ML100120596: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: Martin, Robert Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 2:01 PM To: McKinney, B. Doug; Hess, Thomas A. Cc: Mitchell, Matthew; Feintuch, Karl  
{{#Wiki_filter:From:                     Martin, Robert Sent:                     Tuesday, January 12, 2010 2:01 PM To:                       McKinney, B. Doug; Hess, Thomas A.
Cc:                       Mitchell, Matthew; Feintuch, Karl


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance of Farley Relief Request dated January 4, 2010
Acceptance of Farley Relief Request dated January 4, 2010 By letter dated January 4, 2010 SNC submitted a relief request for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 2, FNP-ISI-ALT-09, Version 1.0, Proposed Alternative in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(a)(3)(i)," The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
 
By letter dated January 4, 2010 SNC submitted a relief request for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 2, "FNP-ISI-ALT-09, Version 1.0, Proposed Alternative in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(a)(3)(i)," The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
 
Bob Martin, Project Manager LPL 2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ADAMS ML100050080, TAC ME3010, Docket No: 50-364 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()
Bob Martin, Project Manager LPL 2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ADAMS ML100050080,     TAC ME3010,     Docket No: 50-364 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Acceptance of Farley Relief Request dated January 4, 2010 Sent Date:       1/12/2010 1:49:49 PM Received Date:        1/12/2010 2:01:00 PM From:               Martin, Robert  
Acceptance of Farley Relief Request dated January 4, 2010 Sent Date:       1/12/2010 1:49:49 PM Received Date:        1/12/2010 2:01:00 PM From:             Martin, Robert Created By:       Robert.Martin@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
Created By:         Robert.Martin@nrc.gov  
 
Recipients:
BDMCKINN@southernco.com (McKinney, B. Doug)
BDMCKINN@southernco.com (McKinney, B. Doug)
Tracking Status: None TAHess@southernco.com (Hess, Thomas A.)
Tracking Status: None TAHess@southernco.com (Hess, Thomas A.)
Tracking Status: None Matthew.Mitchell@nrc.gov (Mitchell, Matthew)                Tracking Status: None
Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl)                Tracking Status: None
Post Office:
Files                Size        Date & Time
MESSAGE        11150        1/12/2010
Options Expiration Date:
Priority:                        olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:        False Return Notification:        False


Sensitivity:         olNormal Recipients received:}}
Tracking Status: None Matthew.Mitchell@nrc.gov (Mitchell, Matthew)
Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl)
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files          Size      Date & Time MESSAGE          11150      1/12/2010 Options Expiration Date:
Priority:              olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested:      False Return Notification:      False Sensitivity:     olNormal Recipients received:}}

Latest revision as of 22:56, 13 November 2019

Email on Acceptance Review for Farley Relief Request
ML100120596
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 01/12/2010
From: Martin R
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Hess T, Mckinney B
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
Martin R, NRR/DORL, 415-1493
References
TAC ME3010
Download: ML100120596 (2)
v • d • e


Text

From: Martin, Robert Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2010 2:01 PM To: McKinney, B. Doug; Hess, Thomas A.

Cc: Mitchell, Matthew; Feintuch, Karl

Subject:

Acceptance of Farley Relief Request dated January 4, 2010 By letter dated January 4, 2010 SNC submitted a relief request for the Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 2, FNP-ISI-ALT-09, Version 1.0, Proposed Alternative in Accordance with 10 CFR 50.55(a)(3)(i)," The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(a)(3)(i) and 50.55a(a)(3)(ii) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to proceed with its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. If additional information is needed for the staff to complete its technical review, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

Bob Martin, Project Manager LPL 2-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ADAMS ML100050080, TAC ME3010, Docket No: 50-364 E-mail Properties Mail Envelope Properties ()

Subject:

Acceptance of Farley Relief Request dated January 4, 2010 Sent Date: 1/12/2010 1:49:49 PM Received Date: 1/12/2010 2:01:00 PM From: Martin, Robert Created By: Robert.Martin@nrc.gov Recipients:

BDMCKINN@southernco.com (McKinney, B. Doug)

Tracking Status: None TAHess@southernco.com (Hess, Thomas A.)

Tracking Status: None Matthew.Mitchell@nrc.gov (Mitchell, Matthew)

Tracking Status: None Karl.Feintuch@nrc.gov (Feintuch, Karl)

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 11150 1/12/2010 Options Expiration Date:

Priority: olImportanceNormal ReplyRequested: False Return Notification: False Sensitivity: olNormal Recipients received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML100120596&oldid=2138110"