ML111650038: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Seabrook Station Assessment MeetingSeabrook StationSafety Performance in 2010
{{#Wiki_filter:Seabrook Station Assessment Meeting Seabrook Station Safety Performance in 2010 U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events 2010 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I 1
&&U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events2010 Reactor Oversight ProcessNuclear Regulatory Commission -Region I 1
 
NRC Representatives*James Clifford-Deputy Dir ector, Division of Reactor Projects*Arthur Burritt -Branch Chief *William Raymond -Senior Resident Inspector  
NRC Representatives
*Jonathan Johnson -Resident Inspector 2
* James Clifford- Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects
Agenda*Introduction*Discussion of safety performance at Seabrook*Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of Japan events*NRC to address public questions
* Arthur Burritt - Branch Chief
*Closing remarks 3  
* William Raymond - Senior Resident Inspector
*NextEra operated Seabrook safely and in a manner thatpreserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
* Jonathan Johnson - Resident Inspector 2
NRC Assessment Summary Seabrook*Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix*Baseline inspections planned for 2011 4  
 
*6753hours of inspection and related activities
Agenda
*2 resident inspectors on site -residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant events atanytime Inspection Activities 2010 Seabrook at any time*3  major team inspections
* Introduction
*CDBI*Emergency Planning
* Discussion of safety performance at Seabrook
*PI&R 5  
* Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of Japan events
*AllGreenPerformanceJanuary 1 through December 31, 2010Performance Indicator and Inspection Results Seabrook All Green Performance Indicators
* NRC to address public questions
*3 Green inspection finding 6
* Closing remarks 3
NRC Action Matrix Licensee ResponseRegulatory Response Degraded CornerstoneMultiple Repetitive Degraded CornerstoneUnacceptable PerformanceAll Inputs are Green; Cornerstone Objectives FullyMet1 or 2 White Inputs; Cornerstone Objectives FullyMet2 White or 1 Yellow Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/
 
ModerateMultiple Yellow Inputs or 1 Red Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/
NRC Assessment Summary Seabrook
SignificantOverall Unacceptable Performance; Plants not permitted to Operatew/inthis
* NextEra operated Seabrook safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
*Increasing safety significance
* Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
*IncreasingNRC inspection efforts
* Baseline inspections planned for 2011 4
*Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement
 
*Increasing regulatory actions Fully Met Fully Met Moderate Degradation in Safety Performance Significant Degradation in Safety Performance Operate w/in this Column; Unacceptable Margin to Safety
Inspection Activities 2010 Seabrook
*Seabrook was operated safely
* 6753 hours of inspection and related activities
*Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
* 2 resident inspectors on site - residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant events at any time
*Baselineinspectionsplannedfor2011 2010 Seabrook Assessment Summary Baseline inspections planned for 2011 8 Seabrook Assessment MeetingU.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9
* 3  major team inspections
U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Safe*NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand external events
* CDBI
*NRCrequiresadefense
* Emergency Planning
-in-depthapproachto NRC requires a defense indepth approach to safety*NRC performs independent safety inspections
* PI&R 5
*NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements 10 Designed forSite Specific Natural Events*Earthquakes*Tsunamis*Hurricanes
 
*Floods
Performance Indicator and Inspection Results January 1 through December 31, 2010 Seabrook
*Tornadoes 11 The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth*Redundant and diverse safety systems*Multiplephysicalbarriersto
* All Green Performance Indicators
*Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material*Testing and inspection of systems important to safety*Emergency planning 12 NRC Independent Safety InspectionsReactor Oversight Program
* 3 Green inspection finding 6
*NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security
 
*At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant  
NRC Action Matrix Licensee       Regulatory      Degraded       Multiple Repetitive     Unacceptable Response        Response      Cornerstone          Degraded           Performance Cornerstone All Inputs are   1 or 2 White   2 White or 1   Multiple Yellow Inputs      Overall Green;          Inputs;      Yellow Input;     or 1 Red Input;         Unacceptable Cornerstone      Cornerstone    Cornerstone          Cornerstone       Performance; Plants Objectives      Objectives  Objectives Met w/  Objectives Met w/       not permitted to Fully Met        Fully Met      Moderate            Significant      Operate w/in this Degradation in  Degradation in Safety        Column; Safety          Performance          Unacceptable Performance                            Margin to Safety
*NRC specialists conduct additional inspections at each nuclear plant 13 NRC Requires Safety ImprovementsNRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements:
* Increasing safety significance
*NRC operating experience program 14*Rulemaking (Station Blackout)
* Increasing NRC inspection efforts
*Post TMI Actions
* Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement
*Post 9/11 Orders
* Increasing regulatory actions
*Generic Safety Issues NRC Response to Events in Japan *NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review*Near-term actions (<90 days)conductingadditional 15-conducting additional inspections-identifying near term operational issues*Longer-term actions Director's Comments Jim Clifford 16 Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Region I Meeting Ground Rules1.Please be respectful to the speaker -only one speaker at a time2.See NRC staff if you have procedural questions/concerns or still want to sign up.3.NRC staff members will be available after the meeting to talk to those interested 17 Questions 18 Contacting the NRC*Report a safety concern
 
*1-800-695-7403
2010 Seabrook Assessment Summary
*allegation@nrc.gov
* Seabrook was operated safely
*General questions
* Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
*www.nrc.gov
* Baseline inspections planned for 2011 8
*Region I Public Affairs
 
*Diane Screnci, 610-332-5330 or diane.screnci@nrc.gov
Seabrook Assessment Meeting U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9
*Neil Sheehan, 610-332-5331 or neil.sheehan@nrc.gov 19}}
 
U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Safe
* NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand external events
* NRC requires a defense defense-in-depth in depth approach to safety
* NRC performs independent safety inspections
* NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements 10
 
Designed for Site Specific Natural Events
* Earthquakes
* Tsunamis
* Hurricanes
* Floods
* Tornadoes 11
 
The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth
* Redundant and diverse safety systems
* Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material
* Testing and inspection of systems important to safety
* Emergency planning 12
 
NRC Independent Safety Inspections Reactor Oversight Program
* NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security
* At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant
* NRC specialists conduct additional inspections at each nuclear plant 13
 
NRC Requires Safety Improvements NRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements:
* NRC operating experience program
* Rulemaking (Station Blackout)
* Post TMI Actions
* Post 9/11 Orders
* Generic Safety Issues 14
 
NRC Response to Events in Japan
* NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review
* Near-term actions (<90 days)
  - conducting additional inspections
  - identifying near term operational issues
* Longer-term actions 15
 
Directors Comments Jim Clifford Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Region I 16
 
Meeting Ground Rules
: 1. Please be respectful to the speaker - only one speaker at a time
: 2. See NRC staff if you have procedural questions/concerns or still want to sign up.
: 3. NRC staff members will be available after the meeting to talk to those interested 17
 
Questions 18
 
Contacting the NRC
* Report a safety concern
* 1-800-695-7403
* allegation@nrc.gov
* General questions
* www.nrc.gov
* Region I Public Affairs
* Diane Screnci, 610-332-5330 or diane.screnci@nrc.gov
* Neil Sheehan, 610-332-5331 or neil.sheehan@nrc.gov 19}}

Latest revision as of 20:45, 10 March 2020

Aam Slides, June 8, 2011
ML111650038
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/08/2011
From: Arthur Burritt
Reactor Projects Branch 3
To:
burritt al
References
Download: ML111650038 (19)


Text

Seabrook Station Assessment Meeting Seabrook Station Safety Performance in 2010 U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events 2010 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I 1

NRC Representatives

  • James Clifford- Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects
  • William Raymond - Senior Resident Inspector
  • Jonathan Johnson - Resident Inspector 2

Agenda

  • Introduction
  • Discussion of safety performance at Seabrook
  • Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of Japan events
  • NRC to address public questions
  • Closing remarks 3

NRC Assessment Summary Seabrook

  • NextEra operated Seabrook safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
  • Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
  • Baseline inspections planned for 2011 4

Inspection Activities 2010 Seabrook

  • 6753 hours0.0782 days <br />1.876 hours <br />0.0112 weeks <br />0.00257 months <br /> of inspection and related activities
  • 2 resident inspectors on site - residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant events at any time
  • 3 major team inspections
  • Emergency Planning

Performance Indicator and Inspection Results January 1 through December 31, 2010 Seabrook

  • All Green Performance Indicators
  • 3 Green inspection finding 6

NRC Action Matrix Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple Repetitive Unacceptable Response Response Cornerstone Degraded Performance Cornerstone All Inputs are 1 or 2 White 2 White or 1 Multiple Yellow Inputs Overall Green; Inputs; Yellow Input; or 1 Red Input; Unacceptable Cornerstone Cornerstone Cornerstone Cornerstone Performance; Plants Objectives Objectives Objectives Met w/ Objectives Met w/ not permitted to Fully Met Fully Met Moderate Significant Operate w/in this Degradation in Degradation in Safety Column; Safety Performance Unacceptable Performance Margin to Safety

  • Increasing safety significance
  • Increasing NRC inspection efforts
  • Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement
  • Increasing regulatory actions

2010 Seabrook Assessment Summary

  • Seabrook was operated safely
  • Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
  • Baseline inspections planned for 2011 8

Seabrook Assessment Meeting U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9

U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Safe

  • NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand external events
  • NRC requires a defense defense-in-depth in depth approach to safety
  • NRC performs independent safety inspections
  • NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements 10

Designed for Site Specific Natural Events

  • Tsunamis
  • Hurricanes
  • Floods
  • Tornadoes 11

The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth

  • Redundant and diverse safety systems
  • Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material
  • Testing and inspection of systems important to safety
  • Emergency planning 12

NRC Independent Safety Inspections Reactor Oversight Program

  • NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security
  • At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant
  • NRC specialists conduct additional inspections at each nuclear plant 13

NRC Requires Safety Improvements NRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements:

  • NRC operating experience program
  • Rulemaking (Station Blackout)
  • Post TMI Actions
  • Post 9/11 Orders
  • Generic Safety Issues 14

NRC Response to Events in Japan

  • NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review
  • Near-term actions (<90 days)

- conducting additional inspections

- identifying near term operational issues

  • Longer-term actions 15

Directors Comments Jim Clifford Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Region I 16

Meeting Ground Rules

1. Please be respectful to the speaker - only one speaker at a time
2. See NRC staff if you have procedural questions/concerns or still want to sign up.
3. NRC staff members will be available after the meeting to talk to those interested 17

Questions 18

Contacting the NRC

  • Report a safety concern
  • 1-800-695-7403
  • allegation@nrc.gov
  • General questions
  • www.nrc.gov
  • Region I Public Affairs