ML18012A079: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18012A079
| number = ML18012A079
| issue date = 01/12/2018
| issue date = 01/12/2018
| title = Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Use of TORMIS for Assessing Tornado-Missile Protection
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Use of TORMIS for Assessing Tornado-Missile Protection
| author name = Mahoney M
| author name = Mahoney M
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLII-1
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From:Mahoney, Michael Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 9:43 AM To: 'Hentz, Lee A' Cc: jeff.thomas@duke-energy.com
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From:                             Mahoney, Michael Sent:                             Friday, January 12, 2018 9:43 AM To:                               'Hentz, Lee A' Cc:                               jeff.thomas@duke-energy.com


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 -
McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re: Use of TORMIS for Assessing Tornado-Missile Protection (EPID L-2017-LLA-0412)
Acceptance of Reques ted Licensing Action Re: Use of TORMIS for Assessing Tornad o-Missile Protection (EPID L-2017-LLA-0412)Lee, By letter dated December 8, 2017, Duke Energy submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 (McGuire). The LAR proposes to revise McGuire's U pdated Final Safety Analysis Report to describe the methodology and results of the analyses performed to evaluate the protection of the plants structures, systems and components from tornado generated missiles.
: Lee, By letter dated December 8, 2017, Duke Energy submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 (McGuire). The LAR proposes to revise McGuires Updated Final Safety Analysis Report to describe the methodology and results of the analyses performed to evaluate the protection of the plants structures, systems and components from tornado generated missiles.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to co mplete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirem ents or the licensing bas is of the plant.
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory require ments and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of t he acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you w ill be advised by separ ate correspondence.  
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::360 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is January, 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Thanks Mike Michael Mahoney McGuire and Catawba Project Manager, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Desk: (301)-415-3867 Email: Michael.Mahoney@NRC.GOV 1


Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 360 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is January, 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant c hanges in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated durin g the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. 
Hearing Identifier:     NRR_DMPS Email Number:           90 Mail Envelope Properties     (BL0PR0901MB23886D1AB72C86C594DDD80BE5170)
 
These estimates are based on the NRC sta ff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. 
 
If you have any questions, please contact me.
 
Thanks Mike  Michael Mahoney McGuire and Catawba Project Manager, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing  Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Desk: (301)-415-3867
 
Email: Michael.Mahoney@NRC.GOV
 
Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 90   Mail Envelope Properties   (BL0PR0901MB23886D1AB72C86C594DDD80BE5170)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re: Use of TORMIS for Assessing Tornado-Missile Protection (EPID L-2017-LLA-0412) Sent Date:   1/12/2018 9:43:13 AM Received Date: 1/12/2018 9:43:16 AM From:   Mahoney, Michael Created By:   Michael.Mahoney@nrc.gov Recipients:     "jeff.thomas@duke-energy.com" <jeff.thomas@duke-energy.com> Tracking Status: None
McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re: Use of TORMIS for Assessing Tornado-Missile Protection (EPID L-2017-LLA-0412)
"'Hentz, Lee A'" <Lee.Hentz@duke-energy.com> Tracking Status: None  
Sent Date:             1/12/2018 9:43:13 AM Received Date:         1/12/2018 9:43:16 AM From:                   Mahoney, Michael Created By:             Michael.Mahoney@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
"jeff.thomas@duke-energy.com" <jeff.thomas@duke-energy.com>
Post Office:   BL0PR0901MB2388.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   2887     1/12/2018 9:43:16 AM
Tracking Status: None
 
"'Hentz, Lee A'" <Lee.Hentz@duke-energy.com>
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None Post Office:           BL0PR0901MB2388.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files                           Size                     Date & Time MESSAGE                         2887                     1/12/2018 9:43:16 AM Options Priority:                       Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 03:26, 8 March 2020

NRR E-mail Capture - McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Use of TORMIS for Assessing Tornado-Missile Protection
ML18012A079
Person / Time
Site: Mcguire, McGuire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/12/2018
From: Michael Mahoney
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Hentz L
Duke Energy Carolinas
References
L-2017-LLA-0412
Download: ML18012A079 (2)
v • d • e


Text

NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Mahoney, Michael Sent: Friday, January 12, 2018 9:43 AM To: 'Hentz, Lee A' Cc: jeff.thomas@duke-energy.com

Subject:

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re: Use of TORMIS for Assessing Tornado-Missile Protection (EPID L-2017-LLA-0412)

Lee, By letter dated December 8, 2017, Duke Energy submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 (McGuire). The LAR proposes to revise McGuires Updated Final Safety Analysis Report to describe the methodology and results of the analyses performed to evaluate the protection of the plants structures, systems and components from tornado generated missiles.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this LAR. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 360 hours15 days <br />2.143 weeks <br />0.493 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 12 months, which is January, 2019. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities.

If you have any questions, please contact me.

Thanks Mike Michael Mahoney McGuire and Catawba Project Manager, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Desk: (301)-415-3867 Email: Michael.Mahoney@NRC.GOV 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 90 Mail Envelope Properties (BL0PR0901MB23886D1AB72C86C594DDD80BE5170)

Subject:

McGuire Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Re: Use of TORMIS for Assessing Tornado-Missile Protection (EPID L-2017-LLA-0412)

Sent Date: 1/12/2018 9:43:13 AM Received Date: 1/12/2018 9:43:16 AM From: Mahoney, Michael Created By: Michael.Mahoney@nrc.gov Recipients:

"jeff.thomas@duke-energy.com" <jeff.thomas@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None

"'Hentz, Lee A'" <Lee.Hentz@duke-energy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: BL0PR0901MB2388.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2887 1/12/2018 9:43:16 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18012A079&oldid=2536243"