ML111650038: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML111650038
| number = ML111650038
| issue date = 06/08/2011
| issue date = 06/08/2011
| title = Seabrook Aam Slides, June 8, 2011
| title = Aam Slides, June 8, 2011
| author name = Burritt A L
| author name = Burritt A
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRP/PB3
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRP/PB3
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 13: Line 13:
| page count = 19
| page count = 19
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Seabrook Station Assessment Meeting Seabrook Station Safety Performance in 2010 U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events 2010 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I 1
NRC Representatives
* James Clifford- Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects
* Arthur Burritt - Branch Chief
* William Raymond - Senior Resident Inspector
* Jonathan Johnson - Resident Inspector 2
Agenda
* Introduction
* Discussion of safety performance at Seabrook
* Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of Japan events
* NRC to address public questions
* Closing remarks 3
NRC Assessment Summary Seabrook
* NextEra operated Seabrook safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
* Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
* Baseline inspections planned for 2011 4
Inspection Activities 2010 Seabrook
* 6753 hours of inspection and related activities
* 2 resident inspectors on site - residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant events at any time
* 3  major team inspections
* CDBI
* Emergency Planning
* PI&R 5
Performance Indicator and Inspection Results January 1 through December 31, 2010 Seabrook
* All Green Performance Indicators
* 3 Green inspection finding 6
NRC Action Matrix Licensee        Regulatory      Degraded        Multiple Repetitive      Unacceptable Response        Response      Cornerstone          Degraded            Performance Cornerstone All Inputs are  1 or 2 White    2 White or 1    Multiple Yellow Inputs      Overall Green;          Inputs;      Yellow Input;    or 1 Red Input;        Unacceptable Cornerstone      Cornerstone    Cornerstone          Cornerstone      Performance; Plants Objectives      Objectives  Objectives Met w/  Objectives Met w/      not permitted to Fully Met        Fully Met      Moderate            Significant      Operate w/in this Degradation in  Degradation in Safety        Column; Safety          Performance          Unacceptable Performance                            Margin to Safety
* Increasing safety significance
* Increasing NRC inspection efforts
* Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement
* Increasing regulatory actions
2010 Seabrook Assessment Summary
* Seabrook was operated safely
* Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
* Baseline inspections planned for 2011 8
Seabrook Assessment Meeting U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9
U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Safe
* NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand external events
* NRC requires a defense defense-in-depth in depth approach to safety
* NRC performs independent safety inspections
* NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements 10
Designed for Site Specific Natural Events
* Earthquakes
* Tsunamis
* Hurricanes
* Floods
* Tornadoes 11
The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth
* Redundant and diverse safety systems
* Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material
* Testing and inspection of systems important to safety
* Emergency planning 12
NRC Independent Safety Inspections Reactor Oversight Program
* NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security
* At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant
* NRC specialists conduct additional inspections at each nuclear plant 13
NRC Requires Safety Improvements NRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements:
* NRC operating experience program
* Rulemaking (Station Blackout)
* Post TMI Actions
* Post 9/11 Orders
* Generic Safety Issues 14
NRC Response to Events in Japan
* NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review
* Near-term actions (<90 days)
  - conducting additional inspections
  - identifying near term operational issues
* Longer-term actions 15
Directors Comments Jim Clifford Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Region I 16
Meeting Ground Rules
: 1. Please be respectful to the speaker - only one speaker at a time
: 2. See NRC staff if you have procedural questions/concerns or still want to sign up.
: 3. NRC staff members will be available after the meeting to talk to those interested 17
Questions 18
Contacting the NRC
* Report a safety concern
* 1-800-695-7403
* allegation@nrc.gov
* General questions
* www.nrc.gov
* Region I Public Affairs
* Diane Screnci, 610-332-5330 or diane.screnci@nrc.gov
* Neil Sheehan, 610-332-5331 or neil.sheehan@nrc.gov 19}}

Latest revision as of 21:45, 10 March 2020

Aam Slides, June 8, 2011
ML111650038
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/08/2011
From: Arthur Burritt
Reactor Projects Branch 3
To:
burritt al
References
Download: ML111650038 (19)


Text

Seabrook Station Assessment Meeting Seabrook Station Safety Performance in 2010 U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events 2010 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I 1

NRC Representatives

  • James Clifford- Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects
  • William Raymond - Senior Resident Inspector
  • Jonathan Johnson - Resident Inspector 2

Agenda

  • Introduction
  • Discussion of safety performance at Seabrook
  • Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of Japan events
  • NRC to address public questions
  • Closing remarks 3

NRC Assessment Summary Seabrook

  • NextEra operated Seabrook safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
  • Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
  • Baseline inspections planned for 2011 4

Inspection Activities 2010 Seabrook

  • 6753 hours0.0782 days <br />1.876 hours <br />0.0112 weeks <br />0.00257 months <br /> of inspection and related activities
  • 2 resident inspectors on site - residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant events at any time
  • 3 major team inspections
  • Emergency Planning

Performance Indicator and Inspection Results January 1 through December 31, 2010 Seabrook

  • All Green Performance Indicators
  • 3 Green inspection finding 6

NRC Action Matrix Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple Repetitive Unacceptable Response Response Cornerstone Degraded Performance Cornerstone All Inputs are 1 or 2 White 2 White or 1 Multiple Yellow Inputs Overall Green; Inputs; Yellow Input; or 1 Red Input; Unacceptable Cornerstone Cornerstone Cornerstone Cornerstone Performance; Plants Objectives Objectives Objectives Met w/ Objectives Met w/ not permitted to Fully Met Fully Met Moderate Significant Operate w/in this Degradation in Degradation in Safety Column; Safety Performance Unacceptable Performance Margin to Safety

  • Increasing safety significance
  • Increasing NRC inspection efforts
  • Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement
  • Increasing regulatory actions

2010 Seabrook Assessment Summary

  • Seabrook was operated safely
  • Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
  • Baseline inspections planned for 2011 8

Seabrook Assessment Meeting U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9

U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Safe

  • NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand external events
  • NRC requires a defense defense-in-depth in depth approach to safety
  • NRC performs independent safety inspections
  • NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements 10

Designed for Site Specific Natural Events

  • Tsunamis
  • Hurricanes
  • Floods
  • Tornadoes 11

The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth

  • Redundant and diverse safety systems
  • Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material
  • Testing and inspection of systems important to safety
  • Emergency planning 12

NRC Independent Safety Inspections Reactor Oversight Program

  • NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security
  • At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant
  • NRC specialists conduct additional inspections at each nuclear plant 13

NRC Requires Safety Improvements NRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements:

  • NRC operating experience program
  • Rulemaking (Station Blackout)
  • Post TMI Actions
  • Post 9/11 Orders
  • Generic Safety Issues 14

NRC Response to Events in Japan

  • NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review
  • Near-term actions (<90 days)

- conducting additional inspections

- identifying near term operational issues

  • Longer-term actions 15

Directors Comments Jim Clifford Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Region I 16

Meeting Ground Rules

1. Please be respectful to the speaker - only one speaker at a time
2. See NRC staff if you have procedural questions/concerns or still want to sign up.
3. NRC staff members will be available after the meeting to talk to those interested 17

Questions 18

Contacting the NRC

  • Report a safety concern
  • 1-800-695-7403
  • allegation@nrc.gov
  • General questions
  • www.nrc.gov
  • Region I Public Affairs