ML17290A838: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONS~TION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)ACCESSION NBR:9312230135 DOC.DATE: 93/12/10.NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONS~TION               SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
NO DOCKET FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION PARRISH,J.V.
ACCESSION NBR:9312230135             DOC.DATE: 93/12/10. NOTARIZED: NO             DOCKET FACIL:50-397   WPPSS   Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH. NAME             AUTHOR AFFILIATION PARRISH,J.V.         Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME           . RECIPIENT AFFILIATION NOTES'i FAULKENBERRY,B. Region 5 (Post 820201)
Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME
.RECIPIENT AFFILIATION FAULKENBERRY,B.
Region 5 (Post 820201)


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Special rept:on 931126,main control room received stack monitor sys trouble annunciator
Special rept:on 931126,main control room received stack monitor sys trouble annunciator & status display indicated                         I '
&status display indicated high range channel failed self-test.
high range channel failed self-test. Caused by component fax.lure of stack monitor detector. Replacement in progress.
Caused by component fax.lure of stack monitor detector.Replacement in progress.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR
DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR )               ENCL I     SIZE:
)ENCL I SIZE: TITLE: '50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc, NOTES'i I'RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PDV LA CLIFFORD,J INTERNAL: ACRS AEOD/DS P/TPAB NRR/DE/EELB NRR/DORS/OEAB NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DRIL/RPEB RRQBSSA.SPLB.GF E 02 RGA FILE 01 EXTERNAL: EG&G BRYCE,J.H NRC PDR NSIC POORE,W.COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1~1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1=1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 l.RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PDV PD AEOD/DOA AEOD/ROAB/DSP NRR/DE/EMEB NRR/DRCH/HHFB NRR/DRCH/HOLB NRR/DRSS/PRPB NRR/DSSA/SRXB RES/DSIR/EIB L ST LOBBY WARD NSIC MURPHY,G.A NUDOCS FULL TXT COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1-1 2 2 1 1 1.1 1'2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A D D NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
TITLE: '50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc, RECIPIENT A
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM P 1-37 (EXT.20079)TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 30 ENCL 30 D D-S WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O.Bax 968 3000 Geode Washington Way Richland, Washington 993524968 0'09)372-5000 December 10, 1993 G02-93-290 Docket No.50-397 Mr.B.'H.Faulkenberry Regional Administrator VS Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane Walnut Creek, CA.94596
COPIES            RECIPIENT          COPIES ID CODE/NAME           LTTR ENCL      ID CODE/NAME        LTTR ENCL          D PDV LA                       1    1    PDV PD                  1 CLIFFORD,J                   1 ~1                                      1 INTERNAL: ACRS                           2    2    AEOD/DOA                1-    1 AEOD/DS P/TPAB               1    1    AEOD/ROAB/DSP          2      2 NRR/DE/EELB                   1    1    NRR/DE/EMEB            1      1 NRR/DORS/OEAB NRR/DRCH/HICB 1
1
                                              =1 1
NRR/DRCH/HHFB NRR/DRCH/HOLB 1
1
                                                                                  .1 NRR/DRIL/RPEB                1    1    NRR/DRSS/PRPB           2      2 RRQBSSA. SPLB.              1    1    NRR/DSSA/SRXB           1      1 GF E            02          1    1    RES/DSIR/EIB           1      1 RGA      FILE 01            1    1 EXTERNAL: EG&G BRYCE,J.H                2    2    L ST LOBBY WARD       1      1 NRC PDR                      1    1    NSIC MURPHY,G.A         1     1 NSIC POORE,W.                1     l. NUDOCS FULL TXT        1     1 D
D D
NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
                                                                                            -S PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM P 1-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR               30   ENCL   30


==Dear Mr.Faulkenberry:==
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Bax 968 3000 Geode Washington Way Richland, Washington 993524968 0'09) 372-5000 December 10, 1993 G02-93-290 Docket No. 50-397 Mr. B.'H. Faulkenberry Regional Administrator VS Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane Walnut Creek, CA. 94596
 
==Dear Mr. Faulkenberry:==


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
%iiP-2, OPERATING LICENSE NO.NPF-21 SPECIAL REPORT: REACTOR BUILDING EFFLUENT MONITORING SYSTEM This special report is submitted pursuant to the requirements of WNP-2 Technical Specification Section 3.3.7.5,"Accident Monitoring Instrumentation." This Technical Specification includes Table 3.3.7.5-1, Item 31,"Reactor Building Effluent Monitoring System." Item 31 references Action 81 which states: "With the number of OPERABLE accident monitoring instrumentation channels less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, either restore the inoperable channel(s) to OPERABLE status within 72 hours, or:...In lieu of any other report required by Specification 6.9.1, prepare and submit a Special Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.2 within 14 days following the event outlining the action taken', the cause of the inoperability and the plans and schedule for restoring the system to OPERABLE status." At 0854 hours on November 29, 1993, the Reactor Building Effluent Monitoring System was inoperable for 72 hours requiring the submittal of this special report.~EE E~D On November 26, 1993 at 0854 hours, the Main Control Room received a"Stack Monitor='System Trouble" annunciator.
        %iiP-2, OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-21 SPECIAL REPORT: REACTOR BUILDINGEFFLUENT MONITORING SYSTEM This special report is submitted pursuant to the requirements of WNP-2 Technical Specification Section 3.3.7.5, "Accident Monitoring Instrumentation." This Technical Specification includes Table 3.3.7.5-1, Item 31, "Reactor Building Effluent Monitoring System." Item 31 references Action 81 which states: "With the number of OPERABLE accident monitoring instrumentation channels less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, either restore the inoperable channel(s) to OPERABLE status within 72 hours, or:... In lieu of any other report required by Specification 6.9.1, prepare and submit a Special Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.2 within 14 days following the event outlining the action taken', the cause of the inoperability and the plans and schedule for restoring the system to OPERABLE status." At 0854 hours on November 29, 1993, the Reactor Building Effluent Monitoring System was inoperable for 72 hours requiring the submittal of this special report.
The.Stack Monitor Status Display indicated that the high range channel (PRM-RE-1C) had failed its self-test.
E~D
The stack monitor is part of the Reactor Building Effluent Monitoring System which is required to be in service during Operating Conditions 1, 2, and 3 in accordance with Technical Specification Table 3.3.7.5-1 (Item 31).210064 9312230135 931210 PDR ADOCK 05000397 S PDR i Page Two SPECIAL REPORT: REACTOR BUILDING EFFLUENT MONITO~G SYSTEM Action Taken" Immediate corrective action was taken to declare the stack mohitor inoperable.
                                                                  ~ EE On November 26, 1993 at 0854 hours, the Main Control Room received a "Stack Monitor
The System Engineer was then notified and Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO)3.3.7.5 Action Statement No.81 was entered to initiate the preplanned alternate monitoring method and submit this'pecial report.Troubleshooting by the System Engineer on November 26, 1993 indicated a failure of the cryogenically cooled stack monitor detector.Additional troubleshooting on November 28, 1993 confirmed the initial findings.The equipment vendor (EG&G ORTEC)was contacted on November 29, 1993 for assistance in determining the location of the fault.Because the stack monitor detector requires a controlled warm-up and,cooldown from 70'elvin (-333.4'), a process that takes approximately 48 hours, the vendor recommended replacement of several components within the detector preamplifier before proceeding with detector replacement.
=
The vendor supplied preamplifier components were installed on December 2, 1993 but subsequent testing on December 3, 1993 indicated that the fault had not been corrected.
  'System Trouble" annunciator. The. Stack Monitor Status Display indicated that the high range channel (PRM-RE-1C) had failed its self-test. The stack monitor is part of the Reactor Building Effluent Monitoring System which is required to be in service during Operating Conditions 1, 2, and 3 in accordance with Technical Specification Table 3.3.7.5-1 (Item 31).
The vendor determined that the fault was internal to the stack monitor detector, requiring replacement.
210064 9312230135       931210 PDR     ADOCK     05000397 S                     PDR
a e of he In era ili The cause of the Reactor Building Effluent Monitoring System inoperability was a component failure of the stack monitor detector.However, the cause of the detector failure has not been determined because the fault apparently resides within the high-vacuum, sealed detector canister.The detector will be returned to the v'endor for warranty repair.lan and chedule for Rest rin the System t rable tatus The stack monitor detector replacement work is currently in progress with completion of installation.and calibration expected by December 17, 1993.Sincerely.V.Parrish (Mail Drop 1023)Assistant Managing Director, Operations CDM/bk CC: Document Control Desk NS Reynolds-Winston&Strawn'W Clifford-NRC DL Williams-BPA/399 NRC Site Inspector-927N Regulatory Agency wasNINCTCN puaLlc Pew!a A SUPPLY SYSTEM REGULATORY COMMITMENT IDENTIFICATION FORM~(FOR INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY)Source OocumenVDate S~al Gporf I/2llol93-/tobZ-93-2'utgorng Document Autttor Q.D.MCL~HACLLA Incomrng Document Reviewer Mail Drop Ext TeIs 44s I Summary ol Document Z ma(Lporf: Pitric.kv Eurfcfiu E4/0~k kfourka ru ZilW CONCURRENCE FOR COMMITMENTS LISTED BELOW.ASSIGNED TO SUPV.NAME rInt COMMITMENT wavily r'otuJtl~k~
 
nPdack.tuou r4v radar't uo k,~J v~4 ah~ol P Ew~uri~ku~'A.
Page Two i
gggA~+o Dp~c/o/a.SdrtArS-ZÃSA&w~,'A v Jeer lev radar'vMbq I/araadOV r QOWreraui~h.
SPECIAL REPORT: REACTOR BUILDINGEFFLUENT MONITO~G SYSTEM Action Taken" Immediate corrective action was taken to declare the stack mohitor inoperable. The System Engineer was then notified and Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.3.7.5 Action Statement No. 81 was entered to initiate the preplanned alternate monitoring method and submit this'pecial report.
Ar lant.tuaCAauiSaee
Troubleshooting by the System Engineer on November 26, 1993 indicated a failure of the cryogenically cooled stack monitor detector. Additional troubleshooting on November 28, 1993 confirmed the initial findings. The equipment vendor (EG&G ORTEC) was contacted on November 29, 1993 for assistance in determining the location of the fault. Because the stack monitor detector requires a controlled warm-up and,cooldown from 70'elvin (-333.4'), a process that takes approximately 48 hours, the vendor recommended replacement of several components within the detector preamplifier before proceeding with detector replacement. The vendor supplied preamplifier components were installed on December 2, 1993 but subsequent testing on December 3, 1993 indicated that the fault had not been corrected. The vendor determined that the fault was internal to the stack monitor detector, requiring replacement.
+O&Sr'/Cud A/QC Zus~4v.Dkmu FVL~era.v shw<3t'.Action Tracking No.6 CduSiag'iz/I v/9s Hard Date Ag ll~/~v LicLusiur3 A6 Cfos lc,t-orecast Date OA.re I Hard Date DUE DATE SUPV.SIGNATURE Action Tracking No.o recast Date ard Date Action Tracking No.o recast Date ard Date Action Tracking No.orecaat Date ard Date of ecaSt Date ard Date ofecast Date Hafd Date 969 25260 At tefea)o recast Date a Date}}
a e of he In   era ili The cause of the Reactor Building Effluent Monitoring System inoperability was a component failure of the stack monitor detector. However, the cause of the detector failure has not been determined because the fault apparently resides within the high-vacuum, sealed detector canister.
The detector will be returned to the v'endor for warranty repair.
lan and   chedule for Rest rin the System t       rable   tatus The stack monitor detector replacement work is currently in progress with completion of installation.and calibration expected by December 17, 1993.
Sincerely
. V. Parrish (Mail Drop 1023)
Assistant Managing Director, Operations CDM/bk CC:     Document Control Desk NS Reynolds - Winston &     Strawn'W Clifford - NRC DL Williams - BPA/399 NRC Site Inspector - 927N
 
A      wasNINCTCN puaLlc Pew!a SUPPLY SYSTEM REGULATORY COMMITMENTIDENTIFICATIONFORM
                                  ~
(FOR INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY)
Source OocumenVDate Regulatory Agency Document Autttor S~al Gporf Incomrng Document Reviewer I /2llol93- Mail Drop
                                                                                                          /tobZ-93-2'utgorng Ext Q. D. MCL~HACLLA                                                                                 TeIs                               44s I Summary ol Document Z ma(Lporf:         Pitric.kv Eurfcfiu E4             /0~k kfourka ru             ZilW CONCURRENCE FOR COMMITMENTS LISTED BELOW                   .
ASSIGNED TO                             SUPV. NAME rInt COMMITMENT                                               DUE DATE                            SUPV. SIGNATURE wavily r'otuJtl~k~ nPdack. tuou r4v radar't                                       6 CduSiag                                Ag  ll~/~v uo k,~J v~4 ah~ ol P Ew~uri~ku~'A. gggA~                                                   'iz/Iv/9s Hard
+o Dp~c/o/a. SdrtArS-                                                             Date Z&#xc3;SA&w~,'Av Jeer lev radar'vMbq                                                   LicLusiur3                              A6 Cfos lc,t-I/araadOV r QOWreraui~h. Ar lant. tuaCAauiSaee +O &Sr'/Cud                         orecast Date      OA. re I A/QC Zus ~4v. Dkmu FVL ~era.v                         shw<3t'.                   Hard Date Action Tracking No.
o recast Date ard Date Action Tracking No.
o recast Date ard Date Action Tracking No.
orecaat Date ard Date Action Tracking No.
of ecaSt Date ard Date ofecast Date Hafd Date o recast Date a
Date 969 25260 At tefea)}}

Latest revision as of 07:23, 4 February 2020

Special Rept:On 931126,main Control Room Received Stack Monitor Sys Trouble Annunciator & Status Display Indicated High Range Channel Failed self-test.Caused by Component Failure of Stack Monitor Detector.Replacement in Progress
ML17290A838
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 12/10/1993
From: Parrish J
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To: Faulkenberry B
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
References
GO2-93-290, NUDOCS 9312230135
Download: ML17290A838 (4)


Text

ACCELERATED DISTRIBUTION DEMONS~TION SYSTEM REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9312230135 DOC.DATE: 93/12/10. NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION PARRISH,J.V. Washington Public Power Supply System RECIP.NAME . RECIPIENT AFFILIATION NOTES'i FAULKENBERRY,B. Region 5 (Post 820201)

SUBJECT:

Special rept:on 931126,main control room received stack monitor sys trouble annunciator & status display indicated I '

high range channel failed self-test. Caused by component fax.lure of stack monitor detector. Replacement in progress.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE22D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ) ENCL I SIZE:

TITLE: '50.73/50.9 Licensee Event Report (LER), Incident Rpt, etc, RECIPIENT A

COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL D PDV LA 1 1 PDV PD 1 CLIFFORD,J 1 ~1 1 INTERNAL: ACRS 2 2 AEOD/DOA 1- 1 AEOD/DS P/TPAB 1 1 AEOD/ROAB/DSP 2 2 NRR/DE/EELB 1 1 NRR/DE/EMEB 1 1 NRR/DORS/OEAB NRR/DRCH/HICB 1

1

=1 1

NRR/DRCH/HHFB NRR/DRCH/HOLB 1

1

.1 NRR/DRIL/RPEB 1 1 NRR/DRSS/PRPB 2 2 RRQBSSA. SPLB. 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SRXB 1 1 GF E 02 1 1 RES/DSIR/EIB 1 1 RGA FILE 01 1 1 EXTERNAL: EG&G BRYCE,J.H 2 2 L ST LOBBY WARD 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC MURPHY,G.A 1 1 NSIC POORE,W. 1 l. NUDOCS FULL TXT 1 1 D

D D

NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

-S PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM P 1-37 (EXT. 20079) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 30 ENCL 30

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM P.O. Bax 968 3000 Geode Washington Way Richland, Washington 993524968 0'09) 372-5000 December 10, 1993 G02-93-290 Docket No. 50-397 Mr. B.'H. Faulkenberry Regional Administrator VS Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region V 1450 Maria Lane Walnut Creek, CA. 94596

Dear Mr. Faulkenberry:

Subject:

%iiP-2, OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-21 SPECIAL REPORT: REACTOR BUILDINGEFFLUENT MONITORING SYSTEM This special report is submitted pursuant to the requirements of WNP-2 Technical Specification Section 3.3.7.5, "Accident Monitoring Instrumentation." This Technical Specification includes Table 3.3.7.5-1, Item 31, "Reactor Building Effluent Monitoring System." Item 31 references Action 81 which states: "With the number of OPERABLE accident monitoring instrumentation channels less than required by the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, either restore the inoperable channel(s) to OPERABLE status within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />, or:... In lieu of any other report required by Specification 6.9.1, prepare and submit a Special Report to the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.2 within 14 days following the event outlining the action taken', the cause of the inoperability and the plans and schedule for restoring the system to OPERABLE status." At 0854 hours0.00988 days <br />0.237 hours <br />0.00141 weeks <br />3.24947e-4 months <br /> on November 29, 1993, the Reactor Building Effluent Monitoring System was inoperable for 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> requiring the submittal of this special report.

E~D

~ EE On November 26, 1993 at 0854 hours0.00988 days <br />0.237 hours <br />0.00141 weeks <br />3.24947e-4 months <br />, the Main Control Room received a "Stack Monitor

=

'System Trouble" annunciator. The. Stack Monitor Status Display indicated that the high range channel (PRM-RE-1C) had failed its self-test. The stack monitor is part of the Reactor Building Effluent Monitoring System which is required to be in service during Operating Conditions 1, 2, and 3 in accordance with Technical Specification Table 3.3.7.5-1 (Item 31).

210064 9312230135 931210 PDR ADOCK 05000397 S PDR

Page Two i

SPECIAL REPORT: REACTOR BUILDINGEFFLUENT MONITO~G SYSTEM Action Taken" Immediate corrective action was taken to declare the stack mohitor inoperable. The System Engineer was then notified and Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.3.7.5 Action Statement No. 81 was entered to initiate the preplanned alternate monitoring method and submit this'pecial report.

Troubleshooting by the System Engineer on November 26, 1993 indicated a failure of the cryogenically cooled stack monitor detector. Additional troubleshooting on November 28, 1993 confirmed the initial findings. The equipment vendor (EG&G ORTEC) was contacted on November 29, 1993 for assistance in determining the location of the fault. Because the stack monitor detector requires a controlled warm-up and,cooldown from 70'elvin (-333.4'), a process that takes approximately 48 hours5.555556e-4 days <br />0.0133 hours <br />7.936508e-5 weeks <br />1.8264e-5 months <br />, the vendor recommended replacement of several components within the detector preamplifier before proceeding with detector replacement. The vendor supplied preamplifier components were installed on December 2, 1993 but subsequent testing on December 3, 1993 indicated that the fault had not been corrected. The vendor determined that the fault was internal to the stack monitor detector, requiring replacement.

a e of he In era ili The cause of the Reactor Building Effluent Monitoring System inoperability was a component failure of the stack monitor detector. However, the cause of the detector failure has not been determined because the fault apparently resides within the high-vacuum, sealed detector canister.

The detector will be returned to the v'endor for warranty repair.

lan and chedule for Rest rin the System t rable tatus The stack monitor detector replacement work is currently in progress with completion of installation.and calibration expected by December 17, 1993.

Sincerely

. V. Parrish (Mail Drop 1023)

Assistant Managing Director, Operations CDM/bk CC: Document Control Desk NS Reynolds - Winston & Strawn'W Clifford - NRC DL Williams - BPA/399 NRC Site Inspector - 927N

A wasNINCTCN puaLlc Pew!a SUPPLY SYSTEM REGULATORY COMMITMENTIDENTIFICATIONFORM

~

(FOR INTERNAL DISTRIBUTION ONLY)

Source OocumenVDate Regulatory Agency Document Autttor S~al Gporf Incomrng Document Reviewer I /2llol93- Mail Drop

/tobZ-93-2'utgorng Ext Q. D. MCL~HACLLA TeIs 44s I Summary ol Document Z ma(Lporf: Pitric.kv Eurfcfiu E4 /0~k kfourka ru ZilW CONCURRENCE FOR COMMITMENTS LISTED BELOW .

ASSIGNED TO SUPV. NAME rInt COMMITMENT DUE DATE SUPV. SIGNATURE wavily r'otuJtl~k~ nPdack. tuou r4v radar't 6 CduSiag Ag ll~/~v uo k,~J v~4 ah~ ol P Ew~uri~ku~'A. gggA~ 'iz/Iv/9s Hard

+o Dp~c/o/a. SdrtArS- Date ZÃSA&w~,'Av Jeer lev radar'vMbq LicLusiur3 A6 Cfos lc,t-I/araadOV r QOWreraui~h. Ar lant. tuaCAauiSaee +O &Sr'/Cud orecast Date OA. re I A/QC Zus ~4v. Dkmu FVL ~era.v shw<3t'. Hard Date Action Tracking No.

o recast Date ard Date Action Tracking No.

o recast Date ard Date Action Tracking No.

orecaat Date ard Date Action Tracking No.

of ecaSt Date ard Date ofecast Date Hafd Date o recast Date a

Date 969 25260 At tefea)