ML16341E007: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilitv: | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilitv: DC ( . C> (> 'i:::. Date of Examination: ,f,,J t<- ** * / ;i. i./11.,, Operating Test Number: | ||
DC (. C> (> 'i:::. Date of Examination: | Initials | ||
,f,,J t<-** */ ;i. i./11.,, | : 1. General Criteria a b* c# | ||
Operating Test Number: 1. General Criteria | : a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.Q., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). -v 5i( '?r~ | ||
sampling requirements (e.Q., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). | : b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durinq this examination. -..; 1:5<7( ~ | ||
-v b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered | : c. T he operatina test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) ......; li j ~ *.(h | ||
-..; 1:5<7( | : d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. | ||
: c. | ......; 11Jf'r.?_~~ | ||
' audit test(s). | : e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the desianated license level. | ||
(see Section D.1.a.) ......; | ...-./ 1J6 I~ | ||
...-./ 1J6 | : 2. Walk-Through Criteria ...,.. -- -- | ||
... , .. ----a. Each JPM includes the following | : a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: | ||
, as applicable: | .. initial conditions initiating cues | ||
. initial conditions | .. references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific | ||
. | . designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include: | ||
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature | |||
- system response and other examiner cues | |||
-system response and other examiner cues -statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant | - statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant | ||
-criteria for successful completion of the task -identification of critical steps and | - criteria for successful completion of the task | ||
- | -I I~( ~ | ||
: b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified | identification of critical steps and thei r associated performance standards | ||
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable | |||
: 3. Simulator Criteria | : b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2. -v 1( ~ | ||
-----The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES- | : 3. Simulator Criteria -- - -- | ||
Printed Name I Signature Date a. Author *?;;:J-r ri>-Ltc, | The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a coov is attached. -v ~ ;e-:~ | ||
s-s-/ti.:. | Printed Name I Signature Date a. | ||
C. NRC Chief Examiner | b. | ||
(#) \S&cg'1l | Author Facility Reviewer(*) | ||
?'. | *?;;:J-r (b~~~5 ;/~d~~ ri>-Ltc, s-s-/ti.:. | ||
ts> L.2Ltb d. NRC Supervisor | C. NRC Chief Examiner (#) ?~~A\.. ~~\S&cg'1l ?'. \\)Q~ ts> L.2Ltb J_~ | ||
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. # | f-3) | ||
: d. NRC Supervisor | |||
{~ ).jllllt 9-o':> .,\ ..:s ()('\~\,,ii I ;}I ' f>( .)'{,j .lOJ b I | |||
NOTE: | |||
* The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests. | |||
# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.}} |
Latest revision as of 22:40, 4 February 2020
ML16341E007 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cook |
Issue date: | 12/02/2016 |
From: | NRC/RGN-III |
To: | Indiana Michigan Power Co, American Electric Power |
Shared Package | |
ML15274A375 | List: |
References | |
Download: ML16341E007 (1) | |
Text
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facilitv: DC ( . C> (> 'i:::. Date of Examination: ,f,,J t<- ** * / ;i. i./11.,, Operating Test Number:
Initials
- 1. General Criteria a b* c#
- a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.Q., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution). -v 5i( '?r~
- b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durinq this examination. -..; 1:5<7( ~
- c. T he operatina test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) ......; li j ~ *.(h
- d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.
......; 11Jf'r.?_~~
- e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the desianated license level.
...-./ 1J6 I~
- 2. Walk-Through Criteria ...,.. -- --
- a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
.. initial conditions initiating cues
.. references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific
. designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature
- system response and other examiner cues
- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant
- criteria for successful completion of the task
-I I~( ~
identification of critical steps and thei r associated performance standards
- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable
- b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2. -v 1( ~
- 3. Simulator Criteria -- - --
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4 and a coov is attached. -v ~ ;e-:~
Printed Name I Signature Date a.
b.
Author Facility Reviewer(*)
- ?;;:J-r (b~~~5 ;/~d~~ ri>-Ltc, s-s-/ti.:.
C. NRC Chief Examiner (#) ?~~A\.. ~~\S&cg'1l ?'. \\)Q~ ts> L.2Ltb J_~
f-3)
- d. NRC Supervisor
{~ ).jllllt 9-o':> .,\ ..:s ()('\~\,,ii I ;}I ' f>( .)'{,j .lOJ b I
NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.