ML18068A704: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML18068A704
| number = ML18068A704
| issue date = 03/09/2018
| issue date = 03/09/2018
| title = River Bend Station Relief Request to Use BWRVIP Guidelines in Lieu of ASME Code
| title = NRR E-mail Capture - River Bend Station Relief Request to Use BWRVIP Guidelines in Lieu of ASME Code
| author name = Regner L M
| author name = Regner L
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV-1
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL/LPLIV-1
| addressee name = Coates A R
| addressee name = Coates A
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
| addressee affiliation = Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc
| docket = 05000458
| docket = 05000458
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project = EPID:L-2018-LLR-0008
| project = EPID:L-2018-LLR-0008
| stage = Other
| stage = Acceptance Review
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Regner, Lisa Sent: Friday, March 09, 2018 2:47 PM To: Coates, Alyson Cc: SCHENK, TIM
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From:                                   Regner, Lisa Sent:                                   Friday, March 09, 2018 2:47 PM To:                                     Coates, Alyson Cc:                                     SCHENK, TIM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review Results: RR-RBS-IS I-019 (EPID L-2018-LLR-0008) Use of BWRVIP GuidelinesBy letter dated February 13, 2018, Entergy submitted a relief request for River Bend Station. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this alternative request to apply the Boiling Water Reactor Vessel and Internals Project (BWRVIP) guidelines in lieu of specific ASME Code Section XI requirements. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  
Acceptance Review Results: RR-RBS-ISI-019 (EPID L-2018-LLR-0008) Use of BWRVIP Guidelines By letter dated February 13, 2018, Entergy submitted a relief request for River Bend Station. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this alternative request to apply the Boiling Water Reactor Vessel and Internals Project (BWRVIP) guidelines in lieu of specific ASME Code Section XI requirements. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed te chnical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::100 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 9 months. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
 
These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 9 months. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project  
If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906.
Lisa M. Regner Senior Project Manager Branch 4, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission OWFN 9E01 301-415-1906 Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov 1


manager. 
Hearing Identifier:   NRR_DMPS Email Number:         237 Mail Envelope Properties   (SN6PR09MB272014ED8BBF62912AD3047FE5DE0)
 
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.
If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906.
Lisa M. Regner Senior Project Manager Branch 4, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 237   Mail Envelope Properties   (SN6PR09MB272014ED8BBF62912AD3047FE5DE0)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance Review Results: RR-RBS-ISI-019 (EPID L-2018-LLR-0008) Use of BWRVIP Guidelines Sent Date:   3/9/2018 2:46:40 PM Received Date: 3/9/2018 2:46:41 PM From:   Regner, Lisa Created By:   Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients:     "SCHENK, TIM" <tschenk@entergy.com> Tracking Status: None "Coates, Alyson" <alacey@entergy.com> Tracking Status: None  
Acceptance Review Results: RR-RBS-ISI-019 (EPID L-2018-LLR-0008) Use of BWRVIP Guidelines Sent Date:             3/9/2018 2:46:40 PM Received Date:         3/9/2018 2:46:41 PM From:                 Regner, Lisa Created By:           Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
"SCHENK, TIM" <tschenk@entergy.com>
Post Office:   SN6PR09MB2720.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   2939     3/9/2018 2:46:41 PM
Tracking Status: None "Coates, Alyson" <alacey@entergy.com>
 
Tracking Status: None Post Office:           SN6PR09MB2720.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files                         Size                   Date & Time MESSAGE                       2939                   3/9/2018 2:46:41 PM Options Priority:                     Standard Return Notification:         No Reply Requested:             No Sensitivity:                 Normal Expiration Date:
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Recipients Received:}}

Latest revision as of 12:31, 2 December 2019

NRR E-mail Capture - River Bend Station Relief Request to Use BWRVIP Guidelines in Lieu of ASME Code
ML18068A704
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 03/09/2018
From: Lisa Regner
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Anissa Coates
Entergy Nuclear Operations
References
L-2018-LLR-0008
Download: ML18068A704 (2)
v • d • e


Text

NRR-DMPSPEm Resource From: Regner, Lisa Sent: Friday, March 09, 2018 2:47 PM To: Coates, Alyson Cc: SCHENK, TIM

Subject:

Acceptance Review Results: RR-RBS-ISI-019 (EPID L-2018-LLR-0008) Use of BWRVIP Guidelines By letter dated February 13, 2018, Entergy submitted a relief request for River Bend Station. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this alternative request to apply the Boiling Water Reactor Vessel and Internals Project (BWRVIP) guidelines in lieu of specific ASME Code Section XI requirements. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours4.167 days <br />0.595 weeks <br />0.137 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review in approximately 9 months. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.

If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906.

Lisa M. Regner Senior Project Manager Branch 4, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission OWFN 9E01 301-415-1906 Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_DMPS Email Number: 237 Mail Envelope Properties (SN6PR09MB272014ED8BBF62912AD3047FE5DE0)

Subject:

Acceptance Review Results: RR-RBS-ISI-019 (EPID L-2018-LLR-0008) Use of BWRVIP Guidelines Sent Date: 3/9/2018 2:46:40 PM Received Date: 3/9/2018 2:46:41 PM From: Regner, Lisa Created By: Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients:

"SCHENK, TIM" <tschenk@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None "Coates, Alyson" <alacey@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: SN6PR09MB2720.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2939 3/9/2018 2:46:41 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML18068A704&oldid=2225337"