ML073100601: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: <lrrysgl@aol.com>
{{#Wiki_filter:From:         <lrrysgl@aol.com>
To:   <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov> Date:   10/6/2007 1:15:29 AM
To:           <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Date:         10/6/2007 1:15:29 AM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Indian Point EIS Comments
Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham
 
Bo Pham  


==Dear Bo Pham,==
==Dear Bo Pham,==


I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission  
I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:
 
1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal),
address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact St atement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:  
conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.
 
Sincerely, Larry Siegel 2113 Fox Run Drive Plainsboro, NJ 08536
1: the impacts of a terrorist a ttack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reserv oir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents;  


2: the impacts of Indian Poin t's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies;
Federal Register Notice:     72FR45075 Comment Number:               123 Mail Envelope Properties (47306FC6.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000001.1.1514D4.1)
 
3: the build-up of high-level r adioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks or iginating from at least two spent fuel pools;
 
4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a
 
combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal), conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.
 
Sincerely, Larry Siegel
 
2113 Fox Run Drive Plainsboro, NJ 08536
 
Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number:   123   Mail Envelope Properties   (47306FC6.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000001.1.1514D4.1)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date:   10/6/2007 1:15:29 AM From:   <lrrysgl@aol.com>
Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date:       10/6/2007 1:15:29 AM From:                 <lrrysgl@aol.com>
Created By:   lrrysgl@aol.com  
Created By:           lrrysgl@aol.com Recipients
 
<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Recipients    <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>  
Post Office                                     Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01                               nrc.gov Files                         Size             Date & Time MESSAGE                       1084             10/6/2007 1:15:29 AM Mime.822                     1905             11/6/2007 1:44:38 PM Options Priority:                     Standard Reply Requested:             No Return Notification:         None None Concealed  
 
Post Office       Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01       nrc.gov
 
Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1084     10/6/2007 1:15:29 AM Mime.822   1905     11/6/2007 1:44:38 PM Options Priority:     Standard   Reply Requested:   No   Return Notification:   None     None  
 
Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
No Security:     Standard}}
No Security:                     Standard}}

Revision as of 01:04, 23 November 2019

2007/10/06 - Comment (123) Regarding Iplr Scoping
ML073100601
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/06/2007
From: Public Commenter
Public Commenter
To:
Division of License Renewal
References
72FR45075
Download: ML073100601 (2)


Text

From: <lrrysgl@aol.com>

To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>

Date: 10/6/2007 1:15:29 AM

Subject:

Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham

Dear Bo Pham,

I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:

1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal),

conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.

Sincerely, Larry Siegel 2113 Fox Run Drive Plainsboro, NJ 08536

Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number: 123 Mail Envelope Properties (47306FC6.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000001.1.1514D4.1)

Subject:

Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date: 10/6/2007 1:15:29 AM From: <lrrysgl@aol.com>

Created By: lrrysgl@aol.com Recipients

<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>

Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1084 10/6/2007 1:15:29 AM Mime.822 1905 11/6/2007 1:44:38 PM Options Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard