ML073100213: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML073100213 | | number = ML073100213 | ||
| issue date = 10/05/2007 | | issue date = 10/05/2007 | ||
| title = | | title = Comment (12) Regarding Iplr Scoping | ||
| author name = Public Commenter | | author name = Public Commenter | ||
| author affiliation = Public Commenter | | author affiliation = Public Commenter | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: | {{#Wiki_filter:From: <jcvm@optonline.net> | ||
To: | To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov> | ||
Date: 10/5/2007 12:44:00 PM | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Indian Point EIS Comments | Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham | ||
Bo Pham | |||
==Dear Bo Pham,== | ==Dear Bo Pham,== | ||
I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission | I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant: | ||
1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal), | |||
address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact | conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report. | ||
Additionally, the Indian Point Nuclear Plant sits on the RAMAPO FAULT. Please consider the serious consequences on thousands of lives should a massive earthquake occur there! A no-fly zone is presently NOT protecting the air space over this nuclear plant. | |||
1: the impacts of a terrorist | Lastly, three-eyed fish have been seen swimming near the Indian Plant Nuclear facility. A friend of ours actually caught a three-eyed catfish from the Hudson River there, indicating that the steady leak of radioactive material is affecting the fish in this river by the plant. I think it is unconscionable for anyone to even consider renewing Entergy's contract for another 20 | ||
2: the impacts of Indian | |||
3: the build-up of high-level | |||
4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a | |||
combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal), conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report. | |||
years! Besides, why 20 years!? A lot happens in 20 years. By then, we may be using safer sources of energy. | |||
I urge you to keep in mind, first and foremost, the possibility of an earthquake at the Ramapo Fault upon which the plant sits, that could destroy the plant and thousands of lives as a result!!! We can't take Mother Nature for granted, ever. | |||
Sincerely, Joni Mercado 266 Canopus Hollow Rd. | |||
Putnam Valley, NY 10579 | |||
Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number: 12 Mail Envelope Properties (47304039.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000004.1.123061.1) | |||
Federal Register Notice: | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Indian Point EIS Comments | Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date: 10/5/2007 12:44:00 PM From: <jcvm@optonline.net> | ||
Created By: | Created By: jcvm@optonline.net Recipients | ||
<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov> | |||
Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2097 10/5/2007 12:44:00 PM Mime.822 2922 11/6/2007 10:21:45 AM Options Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None None Concealed | |||
Post Office | |||
Files | |||
Concealed | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
No | No Security: Standard}} | ||
Latest revision as of 10:36, 7 December 2019
| ML073100213 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 10/05/2007 |
| From: | Public Commenter Public Commenter |
| To: | Division of License Renewal |
| References | |
| 72FR45075 | |
| Download: ML073100213 (3) | |
Text
From: <jcvm@optonline.net>
To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Date: 10/5/2007 12:44:00 PM
Subject:
Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham
Dear Bo Pham,
I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:
1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal),
conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.
Additionally, the Indian Point Nuclear Plant sits on the RAMAPO FAULT. Please consider the serious consequences on thousands of lives should a massive earthquake occur there! A no-fly zone is presently NOT protecting the air space over this nuclear plant.
Lastly, three-eyed fish have been seen swimming near the Indian Plant Nuclear facility. A friend of ours actually caught a three-eyed catfish from the Hudson River there, indicating that the steady leak of radioactive material is affecting the fish in this river by the plant. I think it is unconscionable for anyone to even consider renewing Entergy's contract for another 20
years! Besides, why 20 years!? A lot happens in 20 years. By then, we may be using safer sources of energy.
I urge you to keep in mind, first and foremost, the possibility of an earthquake at the Ramapo Fault upon which the plant sits, that could destroy the plant and thousands of lives as a result!!! We can't take Mother Nature for granted, ever.
Sincerely, Joni Mercado 266 Canopus Hollow Rd.
Putnam Valley, NY 10579
Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number: 12 Mail Envelope Properties (47304039.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000004.1.123061.1)
Subject:
Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date: 10/5/2007 12:44:00 PM From: <jcvm@optonline.net>
Created By: jcvm@optonline.net Recipients
<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2097 10/5/2007 12:44:00 PM Mime.822 2922 11/6/2007 10:21:45 AM Options Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard