ML19325C853: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:' | {{#Wiki_filter:' | ||
;' i;, fi ''{ . | ;' i;, fi ''{ . | ||
i , | i , | ||
l l} u. ,~,< | l l} u. ,~,< | ||
f | f | ||
"_e_ Q, 1s ;' .h,+ + | "_e_ Q, 1s ;' .h,+ + | ||
~ | ~ | ||
.,..9 9,', ._ | .,..9 9,', ._ | ||
! ' r ,. =. i 4 | ! ' r ,. =. i 4 | ||
; .6 > | ; .6 > | ||
~ | ~ | ||
EDISON PLAZA .. . | EDISON PLAZA .. . | ||
<I ' | <I ' | ||
300 MADISON AVENUE - | 300 MADISON AVENUE - | ||
. TOLEDO, OHIO 43652 0001 a, p. | . TOLEDO, OHIO 43652 0001 a, p. | ||
O' | O' | ||
; | ; | ||
h- 5 ' | h- 5 ' | ||
r, ye .. . . | r, ye .. . . | ||
| Line 48: | Line 39: | ||
: 9. NP33-89-015 i l; - , | : 9. NP33-89-015 i l; - , | ||
i Docket No. 50-346 M License No.-NPF-3 , | i Docket No. 50-346 M License No.-NPF-3 , | ||
sh , | sh , | ||
United; States' Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk. ' | United; States' Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk. ' | ||
Washington, D.-C. 20555 Gentlemen: | Washington, D.-C. 20555 Gentlemen: | ||
I e LER 89 013- | I e LER 89 013- | ||
* I Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 Date of Occurrence - September 13. 1989 | * I Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 1 Date of Occurrence - September 13. 1989 | ||
' Enclosed [ Licensee Event Report 89-013 which is being provided in accordance | ' Enclosed [ Licensee Event Report 89-013 which is being provided in accordance with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(1) to provide'30 days written notification of the | ||
with 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(1) to provide'30 days written notification of the | |||
, subject: occurrence. | , subject: occurrence. | ||
e | e | ||
- Yours' truly,- | - Yours' truly,- | ||
.'] . | .'] . | ||
I g)f.tcw .f Louis'F.. Storz Plant. Manager Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station-LFS/p1g I'nclosure cc: Mr'. A. Bert Davis Regional Administrator USNRC Region III Mr. Paul Byron DB-1 NRC Sr. Resident Inspector V | I g)f.tcw .f Louis'F.. Storz Plant. Manager Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station-LFS/p1g I'nclosure cc: Mr'. A. Bert Davis Regional Administrator USNRC Region III Mr. Paul Byron DB-1 NRC Sr. Resident Inspector V | ||
~'8910170323 891013 P'4 | ~'8910170323 891013 P'4 | ||
. PDR ADOCK 05000346, l | . PDR ADOCK 05000346, l | ||
| Line 75: | Line 55: | ||
;, s - PDC | ;, s - PDC | ||
-3 asne ps see . , UA. seueLEAR ReeULafonY oceanuseoN l a'i *,Paov.3 . M.a,M LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) - | |||
-3 asne ps see . , UA. seueLEAR ReeULafonY oceanuseoN l a'i *,Paov.3 . M.a,M | |||
LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) - | |||
.c DOCKET IIUMBER WI PAtos 434 j | .c DOCKET IIUMBER WI PAtos 434 j | ||
: f. PAcek)TY esAast tu = | : f. PAcek)TY esAast tu = | ||
Davis-Besse Unit No. 1- 0 l5 l 010 l 0 l 3l4 l 6 1 lOFl012 mLE se - | Davis-Besse Unit No. 1- 0 l5 l 010 l 0 l 3l4 l 6 1 lOFl012 mLE se - | ||
' Hourly Fire Watch Patrol Exceeded Allowed Interval By Two Minutes SVfMT DATE 481 LSR NUMBER tel RSPORT DATE (7) OThdA PACILITIES lefv0LVED En e MONTM OAY YEAR YEAR *: 880 'AL m kI vue MONTH DAY YEAR P Act6sYv NAasse DOCKET NUMBERIS) 0l5l0l0l0l l l | ' Hourly Fire Watch Patrol Exceeded Allowed Interval By Two Minutes SVfMT DATE 481 LSR NUMBER tel RSPORT DATE (7) OThdA PACILITIES lefv0LVED En e MONTM OAY YEAR YEAR *: 880 'AL m kI vue MONTH DAY YEAR P Act6sYv NAasse DOCKET NUMBERIS) 0l5l0l0l0l l l | ||
~ ~ | ~ ~ | ||
0 l9 1l3 8 9 8l 9 - 0l1 l 3 0l0 1l0 1l3 8l 9 0 151 0 10 1 0 1 I I ' | 0 l9 1l3 8 9 8l 9 - 0l1 l 3 0l0 1l0 1l3 8l 9 0 151 0 10 1 0 1 I I ' | ||
p,,,,,,, THis mEPORT e tusentTTED PuneuANT To THE mEOuenEMENTs OP to Crn $: (casse one er mee et she 8mmesseisi HH 00006 W) 1 M.40 tit) 30.40Sle) 00.78telWHNI 73.711bl | p,,,,,,, THis mEPORT e tusentTTED PuneuANT To THE mEOuenEMENTs OP to Crn $: (casse one er mee et she 8mmesseisi HH 00006 W) 1 M.40 tit) 30.40Sle) 00.78telWHNI 73.711bl a M 48.14 alt 110) go.SeteHU 98.78talt3Hel 78.714e) n., i i M i. inh.> - | ||
a M 48.14 alt 110) go.SeteHU 98.78talt3Hel 78.714e) | |||
n., i i M i. inh.> - | |||
Mm.=> _ | Mm.=> _ | ||
Mn.H.H . _ =ayp,,g | Mn.H.H . _ =ayp,,g | ||
| Line 98: | Line 68: | ||
=""u=> | =""u=> | ||
'7E e'y c, _ 1 ""*"''a | '7E e'y c, _ 1 ""*"''a | ||
="*"'"*i^' | ="*"'"*i^' | ||
"""H8"'""" | """H8"'""" | ||
;;>.'t!.I \ ' Al, '- | ;;>.'t!.I \ ' Al, '- | ||
's5.'t+'' | 's5.'t+'' | ||
s <' M.40SieHilts) to.73delt2Hil0 30.734 ell 3Hal , | s <' M.40SieHilts) to.73delt2Hil0 30.734 ell 3Hal , | ||
| Line 116: | Line 81: | ||
Ak' s' ; I s | Ak' s' ; I s | ||
Y '%s" jh$;?f$$$$ | Y '%s" jh$;?f$$$$ | ||
I I I I I I i n ' 'i e' I I I I I I I RMM*WA'JA | I I I I I I i n ' 'i e' I I I I I I I RMM*WA'JA 1 l l l J 's l l l l l l l ' | ||
1 l l l J 's l l l l l l l ' | |||
l ) l SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EMPECTED M4) MONTH DAY VSAR | l ) l SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EMPECTED M4) MONTH DAY VSAR | ||
; '8IWi " | ; '8IWi " | ||
| Line 125: | Line 88: | ||
l-l- On September 13, 1989, at 0015 hours, an hourly fire watch patrol exceeded the allowed interval. The patrol was started at 0017 hours and was two minutes late. This is a viclation of Technical Specification 3.7.10, Action "a.2". i The employ.ee assigned to the watch failed to inform the Shift Supervisor immediately when his progress was impeded. His problem was quickly resolved, but not before. the allowed interval had passed. | l-l- On September 13, 1989, at 0015 hours, an hourly fire watch patrol exceeded the allowed interval. The patrol was started at 0017 hours and was two minutes late. This is a viclation of Technical Specification 3.7.10, Action "a.2". i The employ.ee assigned to the watch failed to inform the Shift Supervisor immediately when his progress was impeded. His problem was quickly resolved, but not before. the allowed interval had passed. | ||
The individual was counseled. All fire watch personnel received information on this incident and on their responsibilities as roving fire watches. | The individual was counseled. All fire watch personnel received information on this incident and on their responsibilities as roving fire watches. | ||
(. | (. | ||
.;, . | .;, . | ||
''a ' | ''a ' | ||
| Line 138: | Line 95: | ||
. . . va auctsaa Lieutatont ca | . . . va auctsaa Lieutatont ca | ||
**''. 4 ' LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION ***aovio owe no. sc-m. | **''. 4 ' LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION ***aovio owe no. sc-m. | ||
y .w | y .w p, . | ||
p, . | |||
u - ,,,,. | u - ,,,,. | ||
[, patataTV leases Os occutt NutfS4R 838.. LOR WhdSSR W Pa04 m vtan 88g8 MAL s ."8 vg | [, patataTV leases Os occutt NutfS4R 838.. LOR WhdSSR W Pa04 m vtan 88g8 MAL s ."8 vg l Davis-Besse Unit No.-.1 o l6 lo jo lo l3l4 p 8l9 - | ||
l Davis-Besse Unit No.-.1 o l6 lo jo lo l3l4 p 8l9 - | |||
0 l1 l3 Oj0 0 j2 - or 0l2 wt a== = mewes mammwe ac s==mnaw nn k.- | 0 l1 l3 Oj0 0 j2 - or 0l2 wt a== = mewes mammwe ac s==mnaw nn k.- | ||
!; | !; | ||
Descriotion of Occurrence: | Descriotion of Occurrence: | ||
On September.13, 1989, at 0015 hours, an hourly fire watch patrol exceeded the-one hour interval between patrols of the Radiological Control Area (RCA). The | On September.13, 1989, at 0015 hours, an hourly fire watch patrol exceeded the-one hour interval between patrols of the Radiological Control Area (RCA). The hourly patrol is required by Technical Specification-(TS)-3;7.10, Action "a.2" due to deficiencies in fire barriers in RCA. The hourly patrols are scheduled to begin on the hour. They are' performed at intervals of 60' minutes with a margin of 15 minutes. The patrol that was to start at 0000 hours was not started until 0017 hours. This exceeded the 75 minutes maximum interval' by two minutes. This is a violation of Action Statement "a.2" of TS 3.7.10. | ||
This is reportable under 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(1)(B) as a condition prohibited by Technical Specifications. | |||
hourly patrol is required by Technical Specification-(TS)-3;7.10, Action "a.2" due to deficiencies in fire barriers in RCA. The hourly patrols are scheduled to begin on the hour. They are' performed at intervals of 60' minutes with a margin of 15 minutes. The patrol that was to start at 0000 hours was not started until 0017 hours. This exceeded the 75 minutes maximum interval' by two minutes. This is a violation of Action Statement "a.2" of TS 3.7.10. | |||
This is reportable under 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(1)(B) as a condition prohibited by | |||
Technical Specifications. | |||
Cause of Occurrence: | Cause of Occurrence: | ||
The cause was personnel error. The employee assigned to the fire watch did not conduct the watch as trained. The employee had some problems receiving. | The cause was personnel error. The employee assigned to the fire watch did not conduct the watch as trained. The employee had some problems receiving. | ||
| Line 161: | Line 108: | ||
I Anedvsis of Occurrence: | I Anedvsis of Occurrence: | ||
The hourly fire watch patrols are used as compensation when Technical Specification fire barriers are declared inoperable with operable fire detection on at least one side. The fire detection on at least one side of the barrier still provides early warning of a fire in the area or that fire has penetrated through'a barrier. The hourly fire watch patrol provides additional early'deteetion of fire problems. Being two minutes late for starting an' hourly fire watch patrol has no safety significance. | The hourly fire watch patrols are used as compensation when Technical Specification fire barriers are declared inoperable with operable fire detection on at least one side. The fire detection on at least one side of the barrier still provides early warning of a fire in the area or that fire has penetrated through'a barrier. The hourly fire watch patrol provides additional early'deteetion of fire problems. Being two minutes late for starting an' hourly fire watch patrol has no safety significance. | ||
i corrective Action: ! | i corrective Action: ! | ||
J The employee who started the watch late received counseling on September 21, 1989. All fire watch personnel received information on this event and a reminder of their responsibilities. | J The employee who started the watch late received counseling on September 21, 1989. All fire watch personnel received information on this event and a reminder of their responsibilities. | ||
Revision as of 01:48, 1 February 2020
| ML19325C853 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 10/13/1989 |
| From: | Storz L, Stotz J TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| BB89-01073, BB89-1073, LER-89-013, LER-89-13, NUDOCS 8910170323 | |
| Download: ML19325C853 (3) | |
Text
'
- ' i;, fi { .
i ,
l l} u. ,~,<
f
"_e_ Q, 1s ;' .h,+ +
~
.,..9 9,', ._
! ' r ,. =. i 4
- .6 >
~
EDISON PLAZA .. .
-
Mm.=> _
Mn.H.H . _ =ayp,,g
=
=""u=>
'7E e'y c, _ 1 ""*"a
="*"'"*i^'
"""H8"'"""
- >.'t!.I \ ' Al, '-
's5.'t+
s <' M.40SieHilts) to.73delt2Hil0 30.734 ell 3Hal ,
. LICENSEE CONTACT POR TMit LER (13)
NAME- TELEPHONE NUMSER AREA CODE
{
Jan C. Stotz, Engineer - Maintenance Planning 4li i9 2,4 i 9,-l 5;Og ol0 COMPLETE ONE LINE FOR EACM COMPONENT PAILUAE DESCRISEO IN THIS REeORT 03)
"A CAUS$ 4YSTtu COMPONENT "" [f [nenY '
'f $f"d![ CAUSE SYSTEM COMPONENT '
Ak' s' ; I s
Y '%s" jh$;?f$$$$
I I I I I I i n ' 'i e' I I I I I I I RMM*WA'JA 1 l l l J 's l l l l l l l '
l ) l SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT EMPECTED M4) MONTH DAY VSAR
- '8IWi "
G vEs tor ru. one exPecroo sUewss,on oArts -
~} No l l l A TmV m, ,. , . .s m. . ,,, . - , n .>
l-l- On September 13, 1989, at 0015 hours1.736111e-4 days <br />0.00417 hours <br />2.480159e-5 weeks <br />5.7075e-6 months <br />, an hourly fire watch patrol exceeded the allowed interval. The patrol was started at 0017 hours1.967593e-4 days <br />0.00472 hours <br />2.810847e-5 weeks <br />6.4685e-6 months <br /> and was two minutes late. This is a viclation of Technical Specification 3.7.10, Action "a.2". i The employ.ee assigned to the watch failed to inform the Shift Supervisor immediately when his progress was impeded. His problem was quickly resolved, but not before. the allowed interval had passed.
The individual was counseled. All fire watch personnel received information on this incident and on their responsibilities as roving fire watches.
(.
.;, .
a '
~
. . . va auctsaa Lieutatont ca
- . 4 ' LICENSEE EVENT REPORT (LER) TEXT CONTINUATION ***aovio owe no. sc-m.
y .w p, .
u - ,,,,.
[, patataTV leases Os occutt NutfS4R 838.. LOR WhdSSR W Pa04 m vtan 88g8 MAL s ."8 vg l Davis-Besse Unit No.-.1 o l6 lo jo lo l3l4 p 8l9 -
0 l1 l3 Oj0 0 j2 - or 0l2 wt a== = mewes mammwe ac s==mnaw nn k.-
!;
Descriotion of Occurrence:
On September.13, 1989, at 0015 hours1.736111e-4 days <br />0.00417 hours <br />2.480159e-5 weeks <br />5.7075e-6 months <br />, an hourly fire watch patrol exceeded the-one hour interval between patrols of the Radiological Control Area (RCA). The hourly patrol is required by Technical Specification-(TS)-3;7.10, Action "a.2" due to deficiencies in fire barriers in RCA. The hourly patrols are scheduled to begin on the hour. They are' performed at intervals of 60' minutes with a margin of 15 minutes. The patrol that was to start at 0000 hours0 days <br />0 hours <br />0 weeks <br />0 months <br /> was not started until 0017 hours1.967593e-4 days <br />0.00472 hours <br />2.810847e-5 weeks <br />6.4685e-6 months <br />. This exceeded the 75 minutes maximum interval' by two minutes. This is a violation of Action Statement "a.2" of TS 3.7.10.
This is reportable under 10CFR50.73(a)(2)(1)(B) as a condition prohibited by Technical Specifications.
Cause of Occurrence:
The cause was personnel error. The employee assigned to the fire watch did not conduct the watch as trained. The employee had some problems receiving.
-his self reading dosimeter at the entrance of RCA, but he failed'to contact-the Shift Supervisor immediately that his progress was impeded. By the time this was resolved, the patrol started two minutes beyond the allowed time interval.
I Anedvsis of Occurrence:
The hourly fire watch patrols are used as compensation when Technical Specification fire barriers are declared inoperable with operable fire detection on at least one side. The fire detection on at least one side of the barrier still provides early warning of a fire in the area or that fire has penetrated through'a barrier. The hourly fire watch patrol provides additional early'deteetion of fire problems. Being two minutes late for starting an' hourly fire watch patrol has no safety significance.
i corrective Action: !
J The employee who started the watch late received counseling on September 21, 1989. All fire watch personnel received information on this event and a reminder of their responsibilities.
. Failure Data:
This is the first report of a late fire watch patrol s~ . .'R 88-014 (June 9, 1988) when a patrol was delayed by the testing of a r otation system.
REPORT NO.- NP-33-89-015 PCAO NO.- 89-0439 g*oa= ** - .u s oro iese+e2+saeuse L .
>