ML073100725: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: <joiedevivre@hotmail.com>
{{#Wiki_filter:From:         <joiedevivre@hotmail.com>
To:   <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov> Date:   10/5/2007 10:33:48 AM
To:           <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Date:         10/5/2007 10:33:48 AM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Indian Point EIS Comments
Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham
 
Bo Pham  


==Dear Bo Pham,==
==Dear Bo Pham,==


I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission  
I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:
 
1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal),
address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact St atement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:  
conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.
 
Sincerely, Josefina Vidal 4523 Broadway Apt 6D New York, NY 10040-2418
1: the impacts of a terrorist a ttack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reserv oir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents;  
 
2: the impacts of Indian Poin t's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies;  
 
3: the build-up of high-level r adioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks or iginating from at least two spent fuel pools;  
 
4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a  
 
combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal), conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.  
 
Sincerely, Josefina Vidal  
 
4523 Broadway  
 
Apt 6D New York, NY 10040-2418  


Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number:   227   Mail Envelope Properties   (47307089.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000009.1.17E9D6.1)
Federal Register Notice:     72FR45075 Comment Number:               227 Mail Envelope Properties (47307089.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000009.1.17E9D6.1)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date:   10/5/2007 10:33:48 AM From:   <joiedevivre@hotmail.com>
Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date:       10/5/2007 10:33:48 AM From:                 <joiedevivre@hotmail.com>
Created By:   joiedevivre@hotmail.com  
Created By:           joiedevivre@hotmail.com Recipients
 
<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Recipients    <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>  
Post Office                                     Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01                               nrc.gov Files                         Size             Date & Time MESSAGE                       1092             10/5/2007 10:33:48 AM Mime.822                     1930             11/6/2007 1:47:53 PM Options Priority:                     Standard Reply Requested:             No Return Notification:         None None Concealed  
 
Post Office       Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01       nrc.gov
 
Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1092     10/5/2007 10:33:48 AM Mime.822   1930     11/6/2007 1:47:53 PM Options Priority:     Standard   Reply Requested:   No   Return Notification:   None     None  
 
Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
No Security:     Standard}}
No Security:                     Standard}}

Revision as of 02:00, 23 November 2019

2007/10/05 - Comment (227) Regarding Iplr Scoping
ML073100725
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/05/2007
From: Public Commenter
Public Commenter
To:
Division of License Renewal
References
72FR45075
Download: ML073100725 (2)


Text

From: <joiedevivre@hotmail.com>

To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>

Date: 10/5/2007 10:33:48 AM

Subject:

Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham

Dear Bo Pham,

I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:

1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal),

conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.

Sincerely, Josefina Vidal 4523 Broadway Apt 6D New York, NY 10040-2418

Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number: 227 Mail Envelope Properties (47307089.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000009.1.17E9D6.1)

Subject:

Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date: 10/5/2007 10:33:48 AM From: <joiedevivre@hotmail.com>

Created By: joiedevivre@hotmail.com Recipients

<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>

Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1092 10/5/2007 10:33:48 AM Mime.822 1930 11/6/2007 1:47:53 PM Options Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard