident by some of the incorrect statement of facts that were made at the hearing.

This is America, and everyone is entitled to an opinion. However, if you don't like or are afraid of nuclear power, then don't move near a nuclear power plant. Don't move in and think, "Now that I'm here, the plant needs to close." Indian Point was there first, and as long as the plants are run safely, they should be allowed to continue to run. New York needs the power.

Thank you, Doreen Costabile

-J rn

-Ti C_--

- Ti

.m~)

9 file://C:\temp\GW} 00002.HTM 10/01/2007

c:\temq

\Gw}nnn3.TMP Page 1 1 Mail Envelope Properties (46F7A4E2.D5E : 11 : 11614)

Subject:

Relicensing of Indian Point - Public Comment Creation Date Mon, Sep 24, 2007 7:51 AM From: "Costabile, Doreen" <DCostab(@entergy.com>

Created By: DCostab(aentergy.com Recipients nrc.gov TWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 IndianPointEIS Post Office Route TWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1256 Monday, September 24, 2007 7:51 AM TEXT.htm 6712 Mime.822 11233 Options Expiration Date: None Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard Junk Mail Handling Evaluation Results Message is eligible for Junk Mail handling This message was not classified as Junk Mail Junk Mail settings when this message was delivered Junk Mail handling disabled by User Junk Mail handling disabled by Administrator Junk List is not enabled Junk Mail using personal address books is not enabled Block List is not enabled