ML072110442: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 07/25/2007
| issue date = 07/25/2007
| title = BWR Sample Problem Loss of Inventory
| title = BWR Sample Problem Loss of Inventory
| author name = Pruett T W
| author name = Pruett T
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-IV
| addressee name =  
| addressee name =  
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:jroy'Pruett-video conference sample prolt1emrswpd Page j-]BWR Sample Problem Loss of Inventory at Peach Bottom Event Details* Licensee in cold shutdown* Licensee conduced an infrequently performed procedure to flush hot spots from the RHR piping.* Procedure required the RHR system to be aligned in the LPCI mode.* Operators made pen and ink change to the procedure to allow the evolution to be conducted in the shutdown cooling mode.When operators started the 3D RHR pump to flush the line, a siphon was creased from the vessel through the 3B RHR pump and heat exchanger to the torus* Operators diagnosed the event and terminated the leak path* Level was inadvertent reduced from +200 inches to + 158" in 4.5 minutes* 8500 gallons displaced from vessel to torus.* Time to RHR shutoff head 3 hours Plant Configuration 0 Low Low vessel level isolation was in service and would have terminated the leak path with an additional 1" of level decrease.* 2 SRVs were available for long term cooling and pressure control.0 At low-low low level, a train of core spray and a train of LPCI would have automatically injected into the vessel.0 The operators were able to terminate the leak path using valves other than the RHR suction valves.* Time to RHR shutoff head was 3 hours 0 Containment venting is available.
{{#Wiki_filter:jroy'Pruett- video conference sample prolt1emrswpd                                                     Page j-]
0 Long term source of water is available.
BWR Sample Problem Loss of Inventory at Peach Bottom Event Details
0 For problem estimate that containment Cooling or venting not needed for 24 hours.
* Licensee in cold shutdown
Troy-Pruett  
* Licensee conduced an infrequently performed procedure to flush hot spots from the RHR piping.
-video conference sample problems.wpd
* Procedure required the RHR system to be aligned in the LPCI mode.
... ..... .... .. ' _ _....._ P a g e 2 1 Supporting Facts for Analysis The licensee's action on the discharge side of the pump (throttling) initially solved the flow perturbations.
* Operators made pen and ink change to the procedure to allow the evolution to be conducted in the shutdown cooling mode.
Once the heat-up and/or the drawing of a vacuum in the RCS negated the effects of throttling the RHR pump discharge, charging quickly returned RHR pump performance to normal.The licensee states that the operators were seeing very early indications of problems with the RHR system, and that the problems were easily corrected.
When operators started the 3D RHR pump to flush the line, a siphon was creased from the vessel through the 3B RHR pump and heat exchanger to the torus
The resident agrees with the licensee's assessment that pump performance was slightly degraded.All instrumentation was reported to be working normally, and recovery actions were easily identified and implemented by the licensee in a matter of a few minutes.
* Operators diagnosed the event and terminated the leak path
I.CýýOy-Pruett'--V'idec, conference sampJ1_e_'1D  
* Level was inadvertent reduced from +200 inches to + 158" in 4.5 minutes
--- 6616'ms -----..........  
* 8500 gallons displaced from vessel to torus.
..........
* Time to RHR shutoff head 3 hours Plant Configuration 0     Low Low vessel level isolation was in service and would have terminated the leak path with an additional 1" of level decrease.
de....conference....  
* 2 SRVs were available for long term cooling and pressure control.
.sam' .']age PWR Sample Problem 1 Shutdown Cooling Flow Perturbations at Wolf Creek Initial Conditions for this Event* The plant was in Mode 5 with the RCS level at mid-loop.* The RCS was aligned for vacuum fill; no RCS vent was in place.* Train "A" RHR was in service providing shutdown cooling.* Train "B" RHR was in standby aligned for shutdown cooling.* Secondary sides of the steam generators were filled.* All plant equipment was available except for the non-safety related "C" normal service water pump and the non-safety related normal charging pump (NCP).Accumulators are isolated from the RCS by closure of their motor-operated discharge valves. Automatic safety injection signal is also disabled in this mode/configuration.
0     At low-low low level, a train of core spray and a train of LPCI would have automatically injected into the vessel.
Wolf Creek plant had shut down on 5/13/02 for retrieval of foreign objects (loose parts)from the "D" steam generator bowl.Event In order to accomplish object retrieval, the level in the RCS was reduced to mid-loop to allow opening of the steam generator manways. Following foreign object retrieval on 5/17/02, the steam generator manways were installed and the RCS was aligned for vacuum fill and vent.While drawing a vacuum on the RCS, the "A" train RHR pump, which was in service for shutdown cooling, experienced flow perturbations.
0     The operators were able to terminate the leak path using valves other than the RHR suction valves.
* Time to RHR shutoff head was 3 hours 0     Containment venting is available.
0     Long term source of water is available.
0     For problem estimate that containment Cooling or venting not needed for 24 hours.
 
Troy-Pruett - video conference sample problems.wpd                                     ... ..... . . .. .. ' _   _....._ P a ge 21 Supporting Factsfor Analysis The licensee's action on the discharge side of the pump (throttling) initially solved the flow perturbations. Once the heat-up and/or the drawing of a vacuum in the RCS negated the effects of throttling the RHR pump discharge, charging quickly returned RHR pump performance to normal.
The licensee states that the operators were seeing very early indications of problems with the RHR system, and that the problems were easily corrected. The resident agrees with the licensee's assessment that pump performance was slightly degraded.
All instrumentation was reported to be working normally, and recovery actions were easily identified and implemented by the licensee in a matter of a few minutes.
 
I.CýýOy-Pruett'--V'idec, conference sampJ1_e_'1D---
6616'ms - ----
                                                            .......... .......... de....conference.... . sam'           .']age PWR Sample Problem 1 Shutdown Cooling Flow Perturbations at Wolf Creek Initial Conditionsfor this Event
* The plant was in Mode 5 with the RCS level at mid-loop.
* The RCS was aligned for vacuum fill; no RCS vent was in place.
* Train "A" RHR was in service providing shutdown cooling.
* Train "B" RHR was in standby aligned for shutdown cooling.
* Secondary sides of the steam generators were filled.
* All plant equipment was available except for the non-safety related "C" normal service water pump and the non-safety related normal charging pump (NCP).
Accumulators are isolated from the RCS by closure of their motor-operated discharge valves. Automatic safety injection signal is also disabled in this mode/configuration.
Wolf Creek plant had shut down on 5/13/02 for retrieval of foreign objects (loose parts) from the "D" steam generator bowl.
Event In order to accomplish object retrieval, the level in the RCS was reduced to mid-loop to allow opening of the steam generator manways. Following foreign object retrieval on 5/17/02, the steam generator manways were installed and the RCS was aligned for vacuum fill and vent.
While drawing a vacuum on the RCS, the "A" train RHR pump, which was in service for shutdown cooling, experienced flow perturbations.
RHR flow rate was reduced which initially decreased the perturbations, but as the RCS temperature increased, RHR flow perturbations were again experienced.
RHR flow rate was reduced which initially decreased the perturbations, but as the RCS temperature increased, RHR flow perturbations were again experienced.
The "A" CCP was aligned to deliver water from the RWST and as soon as RCS loop level began to increase, the RHR flow perturbations stopped, The licensee continued with their planned filling of the RCS.RHR/RCS temperature did not exceed the Technical Specification limit of 140'F.Performance Deficiency The cause of the flow perturbation was operating the RHR pump at a flow rate greater than 2000 gpm, which is a violation of licensee procedures.
The "A" CCP was aligned to deliver water from the RWST and as soon as RCS loop level began to increase, the RHR flow perturbations stopped, The licensee continued with their planned filling of the RCS.
The resident stated that control room operators were not aware of the caution in the procedures.}}
RHR/RCS temperature did not exceed the Technical Specification limit of 140'F.
PerformanceDeficiency The cause of the flow perturbation was operating the RHR pump at a flow rate greater than 2000 gpm, which is a violation of licensee procedures. The resident stated that control room operators were not aware of the caution in the procedures.}}

Latest revision as of 05:09, 23 November 2019

BWR Sample Problem Loss of Inventory
ML072110442
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/25/2007
From: Troy Pruett
NRC Region 4
To:
References
FOIA/PA-2007-0180
Download: ML072110442 (3)


Text

jroy'Pruett- video conference sample prolt1emrswpd Page j-]

BWR Sample Problem Loss of Inventory at Peach Bottom Event Details

  • Licensee in cold shutdown
  • Licensee conduced an infrequently performed procedure to flush hot spots from the RHR piping.
  • Procedure required the RHR system to be aligned in the LPCI mode.
  • Operators made pen and ink change to the procedure to allow the evolution to be conducted in the shutdown cooling mode.

When operators started the 3D RHR pump to flush the line, a siphon was creased from the vessel through the 3B RHR pump and heat exchanger to the torus

  • Operators diagnosed the event and terminated the leak path
  • Level was inadvertent reduced from +200 inches to + 158" in 4.5 minutes
  • 8500 gallons displaced from vessel to torus.
  • Time to RHR shutoff head 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> Plant Configuration 0 Low Low vessel level isolation was in service and would have terminated the leak path with an additional 1" of level decrease.
  • 2 SRVs were available for long term cooling and pressure control.

0 At low-low low level, a train of core spray and a train of LPCI would have automatically injected into the vessel.

0 The operators were able to terminate the leak path using valves other than the RHR suction valves.

  • Time to RHR shutoff head was 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> 0 Containment venting is available.

0 Long term source of water is available.

0 For problem estimate that containment Cooling or venting not needed for 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />.

Troy-Pruett - video conference sample problems.wpd ... ..... . . .. .. ' _ _....._ P a ge 21 Supporting Factsfor Analysis The licensee's action on the discharge side of the pump (throttling) initially solved the flow perturbations. Once the heat-up and/or the drawing of a vacuum in the RCS negated the effects of throttling the RHR pump discharge, charging quickly returned RHR pump performance to normal.

The licensee states that the operators were seeing very early indications of problems with the RHR system, and that the problems were easily corrected. The resident agrees with the licensee's assessment that pump performance was slightly degraded.

All instrumentation was reported to be working normally, and recovery actions were easily identified and implemented by the licensee in a matter of a few minutes.

I.CýýOy-Pruett'--V'idec, conference sampJ1_e_'1D---

6616'ms - ----

.......... .......... de....conference.... . sam' .']age PWR Sample Problem 1 Shutdown Cooling Flow Perturbations at Wolf Creek Initial Conditionsfor this Event

  • The plant was in Mode 5 with the RCS level at mid-loop.
  • The RCS was aligned for vacuum fill; no RCS vent was in place.
  • All plant equipment was available except for the non-safety related "C" normal service water pump and the non-safety related normal charging pump (NCP).

Accumulators are isolated from the RCS by closure of their motor-operated discharge valves. Automatic safety injection signal is also disabled in this mode/configuration.

Wolf Creek plant had shut down on 5/13/02 for retrieval of foreign objects (loose parts) from the "D" steam generator bowl.

Event In order to accomplish object retrieval, the level in the RCS was reduced to mid-loop to allow opening of the steam generator manways. Following foreign object retrieval on 5/17/02, the steam generator manways were installed and the RCS was aligned for vacuum fill and vent.

While drawing a vacuum on the RCS, the "A" train RHR pump, which was in service for shutdown cooling, experienced flow perturbations.

RHR flow rate was reduced which initially decreased the perturbations, but as the RCS temperature increased, RHR flow perturbations were again experienced.

The "A" CCP was aligned to deliver water from the RWST and as soon as RCS loop level began to increase, the RHR flow perturbations stopped, The licensee continued with their planned filling of the RCS.

RHR/RCS temperature did not exceed the Technical Specification limit of 140'F.

PerformanceDeficiency The cause of the flow perturbation was operating the RHR pump at a flow rate greater than 2000 gpm, which is a violation of licensee procedures. The resident stated that control room operators were not aware of the caution in the procedures.