ML073100491: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:From: | {{#Wiki_filter:From: <JOEL@ALCHEMY-PROPERTIES.COM> | ||
To: | To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov> | ||
Date: 10/11/2007 6:36:18 PM | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Indian Point EIS Comments | Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham | ||
Bo Pham | |||
==Dear Bo Pham,== | ==Dear Bo Pham,== | ||
I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission | I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant: | ||
1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal), | |||
address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact | conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report. | ||
: 5. You would never site a new plant at this location in this day and age. Even if there is 1/100 of a 1% chance of a disaster it is too much for this location!! It is a common sense decision. | |||
1: the impacts of a terrorist | Nuclear plants should be located away from major population centers. | ||
Sincerely, JOEL BREITKOPF C/O ALCHEMY PROPERTIES 200 MADISON AVENUE, 20TH FL | |||
2: the impacts of Indian | |||
3: the build-up of high-level | |||
4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a | |||
combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal), conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report. | |||
: 5. You would never site a new | |||
It is a common sense decision. | |||
Nuclear plants should be | |||
Sincerely, JOEL BREITKOPF | |||
C/O ALCHEMY PROPERTIES | |||
200 MADISON AVENUE, 20TH FL | |||
Federal Register Notice: | NEW YORK, NY 10016 Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number: 29 Mail Envelope Properties (47306F76.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000006.1.13A832.1) | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Indian Point EIS Comments | Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date: 10/11/2007 6:36:18 PM From: <JOEL@ALCHEMY-PROPERTIES.COM> | ||
Created By: | Created By: JOEL@ALCHEMY-PROPERTIES.COM Recipients | ||
<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov> | |||
Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1385 10/11/2007 6:36:18 PM Mime.822 2235 11/6/2007 1:43:18 PM Options Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None None Concealed | |||
Post Office | |||
Files | |||
Concealed | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
No | No Security: Standard}} | ||
Revision as of 02:08, 23 November 2019
| ML073100491 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Indian Point  |
| Issue date: | 10/11/2007 |
| From: | Public Commenter Public Commenter |
| To: | Division of License Renewal |
| References | |
| 72FR45075 | |
| Download: ML073100491 (3) | |
Text
From: <JOEL@ALCHEMY-PROPERTIES.COM>
To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Date: 10/11/2007 6:36:18 PM
Subject:
Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham
Dear Bo Pham,
I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:
1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal),
conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.
- 5. You would never site a new plant at this location in this day and age. Even if there is 1/100 of a 1% chance of a disaster it is too much for this location!! It is a common sense decision.
Nuclear plants should be located away from major population centers.
Sincerely, JOEL BREITKOPF C/O ALCHEMY PROPERTIES 200 MADISON AVENUE, 20TH FL
NEW YORK, NY 10016 Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number: 29 Mail Envelope Properties (47306F76.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000006.1.13A832.1)
Subject:
Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date: 10/11/2007 6:36:18 PM From: <JOEL@ALCHEMY-PROPERTIES.COM>
Created By: JOEL@ALCHEMY-PROPERTIES.COM Recipients
<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1385 10/11/2007 6:36:18 PM Mime.822 2235 11/6/2007 1:43:18 PM Options Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard