ML15272A254: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 08/21/2015
| issue date = 08/21/2015
| title = 2015 Clinton Power Station Initial License Examination Re-Take Examination Form ES-201-2
| title = 2015 Clinton Power Station Initial License Examination Re-Take Examination Form ES-201-2
| author name = McNeil D R
| author name = Mcneil D
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Examination Outline                                                                                        Form ES*20i-2
-==-....:::-===----=-===--===-~,-------                                                .,., ,.,_.,., _,_____________._,_,'"==':':"'"""'-----=-=::........
F acllity:. CHnton Pc.wvsir Station                                                                                          Daie of E:<arnination: 8/13'1 '5 Task D!::scriplion c#
  *1.                  \loritv that th*i outlin1~(E) fit(s) the Hppmpriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.
w R            b      Assess whother the GutlinE* was systernatit::ally and randomly prepMed in acrnrdance with Section D. 1 ot ES-401 01 ES-401 N and whether a!i KiA r::.""'"''"'n""
T r                  AssHss whethH ttie outline over-*e1nphasiz(~S any sysi.fm1~;. *z:volution:,;, or ~;enenc topics.
f:
N            d.      Assess whether the iustifications for deseloctcKJ or n:J.iected KIA sta1flmEmls are approprialf)
  ,,            a      Using Form ES-301 *5, V(~nty that the proposed sconario sots cov<~: the requirr:id number c..                  o! nornml fnmlutions, inst~urnent and cornponent taiiures, technical sp<Jcitications, nnd maj()r trn.nsicmts b      Assess whether them are Emough SC('lflario sets (and spBres) to tesl the projEicted nun1b1;r M                    and mix of appliGants m accordancE1 with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule u                    without cornprornising exam 1ntoqrity, and ensure if*;at each applicant can be testsid using L                    at lfJast one new or significantly modified scenario. that no scenarios me duplicated A                    from the applicants' audit test(s). and scenarios will not be repeated on sutisequent days.
T 0
c      To thH extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative Fl and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-:301-4 and described in AppE'ndix D.
: 3.            a.      Verity that the systems walk-throu9h outline meets the criteria spf.'cified on                      FomlES:3o        ;-:~--
                        \ 1) the outline(s) conlain(s) th(~ required nurnbE;r of control roorn and in-plant tasks w                            distributed among the safetv functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC exarrnnations is within the limits specitieci on the form T                    (3) no tasks are duplicated from th<J applicants' ;iudit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks nrnets or e.xceeds the minirnurns specified on thfJ form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks mQet the criteria on the form
          *----b.
Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 *1 *
                                                                                                                            --------*-----------1---._.. . . ..,1-----11 (1) tile tasks are distributed among the topics as spixifif:d on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly mod1fie(J
___.[!} no r!:..&#xa3;r.&#xa3;Jl1an one iask is_ repeat"!.9J~!=lm f!!&#xa3;_1ast t::v..o NR_C lics~*ng exa.~ninatlo~~----*-*---*~-..,,..._!-
G.      Determine if th.-ire are enou~Jh different ou!lines 10 lest the pmiecte'd number and mi:~
            **--***-*-S~!.2.EPi!~:'!.1ts <::!!CJ ensure that no items are duolicated 2!l&#xa3;~Sl1quen!_~~.:?.:__ _____ , ________,........-+-r---*-+v.-.p,1-
: a.      Ass\';ss whether plan!-spr:)cific priorities (induding PR,O, ancJ IPE inslfJhts) are covmod in th~;                  exarn section.
: b.      /l.ssess whettrnr the 10      CFf'.~ 55.4 *1;43 and 55.45 r;;arnp1in\1 is appropriate.
d.
Ghei::k 1he entire exam for balance of i:;ovemge L
: 1.      ic\ssess whe1her tho:; exam fits the appropriat1:\ .1ob IB111,3i !HO or SFiO).
                                                                                                ***-*-----*-*-*-----*~-******-*-*-***--***--*****-*-**~****-
: b. Facility flwm.:wo:* \')
c    NRC Ghinf *:.xamiPf:'f (ti\
~t    r""~F:1c  .:.3upPi1.iisor ES-201}}

Latest revision as of 08:49, 5 February 2020

2015 Clinton Power Station Initial License Examination Re-Take Examination Form ES-201-2
ML15272A254
Person / Time
Site: Clinton Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 08/21/2015
From: Mcneil D
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Shared Package
ML15216A597 List:
References
Download: ML15272A254 (1)


Text

Examination Outline Form ES*20i-2

-==-....:::-===----=-===--===-~,------- .,., ,.,_.,., _,_____________._,_,'"==':':"'"""'-----=-=::........

F acllity:. CHnton Pc.wvsir Station Daie of E:<arnination: 8/13'1 '5 Task D!::scriplion c#

  • 1. \loritv that th*i outlin1~(E) fit(s) the Hppmpriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.

w R b Assess whother the GutlinE* was systernatit::ally and randomly prepMed in acrnrdance with Section D. 1 ot ES-401 01 ES-401 N and whether a!i KiA r::.""'""'n""

T r AssHss whethH ttie outline over-*e1nphasiz(~S any sysi.fm1~;. *z:volution:,;, or ~;enenc topics.

f:

N d. Assess whether the iustifications for deseloctcKJ or n:J.iected KIA sta1flmEmls are approprialf)

,, a Using Form ES-301 *5, V(~nty that the proposed sconario sots cov<~: the requirr:id number c.. o! nornml fnmlutions, inst~urnent and cornponent taiiures, technical sp<Jcitications, nnd maj()r trn.nsicmts b Assess whether them are Emough SC('lflario sets (and spBres) to tesl the projEicted nun1b1;r M and mix of appliGants m accordancE1 with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule u without cornprornising exam 1ntoqrity, and ensure if*;at each applicant can be testsid using L at lfJast one new or significantly modified scenario. that no scenarios me duplicated A from the applicants' audit test(s). and scenarios will not be repeated on sutisequent days.

T 0

c To thH extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative Fl and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-:301-4 and described in AppE'ndix D.

3. a. Verity that the systems walk-throu9h outline meets the criteria spf.'cified on FomlES:3o  ;-:~--

\ 1) the outline(s) conlain(s) th(~ required nurnbE;r of control roorn and in-plant tasks w distributed among the safetv functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC exarrnnations is within the limits specitieci on the form T (3) no tasks are duplicated from th<J applicants' ;iudit test(s)

(4) the number of new or modified tasks nrnets or e.xceeds the minirnurns specified on thfJ form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks mQet the criteria on the form

  • ----b.

Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 *1 *


*-----------1---._.. . . ..,1-----11 (1) tile tasks are distributed among the topics as spixifif:d on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly mod1fie(J

___.[!} no r!:..£r.£Jl1an one iask is_ repeat"!.9J~!=lm f!!£_1ast t::v..o NR_C lics~*ng exa.~ninatlo~~----*-*---*~-..,,..._!-

G. Determine if th.-ire are enou~Jh different ou!lines 10 lest the pmiecte'd number and mi:~

    • --***-*-S~!.2.EPi!~:'!.1ts <::!!CJ ensure that no items are duolicated 2!l£~Sl1quen!_~~.:?.:__ _____ , ________,........-+-r---*-+v.-.p,1-
a. Ass\';ss whether plan!-spr:)cific priorities (induding PR,O, ancJ IPE inslfJhts) are covmod in th~; exarn section.
b. /l.ssess whettrnr the 10 CFf'.~ 55.4 *1;43 and 55.45 r;;arnp1in\1 is appropriate.

d.

Ghei::k 1he entire exam for balance of i:;ovemge L

1. ic\ssess whe1her tho:; exam fits the appropriat1:\ .1ob IB111,3i !HO or SFiO).
      • -*-----*-*-*-----*~-******-*-*-***--***--*****-*-**~****-
b. Facility flwm.:wo:* \')

c NRC Ghinf *:.xamiPf:'f (ti\

~t r""~F:1c .:.3upPi1.iisor ES-201