ML102950567: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 04/23/2010
| issue date = 04/23/2010
| title = E-Mail from Lew to Roberts, Biweekly Director'S Counterpart Call
| title = E-Mail from Lew to Roberts, Biweekly Director'S Counterpart Call
| author name = Lew D C
| author name = Lew D
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I
| addressee name = Clifford J W, Roberts D J, Wilson P R
| addressee name = Clifford J, Roberts D, Wilson P
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-I
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-I
| docket = 05000272, 05000311
| docket = 05000272, 05000311
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Burritt, Arthur From: Sent: To:  
{{#Wiki_filter:Burritt, Arthur From:                             Lew, David Sent:                             Friday, April 23, 2010 1:01 PM To:                               Roberts, Darrell; Wilson, Peter; Clifford, James; Dentel, Glenn; Gray, Mel; Burritt, Arthur; Krohn, Paul; Jackson, Donald; Bellamy, Ronald; Powell, Raymond; Khan, Cheryl


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
, Lew, David Friday, April 23, 2010 1:01 PM Roberts, Darrell; Wilson, Peter; Clifford, James; Dentel, Glenn; Gray, Mel; Burritt, Arthur;Krohn, Paul; Jackson, Donald; Bellamy, Ronald; Powell, Raymond; Khan, Cheryl Biweekly Director's Counterpart Call (Inculuding Actions for BCs)Dutside of Scope Outside of Scope Salem Piping Deqradation While DCI was not on the call, the Directors believe that we should consider placing a higher priority on the implications of the Salem AFW degradation.
      ,                   Biweekly Director's Counterpart Call (Inculuding Actions for BCs)
This degradation is of particular interest because the vast majority.of safety related buried piping has been low pressure applications.
Dutside of Outside   of Scope Scope Salem Piping Deqradation While DCI was not on the call, the Directors believe that we should consider placing a higher priority on the implications of the Salem AFW degradation. This degradation is of particular interest because the vast majority.of safety related buried piping has been low pressure applications. However, this piping can see as much as 1275#. DIRS has the action to engage DCI. One of the questions outstanding is whethe*r'there are other plants with high pressure safety related buried pipes. Action: While I am hesitant'to add to our work load, I would like DRP BCs to make a recommendation on whether we should proactively seek the answer to this question. (Note: this is not an action that came out of the call)                                               N Xý O..utside of Scope konin fths Iw_,u[ wa5 U"140i~u,[,
However, this piping can see as much as 1275#. DIRS has the action to engage DCI. One of the questions outstanding is are other plants with high pressure safety related buried pipes. Action: While I am hesitant'to add to our work load, I would like DRP BCs to make a recommendation on whether we should proactively seek the answer to this question. (Note: this is not an action that came out of the call)N XýO..utside of Scope konin fths Iw_,u[ wa5 U"140i~u,[, I aoordance whh the Friaed oil ~f Alt.E2Uw'obfl0%:kI8ý iAt 0
Iaoordance whh the Friaed oil ~f E2Uw'obfl0%:kI8ý Alt.
* 010$
iAt                                                                               0 010$
David C. Lew Director, Division of Reactor Projects USNRC, Region I 610-337-5229 2}}
 
David C. Lew Director,Division of Reactor Projects USNRC, Region I 610-337-5229 2}}

Latest revision as of 15:34, 11 March 2020

E-Mail from Lew to Roberts, Biweekly Director'S Counterpart Call
ML102950567
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 04/23/2010
From: David Lew
NRC Region 1
To: Clifford J, Darrell Roberts, Wilson P
NRC Region 1
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0334
Download: ML102950567 (2)
v • d • e


Text

Burritt, Arthur From: Lew, David Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 1:01 PM To: Roberts, Darrell; Wilson, Peter; Clifford, James; Dentel, Glenn; Gray, Mel; Burritt, Arthur; Krohn, Paul; Jackson, Donald; Bellamy, Ronald; Powell, Raymond; Khan, Cheryl

Subject:

, Biweekly Director's Counterpart Call (Inculuding Actions for BCs)

Dutside of Outside of Scope Scope Salem Piping Deqradation While DCI was not on the call, the Directors believe that we should consider placing a higher priority on the implications of the Salem AFW degradation. This degradation is of particular interest because the vast majority.of safety related buried piping has been low pressure applications. However, this piping can see as much as 1275#. DIRS has the action to engage DCI. One of the questions outstanding is whethe*r'there are other plants with high pressure safety related buried pipes. Action: While I am hesitant'to add to our work load, I would like DRP BCs to make a recommendation on whether we should proactively seek the answer to this question. (Note: this is not an action that came out of the call) N Xý O..utside of Scope konin fths Iw_,u[ wa5 U"140i~u,[,

Iaoordance whh the Friaed oil ~f E2Uw'obfl0%:kI8ý Alt.

iAt 0 010$

David C. Lew Director,Division of Reactor Projects USNRC, Region I 610-337-5229 2

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML102950567&oldid=2554771"