ML073100211: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML073100211 | | number = ML073100211 | ||
| issue date = 10/05/2007 | | issue date = 10/05/2007 | ||
| title = | | title = Comment (10) Regarding Iplr Scoping | ||
| author name = Public Commenter | | author name = Public Commenter | ||
| author affiliation = Public Commenter | | author affiliation = Public Commenter | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: | {{#Wiki_filter:From: <jwanshel@earthlink.net> | ||
To: | To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov> | ||
Date: 10/5/2007 3:05:05 PM | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Indian Point EIS Comments | Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham | ||
Bo Pham | |||
==Dear Bo Pham,== | ==Dear Bo Pham,== | ||
FORMAL REQUEST | FORMAL REQUEST A government agency relicensing a facility leaking lethal radioactivity into the environment, when the source and amount of that pollution is unknown, might represent a first (and new governmental low). The plant has polluted the environment. The only question is, how much? How could you consider relicensing it when you don't know? | ||
You have sworn an oath to protect the public. Stand by it, even if the revolving door jams on you. | |||
I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant. | |||
1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal), | |||
conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report. | |||
Sincerely, jeff wanshel 1 spanish cove rd larchmont, NY 10538 | |||
Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number: 10 Mail Envelope Properties (47304039.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000009.1.17E50C.1) | |||
Federal Register Notice: | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Indian Point EIS Comments | Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date: 10/5/2007 3:05:05 PM From: <jwanshel@earthlink.net> | ||
Created By: | Created By: jwanshel@earthlink.net Recipients | ||
<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov> | |||
Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1545 10/5/2007 3:05:05 PM Mime.822 2378 11/6/2007 10:21:45 AM Options Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None None Concealed | |||
Post Office | |||
Files | |||
Concealed | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
No | No Security: Standard}} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:36, 7 December 2019
| ML073100211 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 10/05/2007 |
| From: | Public Commenter Public Commenter |
| To: | Division of License Renewal |
| References | |
| 72FR45075 | |
| Download: ML073100211 (3) | |
Text
From: <jwanshel@earthlink.net>
To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Date: 10/5/2007 3:05:05 PM
Subject:
Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham
Dear Bo Pham,
FORMAL REQUEST A government agency relicensing a facility leaking lethal radioactivity into the environment, when the source and amount of that pollution is unknown, might represent a first (and new governmental low). The plant has polluted the environment. The only question is, how much? How could you consider relicensing it when you don't know?
You have sworn an oath to protect the public. Stand by it, even if the revolving door jams on you.
I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant.
1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal),
conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.
Sincerely, jeff wanshel 1 spanish cove rd larchmont, NY 10538
Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number: 10 Mail Envelope Properties (47304039.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000009.1.17E50C.1)
Subject:
Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date: 10/5/2007 3:05:05 PM From: <jwanshel@earthlink.net>
Created By: jwanshel@earthlink.net Recipients
<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1545 10/5/2007 3:05:05 PM Mime.822 2378 11/6/2007 10:21:45 AM Options Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard